Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
TGM: Orb
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 21 2007
Location: n/a
Status: Offline
Points: 8052
|
Posted: May 21 2008 at 16:10 |
Review 38, Black Moon, Emerson, Lake &
Palmer, 1992
![Star](smileys/smiley10.gif) ![Star](smileys/smiley10.gif) ![Star](smileys/smiley10.gif) ![Star](smileys/smiley10.gif)
I really like this much-maligned (here,
at least) album, though it's probably not for everyone. Greg Lake's
voice has certainly faded since its glory days, but is still
passable, and has a certain verve and aggression that suits numbers
like Black Moon and Paper Blood. Palmer does have a rather less
constantly-shifting style that takes a while to get used to and
appreciate, but still gives some solid moments. Emerson is on top
form throughout, whether with vicious Hammond or gentle piano. It's
not going to be another reiteration of their glory days, but it is a
collaborative effort and well worth taking a listen to.
Black Moon's classic title track opens
with a tense, dark atmosphere created mostly by Emerson's shimmering
keyboard choices, including a bizarre, brief, crashing piano solo.
Palmer and Lake kick in with a rather We Will Rock You -esque beat,
though it's heavily elaborated (one or two brief bass solos also
colour it). Lake's vocal, strong and aggressive, drives through the
excellent and biting lyrics ('We don't get active, we become
immune/Black Moon.'), and the synths give a certain strut to the
political lyrics. We get two incredibly good solos from Emerson, and
towards the end Palmer gives us some interesting classical-ish
drumming choices which hark back to the glory of Toccata. A classic
ELP track, equal with much of their past fare.
Paper Blood is aggressive ELP-fare,
with a superb performance from Emerson on the hammond, giving some
stabbing bursts of energy as well as that lovable blues block organ.
Palmer's heavy, but quite relaxed, drumming suits the song down to
the ground, and Greg Lake doesn't do badly on the vocals/lyrics
department. Some strong harmonica adds yet another colour to the mix.
A very thick riff holds the song together.
Affairs Of The Heart is (Shock, horror.
They've betrayed prog) a ballad, with some standard Lake acoustic
strumming complimented by a couple of bursts of interest. His vocals
(despite some extremely good lyrical lines ['faces like a ghost with
eyes of jade]) do finder it harder to cope with the extended
showcase, but when Palmer and Emerson (especially, some amazingly
emotional soft keyboard additions, piano and others) come in, it does
take off very impressively.
The interpretation of Tchaikovsky's
Romeo And Juliet has a very vicious and dark colour of its own, with
strutting synths, loud and superbly interesting drumming and even
Greg Lake guitar soloing of the highest order. Palmer definitely
feels very much in his element on this one, and I'm a sucker for a
dark (/re-)interpretation of classical pieces. Great stuff.
Farewell To Arms has a harder time
contending with the rest, because despite some reverent organ and
absolutely beautiful piano from Emerson (as well as excellent bass,
and not-so-great acoustics from Lake). Palmer doesn't quite match up
to himself in the song, feeling a bit subserviant to the mix. Lake's
vocals are basically the song, and, though generally good, but
overblown, they do border on the tacky at times. A whirly moog solo
that from Emerson, almost a nod to Lucky Man, leads us out.
Changing States seems almost like a
soundtrack piece, with an array of great piano, synthesiser and organ
parts leading to the pompous and cheerful addition of a bizarre
drum-bass combination which whimsically take a solo or add in
something. Emerson gives us both the main tune and some variations on
smaller instruments which take a little listening to notice.
Basically, ELP doing what ELP do, but with a different basic sound.
Lots of variations from everyone involved, a panache and grandeur
that isn't to be missed.
Burning Bridges (written by manager,
Terry Mancina) begins with a tense drum-part and some thick organ,
with the later addition of some piano and bass, before it develops to
a pop tune (I love it, don't care.). Greg Lake gives us some great
vocals and lyrics to this pop tune. Keith Emerson's wonderfully
dripping brief piano and organ solos, and his musicianship throughout
shows how great musicians can work superbly in a pop context. Carl
Palmer also provides some very fierce work in addition to his basic
beat. Pop tune, but I like it.
The odd Close To Home is a piano solo
(so I can't help the musicians). The feel is rather carefree,
structured, but not tightly so, and played gently and carelessly on a
warm afternoon. There is a rather developing feel throughout the
solo. Warm and cheerful, but I can't evaluate it.
