Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: June 30 2012 at 14:37 |
Codera the Great wrote:
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying the albums are bad, they deserve praise. It's just my personal opinion. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5eb53/5eb53f154da37ed07cd0db15853a62f67dfefef2" alt="Embarrassed Embarrassed" |
Then they are not overrated.
The way this word is misused pisses me off greatly.
|
What?
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
HarbouringTheSoul
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 21 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 1199
|
Posted: June 30 2012 at 14:38 |
Dayvenkirq wrote:
Codera the Great wrote:
It's just my personal opinion. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5eb53/5eb53f154da37ed07cd0db15853a62f67dfefef2" alt="Embarrassed Embarrassed" |
That line is pretty much like common sense on threads like this one. |
It's certainly sense, but I fear it's not that common.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Master of Time
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 30 2012
Location: UT, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 374
|
Posted: July 01 2012 at 04:05 |
I agree wholeheartedly with that statement. In fact I was kind of trying to make this point earlier.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
fafafooey5
Forum Newbie
Joined: November 19 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1
|
Posted: October 07 2012 at 21:32 |
Never been to one of his shows obviously..... too bad 4 u
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
ole-the-first
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 03 2012
Location: Russia
Status: Offline
Points: 1534
|
Posted: October 08 2012 at 03:00 |
Abbey Road.
|
This night wounds time.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
shermike
Forum Newbie
Joined: May 07 2011
Location: Russia
Status: Offline
Points: 20
|
Posted: October 15 2012 at 03:07 |
Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65606
|
Posted: October 15 2012 at 03:18 |
Zep IV simplistic compositions, none of the spontaneity of the first three albums, both overproduced and under-bottomed, and too popular for its own good
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
|
Posted: October 15 2012 at 04:48 |
Atavachron wrote:
Zep IV simplistic compositions, none of the spontaneity of the first three albums, both overproduced and under-bottomed, and too popular for its own good
|
I kind of agree it gets too much recognition. It's pretty good though.
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65606
|
Posted: October 15 2012 at 04:52 |
well sure it's Zeppelin, but Stairway live is sooo much better
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Tom Ozric
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2005
Location: Olympus Mons
Status: Offline
Points: 15926
|
Posted: October 19 2012 at 03:28 |
I guess one could find many albums to be 'over-rated'. Personally, I'm not a massive Beatles fan. Influential as they were/are, they just strike me as a clever 'pop' band. I do like Revolver, Sgt. Pepper's and Magical Mystery Tour for sure, but I find these vastly over-rated, all 4 stars for me. Close, but no cigar...........
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Argonaught
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 04 2012
Location: Virginia
Status: Offline
Points: 1413
|
Posted: October 19 2012 at 09:33 |
Tom
Ozric wrote:
I guess one could find many albums to be
'over-rated'. Personally, I'm not a massive Beatles fan.
Influential as they were/are, they just strike me as a clever 'pop' band.
I do like Revolver, Sgt. Pepper's and Magical Mystery Tour for sure, but I
find these vastly over-rated, all 4 stars for me. Close, but no
cigar........... |
See, had you just
modestly said 'I don't like them Beatles as much as some folks do', no-one
would have moral grounds to argue against this personal preference... but since
you chose to deploy this heavily over-(ab)used expression 'over-rated', here is
some reasoning why I think Beatles do hit the five full stars overall.
Let's remind ourselves
what Beatles achieved about 50 years ago: They helped establish the UK as a
mighty pop/rock empire that has been punching way above its weight in music
ever since the Beatles and Rolling Stones era.
I believe many musical
titans of the past 30-40-50 years have quoted Beatles as being their notable
influence.
Also, Beatles improved
the quality and the standing of the pop music to the point where it began to
attain permanent cultural values: meaningfulness,
coherence and depth of thought, relevance to the real world. In other words,
the journey from 'Please, Please Me' to ‘Let It Be’ is comparable to progress
from a shellac record to an MFSL LP.
