Hi,
I hope that you get a chance to read this KingB ... and any of the other responses.
I, personally, always thought "prog-rock" was another word for ... manure.
I say that intentionally because of the compartmentalization of things ... I once got dumped by a girlfriend because I like prog and she liked country ... it had nothing to do with anything else ... and that is the the attitude that I dislike the most when it came to my involvement with radio and other artistic endeavours.
It didn't help that far too many groups were copies and more tribute bands than real ... well, I can't really fault them ... that's like saying no one else ever played or was inspired by something else in their life!
What was sad to me, happened in 1972 ... and is something that I think really killed prog and it's ability to stretch and bend and become bigger and more important ... in that year there were a couple of things that came out that were major ... in some ways they were a bit "self-indulgent" (as Rolling Stone dubbed many of these) ... and the rock press trashed it to smithereens ... the rock press was not interested in music ... it was interested in "songs" and "radio play".
The sadness of it all is that young composers that wanted to do something more valuable to their musical experience all of a sudden felt hurt and disappointed. And, sadly enough, many of them gave in to the critics knock.
To me, that was the day that the music became "less important" and no longer as valid as a lot of classical music ... but ... but ... by that time I had heard things that were classical ... and not "prog-rock" ... no one will ever tell me that Vangelis, Mike Oldfield, Tangerine Dream and Klaus Schulze are not the greatest composers of our time ... to me only Stravinsly and Bartok even come close in the 20th century ... it's just a different instrument ...
But I felt sad to see YES, Jethro Tull and so many others crumble to the press and not fight on ... but it you and all others were stuck listening to rock, and rock only, and our measure for exellence is only how much we like it and the other person's opinion is not valid ... then you can see why ... it's so hard for anyone to believe enough in their own music ... and continue.
If I name a top ten rock/prog albums of all time, "Tales of Topographic Oceans" is one of them, as is "A Passion Play" ... but you will probably never find anyone talking about those as warmly as I do ... and I can hear Jon Anderson probably say ... "bless your dear heart" ... but for all intents and purposes any discussions in this area and archive pretty much shows why ... none of these musicians will ever be able to do something as powerful as Mahler, or whomever you wish to name and show as an example. The majority of stuff listed in here is not even 5 minutes long ... and people think that discussing Metallica as prog is more important than anything else.
They have a right to their opinion. but I doubt that even those folks will be listening to Metallica when they are 55! Just so you know, at 58, I still love listening to Hawkwind ... to me still one of the best, and extremely deserving prog band that never gets a mention ... they have the most unbelievable collage and differences from one album to the next ... compare Electric Tepee to Space Ritual ... and they never even get a mention ... and some of that hard rock is not only progressive, it is mind blowing ...
There are not many composers that do "short cuts" and in this day and age of the iTunes and many other "singles" everything is a couple of minutes and just about all the conversations are about a song or two ... not an artist ... and in that vein, we will be killing the art form ...
While I liked ELP (for example) my greatest frustration in the boards in the 90's (including the folks that created this and other boards) was that everything that got reviewed had all the same instruments as ELP and King Crimson ... and that is not fair to music in general ... and there are a lot of other progressive folks out there ... that even this board is not capable of discussing!
Try these on for size:
- Egberto Gismonti - if this is called jazz naming music is really the pits! It's just music! And if you can handle it, check out the original "No Caipira" ... talk about prog afterwords will you?
- Terje Rypdal/Dave Darling - Eos - Chamber music with an electric guitar like you wish Jimi had done!
- Mike Oldfield - Amarok ... and if you can .. try to see the "Exposed" DVD ... and realize that is "classical music" for our time.
- Djam Karet - Any of the first 5 or 6 ablums
But here ... only singles get discussed. And that will not a Mahler make ... EVER!
Edited by moshkito - December 31 2008 at 15:18