Best US President |
Post Reply | Page <12345> |
Author | |||||
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 27 2005 Location: NE Indiana Status: Offline Points: 28057 |
Posted: January 02 2007 at 21:34 | ||||
You know why liberals haven't gotten "anything done" with the Bush administration? Because they've been in the minority in the House and Senate for 6 years. It's hard to get your agenda on the table when the other party dominates the process. And why did Republicans get stuff done? Because they were in control. |
|||||
Scapler
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 18 2006 Status: Offline Points: 2567 |
Posted: January 02 2007 at 21:40 | ||||
Pray to God if they both go and good ol' Nancy Pelosi gets a chance to screw with the country even more than is currently being done |
|||||
Bassists are deadly
|
|||||
Arrrghus
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 21 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 5296 |
Posted: January 02 2007 at 21:44 | ||||
What agenda? Even with power they're disorganized and trying as hard as they can to be dipsh*ts. |
|||||
|
|||||
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 27 2005 Location: NE Indiana Status: Offline Points: 28057 |
Posted: January 02 2007 at 21:46 | ||||
I'll give you an answer when you start to sound deserving of an answer (ie not calling people dipsh*ts). Edited by stonebeard - January 02 2007 at 21:47 |
|||||
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 27 2005 Location: NE Indiana Status: Offline Points: 28057 |
Posted: January 02 2007 at 22:03 | ||||
Are you just saying that because she's a democrat or because she would be a bad president? Back it up if the second option applies. |
|||||
Peter
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: January 31 2004 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 9669 |
Posted: January 02 2007 at 23:57 | ||||
Yes -- and Solidarity leader Lech Walesa in Poland, too. Don't forget him (and Polish unionism as a whole) -- he was very important in providing the pressures for Gorby to react to. I liked the way Reagan had the courage and foresight to significantly reduce the US nuclear arsenal (and thus Russia's), though. Don't know that I'd give John Paul much credit, as I recall. I'd shake the hands of Walesa and Gorbachev first. Edited by Peter Rideout - January 03 2007 at 00:06 |
|||||
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy! O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!' He chortled in his joy. |
|||||
Peter
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: January 31 2004 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 9669 |
Posted: January 03 2007 at 00:00 | ||||
Anyway, I'm no American, and I'm far from being an expert on US politics, but I always liked Carter (though I know he had his faults, like all leaders and other mere humans).
|
|||||
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy! O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!' He chortled in his joy. |
|||||
Empathy
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 30 2005 Status: Offline Points: 1864 |
Posted: January 03 2007 at 00:29 | ||||
I believe Ford was Speaker of the House before becoming President, so he was still an elected offical. That said, some would say that the reason he had no ambition to become President was exactly why he was suited for the job. "Why is the sea king of a hundred streams? Because it lies below them... If the sage would guide the people, he must serve with humility. If he would lead them, he must follow behind. In this way when the sage rules, the people will not feel oppressed..." - Lao Tzu My vote's for Eisenhower. In his farewell address to the nation in 1961, he warned about the growing danger of what he coined as the "military-industrial complex". http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8y06NSBBRtY Dire words that should have been heeded, long ago. from Wikipedia: "In the penultimate draft of the address, Eisenhower initially used the term military-industrial-congressional complex, and thus indicated the essential role that U.S. Congress plays in the propagation of the military industry. But, it is said, that the president chose to strike the word congressional in order to placate members of the legislative branch of the federal government." Edited by Empathy - January 03 2007 at 00:37 |
|||||
Pure Brilliance:
|
|||||
Peter
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: January 31 2004 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 9669 |
Posted: January 03 2007 at 00:56 | ||||
^ Yep -- Eisenhower was a good'un too, in my books. A good man for the times, with obvious spine and integrity.
I didn't know about his address warning about the growing power of the military-industrial complex. (Now, joined with right-wing religion, it's in power.) Pretty impressive and courageous, especially from a former top general! |
|||||
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy! O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!' He chortled in his joy. |
|||||
Scapler
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 18 2006 Status: Offline Points: 2567 |
Posted: January 03 2007 at 11:15 | ||||
The second option, I don't care about your party if you do a good job (Thus Kennedy as my second choice) Pelosi disagrees with me however. She talks about bi-partisanship, but what she really means is Democrats win while Republicans sit there looking useless. Pelosi would completly ignore any idea coming from any Conservative, it doesn't matter how good it is. Pelosi would ruin the Presidency by becoming the most selfish, partisan President in history. Her idea of politics isn't promoting good ideas, but just making everyone else's good ideas look like crap. |
|||||
Bassists are deadly
|
|||||
Arrrghus
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 21 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 5296 |
Posted: January 03 2007 at 13:19 | ||||
Oh! I've heard of him. Okay, I did some research... and you're absolutely right! Thanks! |
|||||
|
|||||
Peter
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: January 31 2004 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 9669 |
Posted: January 03 2007 at 13:33 | ||||
You're welcome!
Yeah, I lived through those turbulent, exciting times (I was 20 in 1980), and what was happening in Poland, prior to the dissolution of the Eastern Bloc and the USSR was very important, and very revolutionary. (I remember my older brother had a cool "Solidarnosc" poster on his bedroom wall.)
You have to hand it to Walesa, the Solidarity (Solidarnosc) movement, and the Polish people in general. It was amazing what they accomplished and got away with. (And Gorby didn't send in the Red Army to stomp them -- that was amazing, too.)
We never thought such sweeping changes would happen in our lifetimes, or so rapidly -- it was a thrilling time (like China's subsequent Tianamen Square, but with a much better outcome).
Ordinary people (like Walesa's miners) CAN make a big difference, when they stand united against oppression.
And the hated Wall comes down! Edited by Peter Rideout - January 03 2007 at 13:37 |
|||||
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy! O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!' He chortled in his joy. |
|||||
bhikkhu
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 06 2006 Location: A² Michigan Status: Offline Points: 5109 |
Posted: January 03 2007 at 18:16 | ||||
Bill Clinton was actually a very good President. He eliminated the deficit (remember, we didn't have one at the end of the last administration). He also would have gotten healthcare for everyone. The Republicans had to stop it, just because it came from him.
|
|||||
Jared
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 06 2005 Location: Hereford, UK Status: Offline Points: 19221 |
Posted: January 04 2007 at 10:48 | ||||
I've gone for Ike... a decidedly steading influence on US Economics during your post-war boom time of 1952-60, besides his significant contribution to the war... |
|||||
Music has always been a matter of energy to me. On some nights I believe that a car with the needle on empty can run 50 more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. Hunter S Thompson
|
|||||
rileydog22
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 24 2005 Location: New Jersey Status: Offline Points: 8844 |
Posted: January 05 2007 at 20:15 | ||||
Lincoln was the greatest president our country ever had. He had the toughest job ever placed on a leader of this president (uniting the North and South), and he did so spectacularly. No other president has had to deal with anything close (the closest being the decision to drop the bomb on Hiroshima), and frankly, no one SHOULD be subjected to what he was.
|
|||||
|
|||||
Man With Hat
Collaborator Jazz-Rock/Fusion/Canterbury Team Joined: March 12 2005 Location: Neurotica Status: Offline Points: 166178 |
Posted: January 05 2007 at 23:46 | ||||
JFK or Clinton.
|
|||||
Dig me...But don't...Bury me
I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect. |
|||||
The T
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 16 2006 Location: FL, USA Status: Offline Points: 17493 |
Posted: January 06 2007 at 01:39 | ||||
Of course best US president is a question that would get an obvious answer: Abraham Lincoln or, later, FD Roosevelt; but if this is about modern US presidents, I think Clinton has been the best. JFK could've been the one had he lived longer (had they allowed him to live longer, whoever "they" are) but of the remaining ones, Clinton left the country with a big surplus, an employment rate of great proportions, and specially, he was an harmonic figure abroad (in Latin america "che guevara"-fanatics hate whatever comes from US, but rational people liked Clinton, unlike today's chaotic excuse for a president who is hated everywhere). He had an intern perform something on him, so who cares? I prefer a president with a colorful private life but that helps me eat, feed and go to the doctor than a "moral authority" that helps his partners in the religious right and the oil companies feed, eat and FEAST upon the contituents.
|
|||||
|
|||||
markosherrera
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 01 2006 Location: World Status: Offline Points: 3252 |
Posted: January 06 2007 at 02:01 | ||||
Clinton is better of course than Bush daddy and Bush baby,.... better than Nixon and Reagan I want Hillarius Clinton or Nancy Pelosi for president and Bush for presid..iary
Edited by markosherrera - January 06 2007 at 02:10 |
|||||
The T
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 16 2006 Location: FL, USA Status: Offline Points: 17493 |
Posted: January 08 2007 at 20:25 | ||||
Unlike my beautiful latin american lands, The US has been blessed with decent presidents (I don't mean perfect, but if you compare them with the wonders we elect down south, these look like charitable angels). Except Bush, all of them were pretty decent. Yes, Nixon was a crook, but at least he did ONE good thing (opened China).... and that one good thing put him MILES ahead of the current US president.
|
|||||
|
|||||
el böthy
Prog Reviewer Joined: April 27 2005 Location: Argentina Status: Offline Points: 6336 |
Posted: January 08 2007 at 21:14 | ||||
Ah Clinton...what a cool dude
|
|||||
"You want me to play what, Robert?"
|
|||||
Post Reply | Page <12345> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |