Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Proto-Prog and Prog-Related Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Saga - Prog or not? Comments are now allo
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedSaga - Prog or not? Comments are now allo

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>
Poll Question: Do you think Saga have a right to be included as a 'Prog' band?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
36 [64.29%]
20 [35.71%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
lucas View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 06 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 8138
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 14 2006 at 08:03
Originally posted by Moogtron III Moogtron III wrote:

I voted progrock. Now that I've discovered so many 'real' prog bands I should have classified them under prog related maybe, but in the eighties when I started to discover prog, there wasn't so much prog rock to discover for the average prog fan in the days without Internet and almost unknown prog magazines, and Saga was one of those bands which drew my attention as a representative of prog music.

I'm surprised how unpopular they've become through the years Shocked . Not many people discuss them on PA.

 
yes, it's weird to see that a band wit a career that spanned so many years under the label of "prog-rock" has lost its aura among progsters, but it's probably due to the "pop" side of this band.
They may not be popular in America, but they are very popular in Germany, the label on which they release their albums being SPV, and they tour almost exclusively in Germany. 
"Magma was the very first gothic rock band" (Didier Lockwood)
Back to Top
BilboBaggins View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 01 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 108
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2006 at 21:18
Originally posted by Sean Trane Sean Trane wrote:

Originally posted by BigBrownBear BigBrownBear wrote:

 
It seems obvious to me that given the voting in this survey, there is a general feeling that to move them to Prog Related was the wrong decision. >>> far from me the idea of blatant cheating but this poll was not yet one day old and the score was 12-0 with no-one having posted <<<<< since my first post (the second in this thread) the score is now 10-12. Sounds fishy to you?

Sean, your comments here trouble me! I think you are implying cheating on my part which I take
great exception to. It is exactly this kind of post that caused me to define the poll as vote only for the first day or so. I did not want these agressive comments to influence peoples voting. Because it became obvious which way the voting was going I then allowed posting as I felt it would be good to then see what comments people had, hence I edited the title of the poll to read 'Comments now allowed'. In my polls it is only ever possible to vote once. I suggest you are a sore loser Sean...the only problem is that the real losers are Saga, until their full Prog status is reinstated.

Yes, there was a brief uprising among the negative voting faction who were clearly not into Prog in the late seventies (were they even born?) but that only prompted a return to the ratio in favour Saga being in a clearly defined Prog Rock category. For those of us who remember 1978 and were aware of Saga's welcomed entry to the Prog world, it is a great shame that they are not being properly recognised for their much misunderstood contribution.
 
 

 


Edited by BilboBaggins - July 16 2006 at 21:23
Thoughtfullness
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20252
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 17 2006 at 03:55
Originally posted by BilboBaggins BilboBaggins wrote:

Originally posted by Sean Trane Sean Trane wrote:

Originally posted by BigBrownBear BigBrownBear wrote:

 
It seems obvious to me that given the voting in this survey, there is a general feeling that to move them to Prog Related was the wrong decision. >>> far from me the idea of blatant cheating but this poll was not yet one day old and the score was 12-0 with no-one having posted <<<<< since my first post (the second in this thread) the score is now 10-12. Sounds fishy to you?

Sean, your comments here trouble me! I think you are implying cheating on my part which I take
great exception to. It is exactly this kind of post that caused me to define the poll as vote only for the first day or so. I did not want these agressive comments to influence peoples voting. Because it became obvious which way the voting was going I then allowed posting as I felt it would be good to then see what comments people had, hence I edited the title of the poll to read 'Comments now allowed'. In my polls it is only ever possible to vote once. I suggest you are a sore loser Sean...the only problem is that the real losers are Saga, until their full Prog status is reinstated.

Yes, there was a brief uprising among the negative voting faction who were clearly not into Prog in the late seventies (were they even born?) but that only prompted a return to the ratio in favour Saga being in a clearly defined Prog Rock category. For those of us who remember 1978 and were aware of Saga's welcomed entry to the Prog world, it is a great shame that they are not being properly recognised for their much misunderstood contribution.
 
 

 
 
 
Please , BB.
 
Ok , I do not know about the poll only bit. Not calling you a cheat (been discussing with you in the last months enough not to do such a thing withouit solid proof) , but the fact is that there are weird things happened with this poll.
 
it is just so troubling that the first 12 votes were positive (pro-prog) and no-one actually argumented for them, before I got there and started the first negative vote (prog related), and since I did, the voting has been 9 - 15.
 
 
As for being born, back at the time of Saga's early album, I saw them live around seven times in the late 70's/early 80's in their hometown (which was also mine at the time). Believe me, these guys "popped" around . I will NOT lose sleep if they are into Art Rock, and although I have notheard any of their later albums (except for the odd track here and there , but they still have that typical saga sound), but I truly believe they should not be really counted as completely prog.
 
 
BTW, I am no Saga hater, would anybody see a band seven times and owned their first four albums if he was not a fan.
 
 
 
 
 
 
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21206
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 17 2006 at 04:42
^ do you know that the poll started without the option to write posts - it was voting only - and then later on it was modified to allow posts?
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20252
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 17 2006 at 04:49
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

^ do you know that the poll started without the option to write posts - it was voting only - and then later on it was modified to allow posts?
 
 
No I did notWink and and I acknowledge it in the first sentence of my previous post : I did not know of the Poll Only bit. (which meant no answers allowed, >>>> this is a relatively rarely used option, which should not be open to everybody, but only for admins) 
 
 
Still from 12 - 0 to 23 - 15 after it was opened to answers is bizarre............
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
BilboBaggins View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 01 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 108
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 17 2006 at 08:52
Originally posted by Sean Trane Sean Trane wrote:

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

^ do you know that the poll started without the option to write posts - it was voting only - and then later on it was modified to allow posts?
 
 
No I did notWink and and I acknowledge it in the first sentence of my previous post : I did not know of the Poll Only bit. (which meant no answers allowed, >>>> this is a relatively rarely used option, which should not be open to everybody, but only for admins) 
 
 
Still from 12 - 0 to 23 - 15 after it was opened to answers is bizarre............
 
Sean, I accept your explanation (although I did try to tell you it was poll only in my previous post!) and don't worry!...smiles I was a little harsh on you anyway and apologise for that, it was 3:00 am in the morning so wasn't on top form...grin
 
There are enough prog albums in their repetoire for them to be considered Art Rock, which is where they were before some single minded committee had them removed because they didn't sound like Genesis, ELP, King Crimson...etc! (sorry if I'm wrong on this because I actually don't know how these categorisations are dealt with) Check out all the higher rated albums in their discography for these 'Prog' albums.
 
BTW...before anyone says it...I'm not biased as I'm not a Saga fan, however this discussion has been a refreshingly good one as I have revisited their albums and a new apreciation for their work has emerged in my mind!...smiles
 
Come on, why don't some of you go and listen to them again and this time be more vigilant in your listening of them. Some of you could be bigger people if you'd just come out and accept that maybe you have been a little harsh on this hard working band that have stayed together where others have failed, and have stayed true to prog whilst trying to entertain at the same time, thus maintaining a commercial foothold in order to survive as long as they have done!
 
Thoughtfullness
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 20 2006 at 09:32
Saga are definitely Prog-metal related - the music on their first two albums is almost entirely riff-driven, which is a characteristic of Prog metal, but NOT of Prog Rock.

The keyboards seem decorative rather than contrapuntal - the comparisons with Marillion are erroneous for that reason.

They experiment within a naroow Rock formula - and are fully deserving of Prog-Related, but not Neo-Prog, as their music has nothing in common with Neo-Prog and everything in common with stadium rock bands like Styx, REO Speedwagon, Journey and Foreigner.

But you can hear where Queensryche evolved from, and hence Dream Theater - so the Prog metal link is strong.

If there's any actual evidence rather than bald statements (as we've seen so far) about how Saga "changed Prog forever" or any other aspects of real progginess in their music, then I'm as open as ever to consideration - but I simply don't hear any.
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
BilboBaggins View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 01 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 108
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 20 2006 at 14:33
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

Saga are definitely Prog-metal related - the music on their first two albums is almost entirely riff-driven, which is a characteristic of Prog metal, but NOT of Prog Rock.

The keyboards seem decorative rather than contrapuntal - the comparisons with Marillion are erroneous for that reason.

They experiment within a naroow Rock formula - and are fully deserving of Prog-Related, but not Neo-Prog, as their music has nothing in common with Neo-Prog and everything in common with stadium rock bands like Styx, REO Speedwagon, Journey and Foreigner.

But you can hear where Queensryche evolved from, and hence Dream Theater - so the Prog metal link is strong.

If there's any actual evidence rather than bald statements (as we've seen so far) about how Saga "changed Prog forever" or any other aspects of real progginess in their music, then I'm as open as ever to consideration - but I simply don't hear any.


Look my friend, I think I had better leave this alone as we are just going around in circles. I would say of the above selection that there is a clear divide between the mainstream rock bands you have mentioned (although Styx have had their Prog albums) and what Saga do on some albums. It's funny but the poll suggests a clear majority of people have come down in favour of them being Prog, most of the radio stations on PRRN play Saga as Prog...and why?..because they have always been considered Prog! You know i'm in the UK and the Progheads in my community definitely saw what they were doing was blending the complexities of Prog with a more mainstream Pop Rock rhythm sometimes. This should have made them globally commercial but because their music still wasn't mainstream, they were not commercially successful outside of Germany.

In a last ditch attempt to see if you see what I see, try listening to 'The Chapters' in order! Then if by any chance you like them, go back to the first albums and try again.

You mentioned Prog Metal...great because I'd rather they were in there rather than in Prog Related! At least Prog Metal is a real sub genre of Prog Rock. Having given them further consideration though I actually think Neo Progressive is the best category for them. In my humble opinion they were doing what Marillion did 4 or 5 years before and more consistantly...hows that for a 'Humble Stance'?
Thoughtfullness
Back to Top
Flip_Stone View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 388
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 20 2006 at 17:11
If Saga isn't progressive, then nobody is...
 
 
Back to Top
Tony R View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: July 16 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 11979
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 20 2006 at 17:15
I must get a listen to Nobody!
Back to Top
Teaflax View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1225
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 20 2006 at 17:32
Anyone who thinks Saga is Prog is widening the term way too much. It does explain why there is such tolerance for bands that write average Pop/rock tunes that would be indistinguishable from anything on the radio, but the add some instrumental flash to it. Prog is not about taking ordinary music and adding a few elements of a non-standard sound, it's about an entire attitude of wanting to move away from and improve on regular Rock (in the wide sense). So, you can't really - as some have argued before on Saga - see a step back as a progression of Prog. It makes no sense whatsoever.

Back when I was getting into Prog in the mid-eighties, no one I knew considered Saga Prog, and the only kids in my school who liked them much were Metal and Rock fans.

I could be kind and call them Prog Lite, maybe. But when you have that kind of short, repetitive, non-modulating cadence-bound melody as your stock-in-trade, you're just not Prog, and obviously not trying to be, either.
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 21 2006 at 05:51
Originally posted by Teaflax Teaflax wrote:

(...)

I could be kind and call them Prog Lite, maybe. But when you have that
kind of short, repetitive, non-modulating cadence-bound melody as your
stock-in-trade, you're just not Prog, and obviously not trying to be,
either.



You don't even have to go into the "technical" details - just listening to the standard intro/verse/chorus forms and preponderance of riffs is enough to do the classification.

Prog Rock transcends verse/chorus song form, and rarely uses riffs, as it is intrinsically chord progression based.


I suppose that will get me into trouble with the Prog metal fans... again
     


Maybe we could list Prog albums from 1976-1980 and make the comparisons that way - as that would put Saga into a better context.

Let's pick out some competition at random from that era, as these are the bands and albums that we must necessarily compare Saga to:

Barclay James Harvest: Octoberon, Gone To Earth, XII
Holgar Czukay: Movies
Genesis: A Trick of The Tail, Wind and Wuthering, And Then There Were Three, Duke
Gong: Gazeuse, Shamal, Mother Gong's Fairy Tales
Here & Now: Give & Take, What You See is What You Are
Steve Hackett: Please Don't Touch, Spectral Mornings, Defector
Hawkwind: Astounding Sounds, Roadhawks, Quark Strangeness and Charm, Masters of the Universe, P.X.R.5, Levitation
Steve Hillage: L, Motivation Radio, Green
King Crimson: The Young Person's Guide to..., Discipline
Pink Floyd: Wish You Were Here, Animals, The Wall
Klaus Schultze: Moondawn, Mirage, Body Love, X, Dune, Dig It
Twelfth Night: Live at the Target, First and Second Tape Albums


Still think Saga are Prog?

The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 21 2006 at 05:58
Originally posted by BilboBaggins BilboBaggins wrote:


Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

Saga are definitely Prog-metal related - the music on their first two albums is almost entirely riff-driven, which is a characteristic of Prog metal, but NOT of Prog Rock.

The keyboards seem decorative rather than contrapuntal - the comparisons with Marillion are erroneous for that reason.

They experiment within a naroow Rock formula - and are fully deserving of Prog-Related, but not Neo-Prog, as their music has nothing in common with Neo-Prog and everything in common with stadium rock bands like Styx, REO Speedwagon, Journey and Foreigner.

But you can hear where Queensryche evolved from, and hence Dream Theater - so the Prog metal link is strong.

If there's any actual evidence rather than bald statements (as we've seen so far) about how Saga "changed Prog forever" or any other aspects of real progginess in their music, then I'm as open as ever to consideration - but I simply don't hear any.
Look my friend, I think I had better leave this alone as we are just going around in circles. I would say of the above selection that there is a clear divide between the mainstream rock bands you have mentioned (although Styx have had their Prog albums) and what Saga do on some albums. It's funny but the poll suggests a clear majority of people have come down in favour of them being Prog, most of the radio stations on PRRN play Saga as Prog...and why?..because they have always been considered Prog! You know i'm in the UK and the Progheads in my community definitely saw what they were doing was blending the complexities of Prog with a more mainstream Pop Rock rhythm sometimes. This should have made them globally commercial but because their music still wasn't mainstream, they were not commercially successful outside of Germany.In a last ditch attempt to see if you see what I see, try listening to 'The Chapters' in order! Then if by any chance you like them, go back to the first albums and try again.You mentioned Prog Metal...great because I'd rather they were in there rather than in Prog Related! At least Prog Metal is a real sub genre of Prog Rock. Having given them further consideration though I actually think Neo Progressive is the best category for them. In my humble opinion they were doing what Marillion did 4 or 5 years before and more consistantly...hows that for a 'Humble Stance'?

    
The only "circle" here is the traditional "yes it is", "no it isn't" of debate, which is what a discussion forum is for.

So far, the "yes it is" side have only managed bald statements of opinion unbacked by any facts - indeed, some claims are so outlandish as to give the game away entirely to the "no it isn't" side:

For example, there are no similarities whatsoever between Saga's early music and Marillion's - Marillion were almost entirely contrpuntal, while Saga were almost entirely riff-based (as the obvious starting point!).

And I don't see Prog Metal as a "real" sub-genre of Prog Rock, as it subscribes more to repetitious riffs than chord progressions and polyphony, as well as sticking more closely to standard song form.

Prog Metal is different to Prog Rock, although it draws inspiration from it - it is far more a subgenre of Metal than of Prog Rock.
    

Edited by Certif1ed - July 21 2006 at 05:58
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
Bob Greece View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Greece
Status: Offline
Points: 1823
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 21 2006 at 06:04
Back to Top
Teaflax View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1225
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 21 2006 at 06:29
^From the link: "catchy, chorus oriented songs". And that's from a raving fanboy.

Case closed.
Back to Top
Bob Greece View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Greece
Status: Offline
Points: 1823
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 21 2006 at 06:35
http://www.last.fm/music/Saga/+tags
 
See how huge the "Progressive Rock" tag is?


Edited by Bob Greece - July 21 2006 at 06:39
Back to Top
Bob Greece View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Greece
Status: Offline
Points: 1823
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 21 2006 at 06:36
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saga_%28band%29
 
"Saga is a Progressive rock quintet"


Edited by Bob Greece - July 21 2006 at 06:39
Back to Top
Bob Greece View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Greece
Status: Offline
Points: 1823
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 21 2006 at 06:38
http://www.gepr.net/safram.html
 
"Saga was/is possibly the first neo-prog band"
 
Seriously, I've never heard Saga in my life and don't know if they're prog or not. Embarrassed


Edited by Bob Greece - July 21 2006 at 06:44
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 21 2006 at 11:53
With respect, Bob, I would hardly consider either Wikipedia or Last FM to be authoritative sources!


Let's examine the GEPR article:

"Canadian band who got off to a great start, and have tailed off quite a bit recently. Saga, Images at Twilight, Silent Knight and Worlds Apart are all classics combining multiple keyboards and great lead guitar work. Later albums are more pop based or straight rock and often cliched. Wildest Dreams is especially cliched. Security of Illusion reunites the orignal lineup, but the results are still in the AOR vein. Steven Negus does some *excellent* drumming on this album, BTW.

Saga was/is possibly the first neo-prog band. Cert’s Question: How, exactly? It doesn't sound like any Neo Prog I've ever heard.

Their music has two distinct faces - a progressive sound derivative of Yes and perhaps a little Genesis, Cert’s Question: Really? In what way? I’ve never heard any Yes or Genesis music that is so blatantly riff-based.

and a fairly unique pop sound which seems to be their own. The early albums balance these two sides nicely, offering songs that are both accessible and interesting. (…)


The band's debut may be classified as the first neo-prog album. Cert’s Question: How, exactly? It doesn't sound like any Neo Prog I've ever heard.

Marred by two disco-ish songs, still, there's some fine German-styled synth work here though Cert’s Question: Can someone enlighten me on what “German-styled synth work sounds like, and its relevance to Neo-Prog?..

The track "Ice Nice" may be one of the band's best songs ever. Michael Sadler's faux-Anglo voice may get on some people's nerves. Silent Knight is probably the best, opening with the memorable "Don't Be Late". Their albums are solidly in the neo-prog mould, Cert’s Question: How, exactly? It doesn't sound like any Neo Prog I've ever heard... I hate bald statements with no supporting evidence, especially repeated ones…

but the playing and writing are of high quality Clearly Mike neither likes nor listens to Neo-Prog to make a statement like that!. -- Mike Ohman"

    

Edited by Certif1ed - July 21 2006 at 11:55
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
Barla View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 13 2006
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 4309
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 21 2006 at 11:56
For what I've heard of them, I think they're prog.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.266 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.