Most Metal Album Cover

akamaisondufromage wrote:

Dead was a very appropriate stage name for that guy to choose.

Triceratopsoil wrote: something something parental responsibilities etc

If the parents are allowing their children to go on an all-ages forum, where they know nothing x-rated stuff won't happen, they can't know someone is going to post a crime scene photo, even though it is technically an album cover; but it's still a crime scene photo. Can we start a thread posting the top 10 best crime scene photos?

^ Yep, everyone's defense for the indefensible. I've hidden some posts (cos I can).
I get enough mutilation, torture and human degradation at home.

ExittheLemming wrote: ^ Yep, everyone's defense for the indefensible. I've hidden some posts (cos I can). I get enough mutilation, torture and human degradation at home.

Yet you saw no problem with the 'Sexual Carnage' album cover (now also hidden)

Common sense please people

No I see absolutely no problem with the Sexual Carnage album cover. I think there´s quite a bit of difference between showing a picture of a man who has blown his brains out and showing a gimmick picture of a nude lady. The first is disgusting on so many levels, while the latter really shouldn´t bother anyone unless you can´t cope with the site of mother nature herself. It´s nudity alright, but it´s far from what I perceive as pornography (we have several covers here on PA with nude ladies on the front, including "Electric Ladyland" which features several naked ladies). I guess I just have to accept that some people find gimmick nudity (and we´re talking a couple of breasts) offensive .

Edited by UMUR - June 01 2012 at 04:50

So there´s a difference (not talking size or prefered personal taste ) between the breasts shown on the Sexual Carnage cover and the breasts shown on the Electric Ladyland cover? In your world the former is pornography and the latter art? Is that what you´re getting at?

[/thread]