SR XLVIII: Our Jimmies Are Eternal

I was in the car today and my mom said "You're a complex kid. Well, not relly a ki9d, more of a guy" it's kida wierd having my mom think I'm not a kid anymore

smartpatrol you know that Norway spend more money and time on a comcercial film then they use on a long feature film and more time in exectuion on quality and acting,

if a Norwegain investor wanted to make a 1 hour and 50 min comercial it would have won an acadamy for best production, and best direction and probably also best screenwtight

Norwegian comercial films are world class and not normaly couse the product is so good, but beocuse the movies made are extremely well spent time on making k

aginor wrote: smartpatrol you know that Norway spend more money and time on a comcercial film then they use on a long feature film and more time in exectuion on quality and acting, if a Norwegain investor wanted to make a 1 hour and 50 min comercial it would have won an acadamy for best production, and best direction and probably also best screenwtight Norwegian comercial films are world class and not normaly couse the product is so good, but beocuse the movies made are extremely well spent time on making k

http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=87092&PID=4517522

this snakc would be quite popular if it was released, couse it is irresistable, it really is

http://products.nidar.com/eway/default.aspx?pid=272&trg=Page_5711&Page_5711=5766:0:10,1938:1:0:0:::0:0

darkshade wrote: smartpatrol wrote: I was in the car today and my mom said "You're a complex kid. Well, not relly a ki9d, more of a guy" it's kida wierd having my mom think I'm not a kid anymore From my experience, parents rarely stop calling their kids "kids" or "children" even when they're clearly adults in the mid-20s.

My grandmother still treats my father like a kid sometimes, I assume it's just a parent thing.

rushfan4 wrote: The only reason they should get locked is because they get buggy.  And the only reason a new thread should be created is because the old thread got buggy.  It just really irks me that people keep creating new threads when a new one is no required.

ture, but since an update a while ago I haven't seen that happen. Also posting it here because I don't feel like going between the two.

A Person wrote:   I don't feel like going between the two.

I WANT YOU TO BECOME LOST AND CONFUSED!

A Person wrote: darkshade wrote: smartpatrol wrote: I was in the car today and my mom said "You're a complex kid. Well, not relly a ki9d, more of a guy" it's kida wierd having my mom think I'm not a kid anymore From my experience, parents rarely stop calling their kids "kids" or "children" even when they're clearly adults in the mid-20s. My grandmother still treats my father like a kid sometimes, I assume it's just a parent thing. rushfan4 wrote: The only reason they should get locked is because they get buggy.  And the only reason a new thread should be created is because the old thread got buggy.  It just really irks me that people keep creating new threads when a new one is no required. ture, but since an update a while ago I haven't seen that happen. Also posting it here because I don't feel like going between the two.

That is my point.  No new thread should be made until it gets buggy.  Yes it is stupid to bother arguing about it but it is the principle.  Dean has posted numerous times that a new thread does not need to be started at 500 pages.  It can probably go 1000 pages or more, and yet people keep creating unnecessary new threads.  After the updates were done I think that it would be good to see how long a thread can actually last until it becomes bugs, and yet some idiot keeps start prematurely ejaculating a new thread.  And that my friends is the truth.

rushfan4 wrote: A Person wrote: darkshade wrote: smartpatrol wrote: I was in the car today and my mom said "You're a complex kid. Well, not relly a ki9d, more of a guy" it's kida wierd having my mom think I'm not a kid anymore From my experience, parents rarely stop calling their kids "kids" or "children" even when they're clearly adults in the mid-20s. My grandmother still treats my father like a kid sometimes, I assume it's just a parent thing. rushfan4 wrote: The only reason they should get locked is because they get buggy.  And the only reason a new thread should be created is because the old thread got buggy.  It just really irks me that people keep creating new threads when a new one is no required. ture, but since an update a while ago I haven't seen that happen. Also posting it here because I don't feel like going between the two. That is my point.  No new thread should be made until it gets buggy.  Yes it is stupid to bother arguing about it but it is the principle.  Dean has posted numerous times that a new thread does not need to be started at 500 pages.  It can probably go 1000 pages or more, and yet people keep creating unnecessary new threads.  After the updates were done I think that it would be good to see how long a thread can actually last until it becomes bugs, and yet some idiot keeps start prematurely ejaculating a new thread.  And that my friends is the truth.

Yes, and I was saying on the other one that since there's no real reason to start a new one, other than the OP going "HA HA I started a new shred!", it should be kept going for as long as it can go.

There's no real overall topics on these things (other than "I'm so bored.") so there's no reason to start a new shred at an arbitrary amount of pages like 400 or 500.

I wouldn't mind having a new shred if we are passed page 500 or so and someone wanted to make one because they hadn't or whatever. As long as everyone is on board, it wouldn't be a problem I'd think.