Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
octopus-4
Special Collaborator
RIO/Avant/Zeuhl,Neo & Post/Math Teams
Joined: October 31 2006
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 14104
|
Posted: October 02 2024 at 01:41 |
The Area masterpiece. It starts with a woman saying a poetry in Arabic, to stigmatize the suffering of the Palestiian people, then the lyrics say: "To play with the world, breaking it into pieces"
|
I stand with Roger Waters, I stand with Joan Baez, I stand with Victor Jara, I stand with Woody Guthrie. Music is revolution
|
|
Saperlipopette!
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 20 2010
Location: Tomorrowland
Status: Offline
Points: 11621
|
Posted: October 02 2024 at 05:47 |
I guess listening to De Futura make me think that the future doesn't look to bright. Much like Pioneers I would save it for a more futuristic/sci-fi or maybe Post-Apolaclyptic themed poll. Anyway, these five are all essential to me:
Magma - "De Futura" Area - "Luglio, Agosto, Settembre (Nero) Genesis - "Dancing with the Moonlit Knight Van der Graaf Generator - "Pioneers Over C" Jethro Tull - Thick as a Brick
and while I'm relistening to "Marie Antoinette" I'm reminded just how much I love the sound of Curved Air.
|
|
David_D
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 15111
|
Posted: October 02 2024 at 05:58 |
Saperlipopette! wrote:
I guess listening to De Futura make me think that the future doesn't look to bright. Much like Pioneers I would save it for a more futuristic/sci-fi or maybe Post-Apolaclyptic themed poll. |
I think that the view of the future, even just as Sci-Fi, reflects ones thoughts about the society of today. So is Edward Macan's interpretation of Sci-Fi Prog in his Rocking the Classics.
|
quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
|
|
Saperlipopette!
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 20 2010
Location: Tomorrowland
Status: Offline
Points: 11621
|
Posted: October 02 2024 at 06:49 |
^ Sure there's hardly any Sci-Fi that doesn't mirror the time it was written in one way or another. But don't feel a piece like "De Futura" belongs in this context. Its part of a fictional universe and (apart from some grunts and growls) instrumentally describes a dark, dystopian future in a way I think has more in common with John Williams - The Imperial March (Darth Vader's Theme) than "Thinking politically / socially-engaged songs". You do exactly as you please with your polls of course. I wouldn't, and felt like commenting on it.
Here's the text about De Futura on the back of the Üdü Ẁüdü album cover translated to english:
The people of Ork surround us, but we can't see them. These people are a type of being whose relation to machines is like that which machines have to us. Only a voyage through time enables us to see these beings. De Futura is the story of this voyage through time, a voyage which shows us how to stop the illusory movement of passing time which prevents us from seeing. This voyage is a magical and enchanting one - of course, this is on the condition that one really wished to live this adventure, to persevere in it and to let it carry one away. Behind the apparent harshness of this music, all is silence
|
|
moshkito
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17509
|
Posted: October 02 2024 at 07:08 |
Hi,
Amon Duul 2's Mozambique ... makes some of these sound like ...
PS: On top of it, Mozambique got their independence a few months later ... kinda makes the song even more ... to the point! And much more than a pointed finger and mouth!
Edited by moshkito - October 02 2024 at 07:10
|
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com
|
|
Sean Trane
Special Collaborator
Prog Folk
Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20240
|
Posted: October 02 2024 at 08:08 |
David_D wrote:
Saperlipopette! wrote:
I guess listening to De Futura make me think that the future doesn't look to bright. Much like Pioneers I would save it for a more futuristic/sci-fi or maybe Post-Apocaclyptic themed poll. |
I think that the view of the future, even just as Sci-Fi, reflects ones thoughts about the society of today. So is Edward Macan's interpretation of Sci-Fi Prog in his Rocking the Classics. |
Not sure Sci-Fi oriented lyrics should be considered as social or politically-engaged, or else we should be looking at Rush's 2112 and Cygnus X-1. And in general Rush had many socially-conscious texts, though it might ne more right-winged than is generally understood here, partly because Peart was influenced by right-wing Ayn Rand.
For me, these polls should concern the present (when the song was written) or near-past. Predicting the future and its possible negative drifts/excesses is largely fictional, even if plausible events to come. Sure, one can rewrite history about Napoleon or Julius Caesar, Jengis or Alexander (etc...) may be thought-provoking, but bear little importance to today's situations.
