SR V: To boldly go where no room has gone before

Almost all my top 50 most listened to artists are post '89.
In fact, only 7 are pre 89.

As long as I like the music, I don't care if they are pre- or post-1989.... And what's so special about that date anyway?

What do you mean "how you define pre-1989?
Umm, as in, formed before 1989? Seems pretty obvious Itsy, especially since you're super master IQ 10000000000000 lol.


Edited by Petrovsk Mizinski - June 15 2009 at 20:16

Petrovsk Mizinski wrote: What do you mean "how you define 1989? Umm, as in, formed before 1989? Seems pretty obvious Itsy, especially since you're super master IQ 10000000000000 lol.

Formed or debut album was what I was getting at. My extraordinarily large IQ makes it so I need to be certain of things so I don't make a mistake

I used to think it was 1979 because I hate 80s music and The Wall.

I wish my IQ was that huge
Formed. If an artist begins their music career prior to '89, to me that makes sense they are a pre '89 artist regardless of whether they released an album or not. I count Buckethead on my list as 'pre 89 despite his solo album being released in the 90s because his career as a studio and live musician began well before then.

ALSO, Long Distance Calling, did ya b*****ds try it out yet?

I hate music pre-20,000,000 B.C.

Jazz trumpet ftw

MovingPictures07 wrote: Henry Plainview wrote: I used to think it was 1979 because I hate 80s music and The Wall. 80s = generally the worst decade for music in the past five or six There is some really good stuff though. Like Rush and King Crimson. And Fish-Marillion.

There was some great avant-garde stuff going on, mostly the Downtown Scene, but generally it's pretty bad. But I'm not a Pink Floyd fanboy anymore so I'm a little more objective. ;-)