Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - How did prog rock become the laughing stock...
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedHow did prog rock become the laughing stock...

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345>
Author
Message
uduwudu View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 17 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2601
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 03 2016 at 06:11
The whole thing was all for publicity. Punk pogo-ing in Chelsea was as middle class as it could get. Wouldn't have got anywhere were it not for the fashions and antics (as I read somewhere that was not on the web).

Prog rock was and is the classical or art music of rock and as subject to pop culture as anything.

Still as prog rock "died" or mutated what happened to all the supporters who saw Genesis at Wembley Arena while The Pistols played a club?

Yes and ELP called it quits as creatively they were at an impasse and needed a rest. Same with Sabbath and poor old Heep. Tull, Floyd, Genesis and as it turned out Zeppelin were just fine for a while).

Things is that everyone was subject to fickle public. It took a "disco" Floyd tune and a symphonic ballad to get Floyd and Zeppelin to save a music industry that was dying. Punk offered little but noise and exclusion (like most sub genres of pop music). Until the new wave turned up and found hey, the real punk musicians want to and can play music. That just kept on renewing into alt rock, alt country, grunge and a more mainstream oriented punk (Green Day); as prog kept re-morphing until it was "ok" to use that term in public.

I suppose it boils down to the usual way of getting people to talk about something (in terms of hate and derision in which terms we as humans are most happy at expressing ourselves) and then, eventually, some might begin thinking about it; some even forking out the hard earned while the few left are busy selling the same old song and dance. Follow the money.

There were a few ok punk records just as there really were very few bad prog albums (good = effectively communicated / longevity x social relevance / actual interest). I suppose the band that had it all at the time was Blondie. They even had Fripp guesting, terrific drumming punk "cred", pop appeal and big success. For a while.

So where did that leave The League of Gentlemen other than my LP collection? Fripp's version of Blondie?

Anyway this was where Rush really came into their own by having interesting lyrics and terrific albums around this time. Others (Cars, Van Halen) had 1 - 3 but Rush just kept on. The rise of NWOBHM and the force of Rainbow was all pretty good stuff too.

But, yeah, the cover of Love Beach.

The thing is - what and in what form would any prog or other, heh, pop music survive the ages as Haydn, Beethoven, Chopin, Bach and all the other boys in the band have done?
Back to Top
Flight123 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 01 2010
Location: Sohar, Oman
Status: Offline
Points: 1399
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 03 2016 at 06:38
Would agree that Rush exploited the vacuum to some extent, but hard to describe them as 'prog'...(sorry, I was surrounded by Rush lovers so I had their stuff rammed down my throat)

Since 78; we have had pastiches of prog - some better than others.  I lived through the time and I honestly thought prog had died by the early 80s.
Back to Top
Bungler View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: January 28 2016
Location: Finalnd
Status: Offline
Points: 34
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 03 2016 at 08:30
This whole Prog vs Punk thing is really just a myth. I personally love all kinds of music( Punk, Prog, Disco, Jazz, whatever). There are many Punk bands who are big fans of Prog music. Johnny Lydon has said that Roxy Music was a big influence on him. He also said that he likes Hawkwind, and the album Aqualung by Jethro Tull.

Here are a few examples of Punk artists saying good things about Prog artists
1- I have seen an interview with the drummer from X, who said that Captain Beefheart was a big influence on him.
2- Roddy Bottum of Faith No More has said that he liked Sparks and Roxy Music.
3- I also had seen an Interview where Buzz Osborne(of The Melvins) is praising Captain Beefheart, and Isis.
4- Kurt Cobain has said that he liked the album Red by King Crimson

Now there are Prog bands like The Mars Volta, Dillinger Escapeplan, and many others. Who are influenced by both Punk, and Prog. Also I am not sure, but I think Peter Gabriel has done some music with the lead singer of The Clash. And speaking of Peter Gabriel, he had a guitarist from The Jam playing on Melt. Nick Cave has done some work with The Dirty Three also. King Crimson also had a lot connections to New Wave groups such as Blondie, and Missing Persons.

Plus lets not forget Hawkwind. The band was a huge influence on Punk. The band played many free shows, and were pretty rebellious( in my opinion). Lemmy later formed Motorhead, which was one of the first Metal bands, that Punk bands liked.

Almost every person I know in real life( that dose not listen to bad Pop Music) listens to both Bad Brains, and Rush. So is the problem that not everyone is saying good things about ELP?

And to end this... Here is a list of (old) Prog bands, that many Punk bands like
Captain Beefheart
Roxy Music
Genesis( usually, only the Peter Gabriel era)
Jazz Prog/ Jazz Fusion
Hawkwind
Pink Floyd( usually, Syd Barret era)
Van Der Graaf Generator
Frank Zappa
Sparks
A lost of Experimental stuff
Can
Experimental Prog
Krafwerk( If you count Electronic Prog)
Krautrock




 


Edited by Bungler - June 03 2016 at 08:35
Back to Top
twosteves View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 01 2007
Location: NYC/Rhinebeck
Status: Offline
Points: 4095
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 03 2016 at 09:38
A lot of people hated prog when I was in college---it was embarrassing for me to admit I loved lol
People think rock and roll should be simple and hard driving and full of angst---and not "pretentious" or melodic or complicated. It's very simple---no real connection between ----I want to be sedated-- and Awaken lol
Having said that there have been prog acts that were accepted by the rock hipsters of the world---

That Wakeman concert is hysterical ----maybe he should do a concept album on Game of Thrones --that would be current. It does make me think that Europe and other parts of the world --other than the USA---accepted more types of music.


Edited by twosteves - June 03 2016 at 09:42
Back to Top
Rednight View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 18 2014
Location: Mar Vista, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 4812
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 03 2016 at 11:55
Anderson, Walkman, Butthole, and How - The Dead Milkmen
"It just has none of the qualities of your work that I find interesting. Abandon [?] it." - Eno
Back to Top
Smurph View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 11 2012
Location: Columbus&NYC
Status: Offline
Points: 3167
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 03 2016 at 12:06
Originally posted by twosteves twosteves wrote:

A lot of people hated prog when I was in college---it was embarrassing for me to admit I loved lol
People think rock and roll should be simple and hard driving and full of angst---and not "pretentious" or melodic or complicated. It's very simple---no real connection between ----I want to be sedated-- and Awaken lol
Having said that there have been prog acts that were accepted by the rock hipsters of the world---

That Wakeman concert is hysterical ----maybe he should do a concept album on Game of Thrones --that would be current. It does make me think that Europe and other parts of the world --other than the USA---accepted more types of music.

There is a connection between I wanna be sedated and awaken. nomeansno and Cardiacs.
Back to Top
KingCrInuYasha View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 26 2010
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1281
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 03 2016 at 13:22
Originally posted by twosteves twosteves wrote:


...It's very simple---no real connection between ----I want to be sedated-- and Awaken lol
Having said that there have been prog acts that were accepted by the rock hipsters of the world---

...

Don't you mean No Earthly ConnectionLOL


Edited by KingCrInuYasha - June 03 2016 at 13:22
He looks at this world and wants it all... so he strikes, like Thunderball!
Back to Top
tszirmay View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: August 17 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 6673
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 03 2016 at 14:27
Originally posted by ALotOfBottle ALotOfBottle wrote:

They did not hate  prog. It was comfortable for them to say so  and  it was supposed to be a part of their image. From what I understand, English society is quite class-based and  punks, being working class were not hip with the bourgeoisie music that prog appeared to be. And it was! Greg Lake, for example, carried a persian carpet on tour. ELP in particular were a bourgeoisie band. But remember Sex Pistols also sold out and in a way betrayed ideas that they were fighting for. From as far as I know, Johnny Rotten admitted that Aqualung was one of his favorite albums, while many years later Rat Scabies came up to Phil Collins at an airport and said he had secretly been a great influence of his. It was not "hate", it was part of their image. They wanted people to think it was all about "hate". But indeed, prog became regarded as unfashionable and too escapist, if you will.