.
|
let's just stay above the moral melee prefer the sink to the gutter keep our sand-castle virtues content to be a doer as well as a thinker, prefer lifting our pen rather than un-sheath our sword
|
|
David_D
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 15111
|
Posted: October 02 2024 at 08:45 |
Saperlipopette! wrote:
Here's the text about De Futura on the back of the Üdü Ẁüdü album cover translated to english:
The people of Ork surround us, but we can't see them. These people are a type of being whose relation to machines is like that which machines have to us. Only a voyage through time enables us to see these beings. De Futura is the story of this voyage through time, a voyage which shows us how to stop the illusory movement of passing time which prevents us from seeing. This voyage is a magical and enchanting one - of course, this is on the condition that one really wished to live this adventure, to persevere in it and to let it carry one away. Behind the apparent harshness of this music, all is silence |
|
quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
|
|
David_D
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 15111
|
Posted: October 02 2024 at 09:04 |
Sean Trane wrote:
Not sure Sci-Fi oriented lyrics should be considered as social or politically-engaged,..... |
As I wrote in the thread "Prog about nightmarish technocracy?":
David_D wrote:
Besides the overtly political Prog, and according to Edward Macan's Rocking the Classics (1997, p. 69, 73), symbols drawn from mythology, fantasy and science fiction literature, as well as a host of sacred texts from the past have been used in Progressive Rock lyrics as symbols of resistance and protest in two ways:1. to symbolize an idealized society toward which we might strive, or 2. to symbolize a nightmarish technocracy which the hippies believed is on the verge of overwhelming us.
|
So I think Sci-Fi lyrics can be considered as socially/politically engaged, but best of course to confirm it in specific cases. We should definitely be cautious here, as it's a matter of giving credits where the credits should be given.
Edited by David_D - October 02 2024 at 13:14
|
quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
|
|
Sean Trane
Special Collaborator
Prog Folk
Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20240
|
Posted: October 03 2024 at 02:51 |
David_D wrote:
Sean Trane wrote:
Not sure Sci-Fi oriented lyrics should be considered as social or politically-engaged,..... |
As I wrote in the thread "Prog about nightmarish technocracy?":
David_D wrote:
Besides the overtly political Prog, and according to Edward Macan's Rocking the Classics (1997, p. 69, 73), symbols drawn from mythology, fantasy and science fiction literature, as well as a host of sacred texts from the past have been used in Progressive Rock lyrics as symbols of resistance and protest in two ways:1. to symbolize an idealized society toward which we might strive, or 2. to symbolize a nightmarish technocracy which the hippies believed is on the verge of overwhelming us.
|
So I think Sci-Fi lyrics can be considered as socially/politically engaged, but best of course to confirm it in specific cases. We should definitely be cautious here, as it's a matter of giving credits where the credits should be given.
|
In that case, 2112 should be considered. Less certain about Cygnus, however; but tracks like The Trees (US oaks and Canadian Maples) or Subdivisions are also eligible.
.
|
let's just stay above the moral melee prefer the sink to the gutter keep our sand-castle virtues content to be a doer as well as a thinker, prefer lifting our pen rather than un-sheath our sword
|
|
David_D
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 15111
|
Posted: October 03 2024 at 03:56 |
David_D wrote:
Well, it can be said in general about Magma's maybe more or less entire work, or at least the one from the '70s, that Christan Vander, according to Wikipedia, has claimed as his inspiration a "vision of humanity's spiritual and ecological future" that profoundly disturbed him (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magma_(band)) - which I find to be very socially engaged. |
Considering what the experts today agree very much about the state of our planet, one can wonder how prophetic this vision of Christian Vander was - but he was of course not the only one to worry.
|
quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
|
|
David_D
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 15111
|
Posted: October 03 2024 at 04:23 |
Sean Trane wrote:
In that case, 2112 should be considered. Less certain about Cygnus, however; but tracks like The Trees (US oaks and Canadian Maples) or Subdivisions are also eligible. |
It definitely should be when somebody wants to make a poll about right-wing, socially-engaged music.
|
quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
|
|
Saperlipopette!