Better Days is a punchy,
almost-electronic-feeling piece, with catchy bass and drums, some
rocking keyboards from Emerson, mostly tolerable (narrative) lyrics
and good vocals from Lake. Palmer gets to use some bells as well as a
bass drum-heavy beat. All in all, a good pop song, with Emerson and
Palmer giving it a little extra class.
Footprints In The Snow is another
of the ballads, with the usual Greg Lake acoustics, which I can't say
I find very interesting, but also some gorgeous piano
additions, background keys and small bass parts. Lake's voice doesn't
really have too much difficulty handling the spotlight, and the
lyrics are good enough for the piece, though not great. The gradual
build up in the last verse is sublime, and the conclusion for the
album is prety strong.
The bonus material on my remaster is
banal. Four edits with reduced atmospheric build-up. No point in
listening any further than Footprints In The Snow, really. I could
have done without the extras.
Basically, around half of this album is
heavily pop-based or ballad-styled, so if you don't care for that,
put it somewhere later on in your ELP-list. However, this half is
very well done, and the other half (Romeo And Juliet, Black Moon,
Changing States, etc.) is certainly not to be missed by anyone who
likes ELP (or doesn't), and I think a reasonably open-minded prog fan
should be happy with it. Not a masterpiece, certainly, but a very
good album in a changed musical world. Rating: Four Stars Favourite Track: Black Moon --- There we go, complete with sarcasm. Interestingly, I saw a one-star collab review on this. He's got across his opinion well (much better than most idiotically bad Works 1-star reviews), even if I think he's wrong on a couple of points and doesn't really explain some of his dislikes properly (especially Affairs Of The Heart). Album just in, Camel's self-titled debut (thank you, Joao [can't get proper 'o' on my keyboard without fiddling around for ages, sorry!]), which I really liked. 3/4 stars impression from the first listen, though 4 seems more obvious.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Queen By-Tor
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 13 2006
Location: Xanadu
Status: Offline
Points: 16111
|
Posted: May 21 2008 at 16:17 |
Nice review ![Clap](smileys/smiley32.gif) I liked this line a lot
TGM: Orb wrote:
(Shock, horror.
They've betrayed prog) |
![LOL](smileys/smiley36.gif) Can't say much to agree or detest with the review because I haven't heard the album yet. But I think I might just buy it if I ever find it for a decent price.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
TGM: Orb
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 21 2007
Location: n/a
Status: Offline
Points: 8052
|
Posted: May 22 2008 at 08:20 |
Review 39, The Problem of Pain, Torman
Maxt, 2007
![Star](smileys/smiley10.gif)
I Know What I Don't Like (In My Torman
Maxtrobe) [apologies to James for the blatant joke theft]
Usually I have the blessed advantage of
exploring classic groups, or else looking at high-rated groups. Hence
I rarely find things I really dislike. This, however, even on a free
download, was among the rarely. The singer's voice is intolerable
(really, I can't stand it. Whiny, unemotional and irritating), the
music is desperately trying to duplicate 2112, only without any
skill, atmosphere or direction, and lyrically it is simply very badly
done. One of my pet quibbles is lyrics not being reflected in the
music, and this takes that to another level. The interpretation is
constantly cheerful, and really does not convey any pain or anguish
whatsoever in the subject matter. The only high point is Satan's
First Song, which has some darker tones that are extremely
refreshing. I'm not sure I agree with
The overture begins with a random bit
of dancy rhythm before the completely unrelated guitars kick off with
a cheerful, bland piece. One of the guitars provides rhythm, the
other just wails nonsensically. Rather weak drumming marks the piece.
Spots of acoustics turn up every now and then, but I have no idea
why.
Job's First Song features the vocals. I
wish it hadn't. Slightly different, but equally boring guitars
feature at times, barely connected. A brief, cheery guitar solo
features, but it does little to alleviate the lack of interest.
The Angel's First Song is an
acoustic-based piece with a slightly mantric set of multiple vocals
with some rather failed Scarborough Fair-esque layering. A bland drum
part again runs behind it, and the mindless acoustic strumming isn't
really contributed to by the bursts of electrics.
Satan's First Song is the unmistakable
highlight of the album, with unfortunately terrible vocals dragging
down even further the opening generics of the piece. However, a
rather dark metallic feel takes over, including a decent solo and
some potent, shifting guitar. This leads rather artificially to set
of maddened guitar and some haunting background throbs and
glockenspiel, which in turn leads to another decent song part with
some more passable guitar work and drums that actually highlight it.
Not great, but I could imagine myself listening to an album of this
song's quality without the cringing I get from the rest of Pain, Pt.
1.
