Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Theism vs. Atheism ... will it ever be settled?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedTheism vs. Atheism ... will it ever be settled?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1819202122 174>
Author
Message
DisgruntledPorcupine View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 16 2010
Location: Thunder Bay CAN
Status: Offline
Points: 4395
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 08 2010 at 21:16
^^
Doesn't it also say that women are not allowed to speak?
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 08 2010 at 21:17
Originally posted by JLocke JLocke wrote:


Yes, that's all very interesting. Now, quote something out of the Old Testament where it says to stone disobedient children to death.

Nighty night. 
The old Testament is not to be understood literally.
 
Jesus came and gave new rules
 

Matthew 5: 43“You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighborh and hate your enemy.’ 44But I tell you: Love your enemiesi and pray for those who persecute you, 45that you may be sons of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. 46If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? 47And if you greet only your brothers, what are you doing more than others? Do not even pagans do that? 48Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.

Pristine clear.
 
Iván
            
Back to Top
DisgruntledPorcupine View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 16 2010
Location: Thunder Bay CAN
Status: Offline
Points: 4395
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 08 2010 at 21:24
Pobody's nerfect. Unhappy
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 08 2010 at 21:35
This is ridiculous. 

Fundamentalism is wrong. Wherever it's found. It's just bad. And here I see more fundamentalism from the side of "reason". The side that I tend to agree with, except when it starts becoming a religion. 

These kind of atheist is very good at putting words in somebody else's mouth. They assume that all religion people believe exactly the same, and think exactly the same. 

I have many people around me who are religious and in whose intelligence and power of reasoning I would never doubt, and whose advice I would take 100 times before I ask for the one of the people who use reason to call other people's beliefs stupid. 

Sorry, in this case I agree with Ivan. If you call the beliefs of a person "stupid" you're pretty muich calling that person stupid. Remember, beliefs define actions, define ethics, define morals. If your beliefs are stupid, how can you not be also stupid? 

I don't believe there is a god. If there is one, I'm quite sure Mike's and the other atheist's brains (including mine) are to small and irrelevant to comprehend it. And if there's no god, so what, this is no contest of whio's right and who's wrong. 

Stop abuse, stop fundamentalism, of course. Stop church's abuses, islam's abuses, stop mutilation, stop rape, of course. It has to be stopped. But that's just stopping that which is wrong. That doesn't mean ALL people who share the same beliefs have to be called the same way and viewed as unreasonable. 

Curiously, the most reasonable person in this entire discussion has been absent, and curiously, he's extremely religious: Robert (Epignosis)


Back to Top
Finnforest View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 16913
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 08 2010 at 21:50
Well, the Mumbari in Babylon 5 just said that the universe and the alien races which inhabit it are God trying to learn more about himself and explore by the continues creation of life forms and their free will.  Thus, God is us. 

Also, there was a scene where a "guardian angel" sprung up to save a person who was about to die, and the event was witnessed by dozens of different aliens.  Each of the aliens witnessed the same even, but the face they saw on the angel was the face of their individual faith traditions.  So they proceeded to argue over what it was they just witnessed moments earlier.  Sounds about right. 

Sorry to butt in with nonsense, but watching Sci-Fi shows is my religion pretty much.....LOL


Edited by Finnforest - July 08 2010 at 21:50
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 08 2010 at 22:05
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

[Hey Iván, I'm just trying to keep the peace in my own inimitable way. However, I do think that likening Mike to the WBC is below the belt. If he behaved in any way approaching how they behave he would have been ejected from this site without a second thought. Mike is many things, but he is not a bigot, he has said repeatedly that he does not think that believers in religions are stupid people.
 
No Dean, but he has said that everything we believe in is stupid.................Please, it's the same thing
 
He has called us delusional, ignorants (I quoted him on the other thread) fanatics and still you don't believe he's arrogant?
 
We ask respect for our beliefs, not to share them, not to agree wtih us, but to avoid denigrating our fundamental beliefs...Is that too much?
 
Iván
My initial comment regarding Mike never having experienced "belief" was directed at him as much as it was at anyone else. His lack of personal experience in this matter is way beyond your never experiencing atheism to the extent that it is not the same thing at all and never can be. You cannot learn belief from a book, it has to be experienced, and without that you can never understand it and you can never understand how anybody can believe it, especially when faced with the cold truth that the people who believe in that belief are rational, logical, intelligent people who will happily and readily discard all other supernatural, paranormal, mystical and mythical things without argument. To someone who has never experienced belief it looks exactly like delusion and ignorance, and by "ignorance" I mean the lack of knowledge that can be corrected by education ... something that Mike has made pains to point out, he honestly thinks that this can be cured through education - which as you, I and everyone else knows is not true. People can have all the facts, all the knowledge and all the understanding and still believe in their religion. And I do not mean "ignorance" because believer's are stupid - that is indeed an insult and one I do not believe that Mike is making, since he has specifically said he is not. Belief is more than just believing in words spoken in a church, it is not something you do with your head but with your heart, so words like "irrational", "delusional" "stupid" and "ignorant" are meaningless when applied to religion (and love come to that).
 
 
 
 
What?
Back to Top
thellama73 View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 08 2010 at 22:20
I feel the need to point out (as people seem to have a hard time grasping this) that very few religious people take the Bible literally (apart from Fundamentalists.)Catholics in particular take an allegorical interpretation of much of the Bible. So when it says that not believing in God will cause you to burn in a fiery pit, it doesn't mean the cartoon version of hell we all think about. It may just mean that the person will be separated from God's presence (like in the first circle of Dante's hell) which from what I've heard is pretty lonely. This emotional pain could be said to be like being in a fiery pit. That's just one example,of course.

So there's no need to argue against the world being made in seven days or Noah fitting every animal in the world into a boat, since nobody here believes in those things literally (I don't think.)
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 08 2010 at 22:47
Me after reading religious argument threads:


Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65248
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 08 2010 at 22:55
LOL  okay Stoney, but what do you intend to shoot?  Yourself, your 'puter, your local post office?

BTW I thought you were Henry with that avy


Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 08 2010 at 22:55
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

My initial comment regarding Mike never having experienced "belief" was directed at him as much as it was at anyone else. His lack of personal experience in this matter is way beyond your never experiencing atheism to the extent that it is not the same thing at all and never can be. You cannot learn belief from a book, it has to be experienced, and without that you can never understand it and you can never understand how anybody can believe it, especially when faced with the cold truth that the people who believe in that belief are rational, logical, intelligent people who will happily and readily discard all other supernatural, paranormal, mystical and mythical things without argument. To someone who has never experienced belief it looks exactly like delusion and ignorance, and by "ignorance" I mean the lack of knowledge that can be corrected by education ... something that Mike has made pains to point out, he honestly thinks that this can be cured through education - which as you, I and everyone else knows is not true. People can have all the facts, all the knowledge and all the understanding and still believe in their religion. And I do not mean "ignorance" because believer's are stupid - that is indeed an insult and one I do not believe that Mike is making, since he has specifically said he is not. Belief is more than just believing in words spoken in a church, it is not something you do with your head but with your heart, so words like "irrational", "delusional" "stupid" and "ignorant" are meaningless when applied to religion (and love come to that).
 
I understand that religion may be out of Mike's experience Dean, but you also learn behaviour by comparison.

If I said All Extreme Tech Metal is stupid, I'm sure he would jump and probably report my post, then he should extrapolate this feeling to what we may feel when somebody says that our beliefs are stupid.

Here we have a group called Alpha & Omega (Brotherhood Of Divine Lamb Of God. News. Divine Revelation Alpha And Omega) http://www.alfayomega.com.pe/principalen.htm that has a TV program where they say Jesus was an ET and that he will come back in his flying saucer to take the believers to Ganymede where paradise is.

This is something that goes beyond my understanding and you can imagine what I think about them, but I wouldn't dare to say a believer from Alpha & Omega...Your beliefs are stupid, because there's something called courtesy and respect.

Iván



Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - July 08 2010 at 23:23
            
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65248
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 08 2010 at 23:01
 ^ LOL  oh dear

BTW, the notion that calling someone's ideas ignorant is not the same as calling the person ignorant is wearing thin.  Of course it's the same thing, at least to the extent that you can expect an angry response.  How would any of us feel if someone said, "Yeah, your taste in food, friends and art is ignorant.  But YOU'RE not ignorant."  C'mon, either have the balls to say it, or the balls not to.  But you can't have it both ways.


Back to Top
thellama73 View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 08 2010 at 23:26
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Here we have a group called Alpha & Omega (Brotherhood Of Divine Lamb Of God. News. Divine Revelation Alpha And Omega) http://www.alfayomega.com.pe/principalen.htm that has a TV program where they say Jesus was an ET and that he will come back in his flying saucer to take the believers to Ganymede where paradise is.

This is something that goes beyond my understanding and you can imagine what I think about them, but I wouldn't dare to say a believer from Alpha & Omega...Your beliefs are stupid, because there's something called courtesy and respect.

Iván



I actually don't think that's that crazy. A lot of the miracles people claim to have witnessed "back in the day" could be easily reproduced by our technology. It's not outside the realm of possibility that visitors from another world showed up and were like "I'm God! Look at my magic tricks! Oh, I have to go now. I might come back someday."

Okay, so it's not probable, but certainly not impossible. I didn't mean to drag the thread off topic. Carry on.

P.S. Totally agree with your point about respect and courtesy.
Back to Top
UndercoverBoy View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 10 2009
Location: Tulsa, OK, U.S.
Status: Offline
Points: 5148
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 08 2010 at 23:30
Originally posted by thellama73 thellama73 wrote:

Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Here we have a group called Alpha & Omega (Brotherhood Of Divine Lamb Of God. News. Divine Revelation Alpha And Omega) http://www.alfayomega.com.pe/principalen.htm that has a TV program where they say Jesus was an ET and that he will come back in his flying saucer to take the believers to Ganymede where paradise is.

This is something that goes beyond my understanding and you can imagine what I think about them, but I wouldn't dare to say a believer from Alpha & Omega...Your beliefs are stupid, because there's something called courtesy and respect.

Iván



I actually don't think that's that crazy. A lot of the miracles people claim to have witnessed "back in the day" could be easily reproduced by our technology. It's not outside the realm of possibility that visitors from another world showed up and were like "I'm God! Look at my magic tricks! Oh, I have to go now. I might come back someday."

Okay, so it's not probable, but certainly not impossible. I didn't mean to drag the thread off topic. Carry on.

P.S. Totally agree with your point about respect and courtesy.
Ever heard of Daniken?LOL
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 09 2010 at 00:17
God damn it...not even in hell are we safe from the rick roll.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LKY5vvDC7Bc&feature=related
Back to Top
JLocke View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 09 2010 at 00:41
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by JLocke JLocke wrote:


Yes, that's all very interesting. Now, quote something out of the Old Testament where it says to stone disobedient children to death.

Nighty night. 
The old Testament is not to be understood literally.
 
Jesus came and gave new rules
 

Matthew 5: 43“You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighborh and hate your enemy.’ 44But I tell you: Love your enemiesi and pray for those who persecute you, 45that you may be sons of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. 46If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? 47And if you greet only your brothers, what are you doing more than others? Do not even pagans do that? 48Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.

Pristine clear.
 
Iván

Not my point. God at one point or another said it was okay to kill your children. That's wrong. I don't care if certain interpretations try to twist it and say ''well, we can't take that literally''-- it was said, nonetheless. So what if Jesus came later and said ''Hey, daddy's wrong. Listen to ME instead,'' such a thing should have never been said to be okay, in any form. 

I don't see how you could possibly not understand why someone who believes in that book is much more inclined to be judgmental than someone who doesn't buy into it at all. I'm not saying ALL believers are judgmental, but many are, and it's because of the Old Testament passages (amended by Jesus, or not). I'm trying to show you why christians are more likely to pass judgment than non-believers, but you still don't believe that, do you?

Back to Top
JLocke View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 09 2010 at 00:47
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

This is ridiculous. 

Fundamentalism is wrong. Wherever it's found. It's just bad. And here I see more fundamentalism from the side of "reason". The side that I tend to agree with, except when it starts becoming a religion. 

These kind of atheist is very good at putting words in somebody else's mouth. They assume that all religion people believe exactly the same, and think exactly the same. 

I have many people around me who are religious and in whose intelligence and power of reasoning I would never doubt, and whose advice I would take 100 times before I ask for the one of the people who use reason to call other people's beliefs stupid. 

Sorry, in this case I agree with Ivan. If you call the beliefs of a person "stupid" you're pretty muich calling that person stupid. Remember, beliefs define actions, define ethics, define morals. If your beliefs are stupid, how can you not be also stupid? 

I don't believe there is a god. If there is one, I'm quite sure Mike's and the other atheist's brains (including mine) are to small and irrelevant to comprehend it. And if there's no god, so what, this is no contest of whio's right and who's wrong. 

Stop abuse, stop fundamentalism, of course. Stop church's abuses, islam's abuses, stop mutilation, stop rape, of course. It has to be stopped. But that's just stopping that which is wrong. That doesn't mean ALL people who share the same beliefs have to be called the same way and viewed as unreasonable. 

Curiously, the most reasonable person in this entire discussion has been absent, and curiously, he's extremely religious: Robert (Epignosis)



I surely hope you're not referring to me. I used to be a believer, and you won't find a more understanding person than I on how diverse and varied a believer and his views on the bible can be. 

But the bible says what it says. You can tip-toe around certain things you don't like, you can even argue that certain passages are no longer relevant, but the bottom line is this: someone at some point wrote down as religious law that it was okay to kill and abuse your family, persecute homosexuality, put other human beings into bondage and slavery, etc. And no amount of re-interpreting and modernizing as an afterthought will make that okay in my eyes. 

And Rob is smart enough to know when to quit beating a dead horse. Mike is never going to change his mind, and debating in his threads only brings about heated arguments and name-calling (ultimately). Anyone with real smarts avoids an accident waiting to happen. But since I don't have real smarts, I come and play. LOL


Edited by JLocke - July 09 2010 at 01:08
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 09 2010 at 03:18
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

 ^ LOL  oh dear

BTW, the notion that calling someone's ideas ignorant is not the same as calling the person ignorant is wearing thin.  Of course it's the same thing, at least to the extent that you can expect an angry response.  How would any of us feel if someone said, "Yeah, your taste in food, friends and art is ignorant.  But YOU'RE not ignorant."  C'mon, either have the balls to say it, or the balls not to.  But you can't have it both ways.


Okay. Just one minor point. No one has called anyones belief in religion ignorant. I have searched  each of the Atheist threads and the first use of the word "ignorant" every time is by Iván.
 
 
 
What?
Back to Top
seventhsojourn View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 11 2009
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 4006
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 09 2010 at 03:24
Originally posted by JLocke JLocke wrote:

Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

This is ridiculous. 

Fundamentalism is wrong. Wherever it's found. It's just bad. And here I see more fundamentalism from the side of "reason". The side that I tend to agree with, except when it starts becoming a religion. 

These kind of atheist is very good at putting words in somebody else's mouth. They assume that all religion people believe exactly the same, and think exactly the same. 

I have many people around me who are religious and in whose intelligence and power of reasoning I would never doubt, and whose advice I would take 100 times before I ask for the one of the people who use reason to call other people's beliefs stupid. 

Sorry, in this case I agree with Ivan. If you call the beliefs of a person "stupid" you're pretty muich calling that person stupid. Remember, beliefs define actions, define ethics, define morals. If your beliefs are stupid, how can you not be also stupid? 

I don't believe there is a god. If there is one, I'm quite sure Mike's and the other atheist's brains (including mine) are to small and irrelevant to comprehend it. And if there's no god, so what, this is no contest of whio's right and who's wrong. 

Stop abuse, stop fundamentalism, of course. Stop church's abuses, islam's abuses, stop mutilation, stop rape, of course. It has to be stopped. But that's just stopping that which is wrong. That doesn't mean ALL people who share the same beliefs have to be called the same way and viewed as unreasonable. 

Curiously, the most reasonable person in this entire discussion has been absent, and curiously, he's extremely religious: Robert (Epignosis)



I surely hope you're not referring to me. I used to be a believer, and you won't find a more understanding person than I on how diverse and varied a believer and his views on the bible can be. 

But the bible says what it says. You can tip-toe around certain things you don't like, you can even argue that certain passages are no longer relevant, but the bottom line is this: someone at some point wrote down as religious law that it was okay to kill and abuse your family, persecute homosexuality, put other human beings into bondage and slavery, etc. And no amount of re-interpreting and modernizing as an afterthought will make that okay in my eyes. 

And Rob is smart enough to know when to quit beating a dead horse. Mike is never going to change his mind, and debating in his threads only brings about heated arguments and name-calling (ultimately). Anyone with real smarts avoids an accident waiting to happen. But since I don't have real smarts, I come and play. LOL
 
This is similar to the point I was trying to make in my post at the top of page 4 of this thread.
 
BTW, I don't discard out of hand... paranormal, aliens or megafauna (thanks for that great word Dean!)... well, maybe the megafauna... guess that makes me a real basket case LOL
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 09 2010 at 04:06
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

 ^ LOL  oh dear

BTW, the notion that calling someone's ideas ignorant is not the same as calling the person ignorant is wearing thin.  Of course it's the same thing, at least to the extent that you can expect an angry response.  How would any of us feel if someone said, "Yeah, your taste in food, friends and art is ignorant.  But YOU'RE not ignorant."  C'mon, either have the balls to say it, or the balls not to.  But you can't have it both ways.


Okay. Just one minor point. No one has called anyones belief in religion ignorant. I have searched  each of the Atheist threads and the first use of the word "ignorant" every time is by Iván.
 
 
 


I've used the word. But I think that it's often misunderstood as an insult, when instead it simply means that someone is ignoring something, which is a fairly neutral observation. For example, in "ignorant fool" it definitely adds to insult, whereas in "argument from ignorance" it has nothing to do with insults.
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 09 2010 at 04:11
^ the same goes for the word "delusion" - it has many meanings. I'm sure that I'm delusional myself about something ... nobody's immune from holding false beliefs.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1819202122 174>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.559 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.