Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - non prog metal vote
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic Closednon prog metal vote

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>
Poll Question: whats your favourite metal group (non prog)
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
20 [28.99%]
6 [8.70%]
2 [2.90%]
11 [15.94%]
1 [1.45%]
0 [0.00%]
0 [0.00%]
0 [0.00%]
1 [1.45%]
1 [1.45%]
27 [39.13%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
Reed Lover View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2005 at 11:48
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

Originally posted by Reed Lover Reed Lover wrote:

Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

No Motorhead or Black Sabbath?

I guess it doesn't matter, because Metallica are/were the ultimate Heavy Metal band. Before them, Motorhead and Sabbath moulded the genre. Metallica kicked the genre's ass.

...in your very humble opinion.........Wink
I think,Metal said all it had to say by 1980.After that it was all about degrees of loudness and crassness! (IMVHO)Big smile

I couldn't disagree more - as a single example, Number of the Beast (1982) was fantastically melodic and very polished.

Your opinion Cert! Fantastically melodic???? Iron maiden are extremely melodic?Ermm

Kill 'Em All (1983) was very rough, production-wise, but blew old-school metal into the dark ages - it's an incredible album full of fresh, new energy, and I cannot think of an album before it with that kind of buzz (except, maybe Metal Church's debut). Metal Militia and Whiplash are stunning examples of what the band had done to revitalise metal.

Your opinion....

Ride the Lightning (1984) added melody and a slick production to Metallica's energy - which intensified in places (Fight Fire with Fire, Trapped Under Ice), whilst being reigned back in others (Fade to Black, For Whom the Bell Tolls).Opinion

Master of Puppets (1986) really showed the world a trick or two - this is where prog metal began, IMNSHO. Battery is a devastating assault on the ears, whilst maintaining a powerful integrity. The title track is practically prog rock, with the numerous time-changes and mega-riffathon worthy of Rush, I would suggest. Then there's Sanitarium, plagirised by nearly every so-called prog metal band on the planet, it seems; Orion, showcasing their melodic sensibilities, and Damage Inc., proving that they were still masters of thrash.Opinion!!

...And Justice for All IS the 1st prog metal album. 'nuff said. It's awesome.That "O" word again-unless I accept that your opinion is more worthy than mine,I dont really understand what you are taking me to task for?

So I'll give you something to argue about:I think "2112" is the first prog metal album and that was 1976...Big smileThe title track is guitar based,no real use of keyboards but "symphonic" in the broadest sense of the word....an intro that introduces elements of the main themes,sections that are self-contained but echo the intro's  motif and a finale,presenting a story from start to finish..oh and top-notch ensemble playing.

Metallica (the Black album) is toned down, but with that massive production that sparked the whole nu-metal thing, and revolutionised metal for the 1990s.

Metallica were the pioneers - the trailblazers of new (not "nu") metal - but they had plenty of challengers;

Slayer, despite the dreadful production on their 1st two albums, kept the faith and produced the ultimate thrash album that has remained a benchmark ever since;

the "ultimate" in your opinion or general concensus?

Reign in Blood is the ultimate in breakneck speed, brutal riffs, screaming vocals and dive-bombing guitars. South of Heaven was much heavier, thanks to even better production, and is a classic in its own right - out-Sabbathing Sabbath, but remains in the shadow of Reign in Blood.
Your use of absolutes suggests that this view is incontravertible.Confused

Other bands that shouldn't be overlooked include the infamous Napalm Death, who took speed metal to its natural conclusion - everything since has just been gravy really. Also worth a mention as pioneers of the darker genre are Helloween, for their early "Maiden on speed" sound, Death, for the notorious and now omnipresent death grunts, Celtic Frost for their daring experimentation, Megadeth, Voivod and Kreator.

All these bands experimented and took their music to new levels - this was a time when creating new music was a good thing again; it was almost like being back in the 1970s to hear all this new stuff being created.


Sabbath (Ozzy era and Dio era),Thin Lizzy,,UFO,Rainbow (Dio era),Scorpions (first 5 or 6 albums were very good) early Van Halen could all be very heavy but tuneful with it.Motorhead (in my experience) where, and should have remained, unique and enjoyable for that fact.Lemmy's vocals were at odds with the bands above and seem to have spawned all these "barking" metal vocalists that are so prevalent now.If I was 10 years younger I would have probably got into Maiden, and later,Metallica but they always seemed empty,hackneyed and soulless to me.

Aha-"to me" -opinion-Ie they did nothing for me!!!