People are talking about Jello Biafra (whom I love BTW), but actually American punk was a much different thing than English punk originally. American punk in its spirit was much closer to prog, as it was music that wanted to be regarded as art. I'm talking about Dead Kennedys in particular here.

Correct interpretation!  I was there and saw the transformation. Classically trained musicians were attracted to rock because of the fame and fortune (and groupies, lets be fair) and created the prog scene. Untrained musicians were attracted to rock because of the potential fame and fortune (and groupies) , plus the fashion lobby (McLaren was a Soho fashionista and store owner , of I am not mistaken) . Steve Jones was a rabid Roxy Music fan (but kept that very quiet) . It was all a big marketing coup and nothing more . In fact, the musical punkers became new wave giants. But in 1977 there was a definite assault on the prog world , led by Lester Bangs and those idiot critics at NME and Melody Maker . 
I never post anything anywhere without doing more than basic research, often in depth.
Back to Top
HosiannaMantra View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 14 2016
Location: Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 206
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 03 2016 at 14:53
I'm too young to talk about the climate change in '76/77, and pretty much everything about it is already said here.
But, I have to mention that the new wave that sort of evolved from punk always seemed to me much more elitist, manufactured, synthetic and sterile, with all those stiff guys in suits with firmly combed hair. I actually like some of those artists very much (Japan, Simple Minds, China Crisis), but I always felt some distance toward that movement, as well as today's indie. Also, I always felt that David Bowie, one of the few from the old guard that most punks accepted, was much less natural in what was doing than majority of prog bands.
And, yes, there were many middle-class and even some higher class (Joe Strummer) musicians in punk bands as well as many working class musicians in prog bands, so that "class fight" manufactured mostly by media and rock critics is downright stupid.
Back to Top
Tillerman88 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 31 2015
Location: Tomorrowland
Status: Offline
Points: 495
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 03 2016 at 14:53
Originally posted by uduwudu uduwudu wrote:


The thing is - what and in what form would any prog or other, heh, pop music survive the ages as Haydn, Beethoven, Chopin, Bach and all the other boys in the band have done?
 
Perhaps film music, soundtracks and all that 'filmy' stuff? Wink
Back to Top
lostrom View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 19 2014
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 122
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 03 2016 at 16:47
It's rather silly that some try to make it that punk didn't dislike prog.
lostrom
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 03 2016 at 17:15
Originally posted by lostrom lostrom wrote:

It's rather silly that some try to make it that punk didn't dislike prog.
Au contraire, it is merely common sense and would be not very bright to think otherwise. Punk (and one must assume you mean the musicians who made it) did not appear in from vacuum so would they have spent their teenage years listening to the same music as the rest of us. They would probably like you to believe that they listened exclusively to The MC5s, The Stooges and the Velvet Underground but that is a fanciful bit of elitist propaganda... (in other words, it would be a big fat lie equal only to the number of people who claimed to have been at the Sex Pistols gig at the Manchester Lesser Free Trade Hall in 1976)... the inevitable reality is, if a band was mentioned in the pages of Sounds, The NME or Melody Maker, or featured at one of the outdoor festivals such as Reading or Glastonbury during the first half of the 1970s then it was listened to (and subsequently liked) by practically every white teenage male in the UK at that time even if they later went on to be Punk. Stern Smile
What?
Back to Top
dr prog View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 25 2010
Location: Melbourne
Status: Offline
Points: 2516
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 03 2016 at 18:29
Punk? lol
Its not even considered music
All I like is prog related bands beginning late 60's/early 70's. Their music from 1968 - 83 has the composition and sound which will never be beaten. Perfect blend of jazz, classical, folk and rock.
Back to Top
ster View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: May 15 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 19
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 04 2016 at 00:30
Originally posted by lostrom lostrom wrote:

It's rather silly that some try to make it that punk didn't dislike prog.

 
It is silly. These people have no clue and haven’t been there. Punks hated prog and especially arena rock acts like Foreigner, Boston Styx etc. Maybe not ALL of them but the general consensus did. I have read countless interviews where punk artists would scorn others if they showed any kind of skill on your instrument. They were ostracized and called a fascist or a poseur. Remember that? Everyone that wasn’t punk was a fascist! Down with elitism! Very militant. They felt that rock n roll was becoming bourgeois or upper class because of the skill that was displayed. Especially the extravagant stage shows where they felt the artists were becoming too big for the audiences. I have read an interview with Adam Clayton from U2 and he said that during his punk days they hated when guitarists were perceived as these super heroes that had to be saluted. 
Punk was a rebellion just like prog was a rebellion against sixties music. Don’t believe me? Bill Bruford had “Keith Moon Sucks" written on his sneakers. Prog rockers wanted to smash the formulaic pop music that came before them–and they did. Punk wanted to simplify rock and bring it back to the kids.





Edited by ster - June 04 2016 at 00:43
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 04 2016 at 02:29
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Punk as was much a product of Art School alumni as Prog ever was, if not more so... And that's a significant point - Punk was not just music - it was an art movement - the Sex Pistols were manufactured by two middle-class Art students with a "product" to sell; whereas Prog (unlike Psychedelia before it) was just music without a subculture and Art-background to support, promote and maintain it. 


This is an important point which addresses why perhaps academics struggle to understand prog and perhaps because they don't understand it, they decide to scorn it (not singling out academics there, this is the natural human tendency - to deride what you don't understand).  Academics tend to approach rock based genres through the prism of their larger cultural relevance and since prog is, often but not always, floating in the stratosphere in blissful oblivion, it is an easy target to mock as pretentious or overblown.  

In a way, metal combined prog's escapism with the sub culture trappings of punk and that may be partly why it endures long after its late 70s breakthrough (classifying metal in the 'real metal' sense used by metalheads which excludes early metal like Black Sabbath).
Back to Top
lostrom View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 19 2014
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 122
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 04 2016 at 04:10
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by lostrom lostrom wrote:

It's rather silly that some try to make it that punk didn't dislike prog.
Au contraire, it is merely common sense and would be not very bright to think otherwise. Punk (and one must assume you mean the musicians who made it) did not appear in from vacuum so would they have spent their teenage years listening to the same music as the rest of us. They would probably like you to believe that they listened exclusively to The MC5s, The Stooges and the Velvet Underground but that is a fanciful bit of elitist propaganda... (in other words, it would be a big fat lie equal only to the number of people who claimed to have been at the Sex Pistols gig at the Manchester Lesser Free Trade Hall in 1976)... the inevitable reality is, if a band was mentioned in the pages of Sounds, The NME or Melody Maker, or featured at one of the outdoor festivals such as Reading or Glastonbury during the first half of the 1970s then it was listened to (and subsequently liked) by practically every white teenage male in the UK at that time even if they later went on to be Punk. Stern Smile
No.
lostrom
Back to Top
lostrom View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 19 2014
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 122
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 04 2016 at 04:12
Originally posted by ster ster wrote:

Originally posted by lostrom lostrom wrote:

It's rather silly that some try to make it that punk didn't dislike prog.

 
It is silly. These people have no clue and haven’t been there. Punks hated prog and especially arena rock acts like Foreigner, Boston Styx etc. Maybe not ALL of them but the general consensus did. I have read countless interviews where punk artists would scorn others if they showed any kind of skill on your instrument. They were ostracized and called a fascist or a poseur. Remember that? Everyone that wasn’t punk was a fascist! Down with elitism! Very militant. They felt that rock n roll was becoming bourgeois or upper class because of the skill that was displayed. Especially the extravagant stage shows where they felt the artists were becoming too big for the audiences. I have read an interview with Adam Clayton from U2 and he said that during his punk days they hated when guitarists were perceived as these super heroes that had to be saluted. 
Punk was a rebellion just like prog was a rebellion against sixties music. Don’t believe me? Bill Bruford had “Keith Moon Sucks" written on his sneakers. Prog rockers wanted to smash the formulaic pop music that came before them–and they did. Punk wanted to simplify rock and bring it back to the kids.




You are correct.
lostrom
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 04 2016 at 05:53
Originally posted by lostrom lostrom wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by lostrom lostrom wrote:

It's rather silly that some try to make it that punk didn't dislike prog.
Au contraire, it is merely common sense and would be not very bright to think otherwise. Punk (and one must assume you mean the musicians who made it) did not appear in from vacuum so would they have spent their teenage years listening to the same music as the rest of us. They would probably like you to believe that they listened exclusively to The MC5s, The Stooges and the Velvet Underground but that is a fanciful bit of elitist propaganda... (in other words, it would be a big fat lie equal only to the number of people who claimed to have been at the Sex Pistols gig at the Manchester Lesser Free Trade Hall in 1976)... the inevitable reality is, if a band was mentioned in the pages of Sounds, The NME or Melody Maker, or featured at one of the outdoor festivals such as Reading or Glastonbury during the first half of the 1970s then it was listened to (and subsequently liked) by practically every white teenage male in the UK at that time even if they later went on to be Punk. Stern Smile
No.
Yes.
 
Originally posted by lostrom lostrom wrote:

Originally posted by ster ster wrote:

Originally posted by lostrom lostrom wrote:

It's rather silly that some try to make it that punk didn't dislike prog.

 
It is silly. These people have no clue and haven’t been there. Punks hated prog and especially arena rock acts like Foreigner, Boston Styx etc. Maybe not ALL of them but the general consensus did. I have read countless interviews where punk artists would scorn others if they showed any kind of skill on your instrument. They were ostracized and called a fascist or a poseur. Remember that? Everyone that wasn’t punk was a fascist! Down with elitism! Very militant. They felt that rock n roll was becoming bourgeois or upper class because of the skill that was displayed. Especially the extravagant stage shows where they felt the artists were becoming too big for the audiences. I have read an interview with Adam Clayton from U2 and he said that during his punk days they hated when guitarists were perceived as these super heroes that had to be saluted. 
Punk was a rebellion just like prog was a rebellion against sixties music. Don’t believe me? Bill Bruford had “Keith Moon Sucks" written on his sneakers. Prog rockers wanted to smash the formulaic pop music that came before them–and they did. Punk wanted to simplify rock and bring it back to the kids.




You are correct.

That's missed the point. (btw: I was there, and hardly any one in the UK listened to Boston, Foreigner or Styx). What Punk musicians said at the time of Punk was contrived propaganda and jumping on a bandwagon steered by manipulative media people (John Savage, Julie Burchill, Tony Parsons, Gary Bushell, Caroline Coon, Charles Shar-Murray, et al ... and lamentably previous Prog supporters such as John Peel and Ann Nightingale who owe their fame and radio careers to Prog). Of course they would never admit to listening to or liking any of the music that came before the emergence of Punk because it wasn't "cool" to do that. Don't believe everything you read in the press.
What?
Back to Top
Quinino View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 26 2011
Location: Portugal
Status: Offline
Points: 3654
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 04 2016 at 05:59
^
"Don't believe everything you read in the press."

Wisest thing to say, thank you Dean for putting it all in perspective with a single sentence. Thumbs Up


Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 04 2016 at 06:33
LOLThumbs Up


The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.232 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.