Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - News of the day
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

News of the day

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 162163164165166 446>
Author
Message
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Equality 7-2521 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 22 2011 at 16:40
I'm going for either that or improper error analysis. 
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
Atkingani View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: October 21 2005
Location: Terra Brasilis
Status: Offline
Points: 12288
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Atkingani Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2011 at 17:22
Guigo

~~~~~~
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Slartibartfast Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2011 at 17:38
Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Neutrinos travel faster than the speed of light.

Really has no bearing on the theory of relativity at all at this stage, but it's interesting.
Well the thing is it's been maintained for a while now that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light and that seems rather illogical.


Edited by Slartibartfast - September 24 2011 at 13:41
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Equality 7-2521 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 24 2011 at 10:58
It seems illogical to you as a man intimately familiar with theoretical physics? What's illogical about it?
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Slartibartfast Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 24 2011 at 13:06
Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

It seems illogical to you as a man intimately familiar with theoretical physics? What's illogical about it?
As someone with a passing interest in physics you pinhead!   LOL

The notion that there is an ultimate speed at which things cannot travel faster than.  And isn't theoretical physics all about challenging the notions of accepted physics?  Once upon a time things couldn't travel faster than the speed of sound.


Edited by Slartibartfast - September 24 2011 at 13:41
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote stonebeard Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 24 2011 at 13:11
I wish I could not be retarded about math and physics. Then I could do more than just nod and smile at news like that.

That's why I like biology. Sure there's probability and probably complex models for ecosystems, but it's more intuitive than physics.
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Slartibartfast Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 24 2011 at 13:39
DuPont's Herbicide Goes Rogue
DuPont: "We are investigating the reports of these unfavorable tree symptoms,"

A Billionaires' Coup in the US: Debt Deal Will Hurt the Poorest Americans, Convinced by Fox and the Tea Party to Act Against Their Own Welfare


Edited by Slartibartfast - September 24 2011 at 14:47
Back to Top
timothy leary View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 29 2005
Location: Lilliwaup, Wa.
Status: Offline
Points: 5319
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote timothy leary Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 24 2011 at 14:43
Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

DuPont's Herbicide Goes Rogue
DuPont: "We are investigating the reports of these unfavorable tree symptoms,"

A Billionaires' Coup in the US: Debt Deal Will Hurt the Poorest Americans, Convinced by Fox and the Tea Party to Act Against Their Own Welfare

No reason to use poisons on the landscape. Laziness. Unwanted plants on our property get dug out by the root, no root, no grow.
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Slartibartfast Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 24 2011 at 14:47
I'm kind of thinking there is no such thing as a magic poison.

Edited by Slartibartfast - September 24 2011 at 19:01
Back to Top
Padraic View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Padraic Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 24 2011 at 14:58
Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

It seems illogical to you as a man intimately familiar with theoretical physics? What's illogical about it?
As someone with a passing interest in physics you pinhead!   LOL

The notion that there is an ultimate speed at which things cannot travel faster than.  And isn't theoretical physics all about challenging the notions of accepted physics?  Once upon a time things couldn't travel faster than the speed of sound.


Show me the published, peer-reviewed physics paper that demonstrated that nothing could exceed the speed of sound.
Back to Top
timothy leary View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 29 2005
Location: Lilliwaup, Wa.
Status: Offline
Points: 5319
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote timothy leary Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 24 2011 at 14:59
http://news.yahoo.com/american-allergy-global-warming-why-171043981.html

For the global warming nay sayers just keep saying no...........
Back to Top
Henry Plainview View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Henry Plainview Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 24 2011 at 15:18
 
Originally posted by Padraic Padraic wrote:

 Show me the published, peer-reviewed physics paper that demonstrated that nothing could exceed the speed of sound.

Seriously. There was difficulty in humans building a plane that could break the sound barrier, and concerns that the person inside that plane would survive when it did, but comparing that to the speed of light is ludicrous. The tip of a whip breaks the sound barrier when it cracks, there was never a time when we thought sound the maximum speed of the universe. 

However, I don't know much about this experiment.
if you own a sodastream i hate you
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Equality 7-2521 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 24 2011 at 15:53
Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

It seems illogical to you as a man intimately familiar with theoretical physics? What's illogical about it?
As someone with a passing interest in physics you pinhead!   LOL

The notion that there is an ultimate speed at which things cannot travel faster than.  And isn't theoretical physics all about challenging the notions of accepted physics?  Once upon a time things couldn't travel faster than the speed of sound.

Why is that on its face illogical? Why is a limit on speed so illogical, but a limit on space and time completely normal? I find it hard to call something illogical when the theory itself explains so much and follows from a very unassuming principle. 
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote The T Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 24 2011 at 17:15
Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:


A
Billionaires' Coup in the US: Debt Deal Will Hurt the Poorest
Americans, Convinced by Fox and the Tea Party to Act Against Their Own
Welfare
I lost interest on this article on the very first paragraph where it says that to combat the deficit you can either "raise taxes which means taking money from the rich" (not true, at least not as an absolute definition of taxation) or "cut spending, which is taking money from the poor" (WTF? So reducing bureaucracy or the military is taking money from the poor? Is it even the poor's money in the first place?) After such a stupid start I didn't follow.




[/QUOTE]
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote stonebeard Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 24 2011 at 18:22
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:


" (WTF? So reducing bureaucracy or the military is taking money from the poor? Is it even the poor's money in the first place?) After such a stupid start I didn't follow.

While you can cut the military's budget, I think we all know the money hogs that would be cut in a situation like that are Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. And poor people benefit from those programs much more than the rich or middle class.
 

Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote The T Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 24 2011 at 18:33
^I understand and it can be seen that way but even then: in one case you're taking more money already earned by a group of people to give it to another; in the second case, you're giving less money earned by the first group to the second. You are not in any instance taking away money that they earned.

Anyway, I qualify as poor so don't think I'm saying this because I'm rich. Social programs can't be cut overnight but you have to start one day. And if that idiot means what you said, it still is a fact that you can cut other programs and spending without "taking money from the poor".
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Slartibartfast Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 24 2011 at 18:54
Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

It seems illogical to you as a man intimately familiar with theoretical physics? What's illogical about it?
As someone with a passing interest in physics you pinhead!   LOL

The notion that there is an ultimate speed at which things cannot travel faster than.  And isn't theoretical physics all about challenging the notions of accepted physics?  Once upon a time things couldn't travel faster than the speed of sound.

Why is that on its face illogical? Why is a limit on speed so illogical, but a limit on space and time completely normal? I find it hard to call something illogical when the theory itself explains so much and follows from a very unassuming principle. 

Ooops, my bad, I meant to say logical. Embarrassed


Edited by Slartibartfast - September 24 2011 at 19:01
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Slartibartfast Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 24 2011 at 19:00
Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:


Why is that on its face illogical? Why is a limit on speed so illogical, but a limit on space and time completely normal? I find it hard to call something illogical when the theory itself explains so much and follows from a very unassuming principle. 

Interesting, what are the extents to which space and time can go?  And if we haven't been to those limits how can we ever know for sure?  The theory that was light being the maximum speed was busted as soon as particle(s) were observed going faster than the speed of light.


Edited by Slartibartfast - September 24 2011 at 19:01
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote The T Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 24 2011 at 19:25
^Inflation goes faster than the speed of light
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Equality 7-2521 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 24 2011 at 19:36
Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:


Why is that on its face illogical? Why is a limit on speed so illogical, but a limit on space and time completely normal? I find it hard to call something illogical when the theory itself explains so much and follows from a very unassuming principle. 

Interesting, what are the extents to which space and time can go?  And if we haven't been to those limits how can we ever know for sure?  The theory that was light being the maximum speed was busted as soon as particle(s) were observed going faster than the speed of light.

That hasn't been observed yet. We've observed something that could have been a particle traveling faster than the speed of light. In either case, that's a really naive statement of the principle. A better formulation would be that information can not travel faster than the speed of light. Sometimes observations can be shielded so that even though something has broken the barrier, no information can be transmitted and this does not violate the principle.

Well if you believe in the standard cosmology model, you obviously believe that space is finite. 

Also, what is logical about faster than light travel? It essentially forces us to abandon a traditional concept of cause and effect. 


Edited by Equality 7-2521 - September 24 2011 at 20:56
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 162163164165166 446>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 1.699 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.