Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Polls

New Posts

FAQ

Deep Purple added to site...

Post Reply

Page <123 4 5 >

Author

Message

Topic Search

Topic Options

stonebeard View Drop Down

Forum Senior Member

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057

Posted: August 30 2005 at 22:29

deep purple wrote worse music than kansas!

My soundcloud. Please give feedback if you want!

The Miracle View Drop Down

Prog Reviewer

Joined: May 29 2005
Location: hell
Status: Offline
Points: 28427

Posted: August 30 2005 at 22:30

stonebeard wrote:

deep purple wrote worse music than kansas!

no way!

last.fm

stonebeard View Drop Down

Forum Senior Member

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057

Posted: August 30 2005 at 22:34

The Miracle wrote:

stonebeard wrote:

deep purple wrote worse music than kansas!

no way!

absolutely!!!!!

My soundcloud. Please give feedback if you want!

The Miracle View Drop Down

Prog Reviewer

Joined: May 29 2005
Location: hell
Status: Offline
Points: 28427

Posted: August 30 2005 at 22:37

stonebeard wrote:

The Miracle wrote:

stonebeard wrote:

deep purple wrote worse music than kansas!

no way!

absolutely!!!!!

tell me you're joking

last.fm

stonebeard View Drop Down

Forum Senior Member

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057

Posted: August 30 2005 at 22:41

The Miracle wrote:

stonebeard wrote:

The Miracle wrote:

stonebeard wrote:

deep purple wrote worse music than kansas!

no way!

absolutely!!!!!

tell me you're joking

you wish i was...

My soundcloud. Please give feedback if you want!

The Miracle View Drop Down

Prog Reviewer

Joined: May 29 2005
Location: hell
Status: Offline
Points: 28427

Posted: August 30 2005 at 22:47

stonebeard wrote:

The Miracle wrote:

stonebeard wrote:

The Miracle wrote:

stonebeard wrote:

deep purple wrote worse music than kansas!

no way!

absolutely!!!!!

tell me you're joking

you wish i was...

I do

C'mon... they are the greatest hard rock band ever

last.fm

stonebeard View Drop Down

Forum Senior Member

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057

Posted: August 30 2005 at 22:50

The Miracle wrote:

stonebeard wrote:

The Miracle wrote:

stonebeard wrote:

The Miracle wrote:

stonebeard wrote:

deep purple wrote worse music than kansas!

no way!

absolutely!!!!!

tell me you're joking

you wish i was...

I do

C'mon... they are the greatest hard rock band ever

zeppelin were better...and "smoke on the water" sucks.

My soundcloud. Please give feedback if you want!

The Miracle View Drop Down

Prog Reviewer

Joined: May 29 2005
Location: hell
Status: Offline
Points: 28427

Posted: August 30 2005 at 22:56

stonebeard wrote:

The Miracle wrote:

stonebeard wrote:

The Miracle wrote:

stonebeard wrote:

The Miracle wrote:

stonebeard wrote:

deep purple wrote worse music than kansas!

no way!

absolutely!!!!!

tell me you're joking

you wish i was...

I do

C'mon... they are the greatest hard rock band ever

zeppelin were better...and "smoke on the water" sucks.

Well, yes, Zeps were better. They're my favorite non-prog pand, with Purple close seond.
smoke on the water is good as a radio hit, but of course not their best. And I have the entire discography

last.fm

TheProgtologist View Drop Down

Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: May 23 2005
Location: Baltimore,Md US
Status: Offline
Points: 27802

Posted: August 30 2005 at 23:03

This is ridiculous.Deep Purple is not prog.

Damen

Forum Senior Member

Joined: August 04 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1068

Posted: August 30 2005 at 23:06

Someone adding Deep Purple to progarchives is scary enough

But they added Deep Purple under CANTERBURY SCENE

AHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!

"It's amazing that we've been able to put up with each other for 35 years. Most marriages don't last that long these days."

-Chris Squire

margaret

Forum Senior Member

Joined: May 29 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 139

Posted: August 30 2005 at 23:10

abstaining for a bit, but no love for early Purples contribution to the fledging prog movement? Obviously they changed in hard rock/metal pick your poison, but is not the site, partially at least, supposed to educate? Playing Devil's advocate here, obviously popular opinion is against them.

