SR XXV: I'm Gonna Git You Sucka

June wrote: James wrote: June wrote: The problem with this book on Bert Jansch I'm reading it that there's a bunch of folk singers mentioned in it that I've never heard about...  Such as? Wizz Jones Andy Irvine Robin Hall Jimmie MacGregor and a ton more (this is just the page I'm looking at right now)

I don't know them either.  Maybe he made them up?

horsewithteeth11 wrote: PF is definitely better than Queen. Are they better than Can?..... *Thinks really hard* That's tough. I think both have 3 masterpieces or near-masterpieces (Animals, WYWH, and Meddle for PF and Tago Mago, Future Days, and Ege Bamyasi for Can). I think I'd have to say I like both about equally. I might prefer Floyd a bit more but not by much.

I hate to hurt a horse, but you're next!

rushfan4 wrote: horsewithteeth11 wrote: PF is definitely better than Queen. Are they better than Can?..... *Thinks really hard* That's tough. I think both have 3 masterpieces or near-masterpieces (Animals, WYWH, and Meddle for PF and Tago Mago, Future Days, and Ege Bamyasi for Can). I think I'd have to say I like both about equally. I might prefer Floyd a bit more but not by much. Pink Floyd over Can was pretty simple really.  Pink Floyd vs Queen is a lot tougher.

To be fair, I haven't heard a whole Queen album in a long time, so that may be why it was an easier decision for me.

Lizzy wrote: horsewithteeth11 wrote: PF is definitely better than Queen. Are they better than Can?..... *Thinks really hard* That's tough. I think both have 3 masterpieces or near-masterpieces (Animals, WYWH, and Meddle for PF and Tago Mago, Future Days, and Ege Bamyasi for Can). I think I'd have to say I like both about equally. I might prefer Floyd a bit more but not by much. I hate to hurt a horse, but you're next!

I am immune to chainsaws. Try putting poison in my pile of hay instead.

James wrote: All is good in James world.  Lizzy doesn't want to chainsaw me to death.  When she sees that Brian May interview, she'll want to kiss me.

I wouldn't be too sure. I'm in a great chainsawing mood.
And I don;t have the patience to listen to Dr Bri talking about saving the slugs and badgers. So

I haven't been chainsawed yet. 

Oi!

He mostly talks about saving animals, 'tis true.  But he's gone up in my estimation now.  I always liked him before, of course but now he's gained more praise from me.  Except with his religious views.  I still don't understand how he can be an Astrophysicist and be religious.  Ah well.

SaltyJon wrote: I haven't been chainsawed yet.

June wrote: James wrote: Oi! He mostly talks about saving animals, 'tis true.  But he's gone up in my estimation now.  I always liked him before, of course but now he's gained more praise from me.  Except with his religious views.  I still don't understand how he can be an Astrophysicist and be religious.  Ah well. I did not even know he has religious views

He barely does.  He doesn't really talk about it all that much.  He's not an Atheist though.