Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Proto-Prog and Prog-Related Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Ringo Starr as a drummer
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedRingo Starr as a drummer

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 567
Author
Message
Negoba View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 24 2008
Location: Big Muddy
Status: Offline
Points: 5210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 08 2009 at 19:18

To paraphrase, if you can't appreciate Ringo's drumming, you got a hole in your soul.

 
You are quite a fine person, and I am very fond of you. But you are only quite a little fellow, in a wide world, after all.
Back to Top
Odisseos View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: March 08 2009
Location: Miami
Status: Offline
Points: 10
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 08 2009 at 20:14

In the context of the 60's, Ringo wasn't a technical but a brilliant and talented drummer, disciplined, innovator, very musical, he had a unique and distinctive sound and had a special ability to create interesting rhythmic structures; he wanted to serve the songs rather than show off. Ringo played “rim shot” before Bill Bruford in 1964 and 1965 (listen “I Call Your Name”, “Help!” and “In My Life”). He knew how to play a tropical mambo (“I Feel Fine”), a Vals with brushes (“A Taste of Honey”), a Latin bolero with bongos (“And I Love Her”) and so on. Listen some disciplined drums passages on: “Happiness Is A Warm Gun”, “Everybody's Got Something To Hide Except Me And My Monkey” or the “Abbey Road suite”. Many drummers from the sixties were virtuosos like John Bonham or Ginger Baker but with not enough discipline to do only a couple of bass drum on “Norwegian Wood” or a little passage on “Martha My Dear”. That is music and progressive means discipline. Do you think Keith Moon could have been played with the Beatles with his non stop drumming? We are sure He did a good job with The Who but, also, we know Ringo did a good job with the Beatles.

Back to Top
el dingo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 08 2008
Location: Norwich UK
Status: Offline
Points: 7053
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2009 at 03:51
Originally posted by fil karada fil karada wrote:

I answer with a question: did the Beatles need someone better than Ringo?
 
1963-1970 no they didn't.
 
Had they stayed together and gone more prog as a unit then, theoretically, yes. But I'm no-one to say Ringo couldn't have evolved further. Had they stayed together, it seems unlikely the band would have thought "oh, we're prog now, let's get rid of Ringo." IMO.
 
Any inadequacies could easily have been covered up in the studio anyway.
It's not that I can't find worth in anything, it's just that I can't find worth in enough.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 567

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.121 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.