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 20 2010
Location: Tomorrowland
Status: Offline
Points: 11621
|
Posted: October 03 2024 at 04:50 |
^You never specified which politial wing, so I don't see why they don't fit nicely in your polls. But I'm sensing that you just don't feel like it:). Which is fine. I do not believe tht Rush ever were right-wing as such though. Neil Peart describes himself as a left-leaning libertarian. So I my impression is the he is not typically a leftie in the free will, individual vs the collective sort of questions. -Anyway, there's certainly nothing right-wing left in Subdivisions. One of the handful of Rush-songs I love:)
|
|
David_D
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 15111
|
Posted: October 03 2024 at 06:02 |
Saperlipopette! wrote:
I do not believe tht Rush ever were right-wing as such though. Neil Peart describes himself as a left-leaning libertarian. So I my impression is the he is not typically a leftie in the free will, individual vs the collective sort of questions. |
In the Danish context, Neil Peart was a rather radical right-wing, as he was opposed the welfare state. This is very evident in an interview with him done by Barry Miles, a reporter for the New Musical Express, upon the release of 2112. This interview is described like this in David Weigel's The Show that Never Ends (2017, p. 163):
"When the interviewer started to raise his doubts, Peart tore into him. "You're living in the best example," he said. "Look at Britain and what socialism has done to Britain! It's crippling! And what it's done to the youth. What do you think The Sex Pistols and all the rest of 'em are really frustrated about? They're are frustrated because they're growing up in a socialist society in which there's no place for them as individuals. They either join the morass or they fight it with the only means left. They have literally no future and I lived and worked here and I know what it feels like and it's not very nice.""
|
quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
|
|
Sean Trane
Special Collaborator
Prog Folk
Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20240
|
Posted: October 03 2024 at 06:58 |
David_D wrote:
Saperlipopette! wrote:
I do not believe tht Rush ever were right-wing as such though. Neil Peart describes himself as a left-leaning libertarian. So I my impression is the he is not typically a leftie in the free will, individual vs the collective sort of questions. |
In the Danish context, Neil Peart was a rather radical right-wing, as he was opposed the welfare state. This is very evident in an interview with him done by Barry Miles, a reporter for the New Musical Express, upon the release of 2112. This interview is described like this in David Weigel's The Show that Never Ends (2017, p. 163):
"When the interviewer started to raise his doubts, Peart tore into him. "You're living in the best example," he said. "Look at Britain and what socialism has done to Britain! It's crippling! And what it's done to the youth. What do you think The Sex Pistols and all the rest of 'em are really frustrated about? They're are frustrated because they're growing up in a socialist society in which there's no place for them as individuals. They either join the morass or they fight it with the only means left. They have literally no future and I lived and worked here and I know what it feels like and it's not very nice.""
|
Well Maggie Bitcher certainly killed those late-70's UK days. not quite sure it did any good for the small/low people, who are still at the bottom rung, but it did allow the UK to reach the 21st C.
Just read Jonathan Coe's The Rotter's Club to see how indeed politics drove the country at a standstill, but it wasn't necessarily the left's fault, since the National Party was doing heavy electoral scores as well (at least equivalent to communists were). BTW, David, if you haven't read it, there is a lengthy passage where the Trotter family goes on holidays in Northern toip of Denmark (Skagen, but it seems like a total sidestep in the storyline, until we get to the trilogy's second part (Closed Circle) when it does all make sense.
But Peart had it wrong: the Pistols only cared about getting their share of the sunshine and would've killed mom & grandma to achieve it. They were 50% junkies anyways: Sid Vicious and Nick Kunt (the writer), whom he replaced. Other punk bands were more credible (though The Jam's Paul Weller was openly pro-Bitcher)
.
|
let's just stay above the moral melee prefer the sink to the gutter keep our sand-castle virtues content to be a doer as well as a thinker, prefer lifting our pen rather than un-sheath our sword
|
|
David_D
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 15111
|
Posted: October 03 2024 at 10:44 |
Sean Trane wrote:
But Peart had it wrong: the Pistols only cared about getting their share of the sunshine and would've killed mom & grandma to achieve it. They were 50% junkies anyways: Sid Vicious and Nick Kunt (the writer), whom he replaced. Other punk bands were more credible (though The Jam's Paul Weller was openly pro-Bitcher) |
I certainly agree with that Peart was completely wrong about the reasons for the emergence of the whole British Punk ("no-future") movement, as I mainly see them as big unemployment and other social conditions which made it difficult for the young people to establish a good life in the mid-'70s Britain.
Edited by David_D - October 03 2024 at 11:53
|
quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
|
|
Saperlipopette!
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 20 2010
Location: Tomorrowland
Status: Offline
Points: 11621
|
Posted: October 03 2024 at 12:55 |
David_D wrote:
Saperlipopette! wrote:
I do not believe tht Rush ever were right-wing as such though. Neil Peart describes himself as a left-leaning libertarian. So I my impression is the he is not typically a leftie in the free will, individual vs the collective sort of questions. |
In the Danish context, Neil Peart was a rather radical right-wing, as he was opposed the welfare state. This is very evident in an interview with him done by Barry Miles, a reporter for the New Musical Express, upon the release of 2112. This interview is described like this in David Weigel's The Show that Never Ends (2017, p. 163):
"When the interviewer started to raise his doubts, Peart tore into him. "You're living in the best example," he said. "Look at Britain and what socialism has done to Britain! It's crippling! And what it's done to the youth. What do you think The Sex Pistols and all the rest of 'em are really frustrated about? They're are frustrated because they're growing up in a socialist society in which there's no place for them as individuals. They either join the morass or they fight it with the only means left. They have literally no future and I lived and worked here and I know what it feels like and it's not very nice.""
|
I can understand the perspective, so I don't think of it as a radical point of view. But as a social democrat who believes in - or rather prefers - a mixed economy, "pure" Socialism is rather extreme and completely dysfunctional to me. The collectivist far left/communist approach isn't my bag, so maybe I'm extreme to some lefties. I don't care, I don't belong to any particular wing and never will.
|
|
David_D
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 15111
|
Posted: October 03 2024 at 21:10 |
While to me, nothing greater than the genuine socialism! - even communism, the way Marx thought of it, is very beautiful too.
|
quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
|
|
Saperlipopette!
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 20 2010
Location: Tomorrowland
Status: Offline
Points: 11621
|
Posted: October 03 2024 at 23:05 |
^Ok. Even communism? That's much, much more extreme (imo). I have communist friends, I don't mind. But I do sometimes wonder how things might change between us, if they actually got their way. As the communist way is intolerant and always by force, it's a scary thought.
|
|
richardh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 28021
|
Posted: October 04 2024 at 00:17 |
Always good to have views about Britain from people who were not born there and have never lived there . I mean I could talk about Belgium if you like , that would be just as meaningful. I grew up in Swindon (generally seen as the ultimate average town in the UK and so companies used to do all sorts of market research there as a result). It was predominantly a labour voting working class town until the seventies. It then started to change in the 70's moving away from heavy industry of the past (the railways workshop was one of the biggest in the UK and links with Isambard Kingdom Brunel were strong) towards the so called 'Service Industry' (Nationwide set up their headquarters there and it's still around) , it did retain a link with the past with the Honda car factory although that closed a few years ago post Brexit. All this somewhat mirrors the country in a way. It's a country that went through massive change in then seventies. The then labour government at that time lost it's grip when the Unions striked at every turn bringing the country to its knees. This is course brought forward the rise of Maggie Thatcher , a divisive figure to many, she brought some order to the chaos and helped re-establish rule of law. ( as an aside I strongly recommend the recent TV series Sherwood (season 1) which is set against the back drop of the war between the Yorkshire miners, Thatchers government with the less militant Nottinghamshire miners unions caught somewhere in between during the early 80's. It's fascinating stuff.) In general Britain has never truly been a left wing embracing coountry. The politics are broadly centre right and that is what the current Sir Keir Starmer lead government is preaching and doing. The will fail like all labour governments as they move a little bit too far left and away from the natural middle ground that most occupy. We are mostly a very boring country that likes to f**k, drink and watch football. We have one of the best and most affordable health care systems in the world so don't believe all the hyper anti English raving loonies out there. You can choose to live anywhere but strangely thousand and thousands want to live here for some reason. I do wonder why? Because it's okay to live here and there is plenty of opportunity in business and to succeed in life. The people are okay. Of course there is a right wing nationalistic element but honestly what country doesn't have one? The recent rumours of civil war spread by Elon Musk among others was complete nonsense. Don't believe in everything you read. However we are living in troubled times for sure and the global system could well be on the verge of total collapse. What Israel does next could change all our futures for good..
|
|
David_D
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 15111
|
Posted: October 04 2024 at 03:58 |
David_D wrote:
Sean Trane wrote:
But Peart had it wrong: the Pistols only cared about getting their share of the sunshine and would've killed mom & grandma to achieve it. They were 50% junkies anyways: Sid Vicious and Nick Kunt (the writer), whom he replaced. Other punk bands were more credible (though The Jam's Paul Weller was openly pro-Bitcher) |
I certainly agree with that Peart was completely wrong about the reasons for the emergence of the whole British Punk ("no-future") movement, as I mainly see them as big unemployment and other social conditions which made it difficult for the young people to establish a good life in the mid-'70s Britain.
|
So I don't think that Peart's social philosophy from the '70s was something the British punks were happy about, but I guess that it was better fitting the '80s yuppies.
|
quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
|
|