Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Tech Talk
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - New decade, end of the CD?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedNew decade, end of the CD?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 57>
Author
Message
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2010 at 07:22
^^ usually these albums are remastered at 24 bit and then downsampled to 16 bit for the CD. Audio CD is always 16 bit, no matter what the packaging says.
Back to Top
clarke2001 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 14 2006
Location: Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 4160
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2010 at 08:28
I don't care, honestly.

If the CD's disappear I won't spill a single tear.

The old technologies are dying out, but they won't go extinct  - at least no so soon. If there are turntables and cassette players around, CD players will be too. I have a device to play my CD's, and I will. But it's all digital data - so it doesn't matter if it's a floppy drive, CD, DVD, BluRay (what an annoying name), USB stick, hard disk, digital cassette, zip drive, jazz drive, mini-disk or something else.

Personally, I would like vinyl to prevail because I like it and I think it's charming. If there's no physical copy, only digital data, it even doesn't have to be on my hard disk. It can be nested on some server in Arizona or Poland and streamed on demand, for all I care, as long as it is available and cataloged properly.


Back to Top
chopper View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Essex, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 20029
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2010 at 09:00
CDs? There are still some people releasing music on cassette!
 
 
Personally I like to have something physical rather than just an MP3 file. Even though the CD artwork struggles in comparison with vinyl album covers due to its size, it's better than nothing (although I could make an exception for the "Olias of Sunhillow" CD).
Back to Top
jampa17 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2009
Location: Guatemala
Status: Offline
Points: 6802
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2010 at 10:15
Vynil still exists... and even cassettes (but this one has really problems of function, the speed of the revolution and the problems with the tape always makes me mad) so CD will exists as well... the problem with the unphysical media is that now we don't have a standard time in a record, so the concept "Album" is in doubt... we can have an "album" that can last 3 hours or 2 minutes, so it's bad for the musicians, how many music you should bring in a recording...??? but I hate the mp3 and worse the m4a... I love CD's and while I have a good music system with CDs, I'll be fine...
Change the program inside... Stay in silence is a crime.
Back to Top
clarke2001 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 14 2006
Location: Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 4160
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2010 at 10:34
Originally posted by jampa17 jampa17 wrote:

the problem with the unphysical media is that now we don't have a standard time in a record, so the concept "Album" is in doubt... we can have an "album" that can last 3 hours or 2 minutes, so it's bad for the musicians, how many music you should bring in a recording...??? 


I couldn't disagree more.

Art should be bounded with imagination, not technical abilities. Whether an artist will compose an entity that is long 5 or 500 minutes, it's artistic freedom. I prefer a certain length, but that's only my preference...which is in many ways imposed upon myself through brain-washing years of "getting used to", but it's purely artificial.

In a same way we will frown upon one's consumerism, preference to generic "beats" and "structure" instead of trying to get into more elaborate music, which will most likely be rejected by a pop consumer because it does not sound ordinary, we should also "think outside the box" and admit everything is allowed in art, and should be encouraged. By accepting the wider picture, although we don't have necessarily to like it, we will broaden our own perceptions and consciousness as well.


Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2010 at 10:52
^ I think that minimum lengths in formats make a lot of sense though. For example, movies are typically at least 90 minutes, music albums are typically at least 30 minutes.

I wouldn't be comfortable with calling a 20 minute release of music an "album" ... it's definitely too short. In the other direction it makes less of a difference ... there are movies that take several hours, or albums that take more than 90 minutes.
Back to Top
Nightfly View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: August 01 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 3659
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2010 at 11:01
I like a hard copy. If cd's die I'm sure they'll be some form of hard copy available. after all vinyl is selling better than it has for years and i'm sure the record companies wont want to miss out on any potential sales. I for one wont be buying any MP3's.
Back to Top
jampa17 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2009
Location: Guatemala
Status: Offline
Points: 6802
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2010 at 11:22
Originally posted by clarke2001 clarke2001 wrote:

Originally posted by jampa17 jampa17 wrote:

the problem with the unphysical media is that now we don't have a standard time in a record, so the concept "Album" is in doubt... we can have an "album" that can last 3 hours or 2 minutes, so it's bad for the musicians, how many music you should bring in a recording...??? 


I couldn't disagree more.

Art should be bounded with imagination, not technical abilities. Whether an artist will compose an entity that is long 5 or 500 minutes, it's artistic freedom. I prefer a certain length, but that's only my preference...which is in many ways imposed upon myself through brain-washing years of "getting used to", but it's purely artificial.

In a same way we will frown upon one's consumerism, preference to generic "beats" and "structure" instead of trying to get into more elaborate music, which will most likely be rejected by a pop consumer because it does not sound ordinary, we should also "think outside the box" and admit everything is allowed in art, and should be encouraged. By accepting the wider picture, although we don't have necessarily to like it, we will broaden our own perceptions and consciousness as well.


 
Well.. I was thinking like a musician... we are planning to record an album in the middle of this year and we have enough material to a 40 minutes production... so for me it's kind of tough to think what is the good amount of music to bring out in your debut CD... don't know... I understand the artistic freedom and we do have short songs about 3 minutes and other of 6+ and links between several songs... but it's still confussing to know or to decide how many music is good enough...
Change the program inside... Stay in silence is a crime.
Back to Top
TheGazzardian View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2009
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 8667
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2010 at 11:34
My personal opinion is that the CD won't go away for good. This is based on the high number of CD-pressing houses that exist that, for a price, will print CDs. There will always be artists who prefer to have their music available that way, especially prog artists who understand the value of artwork, etc. being added to their product. With all of the indy productions going on, there is always going to be someone pressing CDs, just like there's still vinyl. It's might become a niche market, but niche markets make money. 

A lot of the stuff that the industry says about music pertains mostly to pop, because that's what the industry cares about. It's what makes money. And in that case, they are right; I've listened to a fair number of pop/rock albums that had the big singles, and not much more of any particular value. For those, I usually would take the songs that I liked best and add them to a playlist or a mixed CD, and ignore the rest of the album after hearing it enough times to decide what I want. So downloading singles makes  a ton more sense.

But some genres absolutely benefit from the album format. I almost NEVER listen to prog music outside the context of an album, and when I do, it's usually because I have limited time, not because I don't want to listen to an album.

Hard drives failing is of course a problem, but for me it's maintenance that's the biggest issue with digital music. When I move to a new computer (which happens every few years), I have to back up my entire digital music collection, and then re-upload it to the new computer. I have to keep backups in case my computer breaks down at some point for whatever reason, so as not to lose it. I don't like that. Sure, having a CD for each album I own takes up a lot of space (a LOT of space, as I am sure many of you know), but it's so much more flexible. And, despite the fact that CD players may be getting rarer, there are so many things that can play CDs that aren't dedicated CD players. A computer ... a DVD player ... a video game console ... a toaster (okay, maybe not that one). Even if CD players vanish, we will still be able to play them.
Back to Top
clarke2001 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 14 2006
Location: Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 4160
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2010 at 12:11
Originally posted by jampa17 jampa17 wrote:

Originally posted by clarke2001 clarke2001 wrote:

Originally posted by jampa17 jampa17 wrote:

the problem with the unphysical media is that now we don't have a standard time in a record, so the concept "Album" is in doubt... we can have an "album" that can last 3 hours or 2 minutes, so it's bad for the musicians, how many music you should bring in a recording...??? 


I couldn't disagree more.

Art should be bounded with imagination, not technical abilities. Whether an artist will compose an entity that is long 5 or 500 minutes, it's artistic freedom. I prefer a certain length, but that's only my preference...which is in many ways imposed upon myself through brain-washing years of "getting used to", but it's purely artificial.

In a same way we will frown upon one's consumerism, preference to generic "beats" and "structure" instead of trying to get into more elaborate music, which will most likely be rejected by a pop consumer because it does not sound ordinary, we should also "think outside the box" and admit everything is allowed in art, and should be encouraged. By accepting the wider picture, although we don't have necessarily to like it, we will broaden our own perceptions and consciousness as well.


 
Well.. I was thinking like a musician... we are planning to record an album in the middle of this year and we have enough material to a 40 minutes production... so for me it's kind of tough to think what is the good amount of music to bring out in your debut CD... don't know... I understand the artistic freedom and we do have short songs about 3 minutes and other of 6+ and links between several songs... but it's still confussing to know or to decide how many music is good enough...


I understand. I was talking from the idealistic point of view. Of course, recording time in a studio could be expensive as hell, as well as releasing of medium (I'm a musician myself).

I'm in a similar situation. We recorded an album - it's about 40 minutes of music. It's not released yet. And now we're not satisfied with one song, and perhaps will throw it out. Which will cut the length to 36. We're wondering if we should record perhaps one or two songs more, but then again, they won't sound the same  in a different studio and different instruments and line-up (we were recording far from home, in Berlin). Now we're unsure what to do...is it a good idea? Is it necessary at all?

My gut feeling is: do what you like (and you can). Some people will like your music, some will not, anyway. Some people prefer shorter albums, some longer ones.

If only money is not an issue!! Oh, what ideas we have! I would like to publish literally an album (like a photo album) - a collection of vinyl singles bidden in a fat book, rather than a LP, or combination of LP and CD in one unit for a double albums or to release an EP on 10 floppy discs...Smile

Oh well, I guess I'd be lucky if anything got releasedErmm



Back to Top
jampa17 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2009
Location: Guatemala
Status: Offline
Points: 6802
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2010 at 14:13
^ The ideas are cool and the problem to do what we want is that often you are not sure what do you want beyond the music... it sounds cool but if you can make an investment of that level, I think you can go ahead with it...
 
In my case is different... we have to make it very cheap 'cause there's no too much money and the girls -there are three girls in the band- wanted to be a environmental-green production, so we have to avoid the plastic cd box... and they are thinking on the material and an original package... our EP that with gift last year was and origami in a form of a star and inside the origami was the CD... but now we are worry of how the artwork will be and the lyrics and all that... and the same as you, we don't know if we should record again the 2 songs included in the previous EP or record it again to match well with the new track... so... I think we understand each other... the problem is that I don't enjoy when there's difference between track on the quality of the same album so... maybe we HAVE to re-record it again... which means.. more money...
Change the program inside... Stay in silence is a crime.
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2010 at 14:36
Originally posted by SaltyJon SaltyJon wrote:

Originally posted by Finnforest Finnforest wrote:

It's my last format.  When it goes, I start buying used CDs only.  When they're gone, I find a new hobby. 
So NOT interested in downloading and Ipod etc. 


I enjoy having my Zune, because it's more convenient to carry with me at college than my entire CD collection, but having the physical product beforehand is important to me, gives it a sense of value that I still can't attach to downloads.  I just hope that I can manage to get all the music I want before CDs disappear if they do (which I hope they don't for a long, long time).

I like my digital music player, too (a Zune as well).  At first I thought it would be just a novelty, but now it's an essential piece of my music listening equipment.  Also like the ability to play videos on it.  Most of the stuff on it is from my CD collection.  I still carry a CD case with me in my truck so I can pull the disc out and read liner notes and enjoy the artwork.  The only thing that would spell the death of CDs for me would be a player that could holographicaly project artwork to either CD or LP size.  I still have a few LPs, over half were ruined by a recent flood.  And I may sound like a broken record (an odd term when you think about it as it meant a scratched one)  in these threads, but I grew up with LPs and other than the artwork, I never cared for the needle noise and scratch vulnerability that came with that format.  Being able to carry around your whole collection on a device the size of a deck of cards is a beautiful thing.  I don't see CDs being phased out in the new decade.  I do wonder if they do eventually get sort of phased out if they'll make a comeback like LPs.  Probably, people are strange.


Edited by Slartibartfast - January 07 2010 at 14:45
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
progkidjoel View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2009
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 19643
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2010 at 17:41
Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

^^ usually these albums are remastered at 24 bit and then downsampled to 16 bit for the CD. Audio CD is always 16 bit, no matter what the packaging says.

Ah, okay. Thanks
Back to Top
jammun View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 14 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3449
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2010 at 19:33
Regarding price/availability of component CD players:  go check out Best Buy online (not that I'd buy from them).  They have a total of 11 available, most of which are very low end or really nothing more than novelties.  This tells me there is not much demand for these players any longer.
 
I'm an old fart and need a physical copy of whatever I'm buying.  i enjoy seeing the artwork (as best as I can on a CD), reading the liner notes, etc.  This doesn't mean I don't like my iPod, but I wouldn't want my entire collection on my computer, not as its sole source. 
 
I suppose I'm the same way with books.  When I read, I don't want to boot up some electronic reader and download the latest novel.  I like to hold the book, enjoy the feel of the paper, the font on the page.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Can you tell me where we're headin'?
Lincoln County Road or Armageddon.
Back to Top
Henry Plainview View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 08 2010 at 00:12
Originally posted by Petrovsk Mizinski Petrovsk Mizinski wrote:

Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

In what respect would a $400 CD player be different from the CD player in my computer? I understand the differences for vinyl, but it's a laser, how much distortion can there be...



You really need to read up on these things more Henry, lol.
A more expensive CD played is going to have higher quality DACs in it.
All things being equal, this alone can make a noticeable difference in sound quality.
Also, if you're paying 400 dollars, it shouldn't be that hard to figure out the components are probably going to be of better quality too, which makes a difference.
Of course there is a point where the law of diminishing returns will eventually come into play, which is why the difference between a 5000 dollar and 20 000 dollar CD player is going to be sh*t all, and no one except rich people can really justify that 2 per cent performance increase (or whatever small percentage it may be) that the 15000 dollars bring.
But there is easily a difference between a 10 dollar and 400 dollar CD player. You'd have to have the world's sh*ttiest speakers or be deaf not to hear the difference, seriously.
Well of course they're out of more expensive materials, but my question was referring to how it actually affects the sound. You can drink wine out of a $10 or a $100 wine glass, but it's going to taste the same, and similarly, you can drop $500 on a super shielded power cable for your system, but objectively I am reasonably certain that the only difference is in your head. The DAC answers some of my question, but I've never heard a $400 CD player so maybe I should just find a hi-fi store.
Originally posted by chopper chopper wrote:

 There are still some people releasing music on cassette!
That's kind of dumb.


Edited by Henry Plainview - January 08 2010 at 00:12
if you own a sodastream i hate you
Back to Top
A Person View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 10 2008
Location: __
Status: Offline
Points: 65760
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 08 2010 at 00:23
Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

Originally posted by chopper chopper wrote:

 There are still some people releasing music on cassette!
That's kind of dumb.


Quote "You can make funny noises with cassettes," says Mr Turner, a lifelong cassette enthusiast. "You can do all sorts of things. It's just cute. Kids love them. And not just kids. I'm 55 and I love them."

okay...
Back to Top
clarke2001 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 14 2006
Location: Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 4160
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 08 2010 at 07:55
Originally posted by A Person A Person wrote:

Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

Originally posted by chopper chopper wrote:

 There are still some people releasing music on cassette!
That's kind of dumb.


Quote "You can make funny noises with cassettes," says Mr Turner, a lifelong cassette enthusiast. "You can do all sorts of things. It's just cute. Kids love them. And not just kids. I'm 55 and I love them."

okay...


"Format fetishism". I like it!Smile

I'm not surprised some labels are still releasing cassettes, hell, some indie artists are releasing 8-track cartridges nowadays!
Back to Top
chopper View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Essex, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 20029
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 08 2010 at 08:11
I'm pretty sure there aren't many people who can play an 8-track cartridge these days!
Back to Top
jampa17 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2009
Location: Guatemala
Status: Offline
Points: 6802
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 08 2010 at 08:43
I want to by some vynils and I don't have where to reproduce it... it's more like fetishism... for collection... for emotinoal matters...
Change the program inside... Stay in silence is a crime.
Back to Top
Kashmir75 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 25 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1029
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 11 2010 at 22:22
If artists only release material as Mp3 files, or any other kind of cyberspace format, I won't be buying it. I need something physical. I am buying up on CDs while I can, coz I don't know how much longer the format will be mainstream, and not a niche market for collectors. 

The end of CDs is the end of prog. There, I said it. Prog fans are usually album-oriented listeners. Progressive music really does not work as singles or once-off releases when a band decides to do it. Certainly, the concept of 'albums' dies as soon as physical media does. 

If Radiohead don't want to do albums anymore, but will release a new track online when they deign to, good on them. But I won't be buying it. When In Rainbows came out, I waited for the physical in-store CD release!LOL
Hello, mirror. So glad to see you, my friend. It's been a while...
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 57>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.203 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.