Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - American Politics the 2016 edition
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedAmerican Politics the 2016 edition

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 7172737475 146>
Author
Message
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 02 2016 at 15:56
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

To this election, while Micky's analysis is faultless if the campaigns were being fought along traditional voting lines, there is nothing about 2016 thus far that has followed any tradition or trends, or lived up to any pundited predictions.


Thumbs UpBeer

Where to start with that.

I think that whole aspect has completely been over...yes.. overrated.

This election cycle is different, it will be historic. I meant (strongly believe) that this election will be one that will be talked about 100 years from now. But for different reasons perhaps that the upside-down... throw everything you know or think out the window aspects some think it has become.

In short.. we are watching the death throes of a major American political party. Something that hasn't happened in 150+ years. That Dean.. is why you are seeing a campaign that hasn't followed any trends or traditions.  Not a living soul in the US has seen anything like this. It's uniqueness.. is the death of US major political party.. and the interesting part... so few recognize it as it is happening in front of all of our eyes. Both Party's leaderships know it.. one plans for it...an era of Democratic dominance while the fallout flies ..the other dreads it for they have no way out. See the head scratching actions of Paul Ryan. Trapped they are...with no easy way that doesn't involve committing short term political suicide. Alienating the very voters that gave the leaders their cushy jobs...

First and foremost. There is a large... sh*t.. that understates it. Primary and the general election campaigns are alternative universes.

Trump was benefit of a large field that never coalesced around a alternative to him.  In that.. for all the grief the DNC gets.. they did their job in not letting an outsider (Sanders) hijack the party.  The RNC failed in that.. and Trump is what they got. Not comparing the two in terms of their suitability to become President.. but definitely comparing the two in their inability to win a general election where they have to appeal to more than their supporters to WIN. More on that as I go... 

As I've been posting for ..70 odd pages.. the Republican Party is dying.  It can not remain viable appealing to white voters when the white share of the overall vote is declining.. at a rate of 2% per cycle all while appealing ot those white voters based on fear and hate of just that growing aspect of the US population. It is a trap the Party is in, and they know it, but in order to appeal to the changing demographics they have to do a 180 on the fear and division tactics that they have successfully used since 1988 when Willie Horton turned a election.  They are vicitims of their own success. The only way to change that is to burn the Party down. Disown the very core of the party as it exists now.

I digress.  Where this cycle, this election is different Dean is one of our two political parties is showing for all to see, what many suspected would happen, a very real implosiion and the first major Party destruction since the 1840's.

What hasn't changed.. is in a general election. Democrats support the Democratic nominnee..  Republicans support theirs and the fight is for the squishy center or those less Partisan.  Unless Trump does a 180 he will get crushed. He has to win Democratic votes.. not the working class 'democrats' that have been voting Republican.. but take away from teh Obama coalition to have ANY chance to win. White votes just are not there anymore... he is losing white voters in terms of pure numbers even from what Romney had in 2012 where he crushed Obama in winning the white vote. .and still got crushed himself. Trump has to pull like 74% to 75% of white voters to win.  Considering that whites don't all belong to the GOP... and even those Republicans.. those that are especially the college educated.. politically KNOWLEDGABLE.. recognize he is a candidate that shouldn't be within a mile of the White House and either are voting Hillary. or for Johnson

Regardless how strange Trump has been as a candidate.. the basic political reality has not changed.  A republican candidate has to win Democratic votes.. the same ones that voted for Obama to win.  Trump isn't doing that.. and for 2020.. it is hard to see any that will... their fatal weakness is they can not appeal to the voters they need to offset the demographic shifts going on. Trump is only making what was hard, next to impossible not just this year.. but in election to come. Remember.. Trump is gone in 3 months.. those voters that put him there will still be there...


Edited by micky - August 02 2016 at 17:30
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
LearsFool View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 09 2014
Location: New York
Status: Offline
Points: 8642
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 02 2016 at 16:46
Unless Hillary manages to break through the Red Wall, this will be a boring election.

Trump's getting into a new habit of juggling controversies at once. Witness him cover his ass by claiming that the general election is rigged, and what he had to say about Roger Ailes's sexual harassing.

And one last thing: F**k Pat McCrory.
Back to Top
LearsFool View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 09 2014
Location: New York
Status: Offline
Points: 8642
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 02 2016 at 17:20
Oh, wait, there's more!

Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 02 2016 at 17:23
number of the day...

0

this goes back to my earlier post..

a Marist survey last month showed Trump getting 0 percent of the vote among African-Americans in both Ohio and Pennsylvania

you read that right... O f**kING percent.. that is why Trump will not win..

in fact just how bad is it...

Internal Republican polling shows that even Hispanics are more get-able than African-Americans

which means maybe they get 5%





Edited by micky - August 02 2016 at 17:24
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 02 2016 at 18:08
two interesting things to leave off with for the evening.. one old.. one new.

Both sort of hitting on the points I've been making. The first.. the hard reality of the numbers.. the 2nd.. the real reality. Some do realize it, the problem is those in power can't just do what that woman did.. for they have to face the very voters that put Trump where he is. As I've said.. the Republicans created the monster to win elections and get out the vote,.. fear and hate are powerful motivations. but they lost control of the monster.. and with the demographic changes..  it will take a political martyr to sacrifice his career to say what needs to be said... the Party has no clothes...  and say goodbye to the votes and support of the hate/fear/anger filled bible beating... evangelical 'christians'  and the substantial (unfortunately) residue of our own racist and bigoted past that thing this country is and should forever be.. white..and hetrosexual LOL

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/03/17/the-republican-myth-of-the-untapped-white-voter.html

http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/02/politics/maria-comella-hillary-clinton-donald-trump/index.html


Edited by micky - August 02 2016 at 18:12
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
Vompatti View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: elsewhere
Status: Online
Points: 67434
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 02 2016 at 18:48
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

number of the day...

0

this goes back to my earlier post..

a Marist survey last month showed Trump getting 0 percent of the vote among African-Americans in both Ohio and Pennsylvania

you read that right... O f**kING percent.. that is why Trump will not win..

in fact just how bad is it...

Internal Republican polling shows that even Hispanics are more get-able than African-Americans

which means maybe they get 5%



This was before he posted a picture of himself eating KFC. Now that the African-Americans know he loves their culture, they have no reason not to vote for him.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 03 2016 at 00:27
Originally posted by Vompatti Vompatti wrote:

This was before he posted a picture of himself eating KFC. Now that the African-Americans know he loves their culture, they have no reason not to vote for him.
And they learnt that fried chicken should be eaten with knife and fork ... win-win.
What?
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 03 2016 at 02:55
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

number of the day...

0

this goes back to my earlier post..

a Marist survey last month showed Trump getting 0 percent of the vote among African-Americans in both Ohio and Pennsylvania

you read that right... O f**kING percent.. that is why Trump will not win..

in fact just how bad is it...

Internal Republican polling shows that even Hispanics are more get-able than African-Americans

which means maybe they get 5%



Well. Yes and no. 

Trump failing to win African-American votes does not necessarily mean that Clinton gets them by default - that loss of 1 million black votes could simply mean a drop of 5 percentage points in African American turn-out as those Rep voters who wouldn't vote for Clinton in a million years choose to stay at home instead - and you could see similar drops in turn-out for the Hispanic and Asian/non-white voters. This is not beyond the realms of possibility that if they decide that this particular election is a white-man's fight (it's already been called a choice of the lesser of two evils) then they simply won't vote at all. The other possibility is they go and vote for one of the also-ran candidates, which is tantamount to the same thing. Trump could potentially lose 7 million non-white voters. However 30% of whites are in blue-collar/service occupations and that equates to 40 million voters, (25% of them, 10 million voters, are living below the poverty-line), voter-turnout among that demographic is less than 30% so Trump targeting those stay-at-home white voters is attempting to tap into between 10 and 28 million potential voters, which is four times the number he needs to replace the fall in non-white votes to win the popular vote and twice the number he would need to win the electoral college vote. Of course that would equate to something like a 71% turn-out of white-voters (unprecedented?) but that is a false statistic since it is not a percentage change across the board, the turn-out in non-blue collar white voters remains around 60% and Clinton's share of that does not change unless she also loses votes to Johnson or complacency sets in and the Dems simply fail to vote because they think they've already won. If her supporters think this one is in the bag then the turn-out among her potential voters could actually decrease ... and that's a bad thing. When push comes to shove, staunch Republicans will vote Republican regardless of who their candidate is, they will not turn to Johnson to avoid Clinton.

Now - I'm not advocating a Trump win here, I'm simply highlighting that the claims that he cannot win aren't quite as clear-cut as they appear. Democrats have to be aware that no election is a foregone conclusion until all the votes are counted so they must not be complacent - they still have to cast their vote for her to win.

What?
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20616
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 03 2016 at 04:43
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:


Democrats have to be aware that no election is a foregone conclusion until all the votes are counted so they must not be complacent - they still have to cast their vote for her to win.

I agree, blacks not supporting Trump means nothing. The reason the US has had a stalemate congress is because black voters either failed, or were prohibited/dissuaded  for voting for Democratic congressmen and senators after helping to place Barrack in the White House. I'd like to return to this post in the not  too distant future and expand on it in greater detail.

Edited by SteveG - August 03 2016 at 07:45
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 03 2016 at 05:05
^^ I agree. When Modi was made the BJP Prime Ministerial candidate three years back, the media dubbed it a majestic isolation, meaning he would alienate too many from the minority to win. Unfortunately, the majority counts in a democratic system fundamentally based on majority vote. However the demographic may change, the majority is still the majority and someone who can mobilise them could confound media expectations as Modi did two years back. I can't tell if Trump is that person. BUT.... I want to talk about DuPage county, IL here. I have been there - not all of it but Woodridge, Naperville, Bolingbrook - and to my third world eyes it looked like a middle/upper middle class area. It is apparently a pretty well off area by American standards too. Even so, according to some 2011 news report I saw on YouTube, it has 60000 families living below the poverty line. The number may have gone down now but they showed once middle class families now seeking welfare services which were overwhelmed by demand they had never seen before. IF this problem is observed across the nation, it is something a shrewd politician can tap into. I'd have hoped Sanders could have been that politician and I sure hope it won't be Trump but politics is full of surprises.
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 03 2016 at 09:48
Trump's hispanic polling has been in the single digits. 
While a gender gap has been building recently, it's continued with women breaking even stronger for Clinton via polls, and I have to realistically assume moderates are not terribly happy with him, certainly few Democrats. No idea what polling says, but just from observation there are a significant number of dedicated Republicans that wont back him, either going for Gary Johnson or mainly not voting at all. 
I've been beaten this horse to death, but the demographics are not there. Only a recession could perhaps change things. Outside that I just don't know how the numbers are there for Trump. 

I'm not being dismissive, never said "lol trump" or waved my hand and said don't worry, not saying Dems should take the election for granted, just a realistic analysis...how the hell can someone win with such a little base of support?


Anyway, I am now convinced he is throwing the election. Whether he was a bored rich guy out to troll/have some fun as a protest vote and it went too far, or he's a Clinton aid...we cant know, but either way I think it's clear he doesn't want to win. He is making no attempt to "run to the center" and in fact keeps doubling down, he's continued to insult the military, this Khan situation is really biting him in the ass.
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 03 2016 at 10:03
The Khan mess was definitely suicidal.  It is hard to tell if he is just helping Clinton win or he really is a massive egoist who can't let go.  When he attacked Khan's wife for staying silent, I was like, "No, don't go there!" LOL and sure enough, she spoke up the next day.  It cannot be ruled out that he is indeed such a big egoist because I have read a book of his Dead called How To Get Rich which is really about how The Don gets rich by bragging about himself.  And even there (and this book was written way back in 2003 or so) he mentions about holding onto grudges, no kidding. Don't even know why he thought that would be relevant reading for his audience. 

Again, I don't know exactly what kind of reaction the Khan episode has drawn from his 'fanbase' if it may be called that.  I read a news article that said his fans didn't necessarily find his 'pro-Russia' statements so unnerving as the DC lobby seems to.  Does not surprise me; I mean I am sure the DC lobby was outraged when Gorbachev made overtures to USA...not.  Those of us in neutral nations do wish US and Russia would simply bury the spat and co-operate.  It's sad that Trump is overall so disgusting because sometimes, maybe like a broken clock being right kind of thing, he does hit the nail on the head but because it's he who's saying it, even those ideas get dismissed as looney talk.
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 03 2016 at 10:07
Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

^^ I agree. When Modi was made the BJP Prime Ministerial candidate three years back, the media dubbed it a majestic isolation, meaning he would alienate too many from the minority to win. Unfortunately, the majority counts in a democratic system fundamentally based on majority vote. However the demographic may change, the majority is still the majority and someone who can mobilise them could confound media expectations as Modi did two years back. I can't tell if Trump is that person. BUT.... I want to talk about DuPage county, IL here. I have been there - not all of it but Woodridge, Naperville, Bolingbrook - and to my third world eyes it looked like a middle/upper middle class area. It is apparently a pretty well off area by American standards too. Even so, according to some 2011 news report I saw on YouTube, it has 60000 families living below the poverty line. The number may have gone down now but they showed once middle class families now seeking welfare services which were overwhelmed by demand they had never seen before. IF this problem is observed across the nation, it is something a shrewd politician can tap into. I'd have hoped Sanders could have been that politician and I sure hope it won't be Trump but politics is full of surprises.