I really don't understand that

What you dont understand why I have that opinion? It is a matter of taste-I didnt say they were rubbish or anything......

 - Metallica's first 3 albums are crammed full of the passion and hunger that up and coming bands should show - and then some. From the opening of Kill 'Em All - the heavy guitars being gradually faded UP in the mix, through the sheer exuberance of The Four Horsemen,  the gleeful power-riffing of Seek and Destroy and the insanity of Whiplash - this is an album full of a new kind of spirit, but based in the rifferama of Black Sabbath (almost constant use of tritones) and Motorhead.

You are a big-time Metallica fan,I am not......

 Hetfield's voice is atypical of the speed/thrash genre too - it's almost a tuneful "bark"!

But a bark nonetheless.

Frankly, after Metallica entered the scene, I felt that the old school rock bands (Rainbow, UFO, Lizzy, etc.) all sounded a bit tired, lame and thin. Fortunately I got over that, and can enjoy all these bands - and some of the newer crowd, like Cradle of Filth, Killswitch Engage, System of a Down and Bathory. I still don't like Dream Theater though

So we are agreeing or disagreeing?

Same goes for Slayer, although some of the other bands early material sounded a bit nervous, despite the heavy pretensions. Sacred Reich are another good band of the time - they always sounded like they enjoyed what they did.

I dont like thrash/speed metal that is why I am stuck in the 1970's. Tanking along at 100 mph is not condusive to "feel" and "soul", in my opinion.

 



Edited by Reed Lover



Back to Top
Wrath_of_Ninian View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: December 04 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 230
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2005 at 11:51
Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

Iron Maiden were pretty good musicians, and for a while were probably at the top of the metal dung heap. Their albums Killers and Number of the Beast, were as good as they got IMO. After drummer Clive Burr left and Nicko McBrain joined their souned changed, and not just their drum sound! The guitar solos became 'whingy' sounding, Dave Murrays lead guitar sound became very weak. Bruce Dickinson was putting too much vibrato on his voice. They tried to be as clever and conceptual as their prog idols, and failed because at the end of the day, they were just 'heavy metal' and were therefore constrained within the creative walls of power chords and spandex pants. Long songs, the occasional synth guitar, odd time signature, and reference to an opium smoking poet does not a great band make...

Metallica were able to make better 'progessive' metal because they didn't carry the baggage of cliche that Maiden did.

In MY very humble opinion..

Agreed, but with provisions!

Personally I think Powerslave was their strongest moment, but they were still 'creating' by Somewhere In Time (1986/87) and some (not me) would even harbour Seventh Son as their last great masterwork.  All you get now is re-hashed versions of the earlier classics.  I certainly preferred Dianno's voice, much more punky, and probably Burr's drumming (though McBrain has some exquisite moments). 

However, I think they were as clever in places as the idols they draw influence from - especially given that by 1978, Genesis and Crimson made up the musical dung heap (see also Yes, ELP, Tull), and Rush were slowly sliding down the side of it. Most importantly, there are strong melodies beneath all that distortion.

"Long songs, the occasional synth guitar, odd time signature, and reference to an opium smoking poet does not a great band make..."

Agreed.  But the collaborators seem to ask alot less of some new 'prog' bands in order to embrace them into the archives....

Unfortunately, where I totally disagree is your summation of Metallica, who are just unlistenable.  Tuneless, boring, technique-driven, rifferama, with nothing to offer the discerning listener except the opportunity to shake the excess wax from one's ears by frivilous bouncing of the head.  One step down from Techno.  And I hate James Hetfield - what a t**t!  I have never understood the continuing success of this band.  Mind-boggling.  I guess we all have our pet hates. 

At least Slayer had a bit of blood'n'guts about them.

 

"Now all the seasons run together, and the middle days are gone..."
Back to Top
Jimbo View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 28 2005
Location: Helsinki
Status: Offline
Points: 2818
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2005 at 12:09
None of them.. Sorry! 
Back to Top
Aaron View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 08 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 395
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2005 at 12:19

this poll is wicked f**king gay

Aaron

Back to Top
billyshears'67 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 26 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 161
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2005 at 12:22
Why of course,

The....

IRON MAIDEN!!!!!


Peace & take care
Back to Top
Manunkind View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 02 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 2373
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2005 at 12:50

Ah, good ol'metal... the thing that defined my tastes before prog...

But hey, these bands up there are more aluminium than real metal. And some are more plastic, too...

Anyway, these are some of my current favs, and this is at least titanium:

Death (all the albums from "Human" to "The Sound of Perseverance", though they probably shouldn't be mentioned here as they are very prog in my opinion).

Cryptopsy (kinda like Meshuggah on speed)

Nile (one of the few death metal acts that aren't boring, repetitive and devoid of expression)

Khanate (slow and heavy like a hippopotamus driving a steam-roller)

"In war there is no time to teach or learn Zen. Carry a strong stick. Bash your attackers." - Zen Master Ikkyu Sojun
Back to Top
Vaize View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: January 13 2005
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 55
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2005 at 13:23
I clicked Iron Maiden, but I´d like to see Sepultura included in the list.
And I hope that, in the future, the best band of my home, my street, my neighborhood, my town, Veuliah, will be included in polls such as this...
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Veuliah - Brazilian Heavy Metal My page
Back to Top
greenback View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: August 14 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3300
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2005 at 13:33

Iron maiden, followed by judas priest!

iron maiden - killers is the best metal album!

black sabbath should be there!

very honorable mention: ACCEPT!!!!!!!!!

and, if you don't name it metal progressive , MERCYFUL FATE!

ac/dc is not metal



Edited by greenback
[HEADPINS - LINE OF FIRE: THE RECORD HAVING THE MOST POWERFUL GUITAR SOUND IN THE WHOLE HISTORY OF MUSIC!>
Back to Top
Vibrationbaby View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2005 at 13:54
Wow! Maybe we should change this site`s name to metalarchives.com. Metal, like prog,  has all kinds of subdivisions and I listen to a lot of heavy music whether or not it is Rock n`Roll  or metal. Given the choices above I took Priest. Other heavy bands I have listened to over the years include:

Sabbath  (Hell, I played in a Black Sabbath cover band for about 4 months many moons ago)
Iron Maiden
Soundgarden
Scorpions ( In the early 70`s they used to open for Hungarian prog-rockers Omega)
Metallica
Megadeth
9 Inch Nails
Ministry
Ramstein (I just bought ther latest Reise Reise, funny videos, check out  Keine Lust)
Laibach
Deep Purple
Tool


Back to Top
Valarius View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 08 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 1480
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 11 2005 at 03:20
Metallica.
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 11 2005 at 03:40
Originally posted by Wrath_of_Ninian Wrath_of_Ninian wrote:

Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

Iron Maiden were pretty good musicians, and for a while were probably at the top of the metal dung heap. Their albums Killers and Number of the Beast, were as good as they got IMO. After drummer Clive Burr left and Nicko McBrain joined their souned changed, and not just their drum sound! The guitar solos became 'whingy' sounding, Dave Murrays lead guitar sound became very weak. Bruce Dickinson was putting too much vibrato on his voice. They tried to be as clever and conceptual as their prog idols, and failed because at the end of the day, they were just 'heavy metal' and were therefore constrained within the creative walls of power chords and spandex pants. Long songs, the occasional synth guitar, odd time signature, and reference to an opium smoking poet does not a great band make...

Metallica were able to make better 'progessive' metal because they didn't carry the baggage of cliche that Maiden did.

In MY very humble opinion..

Agreed, but with provisions!

Personally I think Powerslave was their strongest moment, but they were still 'creating' by Somewhere In Time (1986/87) and some (not me) would even harbour Seventh Son as their last great masterwork.  All you get now is re-hashed versions of the earlier classics.  I certainly preferred Dianno's voice, much more punky, and probably Burr's drumming (though McBrain has some exquisite moments). 

However, I think they were as clever in places as the idols they draw influence from - especially given that by 1978, Genesis and Crimson made up the musical dung heap (see also Yes, ELP, Tull), and Rush were slowly sliding down the side of it. Most importantly, there are strong melodies beneath all that distortion.

"Long songs, the occasional synth guitar, odd time signature, and reference to an opium smoking poet does not a great band make..."

Agreed.  But the collaborators seem to ask alot less of some new 'prog' bands in order to embrace them into the archives....

Unfortunately, where I totally disagree is your summation of Metallica, who are just unlistenable.  Tuneless, boring, technique-driven, rifferama, with nothing to offer the discerning listener except the opportunity to shake the excess wax from one's ears by frivilous bouncing of the head.  One step down from Techno.  And I hate James Hetfield - what a t**t!  I have never understood the continuing success of this band.  Mind-boggling.  I guess we all have our pet hates. 

At least Slayer had a bit of blood'n'guts about them.

 

Slayers 'Reign in blood' has to be the best thrash album IMO. You cant really fault the playing, I especially like Dave Lombardos drumming. I couldn't believe the sheer brutallity when I first heard it

But its entertainment at the end of the day. I cant really take most HM seriously at all these days. Its only really Sabbath and Motorhead I have time for these days.

With regard to Iron Maiden, I have a love-hate relationship. They were the first HM band I got into. The number of the beast was the first Maiden album I heard. I had not heard Dianno singing at that point. I liked Dickinsons voice on the Beast, but by the time 'Piece of mind' came out, he was warbling and straining terribly. The songs were weak and lacked the passion of the best off the Beast. Notably 'Sun and Steel' 'Quest for fire' which were absolute drivel IMO. Mind you, 'To tame a land' was good! The voice grated, the lyrics failed me, and as they tried to 'prog out' on subsequent albums I was left wanting them to go back to the Beast format and leave 'clever' music to the masters

RUSH - SLIDING DOWN THE SIDE OF THE DUNG HEAP IN 1978..!!?? NO WAY, BUDDY. THEY WERE AT THEIR PEAK BETWEEN 1978 - 1981. HEMISPHERES TO MOVING PICTURES.

In my opinion..

Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
Rob The Good View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 17 2004
Location: New Zealand
Status: Offline
Points: 476
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 11 2005 at 04:00
JETHRO TULL of course!

They won the 1987 Grammy for best metal album with "Crest of a Knave"
They left Metallica in their wake! Ouch!
And Jesus said unto John, "come forth and receive eternal life..."
Unfortunately, John came fifth and was stuck with a toaster.
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 11 2005 at 07:00
Originally posted by Reed Lover Reed Lover wrote:

Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

Originally posted by Reed Lover Reed Lover wrote:

Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

No Motorhead or Black Sabbath?

I guess it doesn't matter, because Metallica are/were the ultimate Heavy Metal band. Before them, Motorhead and Sabbath moulded the genre. Metallica kicked the genre's ass.

...in your very humble opinion.........Wink
I think,Metal said all it had to say by 1980.After that it was all about degrees of loudness and crassness! (IMVHO)Big smile

I couldn't disagree more - as a single example, Number of the Beast (1982) was fantastically melodic and very polished.

Your opinion Cert! Fantastically melodic???? Iron maiden are extremely melodic?Ermm

OK, "fantastically" is my opinion. Iron Maiden have written some very melodic songs, and Number of the Beast is richest in them. That's not my opinion - the melody writing is very strong.

Kill 'Em All (1983) was very rough, production-wise, but blew old-school metal into the dark ages - it's an incredible album full of fresh, new energy, and I cannot think of an album before it with that kind of buzz (except, maybe Metal Church's debut). Metal Militia and Whiplash are stunning examples of what the band had done to revitalise metal.

Your opinion....

No.

Ride the Lightning (1984) added melody and a slick production to Metallica's energy - which intensified in places (Fight Fire with Fire, Trapped Under Ice), whilst being reigned back in others (Fade to Black, For Whom the Bell Tolls).Opinion

No. There IS melody and slicker production on this album. The energy IS intensifed on the tracks I mentioned, and reigned back where I said it was - where's the opinion in that? Have you heard the album?

Master of Puppets (1986) really showed the world a trick or two - this is where prog metal began, IMNSHO. Battery is a devastating assault on the ears, whilst maintaining a powerful integrity. The title track is practically prog rock, with the numerous time-changes and mega-riffathon worthy of Rush, I would suggest. Then there's Sanitarium, plagirised by nearly every so-called prog metal band on the planet, it seems; Orion, showcasing their melodic sensibilities, and Damage Inc., proving that they were still masters of thrash.Opinion!!

Not at all.

What album before "Master of Puppets" did any of the stuff I mentioned?

...And Justice for All IS the 1st prog metal album. 'nuff said. It's awesome.That "O" word again-unless I accept that your opinion is more worthy than mine,I dont really understand what you are taking me to task for?

Nope.

I'm simply disagreeing with the points you made - this is a discussion forum where such things happen.

So I'll give you something to argue about:I think "2112" is the first prog metal album and that was 1976...Big smileThe title track is guitar based,no real use of keyboards but "symphonic" in the broadest sense of the word....an intro that introduces elements of the main themes,sections that are self-contained but echo the intro's  motif and a finale,presenting a story from start to finish..oh and top-notch ensemble playing.

It's a different kind of prog metal - not prog metal as it is known today. To substantiate my claims, you can hear "...And Justice for All" riffs all over "Images and Words" by Dream Theater. Metallica invented a whole new style. So did Rush. Fewer prog metal bands have taken on Rush's style - far more have followed Metallica's lead.

Metallica (the Black album) is toned down, but with that massive production that sparked the whole nu-metal thing, and revolutionised metal for the 1990s.

Metallica were the pioneers - the trailblazers of new (not "nu") metal - but they had plenty of challengers;

Slayer, despite the dreadful production on their 1st two albums, kept the faith and produced the ultimate thrash album that has remained a benchmark ever since;

the "ultimate" in your opinion or general concensus?

You'll probably find that it is a general consensus too, but the facts speak for themselves, if you'd actually listened to the album.

Reign in Blood is the ultimate in breakneck speed, brutal riffs, screaming vocals and dive-bombing guitars. South of Heaven was much heavier, thanks to even better production, and is a classic in its own right - out-Sabbathing Sabbath, but remains in the shadow of Reign in Blood.
Your use of absolutes suggests that this view is incontravertible.Confused

OK, tell me why I'm wrong - don't just keep telling me that it's my opinion, because that simply leaves it at the point where it's your opinion that it's my opinion, and your opinion seems to be founded on guesswork, while mine is founded on an appreciation of the music.

Other bands that shouldn't be overlooked include the infamous Napalm Death, who took speed metal to its natural conclusion - everything since has just been gravy really. Also worth a mention as pioneers of the darker genre are Helloween, for their early "Maiden on speed" sound, Death, for the notorious and now omnipresent death grunts, Celtic Frost for their daring experimentation, Megadeth, Voivod and Kreator.

All these bands experimented and took their music to new levels - this was a time when creating new music was a good thing again; it was almost like being back in the 1970s to hear all this new stuff being created.


Sabbath (Ozzy era and Dio era),Thin Lizzy,,UFO,Rainbow (Dio era),Scorpions (first 5 or 6 albums were very good) early Van Halen could all be very heavy but tuneful with it.Motorhead (in my experience) where, and should have remained, unique and enjoyable for that fact.Lemmy's vocals were at odds with the bands above and seem to have spawned all these "barking" metal vocalists that are so prevalent now.If I was 10 years younger I would have probably got into Maiden, and later,Metallica but they always seemed empty,hackneyed and soulless to me.

Aha-"to me" -opinion-Ie they did nothing for me!!!

I really don't understand that

What you dont understand why I have that opinion? It is a matter of taste-I didnt say they were rubbish or anything......

If my words are too cryptic, I mean that I don't understand why anyone would find their music empty or soulless when it's packed full of so much energy and aggression - takes a soul to have aggression.

As for hackneyed, that's bollocks - by using the word "hackneyed" - and also the word "empty", you ARE saying that you think they are rubbish. You're entitled to not like them, but I'm equally entitled to suggest reasons why they are not as bad as you say they are.

The riffs are reasonably complex, the structure of the songs is immaculate rock-song structure with extended bridges and codas (much like Rush), and the riffs and leads are diamond-sharp - there's absolutely no bluff, unlike in most of the old school rock bands where they thought they could get away with it.

 - Metallica's first 3 albums are crammed full of the passion and hunger that up and coming bands should show - and then some. From the opening of Kill 'Em All - the heavy guitars being gradually faded UP in the mix, through the sheer exuberance of The Four Horsemen,  the gleeful power-riffing of Seek and Destroy and the insanity of Whiplash - this is an album full of a new kind of spirit, but based in the rifferama of Black Sabbath (almost constant use of tritones) and Motorhead.

You are a big-time Metallica fan,I am not......

No sh*t, Sherlock

 Hetfield's voice is atypical of the speed/thrash genre too - it's almost a tuneful "bark"!

But a bark nonetheless.

Frankly, after Metallica entered the scene, I felt that the old school rock bands (Rainbow, UFO, Lizzy, etc.) all sounded a bit tired, lame and thin. Fortunately I got over that, and can enjoy all these bands - and some of the newer crowd, like Cradle of Filth, Killswitch Engage, System of a Down and Bathory. I still don't like Dream Theater though

So we are agreeing or disagreeing?

Discussing.

Same goes for Slayer, although some of the other bands early material sounded a bit nervous, despite the heavy pretensions. Sacred Reich are another good band of the time - they always sounded like they enjoyed what they did.

I dont like thrash/speed metal that is why I am stuck in the 1970's. Tanking along at 100 mph is not condusive to "feel" and "soul", in my opinion.

Speed is irrelevant.

Music is EVERYTHING.

There were crap thrash bands too

Back to Top
Joren View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 07 2004
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 6667
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 11 2005 at 07:07
Originally posted by greenback greenback wrote:

Iron maiden, followed by judas priest!

iron maiden - killers is the best metal album!

black sabbath should be there!

very honorable mention: ACCEPT!!!!!!!!!

and, if you don't name it metal progressive , MERCYFUL FATE!

ac/dc is not metal

GET YOUR BALLS TO THE WALL MAN!

Back to Top
Reed Lover View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 11 2005 at 14:02

I find Metallica and their ilk tedious and soulless.

They are not to my taste.I have heard all their albums and they do nothing for me.If you criticise something on this forum you are automatically accused of either never having heard any of the band's music or having an axe to grind.I do not like Metallica's style at all.I do believe that I have heard it all before, but that is because they do not affect me positively-there is nothing wrong with this view,otherwise everybody would like every kind of music.

Cert sees things in them that I dont. He also occasionally has difficulty from discerning the difference between "opinion" and "fact".Wink

If he believes more prog-metal bands have been influenced by Metallica than Rush,that is his opinion.Being an avid "browser" in my local newsagent,I have read many, many musician's magazines and from what I can see, the percentage of prog-metal musicians who cite Rush as their major influence is so high as you can virtually,but not actually,say all of them.This I cant prove,but have no reason to be dishonest or mistaken about this.To me it is a fact.Embarrassed

As for growling vocals......wtf is that all about?Confused If this view is symptomatic of my lack of understanding of this particular sub-genre, then so be it.I have a recording of my mother-in-law's dog yapping along to Paranoid- if you want to take it off my hands,Cert!Wink



Edited by Reed Lover



Back to Top
Pixel Pirate View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 11 2004
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 793
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 11 2005 at 14:28

The Norwegian Black Metal bands make all the other metal bands sound like Barry Manilow on tranquilizers. Iron Maiden? Judas Priest? Slayer? Ha! They all sound like Bon Jovi to me. I waved goodbye to all of them when I heard Emperor, then I realized that finally someone had made metal that way it should be done. Try "Prometheus: The Discipline Of Fire And Demise" for the ultimate metal album. And then check out the other Norwegian Black Metal bands,they are the only true metal bands,all the rest are ridiculous posers.

Odi profanum vulgus et arceo.
Back to Top
LizardMan View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: February 18 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 18
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 11 2005 at 14:38

Iron Maiden is one of my favorite bands... prog or not prog I don't care! I will admit that their lyrics can be kind of lame sometimes. Anyway, that's where my vote went.

Greg

 

"Life itself is perfect, its people is just what sucks!"
Back to Top
Gaspy Conana View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: October 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 35
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 11 2005 at 14:42
Blind Guardian
i no wuts proggeir and u dont so their
Back to Top
James Lee View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 05 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 3525
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 11 2005 at 14:52

^ LOL, Pixel is Very Metal...who knew?

I'm a Cradle of Filth fan myself. You don't have to take them seriously to recognize how hard and heavy they really are. And Cannibal Corpse is near and dear to me- not only do I like their stuff but I'm from the same place and time.

Not a big fan of the new metal but I have enjoyed System of a Down's stuff from time to time. Reminds me of what Jello Biafra might have been like if he'd been a metalhead instead (if that's even conceivable).

Classics from my youth that I still appreciate: Iron Maiden, undoubtedly. Where I come from, Maiden and Rush were the main choices of discriminating metal nerds.  Slayer, Megadeth, Testament, all killer bands that got a taste of success. Celtic Frost almost got huge, but Tom was a little unstable...love 'em anyway (the 80s was a little early for a metal cover of "Mexican Radio"...but it would have been a sure moneymaker in the Marilyn Manson-soaked mid 90s). Who am I forgetting? Sodom. And the first punk-metal crossover bands, like Suicidal Tendencies and DRI. (and you could almost include the first alt-metal crossover bands, like Jane's Addiction and Faith no More).

And the mighty Sabbath still holds down the heavy crown.

Back to Top
Lunarscape View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 19 2004
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 374
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 11 2005 at 15:07
Metal Sucks....And is performed by a bunch of gay posers ! There is no such thing as Progressive Metal !
Music Is The Soul Bird That Flies In The Immense Heart Of The Listener . . .
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.229 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.