Hemispheres View Drop Down

Forum Senior Member

Joined: December 22 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 533

Posted: August 30 2005 at 23:11

WHAT THE HELL IM GONE F U GUYS

DEEP PURPLE ARE SO NOT PROG

I REALLY DONT CARE BUT CANTEBURY THEY WERENT PROGRESIVE IN THE EARLY YEARS THEY WERE MILDLY PSHYCADELIC (DID I SPELL THAT RIGHT) ALLL THE CAPS

[IMG]http://www.wheresthatfrom.com/avatars/miguelsanchez.gif">[IMG]http://www.rockphiles.com/all_images/Act_Images/TheMothersOfInvention/mothers300.jpg">

The Miracle View Drop Down

Prog Reviewer

Joined: May 29 2005
Location: hell
Status: Offline
Points: 28427

Posted: August 30 2005 at 23:16

They're indeed a great, great band!

but... not prog

last.fm

margaret

Forum Senior Member

Joined: May 29 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 139

Posted: August 30 2005 at 23:18

Hemispheres wrote:

<FONT size=7>WHAT THE HELL IM GONE F U GUYS

<FONT size=7>DEEP PURPLE ARE SO NOT PROG

I REALLY DONT CARE BUT CANTEBURY THEY WERENT PROGRESIVE IN THE EARLY YEARS THEY WERE MILDLY PSHYCADELIC (DID I SPELL THAT RIGHT) ALLL THE CAPS

no you didn't

, and I have to say I didn't hear a bit of psychedelic on the album 'Concerto for Group and Orchestra' (1969) and they had some real progressive gems like the self titled album from 69 as well.

TheProgtologist View Drop Down

Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: May 23 2005
Location: Baltimore,Md US
Status: Offline
Points: 27802

Posted: August 31 2005 at 03:24

NO.They don't belong here,and what's worse is they're listed under "Canterbury".

KoS

Forum Senior Member

Joined: May 17 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Points: 16310

Posted: August 31 2005 at 03:37

TheProgtologist wrote:

NO.They don't belong here,and what's worse is they're listed under "Canterbury".

I agree
Canterbury?
dont you know DP is Zeuhl?

Pablo_P

Forum Senior Member

Joined: March 20 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 1028

Posted: August 31 2005 at 03:41

MY GODS!!!
DEEP PURPLE IS ONE OF MY FAVOURITE BANDS BUT PROGARCHIVES IS NOT A PLACE FOR THEM!!!
DEEP PURPLE AS A PART OF CANTERBURY SCENE???
NO WAY!!!

Pablo P.

Wolf Spider View Drop Down

Forum Senior Member

Joined: August 04 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 1617

Posted: August 31 2005 at 03:45

Deep Purple in not prog and never was!
Listen in the 70`s every rock band improvised on the stage that was how the main part of the rock show, but that doesn`t mean that all 70`s bands were prog! In the name of god stop this madness, there already is lobbing about Led Zeppelin and The Doors but they aren`t prog too! I have all the best DP and LZ CD`s and I can`t find any connections to prog IT`S PURE HARD ROCK

Last.fm

Easy Livin View Drop Down

Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585

Posted: August 31 2005 at 03:54

I'm confused, I don't know how to vote. The question is "Should they stay or should they go?"

If I vote Yes, am I voting they should stay or they should go?

Wink LOL

Ricochet

Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 27 2005
Location: Nauru
Status: Offline
Points: 46301

Posted: August 31 2005 at 04:15

This is amazing...Deep Purple prog?What's next,Led Zeppelin,Black Sabbath,Britney Spears?

Post Reply	Page <123 4 5 >

Forum Jump

Forum Permissions View Drop Down

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

This page was generated in 0.168 seconds.

Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.

Poll Question: Should they stay or should they go?
Poll Choice	Votes	Poll Statistics
Yes	18	[21.95%]
No	59	[71.95%]
Dont Know	1	[1.22%]
Dont Care	4	[4.88%]
Let’s talk....	0	[0.00%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted