Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - For my Libertarian friends
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedFor my Libertarian friends

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 259260261262263 269>
Author
Message
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2010 at 08:16
I really dislike the euphemism of 'letting the cuts expire'. The action constitutes a tax hike. If you believe in it be honest and call it what it is.

Obama wants tax revenue without being known for the largest tax hike in recent memory (I hear history a lot, but I'm not so sure that's true).
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
Padraic View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2010 at 08:47
Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:

Soooo Bama is, after all, going to let the Bush tax cuts expire.


No, he's doing precisely the opposite.
Back to Top
Henry Plainview View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2010 at 09:32
I think JJ forgot a negative. Probably it was because of his positive outlook on life.
 
if you own a sodastream i hate you
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2010 at 10:12
Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

 

I hate cops (mostly). And hate that they have the right to be imbeciles. 
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2010 at 10:14
Back to Top
Henry Plainview View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2010 at 10:23
DDoSing Mastercard or that bank is juvenile and stupid. You're just taking down the front end of the site, that doesn't actually cost them any money. And that is unequivocally a crime, so they're really not helping Wikileaks protestations of innocence. Of course, the people publicly arguing for DDoS attacks on Wikileaks were also committing a crime, but that's a separate issue!
 
The problem with corrupt cops is that it's true that the actual clear instances of police abuse and corruption are relatively rare, which is what the supporters always point to. But the entire police force always closes ranks to prevent any cop from being punished for anything, ever. Everything a law official says in that article makes me incredibly angry. You have a right to privacy during a court session? Go to hell, fascist.


Edited by Henry Plainview - December 08 2010 at 10:24
if you own a sodastream i hate you
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2010 at 10:46
1) True. It's kinda childish and will not bring about any major change. I'm just happy that a bunch of people with time in their hands got to hack a major major corporation's website in relation to a freedom-of-speech issue. 

2) Again I agree. Rotten cops are not the majority, but even the good ones as you say close rank and protect the rotten ones. Ergo, the entire institution's credibility in my eyes is ambiguous at best. 
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2010 at 11:45
Eh, I'm probably wrong...I heard it off a news blurb.
Seriously.

This is what I get for trusting major news channels

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

I really dislike the euphemism of 'letting the cuts expire'. The action constitutes a tax hike. If you believe in it be honest and call it what it is.

Obama wants tax revenue without being known for the largest tax hike in recent memory (I hear history a lot, but I'm not so sure that's true).


As for the first point....you do know it was happening regardless, right?
They were due to expire Jan 1, 2011. I am sure you know this but just have to say it.
And given the make up of Congress (even now) there was no way the cuts were getting extended or made permanent.

Yeah, I don't know the exact numbers and all...but I'm guessing the biggest tax hike in history must've been FDR.




Edited by JJLehto - December 08 2010 at 11:49
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2010 at 11:50
Originally posted by Henry Plainview Henry Plainview wrote:

DDoSing Mastercard or that bank is juvenile and stupid. You're just taking down the front end of the site, that doesn't actually cost them any money. And that is unequivocally a crime, so they're really not helping Wikileaks protestations of innocence. Of course, the people publicly arguing for DDoS attacks on Wikileaks were also committing a crime, but that's a separate issue!
 
The problem with corrupt cops is that it's true that the actual clear instances of police abuse and corruption are relatively rare, which is what the supporters always point to. But the entire police force always closes ranks to prevent any cop from being punished for anything, ever. Everything a law official says in that article makes me incredibly angry. You have a right to privacy during a court session? Go to hell, fascist.


I really don't think that's the case. While the truly evil corrupt acts, like running a kid over in your car and planting a "ham sandwich" on him, are relatively rare, I believe a wide number of cops partake in a number of more easily overlooked abuses like flipping sirens on to avoid red lights or not paying for items at convenience stores.

Growing up I literally never saw a cop stop at a red light. I wanted to be a cop as a child for this reason.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2010 at 11:51
Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:

Eh, I'm probably wrong...I heard it off a news blurb.
Seriously.

This is what I get for trusting major news channels

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

I really dislike the euphemism of 'letting the cuts expire'. The action constitutes a tax hike. If you believe in it be honest and call it what it is.

Obama wants tax revenue without being known for the largest tax hike in recent memory (I hear history a lot, but I'm not so sure that's true).


As for the first point....you do know it was happening regardless, right?
They were due to expire Jan 1, 2011. I am sure you know this but just have to say it.
And given the make up of Congress (even now) there was no way the cuts were getting extended or made permanent.

Yeah, I don't know the exact numbers and all...but I'm guessing the biggest tax hike in history must've been FDR.




I don't think I understand you.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
Finnforest View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Online
Points: 17250
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2010 at 14:32

Stories/videos of police abuse tend to spread around media with a fervency that can make this kind of behaviour seem the norm, which gives us a highly flawed overall portrayal.  This is destructive as it clouds public perceptions, makes people distrust all police, and feeds the kind of attitudes/actions that hurt neighborhoods (but that’s a different thread).  

 
Some cops blow it, and there’s no denying that.  Please just be honest about the reality though, which is that based on the overall number of daily public encounters, police abuse is not “the norm.”  Far, far from it.   The vast majority of cops are very professional and return courtesy when they are shown a little. 

 

Some of the same guys in this thread who have rightfully reminded others not to judge/portray groups negatively based on the actions of a few, seem to have no problem doing this themselves when the group being discussed is police or soldiers.  Funny how that works.  Wink 

...that moment you realize you like "Mob Rules" better than "Heaven and Hell"
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2010 at 14:52
I disagree. I understand the things that potentially skew these things, but my daily interaction with police is a negative one.

I think more are corrupt than are not.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
Finnforest View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Online
Points: 17250
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2010 at 15:07

You believe that more than 50% of all officers in the USA are corrupt/abusive?  Seriously?

 

No point in continuing the conversation then. 

...that moment you realize you like "Mob Rules" better than "Heaven and Hell"
Back to Top
Henry Plainview View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2010 at 15:32
Originally posted by Finnforest Finnforest wrote:

You believe that more than 50% of all officers in the USA are corrupt/abusive?  Seriously?

 

No point in continuing the conversation then. 

It's pretty clear that at 50% will defend the corrupt/abusive ones from being held accountable (just look at the comments of the president of the police union), which to me is a distinction without a difference. I can tell you from experience that my dad was a cop for a signficant period of time after serving in the military (immigration inspection and he did some work with narcotics as well) and he's an avenging angel type and he left because he couldn't put up with all the bullsh*t in the force. He watched some of The Wire with me and he thought it was very realistic, even all the suspect abuse. So I think your faith in the police may be somewhat misplaced.
if you own a sodastream i hate you
Back to Top
Finnforest View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Online
Points: 17250
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2010 at 15:45
And I'm surprised at you too Henry, usually your posts spurn hysterics and pass the sniff test.  Not this time.  
...that moment you realize you like "Mob Rules" better than "Heaven and Hell"
Back to Top
Henry Plainview View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2010 at 16:11
Originally posted by Finnforest Finnforest wrote:

And I'm surprised at you too Henry, usually your posts spurn hysterics and pass the sniff test.  Not this time.  
Well I haven't slept in a while. :P And I'm getting fed up with the cameras thing. But look at the response whenever some sort of allegation of abuse comes out. The entire police force pretty much always closes ranks to prevent any punishment. 
 
Anyway, though, this isn't a cop thread, this thread is for things that matter. :P
if you own a sodastream i hate you
Back to Top
Finnforest View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Online
Points: 17250
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2010 at 16:50
Fair enough Henry, though I didn't start the copper stuff today.   Since you're concerned about the camera thing, here's another take.....coppers who want cameras on their person to protect themselves from the bogus abuse charges that some will concoct in order to have revenge against the cops.  No more, the entire interaction will be filmed by the camera on the officer.  This will give great detail on the close up exchange not picked up on dashcam, and everyone will know if the cop is an abuser, or if the citizen was provoking.  If over 50% of the police are as evil as Pat's personal anecdote suggest, you'd think the police would be up in arms about having their behaviour watched.  Instead, they embrace it.  

http://www.startribune.com/local/south/111325514.html?elr=KArksLckD8EQDUoaEyqyP4O:DW3ckUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUeDyic:E7PNDh_oaE3miUsZ


Edited by Finnforest - December 08 2010 at 17:23
...that moment you realize you like "Mob Rules" better than "Heaven and Hell"
Back to Top
Kestrel View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 18 2008
Location: Minnesota
Status: Offline
Points: 512
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2010 at 17:20
Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:

Eh, I'm probably wrong...I heard it off a news blurb.
Seriously.

This is what I get for trusting major news channels

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

I really dislike the euphemism of 'letting the cuts expire'. The action constitutes a tax hike. If you believe in it be honest and call it what it is.

Obama wants tax revenue without being known for the largest tax hike in recent memory (I hear history a lot, but I'm not so sure that's true).


As for the first point....you do know it was happening regardless, right?
They were due to expire Jan 1, 2011. I am sure you know this but just have to say it.
And given the make up of Congress (even now) there was no way the cuts were getting extended or made permanent.

Yeah, I don't know the exact numbers and all...but I'm guessing the biggest tax hike in history must've been FDR.




I don't think I understand you.

He is saying that because the tax cuts disappear Jan 1, 2001, the correct language is to say they expire. They were impermanent tax cuts; if nothing is done, the tax cuts return to their previous rates.

Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2010 at 17:54
Originally posted by Finnforest Finnforest wrote:

You believe that more than 50% of all officers in the USA are corrupt/abusive?  Seriously?

 

No point in continuing the conversation then. 



Yes I do. If you don't I find you naive.

People who work in an office take pens and paper from the supply room. People who work as cops have a much wider range of power and they use it in the same way.

How many times do cops get a parking ticket, speeding ticket, ticket for running a red light, a DUI? They don't. And no cop says anything about it.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2010 at 17:55
Originally posted by Kestrel Kestrel wrote:

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:

Eh, I'm probably wrong...I heard it off a news blurb.
Seriously.

This is what I get for trusting major news channels

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

I really dislike the euphemism of 'letting the cuts expire'. The action constitutes a tax hike. If you believe in it be honest and call it what it is.

Obama wants tax revenue without being known for the largest tax hike in recent memory (I hear history a lot, but I'm not so sure that's true).


As for the first point....you do know it was happening regardless, right?
They were due to expire Jan 1, 2011. I am sure you know this but just have to say it.
And given the make up of Congress (even now) there was no way the cuts were getting extended or made permanent.

Yeah, I don't know the exact numbers and all...but I'm guessing the biggest tax hike in history must've been FDR.




I don't think I understand you.

He is saying that because the tax cuts disappear Jan 1, 2001, the correct language is to say they expire. They were impermanent tax cuts; if nothing is done, the tax cuts return to their previous rates.



Having the power to extend the cuts and knowingly not doing so is the same as increasing taxes. My original post shows that I understand the situation pretty clearly.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 259260261262263 269>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.641 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.