Yeah, Sanders was simply the first to say out loud what many Americans have been thinking, the middle really is in dire straits. The number has shrunk, and yes some have gone on to higher but many have slipped lower, and middle class income has fallen. I have said this story many times before, my family went from a 1 job family that was doing pretty solid, to a 4 job family which at one point cut all unnecessary spending out, and was still doing worse. Things were real bad after the recession when my father lost his job and his new was at a lower wage, but it goes long before that, since 2001 basically each year seemed a bit worse off. By 2006 already both parents were working full time and I was working 25-30 hours a week and we were barely getting by. 
What you described in DuPage county is indeed a nationwide problem. 

The working class have it worse, and it was noted early in this campaign that white working class Americans, especially males, have seen a huge spike in obesity, hard drug use even suicide. Was even alluded to in one of the Democratic debates. It's a shame much of this has manifested in the form of Trump...while he's deplorable he is absolutely tapping something real, something Sanders did as well though he was actually sincereLOL

Sadly, many of these people are racist/xenophobic and understandably mad at the politicians, so someone like Trump can thrive. It's upsetting, besides seeing how ugly some Americans can get, that Trump is using them. He is just channeling their anger through racism and general anti establishment rhetoric, no real plan. Wanting to keep medicare/medicaid/social security is nice and he wants to cut some taxes for the middle class down but none of this will actually reverse anything. Going back to the dead horse I keep beating...this is a golden opportunity for the Democratic Party. They must capitalize on this anger as well, in a productive way, would be good politically and ya know, actually have some attempt at rectifying the problem. 



Edited by JJLehto - August 03 2016 at 10:12
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 03 2016 at 10:23
Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

The Khan mess was definitely suicidal.  It is hard to tell if he is just helping Clinton win or he really is a massive egoist who can't let go.  When he attacked Khan's wife for staying silent, I was like, "No, don't go there!" LOL and sure enough, she spoke up the next day.  It cannot be ruled out that he is indeed such a big egoist because I have read a book of his Dead called How To Get Rich which is really about how The Don gets rich by bragging about himself.  And even there (and this book was written way back in 2003 or so) he mentions about holding onto grudges, no kidding. Don't even know why he thought that would be relevant reading for his audience. 

Again, I don't know exactly what kind of reaction the Khan episode has drawn from his 'fanbase' if it may be called that.  I read a news article that said his fans didn't necessarily find his 'pro-Russia' statements so unnerving as the DC lobby seems to.  Does not surprise me; I mean I am sure the DC lobby was outraged when Gorbachev made overtures to USA...not.  Those of us in neutral nations do wish US and Russia would simply bury the spat and co-operate.  It's sad that Trump is overall so disgusting because sometimes, maybe like a broken clock being right kind of thing, he does hit the nail on the head but because it's he who's saying it, even those ideas get dismissed as looney talk.

Yeah that's why I no longer am trying to figure WHY he is doing what he does, just accepting the what. 
No doubt there, Trump is an enigma but everyone can agree his an egomaniac of the highest degree. No question thereLOL

I am sure his core base loves it, seems he can't do anything too far for them and they love the Muslim bashing stuff. However it has prompted the strongest Republican criticism yet against him. 
Oh he says some things that are appealing, I just don't believe them. He has been a strong opponent of our bad trade deals, TPP, he's criticized citizen's united and how Republicans "go running to the Koch brothers". I think he's full of sh*tLOL all this stuff came after Sanders started saying most of it, so I think it's more opportunistic than sincere from Trump. I don't believe he means a word of it but no doubt some of what he's playing up is correct. I guess he deserves credit for helping give the working class a voice, wish it was more constructive like Sanders', and he as taken an axe to Republican Party which well...deserves it. 

Their subtle (sometimes not) use of race for years even decades has come to fruition. We kept hearing "WHY WONT OABAMA SAY RADICAL ISLAM!" "HE WONT USE THE WORD MUSLIM!!" but now they party is outraged at Trump?? In this regard Trump is like a wake up call that the GOP really was in the wrong, it's kind of horrifying to see something you do taken to the nth degree, but that you still did start.
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 03 2016 at 10:24
Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:

Yeah, Sanders was simply the first to say out loud what many Americans have been thinking, the middle really is in dire straits. The number has shrunk, and yes some have gone on to higher but many have slipped lower, and middle class income has fallen. I have said this story many times before, my family went from a 1 job family that was doing pretty solid, to a 4 job family which at one point cut all unnecessary spending out, and was still doing worse. Things were real bad after the recession when my father lost his job and his new was at a lower wage, but it goes long before that, since 2001 basically each year seemed a bit worse off. By 2006 already both parents were working full time and I was working 25-30 hours a week and we were barely getting by. 
What you described in DuPage county is indeed a nationwide problem. 

The working class have it worse, and it was noted early in this campaign that white working class Americans, especially males, have seen a huge spike in obesity, hard drug use even suicide. Was even alluded to in one of the Democratic debates. It's a shame much of this has manifested in the form of Trump...while he's deplorable he is absolutely tapping something real, something Sanders did as well though he was actually sincereLOL 

Sorry to hear about what you've been through, man.  Hope things are at least a bit better now.  And it comes as a shock to me that it was already that bad in 2006 when most of us from the outside thought US was doing incredibly well.
Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:


Sadly, many of these people are racist/xenophobic and understandably mad at the politicians, so someone like Trump can thrive. It's upsetting, besides seeing how ugly some Americans can get, that Trump is using them. He is just channeling their anger through racism and general anti establishment rhetoric, no real plan. Wanting to keep medicare/medicaid/social security is nice and he wants to cut some taxes for the middle class down but none of this will actually reverse anything. Going back to the dead horse I keep beating...this is a golden opportunity for the Democratic Party. They must capitalize on this anger as well, in a productive way, would be good politically and ya know, actually have some attempt at rectifying the problem. 


It is a deadly cocktail of nationalism combined with populism.  Politicians in India have worked that formula to death.  Before the 1991 IMF-administered reforms, we had reached a point where on the one hand there was a fanning of communal sentiments by the cultural right wing (culminating in the widely reported demolition of a mosque built by Emperor Babur) and reservation of govt jobs for the backward classes as appeasement.  Because there was literally nothing else to look forward to for the people.  It is true that economic growth, well growth that covers a lot of people in its sweep and not just the top 1%, solves a lot of problems and the absence of growth creates problems that would be once unimaginable.  I never thought I'd see far right parties rise in Europe.  My blood boils when I think of the massive economic mismanagement that is really the root cause of these problems.  If only people got jobs and were at least reasonably comfortable, they would be happy and actually learn to live with each other.  When there's less food to go around, we squabble and start hating the 'other'.


Edited by rogerthat - August 03 2016 at 10:24
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 03 2016 at 14:19
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

number of the day...

0

this goes back to my earlier post..

a Marist survey last month showed Trump getting 0 percent of the vote among African-Americans in both Ohio and Pennsylvania

you read that right... O f**kING percent.. that is why Trump will not win..

in fact just how bad is it...

Internal Republican polling shows that even Hispanics are more get-able than African-Americans

which means maybe they get 5%



Well. Yes and no. 

Trump failing to win African-American votes does not necessarily mean that Clinton gets them by default - that loss of 1 million black votes could simply mean a drop of 5 percentage points in African American turn-out as those Rep voters who wouldn't vote for Clinton in a million years choose to stay at home instead - and you could see similar drops in turn-out for the Hispanic and Asian/non-white voters. This is not beyond the realms of possibility that if they decide that this particular election is a white-man's fight (it's already been called a choice of the lesser of two evils) then they simply won't vote at all. The other possibility is they go and vote for one of the also-ran candidates, which is tantamount to the same thing. Trump could potentially lose 7 million non-white voters. However 30% of whites are in blue-collar/service occupations and that equates to 40 million voters, (25% of them, 10 million voters, are living below the poverty-line), voter-turnout among that demographic is less than 30% so Trump targeting those stay-at-home white voters is attempting to tap into between 10 and 28 million potential voters, which is four times the number he needs to replace the fall in non-white votes to win the popular vote and twice the number he would need to win the electoral college vote. Of course that would equate to something like a 71% turn-out of white-voters (unprecedented?) but that is a false statistic since it is not a percentage change across the board, the turn-out in non-blue collar white voters remains around 60% and Clinton's share of that does not change unless she also loses votes to Johnson or complacency sets in and the Dems simply fail to vote because they think they've already won. If her supporters think this one is in the bag then the turn-out among her potential voters could actually decrease ... and that's a bad thing. When push comes to shove, staunch Republicans will vote Republican regardless of who their candidate is, they will not turn to Johnson to avoid Clinton.

Now - I'm not advocating a Trump win here, I'm simply highlighting that the claims that he cannot win aren't quite as clear-cut as they appear. Democrats have to be aware that no election is a foregone conclusion until all the votes are counted so they must not be complacent - they still have to cast their vote for her to win.



just a factoid. I'm sure Trump will get more than 0%. McVegas has the line of GOP share of the black vote in 2016 at 4%. Not bad.. but not reaching Romney's scant 8%. Trump is poison to all minorities...

Smile  To your point though there is now more reliably Democratic voting block than Blacks Dean.. and in case you having been watching the news... they are pissed off.. and highly energized. Again.. learn from the GOP.  NOthing motivates voters more than fear and hate.  In their eyes.. Trump and all those clowns in the GOP might as well be wearing white robes...LOL. For those in the front lines of our social-economic culture wars.. and no one is more than Black population.. this vote is TOO important to stay home and they ARE being turned out to vote.  They did in the primaries to support Hillary..in massive numbers  they will again in the general election to support her AND vote against the Grand Wizard himself hahah

Though in all fairness.. they are not the GOP's problem. They are not part of any plausible GOP path to victory (getting 35-45 of the non-white vote) The GOP (rightfully so) likely wrote off ever getting a foothold in the Black voting demographic well before I was even born


however what does matter in 2016 is...


The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 03 2016 at 14:25
number of the day!

64,000

Approximately 8.6 million Latinos in the United States are eligible to vote, but have not yet registered; every month, nearly 64,000 young Latino citizens turn 18 and become newly eligible

that is why Arizona is coming into play.

The GOP lost the Black vote many decades ago... if they lose the Latino vote and this more than anything is where Trump, not merely the voters responsible for putting him there, could kill the Republican Party. They only took 30% in 2012.. I'll be blunt... if anything thinks the GOP is going to even get THAT in 2016 they are f**king high or have no knowledge or understanding of politics in this country. If they lose the Hipanics the way they lost the blacks. For all time ... they are finished as a national party. Again goes back to what I said.. the only way they can do that... is to burn the party down for it is party whose cornerstone on fear and hate of Latino immigrants. The loss of the 'white' America...

In fact... Republicans are privately discussing the unthinkable.  The turning of Texas from Red to Blue in the near future..


Edited by micky - August 03 2016 at 14:27
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
LearsFool View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 09 2014
Location: New York
Status: Offline
Points: 8642
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 03 2016 at 14:37
Yup. I mean, there's a case study in Cali - flipped from fairly solid GOP to Democratic concrete mainly because of how Prop 187 galvanised the state's Hispanic voters against the Repubs. Now witness this occurring on a national scale...
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 03 2016 at 14:46
yep...

that is storyline #2 in my thoughts of this election.

It isn't who is going to win...Trump has already for all intents and purposes blown it.  He needs to win a bunch of blue states.. he'll be lucky to win 1.. he is hemoranged GOP voters.. and sure as HELL not winning over Democractic voters.

What is important from this election isn't as much teh result... but the fallout from it from the GOP implosion. Both will tell if the party is getting a bullet to the head... or merely if its throat was cut...

Do the Libertarians become a true 3rd major party for 2020...  death.. a quick death IMO for the GOP.

Does anyone in the GOP hit eject before they alienate the Latino demograph so completely that it becomes a another, but FAR larger and still growing, Black demographic in which a a good year is cracking 10% a great year..20%. again.. Death for the GOP at a national level.  They won't see the Presidency for a generation or more... unthinkable? Perhaps.. but again.. we are heading into territory polically we have perhaps never seen.  Anything is indeed possible..
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 03 2016 at 15:44
speaking of... latest polls out in Arizona.... and Clinton is ahead...

win or lose...she doesn't need to win it. Trump likely can't win if he loses it.  He could win win PA, FL, Ohio and still be looking up at Clinton. That is how much the electoral math favored the Democrats, the fact it is sliding further blue just make the plasubile cases where Trump could win.. all the fewer.. not that him winning FL,PA and Ohio was all that plausible in the first place.

Win lose? Who cares.... the fact it is in play is the story...

oh and that she is within the error plus and minus in Georgia.... a dead heat at the moment. News again in itself.. it should not even be close there.

what is next... Oklahoma for Clinton

*spits beer on monitor*

sorry.. got carried away there LOL


Edited by micky - August 03 2016 at 15:47
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 7172737475 146>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.203 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.