Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - If Britain had won the War
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedIf Britain had won the War
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 2345>
Author
Message
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
The Doctor View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 23 2005
Location: The Tardis
Status: Offline
Points: 8543 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 27 2014 at 11:44
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

The mere lack of existence of the religious right, and the fact that the world wouldn't have needed the word "soccer" but only "football", would have been two very desirable consequences of the the British having won. 


Yeah, cause Britain has no religious fundamentalists.    I don't think that would mean the religious right would not exist today. It would still be around and just as annoying as ever, I fear.

In the interests of civility and forum etiquette, I shall ignore your "football" comment.   
I can understand your anger at me, but what did the horse I rode in on ever do to you?
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 27 2014 at 11:49
Originally posted by akamaisondufromage akamaisondufromage wrote:



imagine the size of a portion of fish chips and mushy peas you'd get in a US British Colony or whatever.


I've eaten "authentic" fisn'n'chips on Pier 39 in San Francisco ... the portion size was indeed ridiculous. However the fish was excellent with the batter light and perfectly cooked, the only disappointment was that the chips were "fries". Can't comment on whether mushy peas were present or not - I can't abide the revolting muck - it's baby food for adults.
What?
Back to Top
akamaisondufromage View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: May 16 2009
Location: Blighty
Status: Offline
Points: 6797 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 27 2014 at 11:54
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by akamaisondufromage akamaisondufromage wrote:



imagine the size of a portion of fish chips and mushy peas you'd get in a US British Colony or whatever.


I've eaten "authentic" fisn'n'chips on Pier 39 in San Francisco ... the portion size was indeed ridiculous. However the fish was excellent with the batter light and perfectly cooked, the only disappointment was that the chips were "fries". Can't comment on whether mushy peas were present or not - I can't abide the revolting muck - it's baby food for adults.


I get the feeling that there aren't 'portion sizes' in the US. Only limit is how much you can get on the plate. (so gravity). 


Help me I'm falling!
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 27 2014 at 11:59
Originally posted by The Doctor The Doctor wrote:

Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

The mere lack of existence of the religious right, and the fact that the world wouldn't have needed the word "soccer" but only "football", would have been two very desirable consequences of the the British having won. 


Yeah, cause Britain has no religious fundamentalists.    I don't think that would mean the religious right would not exist today. It would still be around and just as annoying as ever, I fear.

In the interests of civility and forum etiquette, I shall ignore your "football" comment.   
As has been observed previously on this forum, "soccer" is public school* slang for Association Football to differentiate it from Rugby Football, which is abbreviated to "rugger" ... the toffs would have probably called North American Handegg "gridders" or something.

*Of course "public school" means "private school" such as Eton and Harrow.
What?
Back to Top
chopper View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Essex, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 20032 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 27 2014 at 14:14
Originally posted by sleeper sleeper wrote:

Originally posted by chopper chopper wrote:

Originally posted by Jim Garten Jim Garten wrote:


All that armour

Maybe that's just in case Luis Suarez has taken up American Football?


Surely garlic would be of more use?
Yeah, good point.
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20617 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 27 2014 at 14:33
I just can't imagine the food. Bangers and bloaters. Cock-a-leeky. I can't even imagine saying some names of the food dishes.
Back to Top
The Doctor View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 23 2005
Location: The Tardis
Status: Offline
Points: 8543 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 27 2014 at 14:38
Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

Cock-a-leeky.


That's not food. That's an STD.
I can understand your anger at me, but what did the horse I rode in on ever do to you?
Back to Top
weetabix View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 20 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 170 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 29 2014 at 01:23
Eventually, as in the case of Australia, Canada, India, most of Africa. Sooner or later these colonies would have been given their own way. But I would imagine the borders would look different than today. Maybe British North America would be from the Atlantic coast to the Mississippi River.
Back to Top
ExittheLemming View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2007
Location: Penal Colony
Status: Offline
Points: 11420 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 29 2014 at 02:05
^ maybe British North America would have been called South Canada or the West FalklandsShocked
Back to Top
The Dark Elf View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: February 01 2011
Location: Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 13228 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 29 2014 at 14:24
We'd all have bad teeth, drive on the wrong side of the road, and eat everything boiled, curried or in some sort of glutinous gravy.

I shudder to think what sort of music we'd be listening to without the invention of blues, jazz or rock. Probably some ridiculous variant of burlesque.

Edited by The Dark Elf - June 29 2014 at 14:25
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
Back to Top
dr wu23 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 22 2010
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 20660 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 29 2014 at 15:45
Originally posted by The Dark Elf The Dark Elf wrote:

We'd all have bad teeth, drive on the wrong side of the road, and eat everything boiled, curried or in some sort of glutinous gravy.

I shudder to think what sort of music we'd be listening to without the invention of blues, jazz or rock. Probably some ridiculous variant of burlesque.
 
LOL
That about sounds right ......
One does nothing yet nothing is left undone.
Haquin
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 29 2014 at 16:05
...except burlesque as a popular musical entertainment is an American invention. Tongue
What?
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 29 2014 at 19:04
There would be less idiots masturbating themselves with guns though...
Back to Top
The Doctor View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 23 2005
Location: The Tardis
Status: Offline
Points: 8543 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 29 2014 at 19:20
^Shocked  That's a thing?  Why would we want less of that if it is a thing?  I say let natural selection run its course.  
I can understand your anger at me, but what did the horse I rode in on ever do to you?
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 29 2014 at 19:48
And more people would know when to use "fewer" instead of "less" Geek
What?
Back to Top
tszirmay View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: August 17 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 6673 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 29 2014 at 20:07
Originally posted by The Doctor The Doctor wrote:

Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

Cock-a-leeky.


That's not food. That's an STD.

Are you referring to British cuisine? Wink
I never post anything anywhere without doing more than basic research, often in depth.
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 29 2014 at 22:48
I imagine realistically: As the empire inevitably dissolved the USA would become like the other former colonies? Either part of the commonwealth, and eventually gaining full independence, or basically full independence but under the commonwealth. 

Pretty bland answer I know. 


I reckon we would also have cool variants of the British accent, though it wouldn't actually be pleasant to us in this world...just the norm. So actually that would suck! 
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 29 2014 at 23:25
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

And more people would know when to use "fewer" instead of "less" Geek
Always gets me
Back to Top
Polymorphia View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 06 2012
Location: here
Status: Offline
Points: 8856 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 29 2014 at 23:45
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

And more people would know when to use "fewer" instead of "less" Geek
u wot m8
My Music
Back to Top
Jim Garten View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin & Razor Guru

Joined: February 02 2004
Location: South England
Status: Offline
Points: 14693 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 30 2014 at 02:06
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

And more people would know when to use "fewer" instead of "less" Geek

Jon Lord 1941 - 2012
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 2345>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.320 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.