Classic Rock Bands Still Popular To Youth? |
Post Reply | Page <123> |
Author | ||
MortSahlFan
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 01 2018 Location: US Status: Offline Points: 3049 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I used to check out these live YouTube listening parties (prog-rock), and Yes was a common listen, and most of the people in the live chat were younger than 40.
|
||
https://www.youtube.com/c/LoyalOpposition
https://www.scribd.com/document/382737647/MortSahlFan-Song-List |
||
Lewian
Prog Reviewer Joined: August 09 2015 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 15051 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I find the notion that Can is "Classic Rock" much stranger than the fact that they have some (but limited) popularity today.
|
||
Jacob Schoolcraft
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 22 2021 Location: NJ Status: Offline Points: 1200 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
The youth today has to have a clearer understanding of the golden age of Rock because the representation of it through the media is very questionable..as its ratings by terms of record sales is accurate, but in the early 70s that was insignificant to a Rock band's popularity.
Between 66' and 72' Mike Bloomfield was mentioned in the same breath as Eric Clapton. There was more variety and it was accepted in America with open arms because it was all new and intriguing to the youth. A band like Canned Heat featured jazzy swing rhythm, latin rhythm, psychedelic, jugband Blues, and Boogie..but they weren't all Boogie as the media portrays them to be. They are often portrayed as a "down home party and boogie band", however listening to their album tracks presents something different from the image they are given today. They scored a hit with "Going Up The Country" ..the Woodstock anthem.,,,but the point is people weren't listening to Canned Heat because of their Boogie status..but more because they were eclectic. A young person today would have to stream a lot and research to grasp just how vast and important that was. Their image is a silly God. It's just such a lie. Led Zeppelin wouldn't be represented that way and it's evident to me that many overstatements about their talents are such an exaggeration. Led Zeppelin were huge and the youth loved their music, but bands like Deep Purple and Jethro Tull high and mighty and never thought by the mass to be Rock bands with a few popular songs. You can thank radio in the 80s for screwing that up. A young person getting into Classic Rock should know the truth and take the media handpicked list of usual suspects with a grain of salt. I bought all the Led Zeppelin albums in the 70s, but to embrace their name everywhere in life for a truth ER theory that Zeppelin is God is just rubbish. In America they are considered by the masses to be the greatest Classic Rock band on earth. Their name doesn't differ from being Coke on a billboard sign. They make mistakes on their instruments just like everybody else if not more . They are represented by propagandists ..so if you are young and wanting to explore Classic Rock dont buy into the hype in the media. Research more on the culture and acknowledge the diversity in Rock bands of those times. The media is not going to give Rory Gallagher the same level of credit as Jimmy Page..which some people fall into that mousetrap by thinking "Well, my dad liked Led Zeppelin and he was smart so I guess it must be true" If you follow that line of thinking then you are being force fed Edited by Jacob Schoolcraft - May 30 2023 at 10:19 |
||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65513 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
|
^ No I fundamentally disagree. People listen to what they like not what's most popular, then or now. There are reasons Zeppelin were so successful and considered by many to be the greatest rock band and that's because, 1) they kinda were, and 2) a whole bunch of people loved their music, and they all recognize the mistakes, flubs, shortcomings, and sloppiness of the band. In fact for many, it was a plus and showed the character & soul missing from much music of that era. There's also a reason some people think the Beatles were the greatest or the Stones or the Who, and it's not because those people are sheep any more than those who loved Michael Jackson or David Bowie or Prince. Edited by Atavachron - June 01 2023 at 13:48 |
||
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
||
Stressed Cheese
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 16 2022 Location: The Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 540 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I can't believe I forgot to mention Queen. It really seems sometimes that for some people, Queen is almost the only band they're aware of from the 70's, or the only one where they dare to go back that far anyway. I don't mind Queen, but I feel that they sometimes get a lot of praise for being bombastic and show-y and epic, whereas there are a lot of bands from that era who did that kind of stuff better IMO. But ah well.
[/QUOTE] Sure, but I'm not being influenced like that, because I don't give a sh*t about Can myself, I didn't grow up in the 70's, and I don't have any friends who listen to them. I'm just going on the fact that they (and Tago Mago specifically) seem to be referenced a lot more than you'd expect based on their albums sales back in the day. Look at the amount of ratings they have on RYM, for example. It might be surprising, but they seem to really resonate with younger people.
Edited by Stressed Cheese - June 02 2023 at 04:23 |
||
Saperlipopette!
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 20 2010 Location: Tomorrowland Status: Offline Points: 12205 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
^Fine. The anecdotical bit is that you think what your friends are into is representative. Just like I've done myself. I know all about their online popularity but the numbers don't add up. Can's a band that's referenced to and talked about more than actually listened to. Much like Faust or Amon Düül II, only bigger. Their music was forwardthinking and influential and Can is one of the hippest
bands from the 1970's + the darlings of people who are deeply
into music. But as most young folks haven't heard about them or knows who they are, they aren't really "a classic rock band still popular to youth".
|
||
Stressed Cheese
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 16 2022 Location: The Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 540 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
||
Saperlipopette!
