Kotro wrote:
Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:
Now TOTO
How many albums dies TOTO has? 23!!!!!!
How many 100% Prog? NONE
How many remotely related? I will accept your word about one because I haven't heard it.
This doesn't justify an inclusion...NEO PROG?????
Please read the definition of Neo Prog. it doesn't mean new Prog, it's a defined sub-genre in which Toto has never fit.
Iván |
It's so easy to piss you Prog Purists off, it's not even challenging...
And I'm sorry, Ivan, but Toto's 2006 Falling in Between is 90% Neo-Prog according to PA's definition.
And your argument that one prog album does not make an artist worthy of inclusion has long been proven wrong. |
Which band(s) was included based on simply one album(talking about a band with a long career span, not a band with only a few albums ?
I acknowledge that a single album can perhaps define a bands career, but a band with a very long history of a certain genre of music who changes direction for one album does not all of a sudden make that band belong to a certain genre of music. Established bands often experiment with new styles late in their career.
If I wrong, let me know so I can go to discoarchives.com and suggest ELP for their archive. Certainly the album cover of Love Beach alone makes them a disco group !