Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - The Atheist - Agnostic - Non religious thread
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedThe Atheist - Agnostic - Non religious thread

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 4041424344 191>
Author
Message
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 12 2009 at 20:18
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:


But what is the main believe of an Atheist?

GOD DOESN'T EXIST, it's a firm belief in something that can't be proved...Ergo, it's faith....Read agaibn the definition.

Iván
So... believing is a faith, not belieiving is a faith - so everything is a faith and the word is meaningless.
What?
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 12 2009 at 20:34
Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

 
If you see it as simple as that, then have it your way. Did you see my post regarding the celestial teapot?

Mike, the Celestial Teapot is not a system of beliefs, not even something argued as truth by anybody, it's only an argument obviously absurd created to discredit the belief in God,

There's no scientist or system of beliefs that believes in this atrocity, there are no  Gospels or even oral tradition that mentions it...So there's no need to believe or have faith in it.

On the contrary, there are issues that can be proved wrong.

"Humans need oxygen, so no human being can survive in the vacuum, this can be proved beyond any doubt, you can test all the humans if you want, and all will die, so you can prove this is false.

With simpler examples, it's easier.

Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

 Some things can't be proven, but a certain probability can be assumed. You can collect hints and clues that make a proposition more or less likely to be true. So when something can neither be proved nor disproved, it doesn't automatically follow that there's an equal chance for it to be true or false. 

It depends in your perception of evidence Mike.



Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

And especially for the Christian God there's the problem with the Bible and its inconsistencies. For example, take the Second Coming of Christ. AFAIK Jesus said that it would happen in the lifetime of his contemporaries (apostles) ... we're still waiting for it to happen. It's many little nuggets like this which - for me - shift the probability for God's existence near zero percent. 


This point is not at all clear, the Bible must not be taken literally, specially in time issues: :

"No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father. Be on guard! Be alert! You do not know when that time will come." (NIV, Mark 13:32-33)

So you also must be ready, because the Son of Man will come at an hour when you do not expect him. (NIV, Matthew 24:43-44)

Nobody knows.

Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

Another point is that there are many competing religions on this planet, and most of them claim that their solution is the only valid one. But they can't be all true. These consistencies make much more sense when you assume that God is a delusion, a false belief without any basis in reality, than when you assume that all those people are right and the Atheists are wrong.

Aren't you the slightest bit worried about all these discrepancies?

By the contrary, the idea of God is present in the vast majority of humans. Some of them see God in a different way, but all have the perception in God.

For example, Jewish, Moslem and Christians are often placed as contradictory, but all believe in the same God of Abraham, it's a strong coincidence despitethe differences.

Even some Hindu texts talk about Jesus, and there's a group of Messianic Jewish who believe in Christ. 

I of course believe the Catholic God is the true one, but also believe every God image in human minds  is a reflex of the divinity, but humans  understood the message in different ways, so they see God from a different perspective.

I see no contradiction, that's why I show the same respect for a Church, a Synagogue and a Mosque, because I believe all are tributes to God, no matter our differences.

Iván


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - December 12 2009 at 20:38
            
Back to Top
el dingo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 08 2008
Location: Norwich UK
Status: Offline
Points: 7053
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2009 at 03:30
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by CPicard CPicard wrote:

Why don't you have a pagan/Wiccan thread?
There just aren't enough Wiccan's who believe in Prog. Go to Alt.Gothic or uk.people.gothic and you can't move for them.
 
 
I know a Wiccan couple quite well and musically there's not a trace of goth about them - it's all Blackmore's Knight, Steeleye Span and a bit of Gong thrown in for pot luck. They run a Magick Shop in Norwich where they sell most of their charms amulets and other assorted jewellery to... teenage GothsTongue
It's not that I can't find worth in anything, it's just that I can't find worth in enough.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2009 at 03:55
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:


By the contrary, the idea of God is present in the vast majority of humans. Some of them see God in a different way, but all have the perception in God.

For example, Jewish, Moslem and Christians are often placed as contradictory, but all believe in the same God of Abraham, it's a strong coincidence despitethe differences.

Even some Hindu texts talk about Jesus, and there's a group of Messianic Jewish who believe in Christ. 
Iván
It is nothing to do with coincidence and all to do with geography - if all four of those religions had developed in issolation on seperate continents that would be conincidence so strong that even the most furvent athiest would have difficulty explaining it. If in 1482 Columbus had discovered the Native Americans wearing crucifixes, Captain Cook had found Australian Abouriginies quoting Genesis, had Cortes discovered Moctezuma reading the Qur'an and if a bust of Vishnu had been discovered at Machu Picchu - then that would be an amazingly strong coincidence (even if only one of those had occured it would be pretty spectacular). But they didn't. All four of those religions developed in a relatively small region of the Middle East - that is not a coincidence - it isn't even a surprise.
 
What?
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2009 at 04:10
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Of course I don't believe it, but if I ask respect for my beliefs, I will fight for the same respect for this people's beliefs,  no matter how insane may sound to me.

Now, being that in my case I have a different religious faith, it is contradictory with Scientology, so by the act of having faith in the God of Abraham I'm assuming this is false, being that both couldn't be truth simultaneously.

But if you want, and being I don't have any evidence that the Galactic Confederacy is a myth, yes I have faith that Scientology is false.



What happened to this fantastic tolerance of the Catholic church? You're really being quite intolerant here.Wink

Remember that I am not going much further than you are going here. You say that Scientology belief sounds insane to you, and that you assume that it is a false belief. When you look up "delusion", you'll find that "false belief" is just one of its meanings.

But why are you clinging on to using the word faith in that way? There is no faith required for a Catholic to come to the conclusion that Scientology is a false belief ... it directly follows from all the assumptions that Catholics make for their daily lives. It wouldn't normally occur to a typical Catholic to even consider that Scientology may be true. In order to achieve that, a lot of convincing would have to be done, involving dogmatic teachings (like for example "our auditing equipment works - there's no scientific explanation, you *must* take our word for it").


Edited by Mr ProgFreak - December 13 2009 at 04:12
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2009 at 04:24
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

 
If you see it as simple as that, then have it your way. Did you see my post regarding the celestial teapot?

Mike, the Celestial Teapot is not a system of beliefs, not even something argued as truth by anybody, it's only an argument obviously absurd created to discredit the belief in God,

There's no scientist or system of beliefs that believes in this atrocity, there are no  Gospels or even oral tradition that mentions it...So there's no need to believe or have faith in it.

On the contrary, there are issues that can be proved wrong.

"Humans need oxygen, so no human being can survive in the vacuum, this can be proved beyond any doubt, you can test all the humans if you want, and all will die, so you can prove this is false.

With simpler examples, it's easier.



I'm sorry to see that it seems to be impossible for you to apply logic in this case. I've seen you apply logic before, and that makes me sad ... well, maybe some day you'll see the obvious flaws in your logic.

Originally posted by Iván Iván wrote:



Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

 Some things can't be proven, but a certain probability can be assumed. You can collect hints and clues that make a proposition more or less likely to be true. So when something can neither be proved nor disproved, it doesn't automatically follow that there's an equal chance for it to be true or false. 

It depends in your perception of evidence Mike.




Well, I have a realistic perception of it, and I see that you don't.

Originally posted by Iván Iván wrote:



Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

And especially for the Christian God there's the problem with the Bible and its inconsistencies. For example, take the Second Coming of Christ. AFAIK Jesus said that it would happen in the lifetime of his contemporaries (apostles) ... we're still waiting for it to happen. It's many little nuggets like this which - for me - shift the probability for God's existence near zero percent. 


This point is not at all clear, the Bible must not be taken literally, specially in time issues: :

"No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father. Be on guard! Be alert! You do not know when that time will come." (NIV, Mark 13:32-33)

So you also must be ready, because the Son of Man will come at an hour when you do not expect him. (NIV, Matthew 24:43-44)

Nobody knows.



"Nobody knows" ... that's very true. Yet around the world, at this very moment, there may be hundreds of thousands of people who take prophecies like that literally, and change their lives accordingly, *as if* they knew that it was true.

Originally posted by Iván Iván wrote:


Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

Another point is that there are many competing religions on this planet, and most of them claim that their solution is the only valid one. But they can't be all true. These consistencies make much more sense when you assume that God is a delusion, a false belief without any basis in reality, than when you assume that all those people are right and the Atheists are wrong.

Aren't you the slightest bit worried about all these discrepancies?

By the contrary, the idea of God is present in the vast majority of humans. Some of them see God in a different way, but all have the perception in God.

For example, Jewish, Moslem and Christians are often placed as contradictory, but all believe in the same God of Abraham, it's a strong coincidence despitethe differences.

Even some Hindu texts talk about Jesus, and there's a group of Messianic Jewish who believe in Christ. 

I of course believe the Catholic God is the true one, but also believe every God image in human minds  is a reflex of the divinity, but humans  understood the message in different ways, so they see God from a different perspective.

I see no contradiction, that's why I show the same respect for a Church, a Synagogue and a Mosque, because I believe all are tributes to God, no matter our differences.

Iván


In Irak there's even Muslims blowing up other Muslims, and in Northern Ireland there's Protestants killing Catholics and the other way round.

This violence comes from the fact that all these religions you named demand in some way or another that its followers interact with God in a special way. That may involve praying, mutilating their children, not collect wood at a certain day of the week, fasting etc.. Anyone who doesn't follow the specific procedures - which are, in most cases, defined in scripture - is a potential threat to the religion, because in the minds of the believers this behavior doesn't please their God. Of course many believers are peaceful and tolerant, but the fundamentalist fanatics aren't. That's why I agree with Christopher Hitchens when he says that "religion poisons everything". Most of us appreciate religion because of its morality and sense of community ... but we could have that directly, without the poisonous side effects of religion.
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2009 at 04:28
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:


By the contrary, the idea of God is present in the vast majority of humans. Some of them see God in a different way, but all have the perception in God.

For example, Jewish, Moslem and Christians are often placed as contradictory, but all believe in the same God of Abraham, it's a strong coincidence despitethe differences.

Even some Hindu texts talk about Jesus, and there's a group of Messianic Jewish who believe in Christ. 
Iván
It is nothing to do with coincidence and all to do with geography - if all four of those religions had developed in issolation on seperate continents that would be conincidence so strong that even the most furvent athiest would have difficulty explaining it. If in 1482 Columbus had discovered the Native Americans wearing crucifixes, Captain Cook had found Australian Abouriginies quoting Genesis, had Cortes discovered Moctezuma reading the Qur'an and if a bust of Vishnu had been discovered at Machu Picchu - then that would be an amazingly strong coincidence (even if only one of those had occured it would be pretty spectacular). But they didn't. All four of those religions developed in a relatively small region of the Middle East - that is not a coincidence - it isn't even a surprise.
 




A really nice presentation about the (possible) origins or religious belief.

And btw, as always when I'm posting videos and which I thought was too obvious to mention explicitly: watching the video is not mandatory.Wink


Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2009 at 04:40
Originally posted by el dingo el dingo wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by CPicard CPicard wrote:

Why don't you have a pagan/Wiccan thread?
There just aren't enough Wiccan's who believe in Prog. Go to Alt.Gothic or uk.people.gothic and you can't move for them.
 
 
I know a Wiccan couple quite well and musically there's not a trace of goth about them - it's all Blackmore's Knight, Steeleye Span and a bit of Gong thrown in for pot luck. They run a Magick Shop in Norwich where they sell most of their charms amulets and other assorted jewellery to... teenage GothsTongue


Unfortunately this sort of superstition is on the rise ... TV series like Charmed, Buffy or Ghost Whisperer are no help either.
Back to Top
ExittheLemming View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2007
Location: Penal Colony
Status: Offline
Points: 11420
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2009 at 06:33
Great video from Andy Thomson, enjoyed it immensely. Now I know why my heckles rise when I hear those poseurs describe themselves as 'afro americans' without any trace of irony. We are ALL africans.
Back to Top
BaldFriede View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2009 at 10:18
Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:


By the contrary, the idea of God is present in the vast majority of humans. Some of them see God in a different way, but all have the perception in God.

For example, Jewish, Moslem and Christians are often placed as contradictory, but all believe in the same God of Abraham, it's a strong coincidence despitethe differences.

Even some Hindu texts talk about Jesus, and there's a group of Messianic Jewish who believe in Christ. 
Iván
It is nothing to do with coincidence and all to do with geography - if all four of those religions had developed in issolation on seperate continents that would be conincidence so strong that even the most furvent athiest would have difficulty explaining it. If in 1482 Columbus had discovered the Native Americans wearing crucifixes, Captain Cook had found Australian Abouriginies quoting Genesis, had Cortes discovered Moctezuma reading the Qur'an and if a bust of Vishnu had been discovered at Machu Picchu - then that would be an amazingly strong coincidence (even if only one of those had occured it would be pretty spectacular). But they didn't. All four of those religions developed in a relatively small region of the Middle East - that is not a coincidence - it isn't even a surprise.
 




A really nice presentation about the (possible) origins or religious belief.

And btw, as always when I'm posting videos and which I thought was too obvious to mention explicitly:  is watching the video is not mandatory.Wink


Mike, your argument suffers from the wrong approach. You treat religion like science, you want "proof". But religion is not about proof at all. Science is good at answering the question "how?", but it remains silent to the question "why?". "Big Bang" is definitely not the answer to that question.


BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2009 at 10:24
^ why should religion be more qualified than science to answer the "why"?

BTW: The Big Bang (which actually has been shown not to have been the beginning of the universe, as explained for example in the Lawrence Krauss presentations) is a bit of a far cry from the origins or religions ... Tongue
Back to Top
BaldFriede View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2009 at 10:46
Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

^ why should religion be more qualified than science to answer the "why"?

BTW: The Big Bang (which actually has been shown not to have been the beginning of the universe, as explained for example in the Lawrence Krauss presentations) is a bit of a far cry from the origins or religions ... Tongue
Still the wrong approach, Mike. I am a science nut myself and studied mathematics, physics and computer sciences. Yet I see no contradiction between the existence of a deity and the way the universe is built. On the contrary, the very way the universe is structured makes me believe in a spirit behind it all.
Religions are all about answering the question "why". Whether you believe in them or not is another question. You behave as if all that matters is proof. However, are you aware how many things you yourself take for granted without having any proof at all? That's not a special feat of yours, it is true for all human beings, and be it just the belief "Mr. Miller, my neighbour, is an assh***". You never ask proof for these many things, you simply do believe them. Life and reality are not all about proof at all; there is more to it than that.


BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2009 at 10:50
Is there any good reason to believe that any religion is able to answer the "why" question?
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2009 at 11:46
Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:



What happened to this fantastic tolerance of the Catholic church? You're really being quite intolerant here.Wink 
 
This is a silly question that proves you don't read the posts, my first sentence reads clearly
 
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Of course I don't believe it, but if I ask respect for my beliefs, I will fight for the same respect for this people's beliefs,  no matter how insane may sound to me.


 
Tollerance is not to share their believes or to find them logic, tollerance is precisely to find them wrong and still be ready toi fight for their right to believe.
 
The only thing I can give to Scientologists (and the onlñy thing hey can ask from me)  is RESPECT FOR THEIR RIGHT TO BELIEVE, even if I don't share anything them, you can't ask me to believe in their dogmas, because I have a different religion, but respect for them, is the prove for tollerance.
 
And it's not only words, I have taken cases of religious discrimination, two of them for free, while you say that every religion should vanish.

Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

Remember that I am not going much further than you are going here. You say that Scientology belief sounds insane to you, and that you assume that it is a false belief. When you look up "delusion", you'll find that "false belief" is just one of its meanings.
 
However they sound to me is not transcendental, unlike you, I am willing to fight for their right to believe in their dogmas, no matter how insane they sound to me

Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

But why are you clinging on to using the word faith in that way? There is no faith required for a Catholic to come to the conclusion that Scientology is a false belief ... it directly follows from all the assumptions that Catholics make for their daily lives. It wouldn't normally occur to a typical Catholic to even consider that Scientology may be true. In order to achieve that, a lot of convincing would have to be done, involving dogmatic teachings (like for example "our auditing equipment works - there's no scientific explanation, you *must* take our word for it").
 
You are obsessed with Scientific explanations Mike, this is faith, religion, to believe despite the absence of physical knowledge, so If I strongly believe the Scientologist dogmas are false, I'm having faith (Faith (1) : firm belief in something for which there is no proof ) that this dogmas are false.
 
I don't have prove that this guys are wrong, despíte this fact I believe they are wrong (even when they're entitled to believe in what they want), then it's faith, call it negative faith if you want, but it's simply faith.
 
Iván


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - December 13 2009 at 23:56
            
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2009 at 11:49
Why should a "why?" even matter.

To me, it seems strangely appropriate but unsettling that the universe just exists for no reason.
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2009 at 11:53
Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

TV series like Charmed, Buffy or Ghost Whisperer are no help either.


Buffy was created by Joss Whedon, a well-known atheist and humanist.

Also, it's awesome.
Back to Top
CPicard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 03 2008
Location: Là, sui monti.
Status: Offline
Points: 10841
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2009 at 14:54
Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

Why should a "why?" even matter.

To me, it seems strangely appropriate but unsettling that the universe just exists for no reason.


I think the same things: I don't understand why people ask "why is there something rather than anything?"
The word "chance" seems to make people uneasy.
I mean: protons, electrons, neutrinos, quarks... are just particles of matter. They don't have a mind, a soul and, therefore, an intelligence.
Back to Top
Negoba View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 24 2008
Location: Big Muddy
Status: Offline
Points: 5210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2009 at 17:18

You know the great philosopher Sammy Hagar was a fan of some your position.

See "Right Now".....There's no tomorrow. Right now. It's everything.
 
"You can analyze your situation. But to me it's just mental mastttttttion."
 
But there's only one way to ROCK!!!!!
 
 
 
 
You are quite a fine person, and I am very fond of you. But you are only quite a little fellow, in a wide world, after all.
Back to Top
Badabec View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 14 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 1313
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2009 at 17:38
First was I a protestant-christian, then agnostic for some time and now I am a pantheistic neopagan.

I don't think that only one god is likely, I do not believe in sins, heaven, hell, paradise or last judgement either but I have also come to the conclusion that no god or no spiritual might is a litte bit too few to me. LOL
So that would be my present behavior towards atheism and agnosticism, I think.

Peace and love,
Badabec.
Mesmo a tristeza da gente era mais bela
E além disso se via da janela
Um cantinho de céu e o Redentor

- Antônio Carlos Jobim, Toquinho & Vinícius de Moraes - Carta ao Tom 74
Back to Top
Negoba View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 24 2008
Location: Big Muddy
Status: Offline
Points: 5210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2009 at 20:22
Murky Murky Murkie Muskie, toothed fish, bony fish, carp, camp, mean kids, smelly water, bong water, boring sweat......
 
 
assssssociations from my childhood a la What About Bob.
 
The New Atheist position of simplifying all things complex is laughable to those with a little noggin in their noodle. Don't take the easy way out. It's old, simple, and leads to the dark side.
You are quite a fine person, and I am very fond of you. But you are only quite a little fellow, in a wide world, after all.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 4041424344 191>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.359 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.