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 20 2010 Location: Tomorrowland Status: Offline Points: 12205 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
^Well, the most listened to classic rock bands on Spotify are still the most listened to classic rock by young people. That's what we're discussing isn't it? Those are the same names you will find in the sales charts. Many of them has had successful movies made about them quite recently, a few has a song gone viral with some tik tok-video etc...
|
||
moshkito
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 04 2007 Location: Grok City Status: Online Points: 17940 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Hi, In general, in those "classic rock bs-stations", do not do things that they do not have an interest in and do not own a portion of, at least, the distribution of the works. In my book, all of these, and many more, would have a voice on the air, with one exception ... the moron that put together 5 tapes for those FM stations, wouldn't know music from his _________! And worse, he wouldn't care, either ... he's getting paid to do a job, and he took the money and run! The hard side of it is, that years later, the same "tapes" are still being played and those stations are not people oriented and don't care what is in the tapes. For the price they are paying for those tapes, a low level employee on regular wages would be cheaper and more fun to listen to ... but "radio" ... is no longer radio and we need to let it kill itself for being cheap, stupid and down right malicious!
|
||
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com |
||
Jacob Schoolcraft
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 22 2021 Location: NJ Status: Offline Points: 1200 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
To be in the music business for 50 years and witness that the majority of society's central importance is Led Zeppelin gets very old and tiring. Western culture has it all wrapped up. Jimmy Page is the greatest Rock guitarist and John Bonham the greatest drummer. People don't acknowledge Ian Paice or Ronnie Montrose . If you walk into a Wawa for coffee and another musician simply states that playing Led Zeppelin songs for a buck is a serious drag...watch most or all People turn their head your way. It's like a religion. It's extremism to the point of no return. Some people will shake their head in disbelief of what your musician friend is saying and they will in fact defend their position like a religion. In the music business Led Zeppelin are shoved down your throat. They are overrated in that sense. Just the fact that all the other internationally known Rock musicians are not generally seen in the same light as Led Zeppelin is a silly concept and it lacks glory. Just give Led Zeppelin Park Place and Boardwalk and start the game. It's ignorant stupidity. When you think about all the phenomenal innovative Rock bands in the late 60s and early 70s and their amazing music it seems rather foolish for most people to agree that Led Zeppelin are the greatest Rock band on the planet. It's irrelevant if they like them or not..as they will agree to disagree for the sake of not offending someone's favorite music taste. It's a red flag if you simply and kindly say.."It's not a style I prefer" It brings harm to the music business. It's about following one path which is very bravado, egotistical and nonsensical. People who know that Zeppelin are not the greatest Rock band on the planet will say that they are because they are glib. That ruins it for the musician because now they have to tow this ridiculous line to survive. When people in the crowd appreciate your playing and they discover that you don't like the music of Zeppelin they dislike you. That's not very nice to impose on the rest of the world now is it? We're not playing God..we're playing music and here they are putting rules to it..and that's not extremism? Not all professional musicians will see the blueprint of Zeppelin's mechanism as the ultimate goal in music. Why should they? That's like pressuring society to praise only Beethoven and not Bach. So J.S. Bach gets the cesspool part right? The degrade of credit...the much lesser of the two. In Rock Music Deep Purple, UFO, Thin Lizzy, and Ronnie Montrose get the lesser amount of credit. That's ridiculous! To think that we're bestowed with a theory and stupid enough to think that our intelligence has only one purpose. Obviously the majority of the population is controlled by their music emotionally which puts a huge limitation on searching for other music. Let's stop putting all our quarters in the same machine. Music happens everywhere without the echo of Led Zeppelin. It's not an intelligent design. It's entanglement that achieves a nothing. Edited by Jacob Schoolcraft - June 02 2023 at 10:43 |
||
Saperlipopette!
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 20 2010 Location: Tomorrowland Status: Offline Points: 12205 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Bach and Beethoven weren't contemporaries, so it's better to compare how society praise the latter composer over Johann Nepomuk Hummel and Luigi Cherubini. Which, like it or not, society does. Bach and Beethoven are the leading "stars" of the Baroque and the (early) Romantic era and overshadow a lot of great composers. Not all of course, Schubert and Vivaldi mm are also household names. Just like Black Sabbath and Deep Purple are. Led Zeppelin is Beethoven, Humble Pie is Cherubini. I'm sorry that's just how it works. Not how I want it to be, and there's nothing wrong with being Cherubini.
|
||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65513 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
^^ Wow you really have a Led Zeppelin chip-on-your-shoulder. I understand your grievances against a band as popular as they were, the illusions of music and show business in general-- Zeppelin can be faulted for a great deal, it's true: musical poaching, aggressive business tactics, debauchery. But on a good night they brought it in a way none of their peers could ever consider matching--- not Hendrix, not Floyd, not the Who, not Yes, none of them could match Led Zep's astounding ability to improvise, musically expand, and take bold risks in concert most musicians wouldn't dare trying for fear of failure. Zep weren't afraid and for that they must pay the price of history's scorn. Edited by Atavachron - June 02 2023 at 14:50 |
||
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
||
Grumpyprogfan
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 09 2019 Location: Kansas City Status: Offline Points: 12241 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Nice to hear Steely Dan is still popular. One of my favorite bands.
The Red Hot Chili Peppers are still popular. Started in 83? Does 40 years qualify as classic rock? Edited by Grumpyprogfan - June 02 2023 at 15:00 |
||
omphaloskepsis
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 19 2011 Location: Texas Status: Online Points: 6715 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
That's how I see it. I couldn't agree more.
|
||
The Dark Elf
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: February 01 2011 Location: Michigan Status: Offline Points: 13177 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I think you have issues that transcend Led Zeppelin. They were a great band, and opposed to your nonsensical take, I am continually pleasantly surprised at all the "reaction" videos on YouTube where younger folks are discovering Led Zeppelin, Pink Floyd and Black Sabbath for the first time. The wide-eyed amazement seems genuine. Genuine shock that they have gone most of their lives without hearing these legends of rock, and now they're listening to bands that evidently the older population has taken for granted (or overheard over time). It's quite interesting to see these millenials hearing "Stairway to Heaven" or "Kashmir" for the first time, and then comparing it to the dross and offal that's flung about as music currently ("Hey, he's actually singing without auto-tune!"). I'm not sure what "music business" you're in that is shoving Led Zeppelin down your throat. I've been in bands since the late 70s...Zeppelin has never been a requirement; in fact, bands that mimicked Zeppelin over time like Kingdom Come, Great White or even today with Greta Van Fleet are often mocked for their Ledded pretensions.
Edited by The Dark Elf - June 02 2023 at 20:33 |
||
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology... |
||
Jacob Schoolcraft
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 22 2021 Location: NJ Status: Offline Points: 1200 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
You don't see how they are overrated? I realize that you like them and that's fine. I do see them as a requirement and that's been on going for decades. Even in 2023 with many bar bands in the tri state area. I understand why they are loved. How could I not? In the early 70s at age 15 my mother showed me all of Page's open tunings and my father guided me through his electric solos. I enjoyed playing Zeppelin material in Rock clubs and concert halls. I sense the band is overrated by society when compared to other bands in Rock. I remember the band Detective who were signed to Swan Song. They sounded a bit like Zeppelin. Zeppelin had a unique style and Page was a fine writer..but so was Ian Anderson and several others in those times. It's important to acknowledge the fact that they are overrated when compared to other bands of their time. |
||
The Dark Elf
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: February 01 2011 Location: Michigan Status: Offline Points: 13177 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Please, explain how they are "overrated". Perhaps "overplayed" would be more precise, but then you could say that about another great band, Pink Floyd. I can't count how many times I've heard people say they won't listen to Dark Side of the Moon anymore because of the oversaturation. And, as I've stated, I never had an issue not playing Zeppelin in Michigan. I have been in bands where we played acoustic Zep like "Bron-Yr-Aur Stomp", "Gallows Pole", or "Hey, Hey What Can I Do", but that was of our own volition because they were fun to play. No one twisted our arms and demanded "Whole Lotta Love" be played every set. And Jethro Tull is doing just fine. Without the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame. Sabbath, The Stones, The Who? They are still selling albums. Hell, you could trot out half-dead Ozzy for one more tour and he'd sell out venues. You might as well argue about the immortal status of The Beatles. It is what it is. They are immortal, and young people still listen to them, and whether you consider them overrated is meaningless.
|
||
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology... |
||
Saperlipopette!
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 20 2010 Location: Tomorrowland Status: Offline Points: 12205 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
||
I prophesy disaster
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 31 2017 Location: Australia Status: Online Points: 4911 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
"^" refers to the previous post. "^^" refers to the post before the previous post. So Atavachron was referring to Jacob Schoolcraft. "^^^" would refer to the post before the post before the previous post. ... "^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^" would be better off quoting the intended post. |
||
No, I know how to behave in the restaurant now, I don't tear at the meat with my hands. If I've become a man of the world somehow, that's not necessarily to say I'm a worldly man.
|
||
Saperlipopette!
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 20 2010 Location: Tomorrowland Status: Offline Points: 12205 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
^ Right. Thanks! I had no idea. I guess I thought it was the same as using a lot of exclamation marks!!!!!!
|
||
Post Reply | Page <123> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |