Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
octopus-4
Special Collaborator
RIO/Avant/Zeuhl,Neo & Post/Math Teams
Joined: October 31 2006
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 14773
|
Posted: December 05 2011 at 13:59 |
to pretend=to try in advance (from latin praetendo). prae="in front of".
What are we speaking about? There are good lyrics and bad lyrics as well as good music and bad music, or even rappers who pretend to call music what they do.
|
I stand with Roger Waters, I stand with Joan Baez, I stand with Victor Jara, I stand with Woody Guthrie. Music is revolution
|
 |
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: December 05 2011 at 15:56 |
octopus-4 wrote:
to pretend=to try in advance (from latin praetendo). prae="in front of". |
...from the Latin praetendere = to put forward or stretch forth - originally it meant 'to claim' as in Bonnie Prince Charlie, The Young Pretender who claimed the throne. It was later that it came to mean false claim.
octopus-4 wrote:
What are we speaking about? There are good lyrics and bad lyrics as well as good music and bad music, or even rappers who pretend to call music what they do. |
It is nothing to do with good or bad music, good or bad lyrics - a piece of music that has good music and lyric can still be called pretentious, though personally I don't believe that any piece of music (good or bad) can ever be pretentious in itself.
Pretentious is when the artist or fans makes claims about the music that are attempting to impress by affecting greater importance, talent, culture, etc., than it actually possesses. Raising "Prog" to high Art (with a capital "A") and putting on a par with the great Classic works (rather than the really crap classical works that no one has ever heard of) is pretentious in the extreme - calling Prog anything other than what it is (Popular Rock Music) is pretentious and vainglorious.
Edited by Dean - December 05 2011 at 16:00
|
What?
|
 |
colorofmoney91
Prog Reviewer
Joined: March 16 2008
Location: Biosphere
Status: Offline
Points: 22774
|
Posted: December 05 2011 at 16:14 |
Vompatti wrote:
Much of bad music is pretentious regardless of how complex it is. |
|
|
 |
Triceratopsoil
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 03 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 18016
|
Posted: December 05 2011 at 16:29 |
colorofmoney91 wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
Much of bad music is pretentious regardless of how complex it is. |
|
|
 |
Earendil
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 17 2008
Location: Indiana, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1584
|
Posted: December 05 2011 at 17:50 |
probably
|
 |
abnormalist
Forum Newbie
Joined: November 21 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 17
|
Posted: December 05 2011 at 17:58 |
Well, I think that term has been tossed around way too much. If a musician feels that what he/she creates is more than "just music" and is some kind of spiritual or transcendental experience, then yes it would be pretentious, because it would be pretending to be something it's not. There's no denying that music can create very strong emotions, but, at the core, it's just structured sound that happens to please somebody's ears.
|
 |
The Miracle
Prog Reviewer
Joined: May 29 2005
Location: hell
Status: Offline
Points: 28427
|
Posted: December 05 2011 at 18:06 |
I like my music to be ambitious, which is the same as pretentious but in a good way. A band can come off as plain pretentious when they try too hard to be "intelligent' or to pull off an overblown concept, but that's not restricted to prog and doesn't have to characterize the band's entire output. So I think it's a valid term to describe the flaws of a particular album or track, but to apply it to a whole genre is a sweeping generalization. People who dislike challenging or complex music (such as punks and Rolling Stone reviewers) like to use that term as an excuse to dismiss it, so that's how prog got stuck with that stereotype.
|
|
 |
Alitare
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 08 2008
Location: New York
Status: Offline
Points: 3595
|
Posted: December 05 2011 at 20:33 |
I dislike theoretically challenging/complex music and not only do I hate Punks/punk music in general, but I also detest Rolling Stone Magazine. I like music to be emotionally challenging, but oh well. Is some progressive rock pretentious? Of course! Most of them pretended that simply changing a song from 4/4 time to 19/4 time and changing the length from 4 minutes to 14 minutes makes the songwriting 'better', which makes me laugh a bit. That's a fair bit of pretense. And then they start thinking that quoting Ayn Rand or singing about Henry VIII makes the music somehow innately 'deeper', as if 'I will choose Free Will' is some illustrious, mind-blowing statement. Golly!
I could meander and rant for hours, but I won't. I'm an anti-prog proggist. I love my Aqualung and 1970's Floyd and Gabriel's Melt is so damn exciting! But I can't really appreciate the 'complexity' and 'technical prowess' aspects to this genre. This isn't intended to be some all-encompassing assessment, nor is it a judgement. I'm merely attempting to express my feelings - not my beliefs, my feelings.
|
 |
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Online
Points: 65758
|
Posted: December 05 2011 at 20:40 |
Yes, it is.
|
 |
octopus-4
Special Collaborator
RIO/Avant/Zeuhl,Neo & Post/Math Teams
Joined: October 31 2006
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 14773
|
Posted: December 06 2011 at 00:06 |
Dean wrote:
octopus-4 wrote:
to pretend=to try in advance (from latin praetendo). prae="in front of". |
...from the Latin praetendere = to put forward or stretch forth - originally it meant 'to claim' as in Bonnie Prince Charlie, The Young Pretender who claimed the throne. It was later that it came to mean false claim.
octopus-4 wrote:
What are we speaking about? There are good lyrics and bad lyrics as well as good music and bad music, or even rappers who pretend to call music what they do. |
It is nothing to do with good or bad music, good or bad lyrics - a piece of music that has good music and lyric can still be called pretentious, though personally I don't believe that any piece of music (good or bad) can ever be pretentious in itself.
Pretentious is when the artist or fans makes claims about the music that are attempting to impress by affecting greater importance, talent, culture, etc., than it actually possesses. Raising "Prog" to high Art (with a capital "A") and putting on a par with the great Classic works (rather than the really crap classical works that no one has ever heard of) is pretentious in the extreme - calling Prog anything other than what it is (Popular Rock Music) is pretentious and vainglorious. |
If this is the definition, I think that there are a lot of examples in the top 100: ELP, Yes, Renaissance, and for different reasons King Crimson and so on... the answer should be "yes", but are we absolutely sure that the absolute value (if something like an absolute value exists) of at least one of their work is not "Art"? How many classical works are possibly pretentious when we go to less known or less important classical artists?
Prog is not classical music and is not jazz, but how can we be sure that in the 22nd Century prog and rock won't be studied in the schools? Thinking to Alice Cooper painted close to Beethoven in the same book is quite funny isn't it?
|
I stand with Roger Waters, I stand with Joan Baez, I stand with Victor Jara, I stand with Woody Guthrie. Music is revolution
|
 |
cannon
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 03 2010
Location: Coho Country
Status: Offline
Points: 1302
|
Posted: December 06 2011 at 03:58 |
 "What does it feel like to be in the same room with the greatest rock singer in history?"
|
 |
TODDLER
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: August 28 2009
Location: Vineland, N.J.
Status: Offline
Points: 3126
|
Posted: December 06 2011 at 08:28 |
The word "pretentious" is a word which is over-used in the world of prog. The lyrics of prog come across as being pretentious...(there goes that word again), and then you have the musicians composing a concept album. This is what rattles the chains of prog haters. The last thing on earth they want to hear is a story about Aqualung the hobo or the sci-fi of Tarkus, etc, ect....but people of this nature leave out the other chapters and they miss out on great music. Merlin by Halloween, Attic Thoughts by Bo Hanssan, and all sorts of underground prog artists who have taken the music steps beyond what appears to ride the perfect wave on the surface. Pretentious...the word itself...defines a style of music. If prog is like theatre then it is pretenious for it's nature alone. It's what many people around me have always hated about prog. It's ridiculous to consider their viewpoint a weight of honest value. It's all a preference ..however adults have to return to childhood and make fun of the things they dislike in life. I make fun of the news media and also find it annoying. If I dish it out, I should be able to take it. That is why prog should remain a private self-endulgent affair with yourself.
|
 |
Slartibartfast
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
|
Posted: December 06 2011 at 08:51 |
To be into the music just because of song length or difficult time signatures really misses the point and is the definition of pretentious. If you don't like it simply because it sounds good to you then why bother?
|
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
 |
JJLehto
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
|
Posted: December 06 2011 at 09:20 |
Oh my yes!
Really though, every genre of music is to some extent so watcha gunna do?
|
 |
The Neck Romancer
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 01 2010
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 10189
|
Posted: December 06 2011 at 09:53 |
Triceratopsoil wrote:
colorofmoney91 wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
Much of bad music is pretentious regardless of how complex it is. |
|
|
|
 |
DisgruntledPorcupine
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 16 2010
Location: Thunder Bay CAN
Status: Offline
Points: 4395
|
Posted: December 06 2011 at 09:58 |
Correct. Complexity has absolutely 0 to do with pretentiousness.
|
 |
The Willow Farmer
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 04 2011
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 112
|
Posted: December 06 2011 at 10:39 |
JS19 wrote:
When we start topics on this forum called 'How To Convert People To Prog', that's pretentious. |
True dat
|
Recent Music Acquisitions:
Johnny Marr-"The Messenger"
Steven Wilson-"The Raven that Refused to Sing"
Fish-"Sunsets on Empire"
Riverside-"Shrine of New Generation Slaves"
|
 |
octopus-4
Special Collaborator
RIO/Avant/Zeuhl,Neo & Post/Math Teams
Joined: October 31 2006
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 14773
|
Posted: December 06 2011 at 10:44 |
The Willow Farmer wrote:
JS19 wrote:
When we start topics on this forum called 'How To Convert People To Prog', that's pretentious. |
True dat |
But at least we have a "Vangelis" to show them 
|
I stand with Roger Waters, I stand with Joan Baez, I stand with Victor Jara, I stand with Woody Guthrie. Music is revolution
|
 |
Canterzeuhl
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 06 2011
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 452
|
Posted: December 06 2011 at 10:59 |
Is it pretentious because we know what we're talking about?
To imagine for a moment I don't know what a time signature is, nor what a Moog sounds like and instead I enjoy a thumping backbeat to grind in a dingy club to, and I asked you what sort of music you like, I don't think you could sound like anything else other than pretentious.
Well, other than boring and unsexy.
|
 |
cstack3
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: July 20 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Status: Offline
Points: 7490
|
Posted: December 06 2011 at 12:07 |
Pretentious?? What on earth do you mean??
|
 |
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.