Personally, it is always about the music and nothing else. Yes, the mood I'm in can have an effect on how I percieve what I'm listening to at that time, though rarely a big effect and will never colour my lasting view of that album/song/whatever, but I will never base my preception of an album solely on the a specific listen. Many is the time that the first listen has only left me with a feeling of OK rather than brilliant but for subsequent listens to boost my perception of the album, or for my initial impreciation to be of the best album I've ever heard, only for a few weeks latter for me to realise the flaws that drop the level of the album.
In short, I'm well aware of the outside factors that may colour my perception of an album, but I will never let a single listening session determine my overall view of an album. I also hardly ever listen to an album for the first time without some clue as to the type of music I will here, I dont buy blind because I dont want to waste money.
I've noticed that a lot of people point to the art work as having an impact on their perception of an album as well, and this is something I just can't get my head around. I can appreciate the artwork, particularly for the way some of it relates so well to the music, but never does it impact upon what I think of the music. They are sperate entities, linked but seperate.
Edited by sleeper - December 03 2010 at 10:36