Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Prog and (how much) Music Theory?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedProg and (how much) Music Theory?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 234
Author
Message
popeyethecat View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 04 2008
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 190
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 21 2008 at 11:39
Originally posted by Q6 Q6 wrote:

Music theory? Does that help you put soul into your music? Probably not. Being comfortable with your instrument is more important. You got to let your heart find its voice in your playing then another person will be able to truly hear what you're playing. I sound like yoda Ying Yang

There are several bands out there who play what I call "prog by numbers". You can tell that they know scales and modes and harmonies and blah blah but it's so bland.


BUT surely you would need to know enough theory to successfully put soul into music? It's like expressing yourself with words - you need to know a language first.
Back to Top
Q6 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 18 2008
Location: York, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 126
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 21 2008 at 12:03
Originally posted by popeyethecat popeyethecat wrote:

Originally posted by Q6 Q6 wrote:

Music theory? Does that help you put soul into your music? Probably not. Being comfortable with your instrument is more important. You got to let your heart find its voice in your playing then another person will be able to truly hear what you're playing. I sound like yoda Ying Yang

There are several bands out there who play what I call "prog by numbers". You can tell that they know scales and modes and harmonies and blah blah but it's so bland.


BUT surely you would need to know enough theory to successfully put soul into music? It's like expressing yourself with words - you need to know a language first.


Chanting can be expressive and needs no words. A child's nursery rhyme can be expressive but requires little vocabulary. I could read a book on quantum physics but it would not move me.

Most music (western) is based on a few simple scales. You can whistle them or hum them. Does that mean you know music theory? Or is it a cultural thing. Eastern / middle eastern cultures also have their own scales that give their music a distinctive sound. Sometimes it sounds unfamiliar to those in the western world but to those who are brought up in that culture it is as familiar as DOH-REH-ME-FAR-SO-LA-TE-DO is to westerners.

It is this instinctive knowledge of music that give a musician the skill to communicate the essence of a song, the hook, the melody line, the riff, the bit you whistle. The the next trick is to communicate that essence.

Musical theory helps to add depth or colours to that initial essence. The more theory you know the easier it is to add those musical textures and dynamics.

But the question was specifically about progressive rock musicians? And I think the same holds true. Some are instinctively good at playing. They convey magic in the single notes or even the spaces between the notes... "Gilmour". If you are a natural and have that gift then a basic knowledge is all that is required. If you don't you can flower it up with theory so it "works", as I said prog by numbers.

Now add great musical knowledge to someone who is also a natural then boom!! Light blue touch paper and stand well back. But musical theory by itself... is just theory.


Edited by Q6 - November 21 2008 at 12:09
Back to Top
popeyethecat View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 04 2008
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 190
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 21 2008 at 12:23
Originally posted by Q6 Q6 wrote:


Chanting can be expressive and needs no words. A child's nursery rhyme can be expressive but requires little vocabulary. I could read a book on quantum physics but it would not move me.

Most music (western) is based on a few simple scales. You can whistle them or hum them. Does that mean you know music theory? Or is it a cultural thing. Eastern / middle eastern cultures also have their own scales that give their music a distinctive sound. Sometimes it sounds unfamiliar to those in the western world but to those who are brought up in that culture it is as familiar as DOH-REH-ME-FAR-SO-LA-TE-DO is to westerners.

It is this instinctive knowledge of music that give a musician the skill to communicate the essence of a song, the hook, the melody line, the riff, the bit you whistle. The the next trick is to communicate that essence.

Musical theory helps to add depth or colours to that initial essence. The more theory you know the easier it is to add those musical textures and dynamics.

But the question was specifically about progressive rock musicians? And I think the same holds true. Some are instinctively good at playing. They convey magic in the single notes or even the spaces between the notes... "Gilmour". If you are a natural and have that gift then a basic knowledge is all that is required. If you don't you can flower it up with theory so it "works", as I said prog by numbers.

Now add great musical knowledge to someone who is also a natural then boom!! Light blue touch paper and stand well back. But musical theory by itself... is just theory.


Don't get me wrong, I do agree with you, to an extent! Someone with no natural musicality or feel can read all they want, that won't produce expressive music. What I meant was that music theory helps you express yourself better and more fluently. It is something that can be learned through reading, but also through experience! You may not know the names for things, but you can work things out. After all, theory is just things people in the past have worked out, is it not?
Back to Top
Q6 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 18 2008
Location: York, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 126
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 21 2008 at 12:27
Originally posted by popeyethecat popeyethecat wrote:

Originally posted by Q6 Q6 wrote:


Chanting can be expressive and needs no words. A child's nursery rhyme can be expressive but requires little vocabulary. I could read a book on quantum physics but it would not move me.

Most music (western) is based on a few simple scales. You can whistle them or hum them. Does that mean you know music theory? Or is it a cultural thing. Eastern / middle eastern cultures also have their own scales that give their music a distinctive sound. Sometimes it sounds unfamiliar to those in the western world but to those who are brought up in that culture it is as familiar as DOH-REH-ME-FAR-SO-LA-TE-DO is to westerners.

It is this instinctive knowledge of music that give a musician the skill to communicate the essence of a song, the hook, the melody line, the riff, the bit you whistle. The the next trick is to communicate that essence.

Musical theory helps to add depth or colours to that initial essence. The more theory you know the easier it is to add those musical textures and dynamics.

But the question was specifically about progressive rock musicians? And I think the same holds true. Some are instinctively good at playing. They convey magic in the single notes or even the spaces between the notes... "Gilmour". If you are a natural and have that gift then a basic knowledge is all that is required. If you don't you can flower it up with theory so it "works", as I said prog by numbers.

Now add great musical knowledge to someone who is also a natural then boom!! Light blue touch paper and stand well back. But musical theory by itself... is just theory.


Don't get me wrong, I do agree with you, to an extent! Someone with no natural musicality or feel can read all they want, that won't produce expressive music. What I meant was that music theory helps you express yourself better and more fluently. It is something that can be learned through reading, but also through experience! You may not know the names for things, but you can work things out. After all, theory is just things people in the past have worked out, is it not?


Yep I would agree with that.
Back to Top
DatM View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: November 19 2008
Location: Berlin, Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 95
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 21 2008 at 13:50
The thing about theory is that, more than a set of rules, it's a catalogue of "what's been done".  Once you get past knowing what the note are, how scales and chords are built, etc., it's all about knowing the common practices of the past...and the ultimate goal is to HEAR the theory.  So in that sense a guy who hasn't studied formal theory, but has listened, studied and played a lot of music, probably has an advantage over a guy who's played little, studied theory, and has had little ear training.

The most important thing is just to play and listen to a lot of music.  Music theory is only meant to compliment that and to understand how it all works together.  JMHO

BTW I've always had an issue with the "you gotta know the rules before you break them" thing. To me it's more like,"You gotta know the rules before you can know if you broke them or not..." But that doesn't sound as catchy Wink 
Back to Top
crimson87 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 03 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 1818
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 21 2008 at 20:36
I think that is advisable to know something about music theory if you are into prog. I mean when they start talking about time signaatures and chord progressions all I can say is : " This band Rocks!!" and I feel like an idiot.
I feel incomplete without knowing how to play an instrument but someday I will. Probably after university.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 234

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.117 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.