Job's Initial Shock begins again with
the vocals (alas), more darker guitar parts, though they are repeated
for too long. More of the not-quite-working vocal layering takes
place. Back to the dross, I believe.
Job's Resolve is another of the happy
guitar parts with more post-proto-neo-Mick Pointer drumming. Again,
we have to employ our voluntary deafness to drown out the vocals and
terribly-written lyrics. This is not a resolve, it's a party. A
really, really bad party. Without beer.
Job's Commitment is basically the same
as the previous song.
The Angel's Second song features a
brief soundscape, which provides a gradual release and a rather
transcendal feel that suits the piece, even if I get the sense I've
heard that soundscape before a dozen times. A slightly folky feel,
without a little reminiscence of the more annoying sections of
Remembering – High The Memory (Yes), only without good parts within
that, comes in to conclude the song.
Satan's Second Song again begins with
the dark theme of Satan's First Song, continues with the whiny vocals
trying to carry an atmosphere, which they can't. Another set of
heavier guitar comes in, again very similar to the first song, only
without the interesting break section.
Job's Contemplation begins quite
well with a more thoughtful piece complete with much repeated guitar
parts and some acoustics. I don't like this.
Job's Second Response is whiny and
annoying, with its attempt at defiance crushed by the vocals and
overly-many repeats. Two unconnected parts move before our ears:
electrics and acoustics. Both are boring.
Job's Wife's small measure of anger is
a slight pick-up until the first disastrous chorus. A few mindless
repeats with barely-altered lyrics annoy us. A repetitive metallic
section wears on us for a little while.
A Great Silence is a
poor end to a poor album, with more of the whiny vocals, a repeated
guitar part, some of the attempts at brief, punchy guitar being
repeated too much for effectiveness. However, we do get some moments
of decent guitar. A heartbeat-ish effect and then a whinging,
annoying synth lead us out.
In brief, nothing really
satisfying. Terrible vocals, a poor exploration of the concept, lots
of repetition and a failure to create good songs out of most of the
few good ideas on the album. It's also not really progressive at all,
per se, outside of the soundscape, Satan's First Song (which has a
moment or two or unusual daring), and the multiple vocals, which
while weak, are at least unusual, and only on occasion remotely
metallic. I can't see the appeal at all to this album, though I think
the band do have slightly more potential than they let on, and could
really do with more daring or unconventional compositional choices. I
certainly wouldn't pay money for it, but if you really want to
try it, there's still a download available.
Rating: One Star Favourite Track: Satan's First Song --- Question in general: Who on the archives actually liked this, apart from the two reviewers who signed up specifically to rate this thing highly? Note to the admins: if you want to remove my review until their featured month is over, I'm happy with that. Just thought I'd get a review out of the way now so I can make some more room on my hard drive for the new spree. Edit: I can't count.
Edited by TGM: Orb - May 22 2008 at 08:27
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
LinusW
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 27 2007
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 10665
|
Posted: May 22 2008 at 08:21 |
Question in general: Who on the archives actually liked this, apart from the two reviewers who signed up specifically to rate this thing highly?
I did.
|
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
TGM: Orb
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 21 2007
Location: n/a
Status: Offline
Points: 8052
|
Posted: May 22 2008 at 08:23 |
![Pinch](smileys/smiley26.gif) Really? Going to give it a review?
Edited by TGM: Orb - May 22 2008 at 08:24
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
LinusW
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 27 2007
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 10665
|
Posted: May 22 2008 at 08:24 |
Bit of a joke there. Hoho-hihi, I'm such a jester!
|
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Queen By-Tor
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 13 2006
Location: Xanadu
Status: Offline
Points: 16111
|
Posted: May 22 2008 at 11:17 |
Teehee... I agree in every way with that review.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
TGM: Orb
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 21 2007
Location: n/a
Status: Offline
Points: 8052
|
Posted: May 22 2008 at 11:27 |
Haha, I couldn't even be bothered to finish the introduction, apparently. That's how annoyed I was at the album. Maybe I was just enthusiastic about following in Lappy's footsteps ![LOL](smileys/smiley36.gif) Anyway, many things have arrived. I'll try to get some reviews done anyway, but they might be less frequent.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
LinusW
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 27 2007
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 10665
|
Posted: May 23 2008 at 10:59 |
TGM: Orb wrote:
![Pinch](smileys/smiley26.gif)
Really?
Going to give it a review?
|
We'll see. Time will tell. And so on.
|
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
TGM: Orb
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 21 2007
Location: n/a
Status: Offline
Points: 8052
|
Posted: May 23 2008 at 11:08 |
Review 40, The Yes Album, Yes, 1971
![Star](smileys/smiley10.gif) ![Star](smileys/smiley10.gif) ![Star](smileys/smiley10.gif)
No disgrace.
