How much more should collab/reviewer ratings count

Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic

 clarke2001 wrote:

In my opinion:
Ratings with reviews:

for reviewers/collabs/members who rated up to 50 albums: weight 5.
for reviewers/collabs/members who rated up to 100 albums: weight 10.
for reviewers/collabs/members who rated up to 150 albums: weight 15.
for reviewers/collabs/members who rated up to 200 albums: weight 20.
etc...

regardless of member/reviewer status.

Our most prolific members will get the "heaviest" rating weights.

Do we need "rat races"?
I think when writing reviews people rather try to express themselves than win the title of the Most Prolific Reviewer. 

Different weights are confusing and crazy.
If I see several reviews, each of them gives to some album from 1 to 5 stars, that's enough. I don't care if some of them have different weights.

Edited by NotAProghead - December 23 2007 at 02:08

Poll Question: How much more should the ratings of collabs/prog reviewers count?
Poll Choice	Votes	Poll Statistics
Same as everyone	9	[47.37%]
2 times	1	[5.26%]
3	1	[5.26%]
4	1	[5.26%]
5	0	[0.00%]
6	0	[0.00%]
7	0	[0.00%]
8	1	[5.26%]
9	0	[0.00%]
10 times	5	[26.32%]
More than 10 times	1	[5.26%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted