Flower Kings Appreciation Thread |
Post Reply | Page <1 56789 487> |
Author | ||||
The Quiet One
Prog Reviewer Joined: January 16 2008 Location: Argentina Status: Offline Points: 15745 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
The rating system, please ingnore it from my reviews, well at least pay attention most to the review. Please don't compare ratings, because you'll probably find me saying that I prefer a 4 stars album I rated to a 5 stars I rated. 5 stars aren't really that I like so much, if not that truly deserve the ''masterpiece'' label for being, dunno, just when I hear it, I know when it is, hahaha... You see, Triumvirat's Illusions, isn't so awesome, but I mean, they're 2 songs, very well arranged, with some stunning perfomances, and just by hearing it all the way through, I just can't think of it as another thing as a ''masterpiece'', which btw, in my review I noted that it WASN'T a Prog Masterpiece/Essential, if not Triumvirat's Masterpiece. Don't get me wrong, Karmakanic is AWESOME, but I don't think the ''masterpiece'' status fit, but if I write my review for it, you'll read that I praise it A LOT!! Edited by cacho - March 17 2009 at 15:44 |
||||
TheCaptain
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 04 2009 Location: Ohio, USA Status: Offline Points: 1335 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
I agree with Cacho 100%. 5-star ratings should be handed out rarely because there aren't too many (relatively speaking of course) masterpieces of progressive rock. A masterpiece, in my mind, has to be completely breathtaking, have tremendous replay value, and most importantly be the embodiment of what I believe the sub-genre of the album is. This doesn't mean that I don't love albums I will rate as 4 stars when I get around to it. So while it pains me to say it, I won't rate more than a couple at most of TFK's albums as 5 stars, even though I absolutely love (almost) every one of their albums. If the rating system was based entirely on how much I liked the album, I would be more inclined to give away many 5 star ratings.
|
||||
Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal.
|
||||
Roland113
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 30 2008 Location: Pittsburgh, PA Status: Offline Points: 3843 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Hmm,
I think I look at the whole rating system differently than the majority here. Personally, I think a five star rating is too limiting, I tend to think in percents which lends to a 1 - 10 scale rather than 1 - 5. The way my mind works is that 5 stars is 100%, 4 stars is 80% and nine on a scale of 1-10 would round up to ten, not down to 8. As such, If I think that something gets a 9 out of 10 rating, then I don't have any problems giving it a 5 star rating. Furthermore, using a grading system, 4 stars translate to a B, I don't think an album has to be a masterpiece to be an A. With all of that being said, here is how I'd rate the Flower Kings Albums, on a percent and a star basis. The Flower King - no rating yet, need to listen to it more Back in the World - no rating yet, need to listen to it more Retropolis - 90%, love the album, I'd give it an A and thus, 5 stars Stardust We Are- 95% fantastic album, I don't think what others refer to as filler is filler at all, 5 stars Flower Power - 75%, good album, a little odd at times, 4 stars Space Revolver - 80%, Great album, the book ends are fantastic but the middle sometimes leaves me wanting, 4 Stars The Rainmaker - 60%, Mediocre album, Serious Dreamers the only majoy highlight, 3 stars Unfold the Future - 90%, Wonderful Album, 5 stars Adam and Eve - 60%, I just can't seem to get into this one, 3 stars Paradox Hotel - 95%, My favorite FK album (well, today at least), 5 stars The Sum of No Evil - 85%, four stars, This one is growing on me. There you have it, it may be a bit warped, I'm probably more liberal with te 5 star ratings than others, but it's all math to me. PS: Page 7, woo hoo, we almost got a veritable fan club going. Edited by Roland113 - March 17 2009 at 19:11 |
||||
-------someone please tell him to delete this line, he looks like a noob-------
I don't have an unnatural obsession with Disney Princesses, I have a fourteen year old daughter and coping mechanisms. |
||||
The Quiet One
Prog Reviewer Joined: January 16 2008 Location: Argentina Status: Offline Points: 15745 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
^I'm really no math-man when writing reviews. And no, sorry to dissapoint you Captain, but I really don't think you understood what I meant, I mean you came with a completely opposite explanation. But please, let's not discuss this!!
I rate 5 stars, rarely, but not only that, it doesn't have to be ''perfect'', nor AMAZING!!!, nor all virtuosic. Can it be? Yes. But I frequently don't review albums from that style, I prefer to review controversial, or at least low-rated, or fewer reviewed. The 5 stars, is when I hear the whole album through, I just hear it, smell it, feel it, whatever, I perceive the 'masterpiece' tag there. Maybe not ''essential'' Prog, and sometimes not even Prog, but you get the deal. Yes, I may going against the guide-lines, but really, the guide-lines should be updated for a big quantity of reasons, mainly for Prog-Related/Proto stuff.... |
||||
TheCaptain
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 04 2009 Location: Ohio, USA Status: Offline Points: 1335 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
To mimic Roland I'll post a score out of 100 for how much I liked the album. I am quite hesitant when it comes to rating anything higher than 95.
100 is perfection (unattainable for an album) 50 is completely neutral To cut down on the superfluous superlatives I am prone to give to TFK assume that everything is excellent unless otherwise stated. Flower King - 93 Oh so close. Dissonata was OK and Humanizzimo could have been cut down a little. World of Adventures - 89 Go West Judas didn't do anything for me. Temple of Snakes was unnecessary. World of Adventure maybe could have been cut down a minute or two. Retropolis - 83 There is More to this World could get a little cheesy at times. Silent Sorrow is good. Retropolis by Night is pointless. Stardust We Are - 91 Eyes of the World is a little long/repetitive. Compassion is great on it's own but it disrupts the flow of the album. Flower Power - 92 The Mean Machine, Dungeon of Deep, and Indian Summer should have been merged into a 5 or 6 minute track in order to still convey their purpose but not drag on too long. Deaf Numb & Blind is good. Stupid Girl should be as it is on "The Road Back Home" compilation. Hudson River Sirens Call should lose it's first minute of experimental stuff. Space Revolver - 88 Chicken Farmer Song and Underdog are good. The Rainmaker - 73 Sub-par (for TFK). Great songs are Last Minute on Earth, World Without a Heart, Red Alert, and Serious Dreamers. Unfold the Future - 92Christianopel, Soul Vortex, and Devil's Danceschool aren't my cup of tea. Silent Inferno is a little too dark for my taste and it could be trimmed down. Devil's Playground could be trimmed down. Adam and Eve - 88 Days Gone By should have been worked into A Vampire's View or completely gotten rid of. Adam & Eve is too standard of a rocker for me and is only good up until "we're all connected/through the dust" at which point it becomes excellent until the end of the song. Starlight Man is good at best only when in the mood. I'm not a fan of Timelines at all. Driver's Seat could have trimmed some stuff in the third fifth of the song. Paradox Hotel - 97Paradox Hotel and Blue Planet are good. TSoNE - 85Trading My Soul and The Sum of No Reason are ok to good. Life in Motion could have been cut down. |
||||
Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal.
|
||||
Roland113
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 30 2008 Location: Pittsburgh, PA Status: Offline Points: 3843 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Morning guys,
Quick post. Ok, I gave the first part of Who's the Boss a serious listen on the way in to work this morning and wow, great stuff there. 'Let in Hollywood' is going on my regular listening rotation for a long time. Thanks for pushing me to listen to it. |
||||
-------someone please tell him to delete this line, he looks like a noob-------
I don't have an unnatural obsession with Disney Princesses, I have a fourteen year old daughter and coping mechanisms. |
||||
Roj
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 02 2008 Location: Manchester, UK Status: Offline Points: 3126 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Hey I like this Ratings idea, so I'll have a go too!!
Flower King - not got yet
Back In The World - TOTALLY AWESOME, 5 stars, no question
Retropolis - better than I gave credit earlier, but not as good as debut, 4.2 stars, thus 4
Stardust We Are - Amazing, a few duffers but features the highest of all highs, 5 stars without a doubt
Flower Power - not got yet
Space Revolver - the most consistent album for me, brilliant. 5 stars
Rainmaker - a fine album, but below the standard of most TFK, still a solid 4 stars
Unfold The Future - disc 1 is incredible, disc 2 less so, 4.5 stars
Adam And Eve - not got
Paradox Hotel - my latest, some AMAZING highlights, some weaker stuff, 4.3 stars but rising
Sum Of No Evil - the first and last tracks are incredible, the epic less cohesive for me, but still 4.2, easily warrants 4 stars.
That's my take. One can see I'm quite impressed with TFK . I'm almost dreading completing my set as I'll have no new ones to look forward to.
|
||||
The Quiet One
Prog Reviewer Joined: January 16 2008 Location: Argentina Status: Offline Points: 15745 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Flower King - 4.5 stars
Back In The World - 3.5
Retropolis - 3.5
Stardust We Are - haven't heard it, yet
Flower Power - haven't heard it, yet
Space Revolver -5 stars, maybe not as brilliant as UTF, but this one is the most solid release
Rainmaker - haven't heard it, yet
Unfold The Future - Disc 1 is a masterpiece, Disc 2, quite meh. 4.5 stars/4
Adam And Eve - As solid as Space Revolver, just that the great tunes here are less great than the ones of Space Revolver. 4 stars
Paradox Hotel - Consistent in Good stuff, few killer stuff. 4 stars
Sum Of No Evil - too long stuff..... 3.5 stars |
||||
progrules
Prog Reviewer Joined: September 14 2007 Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 958 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Okay guys, can't stay behind here. I did a little research in my own preferences concerning the albums and it's actually very interesting what I discovered. If I do a song by song rating I get pretty low averages for each album. At first I thought this was very strange but if you think about it there is a very logical explanation.
For understanding this you have to know that I like their long stuff extremely much and their shorter songs are almost all dispensable for me. So if you rate all songs and make a one on one average you get low total averages for each album and we don't want that of course. So I made a sort of model in excel where I did a weigh for the length of each song * the rating and then we get the averages we want. And they are totally different !!
I will show both scores for each album:
unweighed weighed
Flower King 4.06 4.37
Back in the World 3.78 4.09
Retropolis 3.59 4.02
Stardust we Are 3.25 3.94
Flower Power 3.44 4.36
Space Revolver 3.83 4.14
Rainmaker 3.55 3.97
Unfold the Future 3.61 4.05
Adam & Eve 3.33 3.91
Paradox Hotel 3.46 3.81
Sum of No EVil 4.17 4.38
Big differences don't you think ? If I had to deal with the unweighed averages TFK would be just an average band. And we don't like to think that, do we ? Biggest difference is Flower Power which is very logical. Garden of Dreams is a one hour song and I gave it 5 stars so that counts big time of course. This is also the main reason why I gave the album 5 stars on PA eventhough 4 would have been more fair. Same goes for Paradox Hotel which appears my least favourite to my big surprise. I gave them 5 on PA just because of Monsters & Men. Went a little too far there I'm afraid.
After this calculation I could easily make one for Cacho's thread about the three TFK periods and also there I made a mistake. I chose the first period but as you can see it should have been the middle, another surprise ! But what I was right about: it's very very close. Very consistent band TFK
|
||||
A day without prog is a wasted day
|
||||
progrules
Prog Reviewer Joined: September 14 2007 Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 958 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Okay, I'm trying to see what you mean here. There is at least something I recognize when you say "when you hear it you know it's a masterpiece". I sometimes have that feel with a few and those are Room V by Shadow Gallery, The Visitor by Arena, V by Symphony X and Into the Electric Castle by Ayreon. Those four are not really my favourites of all time PERSONALLY but I just FEEL and KNOW they are masterpieces. And of course in the end you will have to like it too because for example maybe Thick as a Brick or Dark Side of the Moon are also masterpieces but I don't have a positiv feel about them, so I can't give them 5.
And that's where this becomes a tough problem because there actually two ways of rating: the OBJECTIVE and the SUBJECTIVE rating. And sometimes I have a hard time choosing between them. Most of the time I rate subjectively but if I understand you right you do it the objective way ? Edited by progrules - March 19 2009 at 08:25 |
||||
A day without prog is a wasted day
|
||||
The Quiet One
Prog Reviewer Joined: January 16 2008 Location: Argentina Status: Offline Points: 15745 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
^ You understood my un-logical logic! hahaha
Yes, it's difficult to go there, between OBJECTIVE and SUBJECTIVE, and also depends in which point of view you are looking! I mean, looking in a OBJECTIVE point of view, all TFK albums, and most modern Prog bands, they are 4 stars and 5 stars. But I think you(not refferin to you in particular) need to take(sometimes) in account the band's other efforts, like The Rainmaker and Unfold the Future, both musically are awesome, but comparing them you see one is very weak compared to the other, so you really can't rate both equally... But let's move on.... |
||||
Roj
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 02 2008 Location: Manchester, UK Status: Offline Points: 3126 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Hi everybody.
I will not be online all weekend, so if my absence is noted, at least I've told you all .
I have a listening to disc 2 of Stardust We Are lined up for tomorrow morning, two of my ultimate favourites to look forward to there - The Merrygoround and of course the title track. I might follow that up with Paradox Hotel or Sum Of No Evil.
Hope you all have a great Flower Kings weekend.
|
||||
Nov
Forum Senior Member Joined: February 28 2009 Status: Offline Points: 523 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
I won't bother with ratings but here's how I rank the 10 studio albums:
1. Space Revolver 2. Flower Power 3. Unfold The Future 4. Stardust We Are 5. Paradox Hotel 6. Back In The World Of Adventures 7. Retropolis 8. The Rainmaker 9. The Sum Of No Evil 10. Adam And Eve |
||||
progrules
Prog Reviewer Joined: September 14 2007 Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 958 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Watch out guys ! New TFK topic coming up. Look in the poll section. It's about their intros. One sad thing though: I noticed a few of us "die hards" still miss out on the Flower Power release and that's a pity because it's more or less essential for the poll. Sorry, can't help it. The more reason to get it as quick as you can !!!!
|
||||
A day without prog is a wasted day
|
||||
progrules
Prog Reviewer Joined: September 14 2007 Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 958 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
I notice you're in the best part of your TFK flow right now. I've experienced it too a few years ago when I bought all their albums in short period of time. You get in a state of ecstasy, intoxication almost by the sheer beauty that's coming over you. It's what TFK does to you. Enjoy it, my friend !
Now a few years further it's sunk in all more and now I enjoy them more in a sober state. But their ultimate class always remains and they remain addictive. They will rule for ever in my life.
|
||||
A day without prog is a wasted day
|
||||
Roland113
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 30 2008 Location: Pittsburgh, PA Status: Offline Points: 3843 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
So I listened to Stardust We Are on the ride into work this morning (heard all of it but the last half hour which I'm taking care of now).
I'd forgotten how good of an album it is. It's been falling down my personal charts over the past couple months mostly due to the recent acquisition of Unfold the Future and my growing appreciation of The Paradox Hotel. I've 'heard' in multiple reviews on here that people take issue with the amount of filler on the album. I do not see the instrumental interludes as filler material, in fact, I think it helps set the overall mood of the album. To further that, one of the younger girls that I work with stopped by my cube the other day while Poor Mr. Rain was playing and commented on how pretty it was. I would not have have predicted Mr. Rain as a gateway to prog but hey if it works. Roland |
||||
-------someone please tell him to delete this line, he looks like a noob-------
I don't have an unnatural obsession with Disney Princesses, I have a fourteen year old daughter and coping mechanisms. |
||||
Roj
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 02 2008 Location: Manchester, UK Status: Offline Points: 3126 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Hi Tom, hope you're well. I'm in total agreement buddy.
As I see it (hear it ) there's not a minute of filler on disc one of Stardust We Are; it's brilliant from start to finish. As for disc two, Different People does nowt for me, and I have to be in the mood for Kingdom Of Lies. Other than that, it's great, and I think the tracks which some describe as filler just provide a break before the amazing title track.
I read an interview with Roine somewhere where he said he likes to allow an album to breathe, rather than be bang bang bang all the time. The instrumental or quieter pieces that some regard as filler can be seen as these interludes Roine speaks of, and personally I think they work well.
|
||||
TheCaptain
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 04 2009 Location: Ohio, USA Status: Offline Points: 1335 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
I'd also like to get on record saying that the little instrumentals in SWA are far from filler. A Day at the Mall is the only little song I could consider filler on that album while I consider some other non-instrumentals filler like you Roj. I had a similar experience as you Roland. I was in a biology lab were looking at various cardiac responses to stimuli. Every group had to pick a "fun" experiment to do to try to affect heart rate. One of the fun experiments dealt with music and we were all in favor of that one. I carry my laptop to class pretty often so I had it on me that day. As the only person with music, I got to subject one of the other members of my group to the wonder of prog. We had to have some calm music to hopefully slow the heart and some aggressive music to hopefully increase the heart rate. For the calm music I picked "If 28" and the guy who was listening to it said it was really good. I gave him plenty of other prog to try to hook him, but my efforts failed. I am quite anxious for the end of Lent so that I may resume listening to prog and be overjoyed at its reentrance into my life. So often do little snippits of songs enter my head then I am forced to follow that tune all the way to the end of the song. I hate not being as active on this thread and other prog threads because I can have no new appreciations for certain albums. |
||||
Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal.
|
||||
Roj
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 02 2008 Location: Manchester, UK Status: Offline Points: 3126 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
I'd just clarify Captain that I don't really see any of the album as filler as such. There's really only a couple of tracks on the album that I'm not madly keen on, but I wouldn't class them as filler.
|
||||
Nov
Forum Senior Member Joined: February 28 2009 Status: Offline Points: 523 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
So, I've only just joined in with this thread and now it's fading away on page 2
|
||||
Post Reply | Page <1 56789 487> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |