SR VI: Incident Free since 2008

Equality 7-2521 wrote: Ricochet wrote: [ Hilarious. And my congratulations to Pat's review. Incredibly well-written and top-notch humor. Too bad is was just as moronic, underneath all that humor. Yet I'm fully convinced that treating Rob's work like that counted much more than Alex and David getting cheered up. Thoughtful, indeed. disgusting Yeah it was moronic as it was written directly with quotes from the ever intelligent people of this forum.

Not that you would have missed the point of the act itself being pointless, singularily STC-good-laugh-worthy, plus (see above in bold) ---- but, fine, let me play by your guidelines, and read again your review (quickly enough deleted, thus again purely gang 's fun worthy; with the exception of a handful of outside readers, nobody even knows what's it about/what happened - so zero point for impressing anybody, or reaching out to anyone through this manifest.)

1. You quoted reviewers who found STW one of the best symphonic albums ever, so if you think they've written stupid stuff, it's them to chat with.

2. Most of the other motives are your own fiction humour, never mentioned in the big argument over at "Reviews discussion" (seriously, how frequent did you ever heard someone rating high something because the artist is posting on this site - thus, sarcasm). So you only have yourself to credit for what, inside the review, was pure blab.

3. So we get to the "vested interest" catchphrase, which is part of a gone-bad conversation, belonging to a sinister admin over which your's and your gang's and now (very likely) the two special-guests' grudge will never mellow until the age of 60, and yet distorting an initially valid, if not plausible assumption, distorted only by how the conversation went (bad enough, I agree) and how outraged the replies to it were. So perhaps a re-read of the conversation, with focus on the beginning. But it's me this time who's blabing, because attention won't be paid anyway, anyhow. It's all down to this remarkable catchphrase: "vested interest". Vested interest, said the sinister admin, and now "we" (you/the gang & guests) must show to others what a sinister fellow that person is. Or, at least, to ironize/mock it to death. Which is high-school level, tops.


Edited by Ricochet - August 17 2009 at 10:54

wish I coulda read that. Sounds offensive.


Although no one cares if you don't know the people in the band, so it seems. Would we have defended Torman Maxt if they were avid forum members?


Edited by King By-Tor - August 17 2009 at 10:58

But it's rather refreshing, can't deny that 

Oh, the only good part (pun) was about how the production would count for how much you'd rate the album. It's indeed an ongoing discussion/debate, that still needs its clarification.


Edited by Ricochet - August 17 2009 at 11:04

LinusW wrote: rushfan4 wrote: Best publicity Robert could have ever asked for. Indeed.

Perhaps, if not tad annoying of the conflict sparked, and the further need to mock based on his work.

King By-Tor wrote: On the bright side... Dire Straits.

poop

NOWIWILLCOMETOSWEDENANDEATYOURFLESH

King By-Tor wrote: NOWIWILLCOMETOSWEDENANDEATYOURFLESH

ITASTELIKECHICKENANDYOUKNOWITSINCEEVERYTHINGALWAYSDOEXCEPTMOOSEWHICHCANADAISFULLOFANDONEISPROBABLYYOURMOTHERCANUCKLOLOLOLOLOLOLO!

Ricochet wrote:   Not that you would have missed the point of the act itself being pointless, singularily STC-good-laugh-worthy, plus (see above in bold) ---- but, fine, let me play by your guidelines, and read again your review (quickly enough deleted, thus again purely gang 's fun worthy; with the exception of a handful of outside readers, nobody even knows what's it about/what happened - so zero point for impressing anybody, or reaching out to anyone through this manifest.) 1. You quoted reviewers who found STW one of the best symphonic albums ever, so if you think they've written stupid stuff, it's them to chat with. 2. Most of the other motives are your own fiction humour, never mentioned in the big argument over at "Reviews discussion" (seriously, how frequent did you ever heard someone rating high something because the artist is posting on this site - thus, sarcasm). So you only have yourself to credit for what, inside the review, was pure blab. 3. So we get to the "vested interest" catchphrase, which is part of a gone-bad conversation, belonging to a sinister admin over which your's and your gang's and now (very likely) the two special-guests' grudge will never mellow until the age of 60, and yet distorting an initially valid, if not plausible assumption, distorted only by how the conversation went (bad enough, I agree) and how outraged the replies to it were. So perhaps a re-read of the conversation, with focus on the beginning. But it's me this time who's blabing, because attention won't be paid anyway, anyhow. It's all down to this remarkable catchphrase: "vested interest". Vested interest, said the sinister admin, and now "we" (you/the gang & guests) must show to others what a sinister fellow that person is. Or, at least, to ironize/mock it to death. Which is high-school level, tops.

Leningrad wrote: King By-Tor wrote: wish I coulda read that. Sounds offensive. I've got it screencapped, so if you actually wanted to read it... you know... you could...

And for this monumental occasion I've chosen to review Epignosis' Still The Waters. I have to say that Still The Waters is one of the finest symphonic prog albums I've had the pleasure of being introduced to this year. Actually I can say even more about this fantastic recording. It is probably the best symphonic prog album I've ever heard. This album is progressive rock. 

Now what justifies such lofty praise. Well I can say with confidence that this album is a clear five starer because Epignosis is a member of the forums. I mean I didn't actually listen to the album, but comeon the guy is on the forum it has to be the best right. Like is Jon Anderson sitting on forum talking to us. Like nope didn't think so. I mean I saw him sitting around the forum making all these post and I was like omg I'm totally gonna go review his album lol like how cool is this? 

That's the only reason this album is good. I mean seriously it doesn't even have professional production how could I legitimately like it? And comeon this is 2009 not 1972, how could a real prog album be made in this decade. And you know I'm not even 25 yet my opinion doesn't mean much. I don't even listen to music I just look at the pretty pictures on the box. 

But yah seriously this album is like the best ever. I'm absolutely sure of it. 

Or am I???????????? 

I hope I don't have a vested interest in writing this review. Doing so would be an insult to the integrity of the site and its most humble collabs.