Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Dream Theater vs Tales From Topographic Oceans
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedDream Theater vs Tales From Topographic Oceans

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 8>
Poll Question: Which is better DT or TFTO??
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
69 [67.65%]
33 [32.35%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
Evans View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 15 2006
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 3004
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 05 2006 at 09:36
Originally posted by TheLamb TheLamb wrote:

I like Focus

So I decided to vote for Focus.
So, then what did you do?
Back to Top
TheLamb View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: November 18 2005
Location: Israel
Status: Offline
Points: 416
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 05 2006 at 10:50
Originally posted by Evans Evans wrote:

Originally posted by TheLamb TheLamb wrote:

I like Focus

So I decided to vote for Focus.
So, then what did you do?
Uhm... Im not sure... I just figured we were resorting to polls that made no point whatsoever so.. There's no reason to trying to find any common-sense in my reply... Just going with the flow of posting meaningless things for no reason... Embarrassed
Back to Top
Sacred 22 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 24 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 1509
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 05 2006 at 12:17
Originally posted by OpethGuitarist OpethGuitarist wrote:

Also, please tell me that any of you enjoy the guitar tone found on Tales.


It is downright atrocious, not to mention that Howe's overall playing was at an all time low at the time it was produced.
 
You have exposed yourself as a fraud my friend.
Back to Top
TheLamb View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: November 18 2005
Location: Israel
Status: Offline
Points: 416
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 05 2006 at 13:03
I think Howe is great on Tales.
Back to Top
Angeldust View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: September 18 2005
Location: Greece
Status: Offline
Points: 336
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 05 2006 at 13:06

It's still a mystery to me how is it possible to compare a band with a single album..!Tongue

Back to Top
Kleynan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: January 28 2006
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 720
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 05 2006 at 13:28
As I think of it. It's not strange to compare them. The achivement of TFTO is huge! As huge or bigger than DT all together? Tongue


You've just had a heavy session of electroshock therapy, and you're more relaxed than you've been in weeks.

Back to Top
AtLossForWords View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 11 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 6699
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 05 2006 at 16:10
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Originally posted by OpethGuitarist OpethGuitarist wrote:

Originally posted by Sacred 22 Sacred 22 wrote:

Originally posted by OpethGuitarist OpethGuitarist wrote:

Dream Theater easily wins


Check out my review on Tales.

 
Hey, I notice you gave Tales a "1" rating but you gave Close to the Edge a "5" rating. LOL


Thats because CTTE is good and Tales is horrible.

Fragile and Relayer are excellent as well, and I have mixed feelings on The Yes album.



hahah... if you gave... TFTO one star.... you have no business reviewing albums.... look forward to my forthcoming DT review for the proper way to review an album you don't like....LOL


 
I agree, no way Tales can be considered a one star album.  I'm looking forward to this incredibly hyped Dream Theater review.  It should be...interesting.

"Mastodon sucks giant monkey balls."
Back to Top
The Green Tank View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 06 2005
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 244
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 05 2006 at 17:25
Tales, for sure. Probably beats all of Dream Theater's totaly dicography, not that it's BAD!LOL

Back to Top
Trickster F. View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 10 2006
Location: Belize
Status: Offline
Points: 5308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 05 2006 at 17:28

lockbandelete

sig
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 05 2006 at 17:54
Originally posted by AtLossForWords AtLossForWords wrote:

Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Originally posted by OpethGuitarist OpethGuitarist wrote:



Thats because CTTE is good and Tales is horrible.

Fragile and Relayer are excellent as well, and I have mixed feelings on The Yes album.



hahah... if you gave... TFTO one star.... you have no business reviewing albums.... look forward to my forthcoming DT review for the proper way to review an album you don't like....LOL


 
I agree, no way Tales can be considered a one star album.  I'm looking forward to this incredibly hyped Dream Theater review.  It should be...interesting.


as always the results fall short of the hype.. especially since my reviewing skills are not as good as I would like.  I'm fair but not as good as I'd like.. especally compared to reviewers I admire like Ghost Rider and CertIfied. I haven't picked a style I like yet.  I have 20 odd reviews with about as many different styles in reviewing them.  I tried to just briefly give a synopsis, and a vibe for the 'Oxygene' and 'Voyage 34' and then went the track by track route for De De Lind's  'Io Non So Da Dove Vengo e Non So Dove Mai Andrņ, Uomo e' il Nome Che Mi han Dato'.  I'm not sure which I prefer yet.. don't get your hopes up for anything earthshattering LOL
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
OpethGuitarist View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: June 25 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1655
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 05 2006 at 18:09
The fact that you people like Howe's playing on that album make me wonder how many of you are musicians. Cry

Either way, the band was worse without Bruford, not that White is bad, but Bruford was a better fit. I don't fit in with a lot of the other "complainers" of that album, in the sense that I don't mind Anderson's lyrics/vox becuase he's always been an odd ball. I'm not really a lyrics person to begin with.

The album I compare to a painter splashing colors around on a canvas. It might look cool but it is not very coherent and their is a lack of transition. This combined with what I feel is one of the worst guitar tone's in the history of music, (it is so thin, almost sounds like he's flat on every note) is what gets me. But, to each his own, I don't have a problem being bashed.

And I am looking forward to this DT review, so I can lose the title of "most-hated" DT reviewer as I was aptly given in the abuse section.


back from the dead, i will begin posting reviews again and musing through the forums
Back to Top
Sacred 22 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 24 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 1509
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 05 2006 at 18:26
Originally posted by OpethGuitarist OpethGuitarist wrote:

The fact that you people like Howe's playing on that album make me wonder how many of you are musicians. Cry
 
Howe himself said that much of his best playing was on Tales. He should know and aside from that, he is one of the most creative guitar players that has ever lived.

Either way, the band was worse without Bruford, not that White is bad, but Bruford was a better fit. I don't fit in with a lot of the other "complainers" of that album, in the sense that I don't mind Anderson's lyrics/vox becuase he's always been an odd ball. I'm not really a lyrics person to begin with.

Again subjective

The album I compare to a painter splashing colors around on a canvas. It might look cool but it is not very coherent and their is a lack of transition. This combined with what I feel is one of the worst guitar tone's in the history of music, (it is so thin, almost sounds like he's flat on every note) is what gets me. But, to each his own, I don't have a problem being bashed.
 
you have to listen to it many many many times to get it

And I am looking forward to this DT review, so I can lose the title of "most-hated" DT reviewer as I was aptly given in the abuse section.
 
I think Micky will give a fair representation of the work.


Back to Top
Tony R View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: July 16 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 11979
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 05 2006 at 19:30
Space reserved for Micky to right some rubbish.














































Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 05 2006 at 19:35
Originally posted by OpethGuitarist OpethGuitarist wrote:

The fact that you people like Howe's playing on that album make me wonder how many of you are musicians. Cry

oh jesus christ not the 'I'm a musician so my opinion is better than yours' logic.  Look at my review of the album and see why that kind of logic (and your rating of it) stinks like sh*t, looks like sh*t, and tastes (theoretically of course LOL) like sh*t. Prog is art... you do not have to be an artist to appreciate art.   A quality review would have noted whether you liked it or not, THEN noted that the album is far more ambitious, grand in scale, complex, and of course famous than most albums in prog. Thus rated it accordingly.  Find me 10 albums in ALL of prog that represent what prog is all about more than that album and I'll have YOUR frickin children ahhahah.  It's an essential 5 star album by any criteria short of whether Joe Six-Pack reviewer likes it or not.  Love an album, hate an album... who really cares.  Taste is personal and if you go into a review with only that in mind.... only you and your circle of pals are going to care about the 10 to 15 minutes that you just wasted.  People want to know about an album and where it fits in the grand scheme of things prog. Should they buy it? Whether you like it or not isn't going to change that. Oh yeah..  I've been a musician for 20+ years....and you'd never know it.. because it doesn't matter a damn bit.  Nothing personal by the way.... just venting hahahha Wink

Either way, the band was worse without Bruford, not that White is bad, but Bruford was a better fit. I don't fit in with a lot of the other "complainers" of that album, in the sense that I don't mind Anderson's lyrics/vox becuase he's always been an odd ball. I'm not really a lyrics person to begin with.

agreed that with Bruford Yes was at another level but that's immaterial to the review...  White's work on The Ancient though... more adventurous than anything Bruford did with Yes.. so I don't buy no Bruford ..crappy album.

The album I compare to a painter splashing colors around on a canvas. It might look cool but it is not very coherent and their is a lack of transition. This combined with what I feel is one of the worst guitar tone's in the history of music, (it is so thin, almost sounds like he's flat on every note) is what gets me. But, to each his own, I don't have a problem being bashed.

EXACTLY the point I made in my review....  what you fail to see is that art hits all of us differently..what is sh*t to you.. is the thing of beauty to others... a point made in my review.  Where you are being presumptuous is assuming.. due to your vaunted musical skills ... that your interpetation is the right.. or only way.  Prog is supposed to challenge the listener.. when you challenge a listener.. and few albums do that as this one does.. .people get lost.. as you did it appears.  No shame in that.. but recognize the highest expression of prog ...while it's biting you on the ass....

 

And I am looking forward to this DT review, so I can lose the title of "most-hated" DT reviewer as I was aptly given in the abuse section.

pfff...  if you don't know my feelings about DT by now.. you're either new.. or put off by me to the point where you do give a flip about what I'm writing hahhahaWink  As I posted in the collab section (spoiler warning)... I will be giving it  2 stars.... for me personally (there were small parts I liked) .... and 5 stars (for the site and the official rating I would award the album) because whether I like it or not... it's a masterpiece and an essential album of prog-metal. 


The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
Tony R View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: July 16 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 11979
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 05 2006 at 19:36
^

Originally posted by Tony R Tony R wrote:

Space reserved for Micky to right some rubbish.
















































He missed,but I was right...
     
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 05 2006 at 19:54
hahhaha... you know me too well... which is scary...  sorry about the language... emoticons  for the pounding my computer desk suffered in the writing of that...
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
OpethGuitarist View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: June 25 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1655
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 05 2006 at 20:02
@micky

If I was going to rate things by what is essential because it was prog and what isnt essential based on that then reviewing would be completely pointless. For example, my DSOTM review. Everyone has heard it, so that means it should automatically be rated 5 stars? No. It doesn't. It's dumb because that would mean I might have 3 and 2 star albums I like more than 5 star albums. That's not really fair to me or to people reading my reviews. Reviews are always going to be subjective, no matter how objective you attempt to make them. Reviews, like music, are not a science.

Example. Everyone likes the movie Gladiator. Or pretty much everyone. Let's suppose I don't like it, and I have reasons why other than, "the film is bad". Should I just go tell my friends to see it because everyone else likes it? No. That's what happens in the pop and mainstream world. You tell people to listen to things because everyone else has and everyone else likes it therefore you should like it too and listen to it.

Also, I never accused any specific person of being or not being a musician, it was a general statement not directed at anyone, it was also more or less a sarcastic comment, maybe I should write sarcasm in big bold letters next time. Ermm

As to you wanting albums with scope? There are plenty of bands that release long "journey-like" songs. I'm not going to be able to find 10 prog albums because you have already limited yourself to that one album, regardless of what I have already found or might find in the future. You should rate the DT album with how you feel it is as an album, and not rate it because all the prog-metal fanboys like it. I rate with my heart, not with what people tell me I should rate something.

@sacred

You say I am subjective, yet your first response is entirely subjective calling him one of the most creative guitarists that ever lived. I could name 100 guitarists I think are more creative than him, and guess what, that's subjective too. So your subjectivity is ok and mine is not?

As for the album? I've listened to it about 10 times over the course of 2/3 years. It's not like I just listened to it yesterday. Maybe "I just don't get it" as some of you say, and then again, maybe you "get it too much". No one can ever really prove either. Anyway, I am much happier listening to CTTE, Fragile, and Relayer, which I consider Yes's best works.
back from the dead, i will begin posting reviews again and musing through the forums
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 05 2006 at 20:25
Originally posted by OpethGuitarist OpethGuitarist wrote:

@micky

If I was going to rate things by what is essential because it was prog and what isnt essential based on that then reviewing would be completely pointless. For example, my DSOTM review. Everyone has heard it, so that means it should automatically be rated 5 stars? No. It doesn't. It's dumb because that would mean I might have 3 and 2 star albums I like more than 5 star albums. That's not really fair to me or to people reading my reviews. Reviews are always going to be subjective, no matter how objective you attempt to make them. Reviews, like music, are not a science.

valid points....  and reasonable stated.. so....blue font hahaha.... Let's take your DSOTM album for example... there is not consensus that DSOTM is an essential prog album.. I do not think so and others do not as well.  It was commerically sucessful yeah... it had a concept that was not particularly earth shattering and musically.. well that was never Floyd's strong suit.  One good guitarist and 3 average musicians.. the sum was truly greater than the parts but I digress..  what is essential IS open for question.  Of course you would talk about whether an album hits you or not... but there are only a handful of album that I think are ESSENTIAL without question.  DSOTM is not one.. and neither is TFTO... too many people dislike it.  Lord knows I got on my high horse with you.... like you really give a flip about me telling you how to review hahahha Wink...however.. consider my post not directly totally at you but an open invite to consider shifting the emphasis of reviews from petty likes and dislikes (where I'll stand by me saying that FEW TO NONE care if you liked it or not) to where the album fits within  prog.  Was it inventive.. original.. is it important (even though I may not have liked it) for people to hear.  I think that would make reviews much more effective than the vanity display that they are now for the most part.  Might be a pipe dream... but hey... why not broach the subject....

Example. Everyone likes the movie Gladiator. Or pretty much everyone. Let's suppose I don't like it, and I have reasons why other than, "the film is bad". Should I just go tell my friends to see it because everyone else likes it? No. That's what happens in the pop and mainstream world. You tell people to listen to things because everyone else has and everyone else likes it therefore you should like it too and listen to it.

Also, I never accused any specific person of being or not being a musician, it was a general statement not directed at anyone, it was also more or less a sarcastic comment, maybe I should write sarcasm in big bold letters next time. Ermm

hahaha just do what I do... cultivate a reputation for scarcasm and smartassery LOLWink 

As to you wanting albums with scope? There are plenty of bands that release long "journey-like" songs. I'm not going to be able to find 10 prog albums because you have already limited yourself to that one album, regardless of what I have already found or might find in the future. You should rate the DT album with how you feel it is as an album, and not rate it because all the prog-metal fanboys like it. I rate with my heart, not with what people tell me I should rate something.

my review will in part be an insight into an older proggers thoughts about 'new prog' and why I dislike it so.  It is far removed from what prog was all about... that is the angle of my review.  I think my system of giving two ratings works well.... if anyone actually did care what I though of an album personally.. it's out there... but for the site at large... it is and should be different.  I use the example of the Live Magma album from Bruxelles 1971 that I reviewed.   LOVED it... however to award any more than 2 stars for an album that NO ONE outside of a Magma fan would buy or maybe even like is assinine. So I give split ratings...  works well for me.. and may be...presumptuous hahahhaWink of me too say.. .but would like to see others adopt it.

anyway...  like I said ...nothing personal.... just using your post as a framework to pound out some things I feel quite strongly about...Smile


@sacred

You say I am subjective, yet your first response is entirely subjective calling him one of the most creative guitarists that ever lived. I could name 100 guitarists I think are more creative than him, and guess what, that's subjective too. So your subjectivity is ok and mine is not?

As for the album? I've listened to it about 10 times over the course of 2/3 years. It's not like I just listened to it yesterday. Maybe "I just don't get it" as some of you say, and then again, maybe you "get it too much". No one can ever really prove either. Anyway, I am much happier listening to CTTE, Fragile, and Relayer, which I consider Yes's best works.
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
OpethGuitarist View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: June 25 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1655
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 05 2006 at 21:02
No biggie, all love here.

I'm pretty open minded actually, I just typically have close-minded reviews, becuase well, I'm stating my opinions on something and it's therefore going to be close-minded, even though in reality I am open to many forms of expression, if that makes any damn sense.

Now awaiting sacred's response as to how his subjectivity is better than mine.

Tick tock.
back from the dead, i will begin posting reviews again and musing through the forums
Back to Top
Sacred 22 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 24 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 1509
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 05 2006 at 22:46
Originally posted by OpethGuitarist OpethGuitarist wrote:

No biggie, all love here.

I'm pretty open minded actually, I just typically have close-minded reviews, becuase well, I'm stating my opinions on something and it's therefore going to be close-minded, even though in reality I am open to many forms of expression, if that makes any damn sense.

Now awaiting sacred's response as to how his subjectivity is better than mine.

Tick tock.
 
We are all entitled to our subjectivity. That being said, I do think that Yes were forced to take a different direction with the addition of Alan White to the band and some feel that comprimises were made as a result. I am one of those, but his work on Tales is not bad really and his work on Relayer stands out as well.
 
As far as Steve Howe goes. He basically took the band from nowhere to stardom when he showed up on the third album. I used to be in the music business and I have met many musicians especially guitar players. Not one of them thinks Howe is anything less than masterful.
 
I do know one guy who likes DT and has even learned to Shred. Hey, he is pretty good. He will say, "Howe can't shred like me." I'll say, "can you write like Howe." We get together and all he wants to hear is music with shredders. I now realize he has trouble appreciating music for music's sake even though he calls himself a musician and can play a mean guitar.
 
Reviews that lean too heavily in the subjective dept. tend to be misleading. That's why I have trouble with your rating of Close to the Edge and Topographic Oceans. Both works are considered master works by any description and to give Tales one star and CttE five is very misleading and as a result I would have trouble using your review as a guide line unless I had the same subjective tastes as you. This could be useful for some but I think more care should be excercised in how ratings are dished out. You may not like Barry Bonds, but to say he a lousy baseball player is just plain wrong if you get my drift.
 
I do thank you for not being afraid to speak your mind.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 8>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.131 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.