The Yes Album is
where my current Yes collection begins (never really had the
inclination to try the debut), and was one of the two Yes albums I
started with (along with Close To The Edge). There are plenty of
people who consider it a masterpiece, and I'm not among them. We can
see some of the superb musicianship and composition that we will see
in later Yes, even if Wakeman really completes the set for me and
Bruford really comes into his own on Fragile. There is a lot of
energy on the album, and that's certainly good for it. However, the
problem is the arrangement, which sometimes falls down into a
bombastic and bouncy section that has basically no relation to the
song it's in, and the vocal repetition is often rather excessive.
This is certainly a good album, and a nice, relatively accessible
introduction to Yes, but they've yet to reach the stellar heights of
things like South Side Of The Sky or Siberian Khatru.
The cheerful chords of Yours Is No
Disgrace (even if repeated for rather longer than I think is
necessary) introduce us to the style of the album, with Tony Kaye's
blocky organ. A whirl of guitar from Howe leads us impressively to
the initial heavily harmonised vocals with an organ background, and
we move on through a few mostly un-necessary instrumental sections
with repeats abounding to a vocal-bass section to a great biting Howe
solo (and a couple of additions from Kaye and Bruford). From then on,
the song is a little more satisfying: Howe's melodic acoustic and
electric guitars over some superb organ from Kaye and a typically
excellent Squire-Bruford duo delights every time, while all the
vocals feel well-placed and the pompous 'bam-babam-bam' theme does
seem appropriate. Howe and Squire both throw in some soloing. On the
plus side, some very nicely done lyrics and essentially good playing
throughout, but the flow is lacking in the first half.
The Clap is an acoustic delight
from Howe, with a cheerful feel, superb moments, extremely good flow
and never dull. A very mobile, original and enjoyable piece.
Starship Trooper is probably going to
be the highlight for most progressive-ly interested people, being
around ten minutes long and featuring an expanding theme. On
Anderson's Life Seeker, Bruford provides some superb style, Squire
provides strong bass and the swelling organ is appropriate for the
song. Jon Anderson's vocal is relaxed, yet assertive and strong
enough to handle the stripped back spots rather well. There are a
couple of places where I think the bombast inserted compromises the
piece's flow. Squire's section, Disillusion, features some
unsurprisingly excellent bass playing, even if the vocals on
'loneliness is a pow'r that we possess' don't do much for me. The
flow up to Howe's excellent entrance to the final instrumental
section (Wurm, written by Howe) is perfectly handled, and that
section is certainly worthy of Yes's efforts, with an excellent
build-up, careful additions from Kaye and Bruford, and Howe gets to
handle an electric guitar solo, which is suitably awesome. It is very
well concluded, but the first two parts of Starship Trooper don't
really satisfy me.
The following 'I've Seen All Good
People' is a mixed piece, with an annoying opening, some beautiful
vocals from Anderson, but some terrible harmonies. Howe provides an
acoustic background to the vocals, with an occasional thump in the
background from Bruford. A flutey sound, probably from Kaye's
direction is present throughout until the large organ bursts in. The
more cheerful All Good People proper features a more bouncy rhythm
created by Squire and Howe, while Kaye and Bruford add in a little
bounce with some piano and excellent drumming. Unfortunately, the
repeats from Anderson don't really help the song a lot, and the
massively blocky organ doesn't really do the end much. One of those
ones I don't really like, even if I admire the components.
I actually like the maligned and folky
'A Venture', which contains a delicious piano opening, followed by a
rather consistent bass part, Anderson contributes to some great
moments as everyone else drops out, and everyone gets to do a bit of
jumping out of the piece's mould. Again, the problem is flow, with a
couple of 'just to hide away' sections feeling awkward, but the
ending is actually very good, with a bizarrely chosen guitar solo
when the piece has already basically faded.
Perpetual Change,
the albums third longer piece, begins with the bombast that the other
two have already seen, and the Howe guitar and Squire bass feels a
little powerless on the opening. Again, we have the flow not
complimented by feeble bridging efforts. A brief Squire bass solo
features before another repeat of the chorus and the bombast. The
verse proper, however, is wonderful, with Anderson's high vocal
contrasting with the harmonies, and we get some more rocking moment
from the band with Anderson's powerful 'You'll see perpetual change'
blasting out from the speakers with a couple of taps on piano not too
dissimilar to something on Aqualung. The piece takes off into an
excellent instrumental section which bridges properly, instead opting
to move into a repeated riff. A moog hum brings us onto the final
vocal section with a very satisfying conclusion created by the vocals
and the wordless harmony, and the bombastic throbs of the earlier
song being repeated, but feeling appropriate. Everyone takes a brief
solo and the piece comes down to a calm end.
The bonus material isn't great. A
single version of I've Seen All Good People and Life Seeker is pretty
unnecessary. The start of Your Move is very jarring after the album
proper's conclusion. However, the studio version of The Clap, which
does vary enough from the one included to be of interest, is worthy
of inclusion on the remaster.
All in all, lots of potential, and some
great sections scattered
about the place. However, the overall flow of lots of the pieces is
lacking, and Kaye's rather simplistic organ as well as the
arrangement-shaped hole and bombastic (I'm sorry for horribly
overusing this word. Allegorical in the extreme) guitar-chords become
quite annoying at times. A nice album. One I like. There are some
bits of this that every Yes fan must
hear, and everyone else will certainly like, but only with Wakeman do
Yes become an essential band.
Rating: Three Stars (but a good
three stars) Favourite
Track: Perpetual Change or Starship Trooper, but I don't particularly
prefer any of the individual tracks to the others. --- Now I need to hide from Micky ![LOL](smileys/smiley36.gif) Impressions from the albums I've listened to:
In The Land Of Grey And Pink - Caravan Liked it all, but really, really loved that concluding Dissociation/100% Proof section of Nine Feet Underground. Wonderful. 4ish stars.
Clutching At Straws - Marillion
What struck me about this album was that it felt a bit like an extension of Script, only with every single kink ironed out. Amazing vocals, including female ones on the final track. Incredible stuff. Really enjoyable, even if I think it's ruined Script for me forever. Cheerful lyrics. 5ish Stars.
McDonald & Giles - s/t I did really enjoy this one. Cheerful, good fun, good music throughout. I wasn't initially convinced by bits of the Birdman suite, but the twist on Cadence And Cascade in Flight Of The Ibis is wonderful. 3/4ish stars. Apocalypse - The Mahavishnu Orchestra I don't feel comfortable rating their style of music, that much, but I can say that the orchestra on this one was used very well, McLaughlin and Jean Luc-Ponty excelled as soloists, and the rest was pretty good, even without Billy Cobham. 4ish stars. Scheherazade and Other Stories - Renaissance Wow. Just wow. Superb throughout. I love the hell out of The Vultures Fly High (I swear, there is a pop demon inside of me rearing to burst out). 5ish stars. The Silent Corner And The Empty Stage - Peter Hammill I'm not quite sure what to say about this one. It is very poetic and well-written, but I need to accept that outside Van Der Graaf Generator this music is going to sound different. Loved A Louse Is Not A Home and Forsaken Gardens (as well as liking The Lie) but I need to relisten to this now my preconceptions of Peter Hammill have been demolished appropriately. Don'tknowish stars. Three Of A Perfect Pair - King Crimson As always with Crimson so far, very good. I liked the style and Levin's bass was excellent throughout. Not sure that having four versions of Sleepless total on the remaster was a great idea. Larks' Tongues In Aspic pt. 3 didn't disappoint at all. True to the feel of the first two, but accomplished it in a different way. And a recap Three Friends - Gentle Giant Loved it. Relevant lyrics, great music throughout, and wonderfully handled vocals. Don't have the intelligence to analyse it, but Man Of Class And Quality is an instant favourite. 4/5ish stars. Exiles - David Cross A very good album. There are a couple of modern choices that I'm gradually getting used to (I'm just *used* to hating the trancey style of the start of the Exiles version, so I'm having a difficult time dealing with it). The version of Exiles is wonderful, even with my acclimatising, and the rest of the album is pretty good. Not the best conclusion, I feel, though I've warmed to it a little. Peter Hammill provides some great vocals on Troppo (IIRC) and the violin throughout is wonderful. 4ish stars. Camel - Camel Very enjoyable, and the blues throughout makes it more bearable than later efforts like Moonmadness. Solid solos, no pretense whatsoever, tolerable vocals, and a relaxing feel, as well as some psychedelic edges. The Mystic Queen is simply amazing. 4ish stars. All things are first impressions, or very nearly first impressions.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Queen By-Tor
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 13 2006
Location: Xanadu
Status: Offline
Points: 16111
|
Posted: May 23 2008 at 11:17 |
^^^ You should hide from me too ![Wink](smileys/smiley2.gif) . Love The Yes Album. Great review again - and I've also always hated the remaster for that exact reason: put more time before the bonus tracks!! I hate hearing Your Move follow Perpetual Change so close... it's annoying! I always have to jump up and mash the stop button on my cd player before right after Perpetual Change ends ![LOL](smileys/smiley36.gif) . I should just the the vinyl version.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
LinusW
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 27 2007
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 10665
|
Posted: May 23 2008 at 11:21 |
Sorry Mike.
Me and Rob basically agrees on this one, but as he accepts it, I openly dislike most of it. Gave it two stars.
|
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Queen By-Tor
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 13 2006
Location: Xanadu
Status: Offline
Points: 16111
|
Posted: May 23 2008 at 11:55 |
BOOOOoooooo. ![LOL](smileys/smiley36.gif) Well fine, I'll play the minority here.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
TGM: Orb
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 21 2007
Location: n/a
Status: Offline
Points: 8052
|
Posted: May 23 2008 at 13:37 |
Review 41, Fragile, Yes, 1971
![Star](smileys/smiley10.gif) ![Star](smileys/smiley10.gif) ![Star](smileys/smiley10.gif) ![Star](smileys/smiley10.gif)
Usually I try to avoid the line of
thinking that a band has a magnum opus period and everything before
that is building up to it. However, I can't help it here.
Cape-wearing keyboardist Rick Wakeman appears to have been the
missing piece in the Yes puzzle. Not only are his distinctive,
intelligently used and manifold keyboards perfect for the
Squire-Howe-Bruford-Anderson sound in a way that Kaye's organ simply
wasn't, but he also provides the compositional/arrangement edge that
Yes desperately needed, adding flawless bridges and banishing any
temptations to step down from a song's overall flow with a bit of TYA
bombast. Now, onto the album, the group pieces are exceptional,
intelligent, well-timed and absolutely wonderful. The solo pieces are
a more mixed bag. This is more than essential, but not consistent
enough for a masterpiece.
I'm going to start this review with
South Side Of The Sky, because it is, in my humble opinion, the best
thing that Yes have ever done, and one of the greatest ever
progressive pieces. A biting, suicidal energy, a bleak, tragic
beauty, incredible playing and atmosphere, fantastic lyrics from Jon
Anderson and a sense of deeper connection that I have had with only a
very few other pieces.
During a walk earlier this year, I was
walking on Kinder Downfall or some other such 600M+
near-mini-mountain in the lovely Peak or Lake District (my memory is
vague). There were substantial windspeeds (50-60 mph, could well have
been less, if I remember), I was poorly waterproofed, rain soaked me
to the skin, jumper, three shirts, coat, hat, coat hood, gloves all
drenched. Even changes of gloves, hat and jumper weren't a big help.
Hail and sleet followed the rain as I got progressively more tired,
and eventually we were on the exposed part of the rocky
near-mountain, with a sheer slope on one side. Every bone in my body
was freezing, I felt a need to carry on, manically, and place one
foot in front of the other, interspersed with moments of resignation.
It is easily the most uncomfortable I have ever been in my life
(sheltered though it's been). An unforgettable experience.
What
Yes have done in South Side Of The Sky is unwittingly convert that
experience into music. Every note of that song conveys something to
me, as does every lyrical line and repeat. For music as a form of
pure expression and imagery, it does not get better for me, and I'm
certain that the experience of discomfort in the, at that time,
less-than-entirely-delightful British countryside of February or
March 2008 is something to do with that.
Whirling winds open the song, and
Bruford explodes in with a percussion solo. Howe appears similarly
out of nowhere as Wakeman's synth oscillates. An organ comes in,
accompanied by Squire's throbbing bass, and Howe gives the song a
number of edges that reflect the adrenaline as well as the
desperation. Bruford continues to crash intelligently throughout the
piece, providing metallic clashes and a number of drum choices.
Wakeman leaps around keyboards throughout the piece, providing
several atmospheric touches as well as his more conventional organ.
Throughout, Anderson gives us brilliant, descriptive and narrative
lyrics, telling the story of doomed polar expedition. His vocals do
not disappoint, only concentrate the atmosphere that everyone else
has been building.
We get one of my all-time favourite
piano solos (I have a lot of them) from Wakeman, who gives us a
haunting edge, a feeling of the real cold of the place and the
descent into death as well as a contrast to the density of the rest
of the piece. He is gradually joined by Bruford and Squire as well as
multiple clever individual vocals. It returns to the piano solo, and
a humming synth meets it. Bruford bursts in with monstrous timing,
Howe provides several guitar parts with the feel of death and loss of
control very much in there and Anderson's sustained vocals are simply
perfect. Another wuthering synth ends the piece. The piece is
perfect. The rest of the album is not South Side Of The Sky,
unfortunately.
Roundabout was initially a bit of an
enigma for me. I can appreciate all the components and the
arrangement is superbly done. A haunting synth and Steve Howe's
gorgeous, dark classical guitar give way to Squire's lightning-fast
leading bass. Bruford thuds on behind with a rock beat contrasted
with some clever variation, and Howe moves between the background and
the foreground flawlessly. Wakeman provides excellent organ, and the
Anderson-Squire-Howe harmony vocals come into their own. Bruford
provides some hollower and unusual percussion in a darker, more
packed section with a clever Howe-Wakeman duet. We get a superb organ
solo from the Caped One, and Howe also gives us a couple of brief
ideas. The band are able to repeat the same basic ideas with a
completely altered feel, creating a masterful song, as well as
providing us with a superb range of ideas in the eight minute or so
period of time. An incredible song, but one that didn't originally
grab me on an emotional level. I've since revised this opinion.
The cheerful Long Distance Run-Around,
with its bouncy feel, basic-riff-reliance and multiple clever parts,
is very much the successor of A Venture. It is, however, miles better
than its predecessor, with Wakeman's spinning Moog providing some
variety, and the opportunities for the band to burst out a little
much welcomed. Squire is a standout throughout, with his bass
suddenly providing a texture or a brief spray of notes.
Heart Of The Sunrise, as a contrast to
the preceding Mood For A Day, begins with a surprisingly savage burst
of energy from Bruford, Wakeman and Howe. Squire and Bruford work
around each other masterfully in a darker, slower, more haunting
piece, with a lead bass part, amazing drumming and a haunting
mellotron from The Caped One. Howe again brings the piece into its
frenzied, heavy section with Moog and later organ additions used
brilliantly, and then back down into a gentle echo of the earlier
haunting section and a soft electric with Anderson's vocals. After
these three minutes of absolutely brilliant sonic battery, Anderson's
voice with its beauty, but yet rather careful edge and lyrical hooks
and ideas, is even better placed. Squire provides some lead bass,
Bruford plays around with his drumkit, and Wakeman's set of Moog and
piano provide a lot of different ideas. Howe is able to return to the
mix effortlessly, and leave it with just as little fuss. Wakeman,
Squire and Howe exchange ideas in a cooler, less manic variation on
the opening chaos and a careful piano leads us down into another
jumpy vocal with a bass humming along behind. The majestic
conclusion, with a mock-triumphant, yet lost vocal from Anderson
leads up to a squirreling Howe disappearing. Up 'til now, a perfect
piece, with ideas oozing from every corner, versatility, clever
essential repeats. The door creaks open and suddenly we get a repeat
of ****ing We Have Heaven. The song was perfect. Why did they have to
go and butcher it with that ending?
I doubt that Yes would have been create
any one of these pieces without Rick Wakeman. Much as more than a few
people worship the jazzy overtones of Moraz (who is, I admit an
excellent player) or the blocky organ of Tony Kaye (which is
basically the same on half of The Yes Album), but I cannot see either
of them ever creating these amazing pieces. The Caped One deserves
all the fawning worship-threads he gets, in my opinion.
Onto the solo pieces:
Rick Wakeman's Cans And Brahms is
essentially playing Brahms ' on all sorts of keyboardy instruments.
The sleeve notes say exactly which. I don't particularly care either
way about it. It's good enough, not particularly annoying in the
contest, and has a good whimsical feel.
We Have Heaven is not so neutral. It
features multiple Anderson vocals over a consistent guitar riff and
some other additions from various features. It's amazing how annoying
the merge of Anderson-related noises gets after a minute or so. The
lyrics are pretty mindless. The door shutting followed by running is
a precursor to the end of Heart Of The Sunrise. 5% for Nothing is a forgettable piece of nonsense from Bruford. Don't really object to it, but it says something that I didn't remember to include this when I wrote the review...
Squire's Schindleria Praematurus
(The Fish) is a little more substantial than the previous solo
pieces, with a number of bizarre bass parts merging into each other
very well and Bruford trundling along behind with tappings on various
things. A harmony accompanies the piece as it fades. I'm not mad
about this one, since I feel the individual parts are rather too
repeated. It feels more like overdubbed bass parts than an actual
arranged and clever multiple-bass piece. The other thing is, as a
bass performance, it's seriously over-rated. The idea is innovative
and does spotlight the bass, but the playing and thought behind the
piece isn't even in the same league as Heart Of The Sunrise, America
or Roundabout, in my opinion.
Mood For A Day is the reason the solo
pieces were worth including. Howe provides a gorgeous, emotional
classicaly-inspired solo guitar, with a combination of lead melodies,
backing notes throughout and some intelligently-used strumming.
Uplifting and beautiful, as well as being wonderfully titled.
Onto the bonus material:
The
longer Yes version of Simon And Garfunkel's America was a great
choice with Squire's throbbing bass, Wakeman's multiplicity of
keyboards and Bruford's innovations and general crashing showing off
themselves nicely. Anderson provides his own feel for the lyrics. The
combination of softer and louder sections works very neatly, and it
gives Howe the opportunities to chord out a lot as well as handle
some brief and extended soloing with great relish. A great cover. I
didn't really need the extra version of Roundabout, but it's a nice
conclusion for the album as a whole, so I can live with it. Jon
Anderson forgets some of the lyrics, it seems (or decides not to add
them in), which is quite funny, and Bruford provides a more rocking
performance, which is interesting. In brief, not a terrible pick as a
bonus track.
This album, even if I could have done
without some parts of it and don't really care for the conclusion to
Heart Of The Sunrise myself, is absolutely essential to any fan of
progressive rock. This is an incredible step forwards from The Yes
Album, and at its high points a match for Close To The Edge. It is a
shame that a few choices in the solo ideas, and that damnable end to
Heart Of The Sunrise make the album less fun to listen to as a whole.
Rating: Four Stars. The group ideas are
brilliant, the solo ideas don't convince me.
Favourite Track: South Side Of The Sky --- Avant-garde arrangement, AND you get a personal anecdote at no extra cost (and I attacked Schindleria Praematurus). There's a first time for everything, right. Naturally, opinions welcome, and I'm interested in anyone else's contrary thoughts.
General Yes discussion now (general guidelines, any discussion beats no discussion): Does anyone believe that Yes with Kaye had anywhere near such a potent future or could have done some form of those longer pieces (and why)? When do Yes take off for you? What effect did Capeman's leaving/arrival have on the band? Are there any reviews of specific Yes albums that you think are *just* perfect? etc. Anything goes. I'm going to be continuing the series up until Relayer, I think, though I might try to make some sense of GFTO as well. -- New listen: If I Could Do It All Over Again was very good. No idea what I'd rate it at, or really about specific tracks other than thingummy with the name in it. Edit: Argh. Extra star syndrome. ![LOL](smileys/smiley36.gif) Forgot 5% for nothing. heh. Fixed.
Edited by TGM: Orb - May 23 2008 at 13:52
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
micky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
|
Posted: May 23 2008 at 15:31 |
|
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Queen By-Tor
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 13 2006
Location: Xanadu
Status: Offline
Points: 16111
|
Posted: May 23 2008 at 20:13 |
Nice review again ![Clap](smileys/smiley32.gif) (I don't know why I haven't yet) To answer your question (the immortal "IMO" goes here) I think Wakeman had a great ear for classical compositions as evident by his first works on Fragile. before then the band had experimented with the notions (likely thanks to the addition of Howe the album before) and combined with the already exceptional powers of Squire they where able to make something really awesome. I think it took an album to actually kick in (CTTE) but I think that Wakeman was able to take a bunch of ideas and streamline them into something that could be a masterpiece (CTTE again.). When he left the music took on a very cold feel (Relayer) which I feel did nothing for the band. But his return on GFTO made for excellent results as the band headed for a harder edged direction (I love that album too much). Hope that shows my opinion a bit! @Micky - Should be get him in his sleep?
Edited by King By-Tor - May 23 2008 at 20:14
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
micky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
|
Posted: May 23 2008 at 20:26 |
hahahha.. hmmm... sounds like an offer I can't refuse..
|
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
TGM: Orb
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 21 2007
Location: n/a
Status: Offline
Points: 8052
|
Posted: May 23 2008 at 20:33 |
Note to self: More Opeth.
No sleep for me.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
micky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
|
Posted: May 23 2008 at 20:33 |
oh yes.... love Opeth...
|
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
TGM: Orb
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 21 2007
Location: n/a
Status: Offline
Points: 8052
|
Posted: May 23 2008 at 20:47 |
Also, if you and Mike get me in my sleep, I'll never write an Ys review ![LOL](smileys/smiley36.gif) @Mike, your opinion is sort of similar to mine. I saw Relayer (specifically Gates) as a bit pretentious and lacking in the ways the previous albums excelled. I now like it, after a bit of acclimatisation, but it's never going to be a masterpiece for me.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |