Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Ecologic urgency : Air traffic excess
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedEcologic urgency : Air traffic excess

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 45678 15>
Author
Message
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2011 at 09:12
I gave scientific references in my last post. Mike must be feverishly
looking for the counter-study...
Back to Top
timothy leary View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 29 2005
Location: Lilliwaup, Wa.
Status: Offline
Points: 5319
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2011 at 09:14
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

Originally posted by timothy leary timothy leary wrote:

^ Good points Mike??
Sounded like ambiguity to me, does not know what causes global warming, no big deal if the polar bear goes extinct, and people should move away from the sea, problem solved, yep

Not quite. Sort of, but not quite.

We know many factors which contribute, we just don't know for sure whether human CO2 emissions are the decisive one. Jumping to this conclusion without clear evidence is what I object to. 


Excerpt from a review:

"The authors classify themselves as believers in man-made contributions to global warming but disbelievers in the climate apocalypse. Rationally speaking, I agree with them. 

They explain that the moderate climate scientists such as themselves are being prosecuted. But the bulk of the book is made out of hundreds or thousands of graphs and their clear interpretations - about the temperature history (obtained by different methods), the number of hurricanes, sea level, ice volumes, fires, droughts, methane, refugees, and lots of other things.

The evidence that there is no reason for hysteria is overwhelming. Pretty much any major consequence of the "apocalypse" is clarified by real numbers in the book and the tricks used by certain people to create a false impression of a problem often become transparent."





And let's not forget that fearmongering is big business.  Huge.
not even close to as big of business as burning oil and polluting

Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32553
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2011 at 09:19
Originally posted by Michael Crichton Michael Crichton wrote:


“I think for anyone to believe in impending resource scarcity, after two hundred years of such false alarms, is kind of weird. I don't know whether such a belief today is best ascribed to ignorance of history, sclerotic dogmatism, unhealthy love of Malthus, or simple pigheadedness, but it is evidently a hardly perennial in human calculation.”

“There are many reasons to shift away from fossil fuels, and we will do so in the next century without legislation, financial incentives, carbon-conservation programs, or the interminable yammering of fearmongers. So far as I know, nobody had to ban horse transportation in the early twentieth century.”

“I conclude that most environmental "principles" (such as sustainable development or the precautionary principle) have the effect of preserving the economic advantages of the West and thus constitute modern imperialism toward the developing world. It is a nice way of saying, "We got ours and we don't want you to get yours, because you'll cause too much pollution.”


Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2011 at 09:34
You talk about fear, mass paranoia. It's related to a vague, confuse concept of "global warming".

But have you ever heard about "air traffic excess" in the medias or anywhere else, expect the ridiculous Chemtrails theory?

You will not, because there's too much money in game.



Edited by oliverstoned - March 10 2011 at 09:35
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2011 at 09:39
Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:

I gave scientific references in my last post. Mike must be feverishly
looking for the counter-study...

Have a look at the book I linked to - it's full of studies. As to the one you posted: Extrapolating from such a short time span is hardly scientific.
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32553
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2011 at 09:48
Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:

You talk about fear, mass paranoia. It's related to a vague, confuse concept of "global warming".

But have you ever heard about "air traffic excess" in the medias or anywhere else, expect the ridiculous Chemtrails theory?

You will not, because there's too much money in game.



I just Googled "air traffic excess" (without the quotes).  This was the first result.  Nothing else on the first page of the search results had anything to do with the problem you are describing.

That said, you're really kind of demonstrating my point.  Why don't you hear much in the media about how terrible recycling is?  No, instead even our children's TV shows are loaded with indoctrinating programming.  Environmentalism is drenched in hypocrisy, and it's main drive is not saving the world- it's building wealth.  Find a problem and sell the solution is one way to make money.  An easier way is to create a problem, convince people it's going to destroy them, then sell the solution.

Speaking of aircraft, the TSA exists why?  Because of fear.
Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2011 at 09:58
So it proves that the issue is not mediatized at all whereas we talk a lot about climate change.

You're true when saying that the system tries to exploit ecology.

In the case of air traffic, there's nothing to exploit except air traffic itself, this is a huge lobby so that's why you'll not hear
about that.

What's frightening is that almost nobody notices the change in our skies...
that's because people spend their time watching their stupid portable phone.



Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32553
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2011 at 10:02
Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:

So it proves that the issue is not mediatized at all whereas we talk a lot about climate change.

You're true when saying that the system tries to exploit ecology.

In the case of air traffic, there's nothing to exploit except air traffic itself, this is a huge lobby so that's why you'll not hear
about that.

What's frightening is that almost nobody notices the change in our skies...
that's because people spend their time watching their stupid portable phone.





I don't really understand- I live right next to Fort Bragg (which is home to the recently annexed Pope Air Force Base).  From our backyard, we see parachutists jump almost everyday.  Planes and helicopters are constantly flying around us.  Around here, I have seen anything like the pictures you are showing.  Why is that?


Back to Top
timothy leary View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 29 2005
Location: Lilliwaup, Wa.
Status: Offline
Points: 5319
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2011 at 10:03
To make changes first you need to acknowledge you have problems.
Back to Top
Negoba View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 24 2008
Location: Big Muddy
Status: Offline
Points: 5210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2011 at 10:09

Since you all asked...I'll spout my opinions (I did earn this by listening to Coyote)

 
1. To deny the immense impact of human life on the environment is complete madness.
2. To think we can name it bad, good, or purple is pretty question
3. Because of #2, thinking we can "fix" our impact is pretty question too
4. Resource scarcity is obviously real. But when forced to adapt, we most likely will.
5. Even in the worst case scenario, the entire world ecosystem is unlikely to collapse. But lots of individual organisms are going to die. They already are.
6. The real consequence people don't want to deal with is that eventually Homo sapiens will be one of the species with alot of casualties.
7. People are already dying of hunger NOW.
8. If the environment's breaking point was going to be breached, it's probably already happened and we're screwed no matter what we do. More likely, the environment's breaking point is much harder to hit that we think, but we can make some impact through total culture changes. But those are small and incremental.
You are quite a fine person, and I am very fond of you. But you are only quite a little fellow, in a wide world, after all.
Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2011 at 14:25
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:


Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:

So it proves that the issue is not mediatized at all whereas we talk a lot about climate change.

You're true when saying that the system tries to exploit ecology.

In the case of air traffic, there's nothing to exploit except air traffic itself, this is a huge lobby so that's why you'll not hear
about that.

What's frightening is that almost nobody notices the change in our skies...
that's because people spend their time watching their stupid portable phone.



I don't really understand- I live right next to Fort Bragg (which is home to the recently annexed Pope Air Force Base). From our backyard, we see parachutists jump almost everyday. Planes and helicopters are constantly flying around us. Around here, I have seen anything like the pictures you are showing. Why is that?


It can be quite subtle. Here's a pic of a sunset in Fort Brag...
The sun is a pale yellow at sunset whereas it used to be deep orange/red
as it is now very white and dazzlig during the day whereas it used to be mellow and yellow.


Fort Brag



Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 11 2011 at 01:06
^ The color of a sunset can change from day to day ... there's such a thing called "fog", which is completely natural. There's also smog - which is simply air pollution and isn't really related to CO2 or steam. 
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32553
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 11 2011 at 07:08
Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:


Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:

So it proves that the issue is not mediatized at all whereas we talk a lot about climate change.

You're true when saying that the system tries to exploit ecology.

In the case of air traffic, there's nothing to exploit except air traffic itself, this is a huge lobby so that's why you'll not hear
about that.

What's frightening is that almost nobody notices the change in our skies...
that's because people spend their time watching their stupid portable phone.



I don't really understand- I live right next to Fort Bragg (which is home to the recently annexed Pope Air Force Base). From our backyard, we see parachutists jump almost everyday. Planes and helicopters are constantly flying around us. Around here, I have seen anything like the pictures you are showing. Why is that?


It can be quite subtle. Here's a pic of a sunset in Fort Brag...
The sun is a pale yellow at sunset whereas it used to be deep orange/red
as it is now very white and dazzlig during the day whereas it used to be mellow and yellow.


Fort Brag





I'm sorry, but that is not Fort Bragg, NC.  I'm pretty sure the military doesn't have an ocean next to their barracks.  Geek

According to "Danandloulou's" Travel Pod bio (from where this picture was taken), they have never been within 300 miles of North Carolina.  They have, however, been to California's coast many, many times.  So this is probably the sunset at Fort Bragg, California- 3,000 miles away from me.

I have a good view of the sunset where I live.  It is dramatically different from day to day.
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 11 2011 at 08:23
This whole thing with the disturbing images is a variation of a logical fallacy:

Counting the hits and ignoring the misses.


In this case some disturbing images are presented and the conclusion is that these images are representative of the overall situation. Obviously that does not follow - you would first have to show that these images are not just cherry-picked to confirm the hypothesis.



Edited by Mr ProgFreak - March 11 2011 at 08:23
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 11 2011 at 08:28
Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:



What's frightening is that almost nobody notices the change in our skies... 
that's because people spend their time watching their stupid portable phone.


Here's a thought: In the next few days I'll take some snapshots of the sky around Nuremberg airport - I drive by it twice a (work)day. I'll post them here - then we'll see if they look anything like the images you posted here.
Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 11 2011 at 12:54
Here's a panoramic view of the sky above Nuremberg airport. Everybody will find this pic normal, but actually the black band on the horizon is artificial:



http://fc05.deviantart.net/fs48/f/2009/213/2/4/Airport_Nuremberg___Panorama_by_montalv0.jpg

Edited by oliverstoned - March 11 2011 at 12:55
Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 11 2011 at 12:57
Same thing here:








Edited by oliverstoned - March 11 2011 at 12:59
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 12 2011 at 03:38
^ are you familiar with the concept of clouds?
Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 12 2011 at 03:57
Could you please tell me the scientific name of this long tube-shaped cloud please?
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 12 2011 at 04:03
You mean the rain clouds? 



Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 45678 15>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.215 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.