Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Arbiter
Forum Groupie
Joined: July 24 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 63
|
Topic: The PROG/POP Spectrum Posted: July 28 2004 at 05:31 |
Scanning this fabulous site it becomes apparent that there are many different tastes in Prog music (what exactly "Prog Music" is, is another hotly contested debate altogether).
Some feel that Prog music should not be easily accessible, that it should not appeal to the masses, not be popular at all (High Prog/Low Pop). Others like their music to be progressive, but easily acessible at the same time (High Prog/High Pop). Still others want their music to be accesible and predictable (Low Prog/High Pop). And then there are those who don't like either Prog or Pop (Low Prog/Low Pop).
Using these differing musical tastes as boundaries for the whole Prog/Pop spectrum (and yes, this is a gross oversimplification) I came up with the nine musical varieties as listed in the poll above. In order to more clearly define the nine categories (more clearly, not more exactly), I used Genesis albums as examples of the nine points on the spectrum (fully expecting some debate regarding my choices, and admitting some might not be in the right category).
Where does your musical taste fit in?
|
"Some things have to be believed to be seen."
-Ralph Hodgson
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
JrKASperov
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 07 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 904
|
Posted: July 28 2004 at 06:19 |
I don't know Genesis that well, where does Yes (Fragile, Close) fit in?
|
Epic.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Arbiter
Forum Groupie
Joined: July 24 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 63
|
Posted: July 28 2004 at 06:38 |
JrKASperov wrote:
I don't know Genesis that well, where does Yes (Fragile, Close) fit in? ![](smileys/smiley2.gif) |
I'd say that "Close to the Edge" is Mid Prog/Low Pop. "Tale of...Oceans" would be High Prog/ Low Pop, "90125" would be Low Prog/High Pop, "Fragile"...Mid Prog/Mid Pop.
Hope this helps.
|
"Some things have to be believed to be seen."
-Ralph Hodgson
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
JrKASperov
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 07 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 904
|
Posted: July 28 2004 at 06:45 |
Ahh, starting to make sense... Then I'd be mid prog/low pop
What am I saying, pop through the bottom.. ![](smileys/smiley7.gif)
|
Epic.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Joren
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 07 2004
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 6667
|
Posted: July 28 2004 at 08:26 |
Arbiter, I don't want to offend you, but I think this poll is REALLY SILLY.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Arbiter
Forum Groupie
Joined: July 24 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 63
|
Posted: July 28 2004 at 13:29 |
Joren wrote:
Arbiter, I don't want to offend you, but I think this poll is REALLY SILLY. ![](smileys/smiley36.gif) |
Ahh! That would make you High Prog/Low Pop/Wooden-shoe-up-the-ass!
|
"Some things have to be believed to be seen."
-Ralph Hodgson
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Joren
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 07 2004
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 6667
|
Posted: July 28 2004 at 13:34 |
Arbiter wrote:
Joren wrote:
Arbiter, I don't want to offend you, but I think this poll is REALLY SILLY. ![](smileys/smiley36.gif) |
Ahh! That would make you High Prog/Low Pop/Wooden-shoe-up-the-ass!
|
ok, ok! I surrender! I think I'm High Prog/Mid Pop
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Dan Bobrowski
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 02 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5243
|
Posted: July 28 2004 at 13:39 |
High Prog / Mid Pop.... I guess.
Interesting way of sub-categorizing. ![](smileys/smiley4.gif)
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
richardh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 29271
|
Posted: July 28 2004 at 14:51 |
Where does Britney Spears fit into all this?
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
diddy
Prog Reviewer
Joined: March 02 2004
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 1117
|
Posted: July 28 2004 at 15:31 |
richardh wrote:
Where does Britney Spears fit into all this?![](smileys/smiley5.gif) |
100% PROG / 0% Pop of course ![](smileys/smiley36.gif) just like Mariah...
Edited by diddy
|
If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear...
George Orwell
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
The Prognaut
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 14 2004
Location: Somewhere Else
Status: Offline
Points: 1492
|
Posted: July 28 2004 at 15:46 |
High Prog/Low Pop I guess... since "Nursery Cryme" is my favorite GENESIS album... but still, relying on the GENESIS productions is quite arbitrary to define the type of prog I enjoy most...
Interesting poll though... ![](smileys/smiley17.gif)
|
break the circle
reset my head
wake the sleepwalker
and i'll wake the dead
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Marcelo
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 15 2004
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 310
|
Posted: July 28 2004 at 16:18 |
Nice definitions and nice poll, but my own is too simple: After W&W, any Genesis album is No Prog/ High S***t.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
|
Posted: July 28 2004 at 16:49 |
Mid Prog/Mid Pop ( eg. "Wind And Wuthering")
Mid Prog/Low Pop (eg. "A Trick Of The Tail") |
Well, I voted for High Pop/Low Pop (Better if NO POP), but that's not the point.
I always thought that W&W is a far more prog' album than Trick of the Tail (except for Your Own Special Way, which IMHO is crap). Trick is a great album but is much more lighter and friendly than W&W which I believe is a return to the roots, especially because Steve composed a lot of stuff there.
Longer songs, more complex lyrics and amazing guitar is the main characteristic of W&W, while ATOTT is mainly a collection of fairy stories and friendlier songs.
But it's only my opinion, maybe I'm wrong.
Iván
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
asuma
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 23 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 230
|
Posted: July 28 2004 at 17:01 |
i'm not exactly sure what it means but i chose
mid/mid. i think music should be easy or somewhat
easy to get into, but it shouldn't always follow a
certain formula.
|
*Remember all advice given by Asuma is for entertainment purposes only. Asuma is not a licensed medical doctor, psychologist, or counselor and he does not play one on TV.*
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Arbiter
Forum Groupie
Joined: July 24 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 63
|
Posted: July 28 2004 at 17:51 |
asuma wrote:
i think music should be easy or somewhat easy to get into, but it shouldn't always follow a certain formula. |
Well said, I completely agree !
This poll was meant to establish whether what is often suggested in reviews and comments on this site is how the majority feels - i.e., that it is somehow wrong if Prog is accessible, or the more commercial it is the worse Prog it is, the more 'out there' it is the better the Prog it is.
"Dark Side of the Moon" is fairly progressive (especially for it's time) IMHO, yet has out sold many Britanny, Mariah, Celine, etc., albums.
For me music can be as accessible or inaccessible as it wants or needs to be, so long as it is good enough to reach me on a deeper emotional level, and keep me interested indefinitely. Mid/Mid usually does that for me.
|
"Some things have to be believed to be seen."
-Ralph Hodgson
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Joren
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 07 2004
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 6667
|
Posted: July 28 2004 at 18:46 |
I LIKE IT when I have to make a little effort to like music. The best albums are the ones that have to grow on you. And that's how I learned to appreciate progressive rock. I'm lazy and I have no discipline, except when it concerns music: then I have A LOT OF DISCIPLINE. And that's how I went from Metallica and Motörhead to Frank Zappa and Gentle Giant in about a year.
Or as Frank Zappa says on the "The Ark" official bootleg album: "Now we're gonna play a piece of music that's bit harder to listen to, but it'll be better for you in the long run." ![](smileys/smiley2.gif)
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
|
Posted: July 28 2004 at 18:58 |
I LIKE IT when I have to make a little effort to like music. |
Agree, I loved A Trick of the Tail at the first listen and couldn't understand Nursery Cryme, but my actual all time favorite Genesis album is Nursery.
Even worst I hated Relayer (The most complex Yes album) now I simply love it.
Iván
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
James Lee
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: June 05 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 3525
|
Posted: July 28 2004 at 19:52 |
I don't know where I'd fit in...can we add a third axis- high/med/low weirdness? High weird would be "Several Species of Small Furry Animals" or anything by Comus or Beefheart...a lot of Zappa too; Medium Weird would be "Dark Side of the Moon" or "In the Land of Grey and Pink"; Low Weird would be most mainstream rock and pop, but also a lot of good prog too (almost all of Rush, Camel, Marillion, Tull, etc...) that wouldn't necessarily qualify as high or medium pop.
|
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
threefates
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 30 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4215
|
Posted: July 28 2004 at 21:10 |
Yeh, I'd be more comfortable if you used ELP as a reference... So where would Tarkus fall into that...
|
THIS IS ELP
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
|
Posted: July 29 2004 at 03:23 |
I see Tarkus and Pictures as High Prog/Low Pop
ELP, Trilogy and BSS as High Prog/mid pop
Works is a special case:
- Emerson's side: High Prog/High classical/Non Pop
- Lake's side: Mid Prog/High Pop
- Palmer's side: High Prog/Low Pop
- ELP's side: Mid Prog/Low Pop
Works II and Love Beach as Mid Prog/High Pop
In the Hot Seat defies any qualification, it's definetly prog but I won't know how to rate it.
In the case of ELP I believe the High Prog/Mid Pop is outstanding.
Iván
Edited by ivan_2068
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.