Also,
a few genres that we enjoy these days also were prototyped by Beatles. Would it
have been possible to reach for the top shelf of ITCOCK without standing on a
tall ladder of Sgt. Pepper and its follow ups?
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Tom Ozric
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2005
Location: Olympus Mons
Status: Offline
Points: 15926
|
Posted: October 19 2012 at 14:39 |
Argonaught wrote:
Tom Ozric wrote:
I guess one could find many albums to be 'over-rated'. Personally, I'm not a massive Beatles fan. Influential as they were/are, they just strike me as a clever 'pop' band. I do like Revolver, Sgt. Pepper's and Magical Mystery Tour for sure, but I find these vastly over-rated, all 4 stars for me. Close, but no cigar........... |
See, had you just modestly said 'I don't like them Beatles as much as some folks do', no-one would have moral grounds to argue against this personal preference... but since you chose to deploy this heavily over-(ab)used expression 'over-rated', here is some reasoning why I think Beatles do hit the five full stars overall.
Let's remind ourselves what Beatles achieved about 50 years ago: They helped establish the UK as a mighty pop/rock empire that has been punching way above its weight in music ever since the Beatles and Rolling Stones era.
I believe many musical titans of the past 30-40-50 years have quoted Beatles as being their notable influence.
Also, Beatles improved the quality and the standing of the pop music to the point where it began to attain permanent cultural values: meaningfulness, coherence and depth of thought, relevance to the real world. In other words, the journey from 'Please, Please Me' to ‘Let It Be’ is comparable to progress from a shellac record to an MFSL LP.
Also, a few genres that we enjoy these days also were prototyped by Beatles. Would it have been possible to reach for the top shelf of ITCOCK without standing on a tall ladder of Sgt. Pepper and its follow ups? |
O.K. - Fair point. I could've said I don't like them as much as other folks, and being born in 1972 means that I probably 'missed the point' somewhere along the way, so I don't find their albums 'masterpieces', excellent as they are. Give me MAGMA any day over the Fab Four.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
HarbouringTheSoul
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 21 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 1199
|
Posted: October 19 2012 at 15:00 |
Tom Ozric wrote:
and being born in 1972 means that I probably 'missed the point' somewhere along the way |
Speaking as someone born in 1994 who worships at the altar that is the Beatles, so to speak, I can assure you that age doesn't make a difference. Anybody who wasn't there at the time shouldn't make the mistake of searching for some kind of 'special attribute' in their music, be it 'progressiveness', 'innovation', 'complexity' or whatever. They certainly had many of these attributes, but that's irrelevant. First and foremost they made great rock music. If you can't entertain the thought that rock music without some 'special attribute' can be good (and I know many prog fans think that way), then the Beatles are not for you.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Tom Ozric
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2005
Location: Olympus Mons
Status: Offline
Points: 15926
|
Posted: October 19 2012 at 19:12 |
HarbouringTheSoul wrote:
Tom Ozric wrote:
and being born in 1972 means that I probably 'missed the point' somewhere along the way |
Speaking as someone born in 1994 who worships at the altar that is the Beatles, so to speak, I can assure you that age doesn't make a difference. Anybody who wasn't there at the time shouldn't make the mistake of searching for some kind of 'special attribute' in their music, be it 'progressiveness', 'innovation', 'complexity' or whatever. They certainly had many of these attributes, but that's irrelevant. First and foremost they made great rock music. If you can't entertain the thought that rock music without some 'special attribute' can be good (and I know many prog fans think that way), then the Beatles are not for you.
|
What you've stated here I can certainly agree with - I never set out to tread on anyone's toes, I just find some of those Beatles albums vastly over-rated. Having said that, there's plenty of obscure stuff I rate as a 'masterpiece' what in most circles would be considered quite laughable. I treasure my old LP of Revolver, which, IMHO, is as close to perfection as The Beatles got, but I can only muster a 4 star rating for it...........here's another - I love Magma, but MDK - now that one's a bit over-rated too. Give me Udu Wudu over it any day......
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
AEProgman
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 11 2012
Location: Toadstool
Status: Offline
Points: 1789
|
Posted: October 19 2012 at 20:16 |
Snow Dog wrote:
Atavachron wrote:
Zep IV simplistic compositions, none of the spontaneity of the first three albums, both overproduced and under-bottomed, and too popular for its own good
|
I kind of agree it gets too much recognition. It's pretty good though. |
IV is overrated to me also, I always thought Presence was underrated...Achilles Last Stand blows me away still.
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Tom Ozric
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2005
Location: Olympus Mons
Status: Offline
Points: 15926
|
Posted: October 19 2012 at 21:47 |
AEProgman wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
Atavachron wrote:
Zep IV simplistic compositions, none of the spontaneity of the first three albums, both overproduced and under-bottomed, and too popular for its own good
|
I kind of agree it gets too much recognition. It's pretty good though. |
IV is overrated to me also, I always thought Presence was underrated...Achilles Last Stand blows me away still. |
Agreed - but how about Tea For One ?? No-one does a slow blues like Zepp......
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
HarbouringTheSoul
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 21 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 1199
|
Posted: October 20 2012 at 05:55 |
Somehow I wasted the last half hour or so compiling a list of albums listed on PA that I consider over- or underrated. And because I know there will be misunderstandings if I don't say this: I'm not trying to make absolute statements of quality or dictate other people's tastes when I use the words "overrated" and "underrated". It merely means that I like the album more or less than most other people.
Overrated: - Agalloch - Ashes Against the Grain: Not necessarily overrated here on PA, where all their album ratings are pretty close, but in the metal community this or The Mantle are usually hailed as their masterpiece. I hear a cold, clinical post-metal album with a few great melodies but a lack of passion and some pretty yawn-inducing clean singing.
- The Beatles - Sgt. Peppers Lonely Hearts Club Band: Any album that receives the label of "best album ever" is bound to disappoint a bit, but I feel that this is the weakest album of their "mature" (1966-1970) phase. Don't get me wrong, it's still great, but there's a pretty miserable stretch from "Lovely Rita" to the title track reprise and I'm not 100% fond of some other songs. As a side effect of PA being pretty cautious on Beatles albums in general, the rating is rather reasonable here.
- Black Sabbath - Paranoid: For a supposed 70s classic I find this rather underwhelming, even though it might just be my favorite Black Sabbath record. It's hardly in my nature to dis more 'radio-friendly' songs just because they're more accessible, but the title track is nothing special (and unfortunately it's the type of song that suffers massively from overplaying). Even worse is "Iron Man", which goes to show that the best way to ruin a great riff is to have Ozzy sing along to it. It's not always a problem (hey, "Electric Funeral" does the same and it's awesome!), but here it sounds incredibly stupid. Much of the rest of the album is pretty great though.
- Black Sabbath - Sabbath Bloody Sabbath: Good god, I can't stand this album. The first two tracks both sport great riffs, but everything else belongs to the trash pile as far as I'm concerned. Nothing against Sabbath branching out, but just about everything goes wrong here.
- Captain Beefheart - Trout Mask Replica: The cult status of this album doesn't become apparent on PA because it's the only Beefheart album that non-fans have rated and that brings down the average. But to those who hail this as his magnum opus I say: Even though it's good, he's done better. Much, much better.
- Cynic - Focus: I just can't stand that vocoder voice, sorry. Despite the many great moments on this disc, I want to puke every time I hear that voice. Plus, it reduces all vocal melodies to the same indiscernible muck.
- David Bowie - Hunky Dory: I count four great songs ("Changes", "Oh! You Pretty Things", "Life on Mars?", "The Bewlay Brothers"), two decent ones ("Fill Your Heart", "Andy Warhol") and a lot of songs that I can't find a good melody in.
- Dream Theater: Let me just say "their entire catalogue besides I&W" and be done with it.
- Eloy - Ocean: Even the fact that I'm German myself doesn't make me oblivious to the unintentional comedy on this album. Funniest part: The first eight minutes of ridiculously titled last track, which are dedicated to a bunch of synthesizer noise and some kind of cosmic ritual spoken in amazingly broken English. Also, lyrics such as "overbearing secular creature" and "Intrinsic virtues awake!". Too bad that in between the broken English and the tons of pseudo-atmospheric non-music you can find some great stuff.
- Frank Zappa - Hot Rats: This famous excursion into jazz fusion is good indeed, but I never understood why it's regarded as one of the classics of the genre. I love "Peaches en Regalia" as much as anybody, but apart from that the album doesn't have much classic material. Not even "Willie the Pimp", whose solo is easily dwarfed by, say, the solo to "Inca Roads".
- Frank Zappa - Broadway the Hard Way: Zappa's rants about the political situation in America circa 1988 might be funny lyrics-wise (although even tzhat is debatable), but musically it's as uninspired as Zappa has ever been.
- Genesis - Trespass: This album's rating must be suffering from 'Genesis inflation': "Every album that is a) by Genesis and b) prog must automatically have its rating boosted by 0.5 points." It has its moments ("Looking for Someone", "Dusk", "The Knife"), but it can't hold a candle to the following albums. Plus, I never liked "Stagnation" anyway.
- Genesis - Foxtrot: Unfortunately "Supper's Ready" leaves me rather cold, which sets me apart from 90% of this community. Even more unfortunately, so do "Time Table", "Get 'Em Out by Friday" and "Can-Utility and the Coastliners".
- Genesis - Wind and Wuthering: See what I wrote about Trespass, except with fewer 'moments' ("Eleventh Earl of Mar", "Blood on the Rooftops"). "One for the Vine" bores me to death.
- Iron Maiden - Brave New World: A lack of energy and good melodies and an overabundance of one-sentence choruses don't make a classic Iron Maiden record.
- King Crimson - Lizard: What, oh what do people see in this mess? Does the fact that it's full of stupid ideas and that the instrumentation is all over the place somehow make it valuable due to its 'progressiveness'. Most of the time I chalk up my discrepancies with the rest of PA up to my differing tastes. Here I'm just completely confused why anyone would like this album except for academic purposes.
- King Crimson - Starless and Bible Black: Do people actually listen to jams like "We'll Let You Know" and the title track? I mean, I have nothing against jamming per se, but I don't hear anything interesting going on in these particular ones. I do like the bookending tracks, "Trio" and to a lesser extent "The Night Watch", but otherwise this can give me one hell of a headache.
- Metallica - Death Magnetic: Gladly this mess isn't viewed too favorably here either, but elsewhere it's hailed as a glorious return to form. Absolutely not! Apart from the massive clipping that pervades pretty much all drum tracks, there are also a lot of embarrassing ideas on this album ("Cyanide", "All Nightmare Long").
- Pink Floyd - Atom Heart Mother: Everything I don't want in a Pink Floyd album, wrapped up into one package. This might be the worst album I have ever listened to enough to pass judgment. The two suites are embarrassing and clumsy, and the 'solo' songs are boring.
- Pink Floyd - The Wall: Adolescent fantasies of a 36-year-old man? No, thank you. There are some great songs on here, but also lots of filler and some prime rubbish. I'm not the only one who feels this way, but the overall rating is still pretty high.
- Radiohead - The Bends: Indie rock hallmark or not, most of these songs strike me as rather listless. Save for "Street Spirit", which might the gloomiest song ever recorded.
- Rush - 2112: Kind of the opposite of Tarkus. Both records have an acclaimed epic on side one and a bunch of usually ignored songs on side two. But whereas I found both sides of Tarkus strong, I find both sides of 2112 only kind of okay.
- Rush - A Farewell to Kings: The first two songs are great. The rest... Not so much.
- Van der Graaf Generator - Pawn Hearts: This album has a lot of gratuitous noise on it. Sometimes I wonder if that is the very reason people like it so much. Me, I think "Lemmings" has some great ideas that were mistreated, "Man-Erg" is pretty good and the title track is an absolute mess.
- Yes - Tales from Topographic Oceans: Even though it's quite controversial, this is a mandatory item on this list just for how dearly a few folks love it. I won't take the opposite view and trash it, but a good part of it leaves me rather cold.
Underrated: - Agalloch - Pale Folklore, Marrow of the Spirit: Again, not necessarily underrated here on PA, but elsewhere the former is often ignored and the latter was moderately controversial when it was released. These are their more metal-oriented releases, which means less clean singing (good!) and less sterility (better!). Marrow of the Spirit might be my favorite metal album.
- The Beatles - Let It Be: A 3.20 rating (it was 3.21 before I changed my admittedly exaggerated 5-star rating to 4 stars)? I know that it has some obvious imperfections (and although I've never heard Let It Be - Naked, I assume it's better), but it's nevertheless one of my favorite Beatles albums. I'm a sucker for the roots-ish sound they adopted on the white album and kept until the end.
- Black Sabbath - Vol. 4: Yes, this album does have "Changes" and "FX". And yes, they both suck. But apart from the rather perfunctory "Cornucopia" and "St. Vitus' Dance", the rest of the album strikes me as the best music that ever came from this maddeningly inconsistent band.
- The Doors - Morrison Hotel: A rating of 3.11? This baffles me. After all, this album has "Roadhouse Blues", "Waiting for the Sun", "Peace Frog" and "The Spy" (plus a number of gems that aren't as well-known).
- Eloy - Colours: The vocals and lyrics are both better than usual (which means they're tolerable) and the band writes some songs instead of cosmic symphonies. The result stands heads and shoulders above anything they did before (don't know about since). Thankfully, the bonus track "Wings of Vision" provides with at least SOME unintentional comedy. The synthesizer riff is so stupid it would make late-period Grobschnitt proud and the lyrics quote "Firth of Fifth", for chrissakes! The first time I heard this album, I feel asleep somewhere in the middle (not the album's fault, I was really tired), but this song is so bad that it managed to wake me up.
- Emerson, Lake & Palmer - Tarkus: Actually, it's not underrated in the numerical sense because most reviewers seem to have the mercy to award it four stars DESPITE the second side, but I vehemently disagree that the second side is weak. I don't have much use for "The Only Way" ("Why did he loooooose/six million Jeeeeeeeews?"), but apart from that it's magnificent. And yes, that includes the two 'funny' numbers that bookend it.
- Frank Zappa - Burnt Weeny Sandwich: This, not Uncle Meat, should be regarded as the masterpiece of the Mothers. The 28 minutes from "Holiday in Berlin" to "Little House" are some of the best music ever recorded and the rest of the album is a hilarious exercise in tension and release.
- Frank Zappa - Apostrophe ('): Usually considered 'just another good Zappa album'. I think it's one of his very best.
- Frank Zappa - Sleep Dirt: Again, one of my favorites, but sadly the fact that for a long time this album had vocals turned people off of it. Thankfully, the only version in print right now doesn't have the vocals.
- Genesis - Duke, Abacab, Genesis: There's also 'Genesis deflation': "Every album that is a) by Genesis and b) NOT prog must automatically have its rating lowered by at least 0.5 points (or more, depending on how straightforward it is)." There's nothing more close-minded than dismissing the non-prog output of a prog band for what I assume are primarily historical-social reasons. These albums are good, sometimes very much so!
- Iron Maiden - Piece of Mind: How come an album that kicks so much ass has such a low rating? Especially since there's enough for the proghead to love ("Where Eagles Dare", "Revelations", "To Tame a Land").
- Jefferson Airplane - Surrealistic Pillow: Nothing particularly proggish about it, but possibly the least dated album to capture the spirit of 1967.
- King Crimson - Islands: The rating is still relatively high on PA, but elsewhere this record receives little mercy. Like with Lizard, the instrumentation can get messy at times, but the melodies are there. And it has a nice 'mediterranean' flavor to it.
- Radiohead - In Rainbows: One of my favorite albums of all time, sadly ignored by a community that probably has little connection to this kind of music. Elsewhere it's hailed as a masterpiece, so maybe I shouldn't include it here.
- Soft Machine - Volume Two: This and Absolutely Free are the two avant-garde masterpieces of the 60s. I like this one even more, but sadly it's kind of ignored in favor of the albums that bookend it. The rating itself is pretty high, it just doesn't seem to attract a lot of attention.
Edited by HarbouringTheSoul - October 20 2012 at 05:55
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Dayvenkirq
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 25 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 10970
|
Posted: October 20 2012 at 09:55 |
HarbouringTheSoul wrote:
I'm not trying to make absolute statements of quality or dictate other people's tastes when I use the words "overrated" and "underrated". It merely means that I like the album more or less than most other people. |
Noted.
HarbouringTheSoul wrote:
Overrated:
- The Beatles - Sgt. Peppers Lonely Hearts Club Band.
|
Agreed. Quite a few tracks on it hurt the album and my opinion of it.
HarbouringTheSoul wrote:
Genesis - Trespass: This album's rating must be suffering from 'Genesis inflation': "Every album that is a) by Genesis and b) prog must automatically have its rating boosted by 0.5 points." It has its moments ("Looking for Someone", "Dusk", "The Knife"), but it can't hold a candle to the following albums. Plus, I never liked "Stagnation" anyway. |
Same here about the tracks, but nonetheless I really enjoy this album. My ratings don't usually suffer because of one or two tracks.
HarbouringTheSoul wrote:
Genesis - Foxtrot: Unfortunately "Supper's Ready" leaves me rather cold, which sets me apart from 90% of this community. Even more unfortunately, so do "Time Table", "Get 'Em Out by Friday" and "Can-Utility and the Coastliners". |
Check, check, check, but I do like "Can-Utility".
HarbouringTheSoul wrote:
King Crimson - Lizard: What, oh what do people see in this mess? Does the fact that it's full of stupid ideas and that the instrumentation is all over the place somehow make it valuable due to its 'progressiveness'. Most of the time I chalk up my discrepancies with the rest of PA up to my differing tastes. Here I'm just completely confused why anyone would like this album except for academic purposes. |
OK, you have to have to have to figure out the merits of this album. I agree: it does get pretty messy on some tracks.
HarbouringTheSoul wrote:
King Crimson - Starless and Bible Black: Do people actually listen to jams like "We'll Let You Know" and the title track? I mean, I have nothing against jamming per se, but I don't hear anything interesting going on in these particular ones. I do like the bookending tracks, "Trio" and to a lesser extent "The Night Watch", but otherwise this can give me one hell of a headache. |
I guess you have your own thresholds, but still, you have to consider the merits of this album too, the songwriting and the sound of the instruments, the guitar in particular, unless you don't like the sound of Fripp's guitar. Also, I wouldn't go as far as to say that it's overrated because I noticed that a lot of people complain about its production, the volume level and awkward fade-outs.
HarbouringTheSoul wrote:
Pink Floyd - Atom Heart Mother: Everything I don't want in a Pink Floyd album, wrapped up into one package. This might be the worst album I have ever listened to enough to pass judgment. The two suites are embarrassing and clumsy, and the 'solo' songs are boring. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77578/7757824c57d4153a317c565ab2e8e4bf49d68f75" alt="Stern Smile Stern Smile" Not just a stern smile. More like a grin wide open. The bottom line is: sorry that you feel that way about the album.
HarbouringTheSoul wrote:
Pink Floyd - The Wall: Adolescent fantasies of a 36-year-old man? No, thank you. There are some great songs on here, but also lots of filler and some prime rubbish. I'm not the only one who feels this way, but the overall rating is still pretty high. |
I have to ask: where did you get the number 36 from?
HarbouringTheSoul wrote:
Rush - 2112 |
Agreed. Frankly, I can't see the merits of this one.
HarbouringTheSoul wrote:
Rush - A Farewell to Kings |
Ditto.
HarbouringTheSoul wrote:
Van der Graaf Generator - Pawn Hearts: This album has a lot of gratuitous noise on it. Sometimes I wonder if that is the very reason people like it so much. Me, I think "Lemmings" has some great ideas that were mistreated, "Man-Erg" is pretty good and the title track is an absolute mess. |
Agreed again, though I hear that Hammill is one hell of a writer. How do you feel about the words?
HarbouringTheSoul wrote:
Yes - Tales from Topographic Oceans: Even though it's quite controversial, this is a mandatory item on this list just for how dearly a few folks love it. I won't take the opposite view and trash it, but a good part of it leaves me rather cold. |
Also sorry that you feel that way about it. However, considering that you said that "a few folks love it", it does not make it overrated. In fact, I think, it's quite the opposite. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e26b7/e26b7e9a2514f34f84924e0e4b54c53ba7159288" alt="Wink Wink"
Edited by Dayvenkirq - October 20 2012 at 10:03
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
HarbouringTheSoul
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 21 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 1199
|
Posted: October 20 2012 at 10:15 |
Dayvenkirq wrote:
Check, check, check, but I do like "Can-Utility". |
I like all tracks on the album, including "Can-Utility", but the only one I like more than just a bit is "Watcher of the Skies".
Dayvenkirq wrote:
OK, you have to have to have to figure out the merits of this album. I agree: it does get pretty messy on some tracks. |
Enlighten me. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f640e/f640e972ca4e739e7a74acbcde0b0a6b6023d619" alt="Tongue Tongue" For the record, I do kind of like "Cirkus" and "Lady of the Dancing Water" is okay too, I guess.
Dayvenkirq wrote:
I guess you have your own thresholds, but still, you have to consider the merits of this album too, the songwriting and the sound of the instruments, the guitar in particular, unless you don't like the sound of Fripp's guitar. Also, I wouldn't go as far as to say that it's overrated because I noticed that a lot of people complain about its production, the volume level and awkward fade-outs. |
I do think this album has its merits. The songwriting is good on most of the songs that are written, it's the improvised pieces I don't like. (On that note, it has occurred to me that many people who dismiss this album are unaware that "Fracture" is a composed piece.) The sound of the instruments alone doesn't interest me in an improvisation. I guess there are people who would say "I could listen to these guys play all day", but I'm not one of those people.
Dayvenkirq wrote:
I have to ask: where did you get the number 36 from? |
The age of Roger Waters when the album was released.
Dayvenkirq wrote:
Agreed again, though I hear that Hammill is one hell of a writer. How do you feel about the words? |
As a non-native English speakers, I rarely pay much attention to the words, although I do recognize the quality of Hammill's lyrics.
Dayvenkirq wrote:
Also sorry that you feel that way about it. However, considering that you said that "a few folks love it", it does not make it overrated. In fact, I think, it's quite the opposite.
|
Well, then it's overrated by those "few folks". data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f640e/f640e972ca4e739e7a74acbcde0b0a6b6023d619" alt="Tongue Tongue" On a more serious note, I do think that the album is viewed rather favorably around here, especially on the forums. I'm much more ambivalent.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Dayvenkirq
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 25 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 10970
|
Posted: October 20 2012 at 11:17 |
HarbouringTheSoul wrote:
Dayvenkirq wrote:
OK, you have to have to have to figure out the merits of this album. I agree: it does get pretty messy on some tracks. |
Enlighten me. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f640e/f640e972ca4e739e7a74acbcde0b0a6b6023d619" alt="Tongue Tongue" For the record, I do kind of like "Cirkus" and "Lady of the Dancing Water" is okay too, I guess. |
Well, there is the musicianship (which could be a problem as well), the sound of the instruments, especially the oboe and the Mellotron (but, I guess, you are not very keen about that on this album), and the composition techniques.
HarbouringTheSoul wrote:
Dayvenkirq wrote:
I have to ask: where did you get the number 36 from? |
The age of Roger Waters when the album was released. |
Oh, I thought it was PInk's age. I thought Pink was a young man in the story.
Edited by Dayvenkirq - October 20 2012 at 11:19
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |