![]() |
|
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 158159160161162 434> |
Author | |||
micky ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 02 2005 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 46838 |
![]() |
||
hard to see him doing so.. was hard to even before tonight but he had a path. However I think the whole dynamic moving forward changed tonight. To be honest .. I think Kamala knew what had to happen and now.. not 6 months from now...and had to make her play. It was a risky one.. but it paid off.. big time apparantly. Risky that if Biden had been prepared for this she could have come off very badly with that (I mean.. how could he not be.. it was like deja vu with Clinton. He was running a general election against Trump.. above the fray and ride out the clock as the front runner and obviously didn't consider that some might be gunning for him) Anyhow.. prior to tonight. Biden had a path. There was a 3 top tier going into the debates. Warren, Sanders and Biden as long as Warren and Sanders divided the progressive vote and Biden soaked up all the oxygen of the centrists and moderates. He would have likely won the nomination.. and god help him if it had been Trump.. not merely the very polite Harris makinig him look old and unprepared. However now things really get interesting... I think it is a no brainer to assume that Harris is going to get a large polling bump.. at Biden's expense into the top tier where he comes back down to the rest and Harris moves up. Which makes for a facinating game moving forward. Harris and Biden aren't done yet.. for the moderate centrist vote but there is still Warren v. Sanders for the progressive. The race will likely be and perhaps what decides the nomination.. who if any gets knocked out and who doesn't. I think it is much more likely Harris can knock out Biden than Warren knocking out Sanders who always has been a oddball and do it is way and even though Sanders and Warren get along well. I don't see him gracefully stepping aside if Warren surpasses him in the battle for the progressive voter. Bernie may not have a large ceiling.. but he does have some very loyal support. After tonight.. Vegas is looking hard at putting Harris in the number betting slot of nominee favorite. Mainly for I think it is very plausible the progressive vote is split between Warren and Bernie. That really was a game changing performance by Kamala tonight. Changed the whole dynamics of the race at a rather unheard of early stage.
Edited by micky - June 27 2019 at 23:11 |
|||
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|||
![]() |
|||
rogerthat ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() Joined: September 03 2006 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 9869 |
![]() |
||
What do you folks make of the unanimous show of hands for Medicare for undocumented immigrants? Look, there may be good intentions behind it but the optics could be terrible. Stripped of all nuance, it makes the Democratic Party look like a party that wants any number of migrants in and also to allow for benefits from the govt and out of the taxpayer's pocket. Between that and Sleepy Fumbling Biden, I can visualize Fox already uncorking the bubbly. One of those smug Fox faces was already celebrating when Biden made that Eastland gaffe.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
micky ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 02 2005 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 46838 |
![]() |
||
so after a bit of digestion.. here is my cold take on what we saw over those two nights.
overall winner - easily Kamala Harris overall loser - easily Joe Biden surprise riser - Julian Castro. Took himself from the bottome and put himself into the conservation. Won't win obviously but unlike most on those stages who will rapidly start falling out. He will be in a longer run and get his name and message out there. surprise faller - Bernie Sanders. Best line I've seen so far. 'Why would one vote for Bernie Sanders in 2020 when Elizabeth Warren exists. While I think Bernie had the singular best closing statement and one that cuts to the heart of what is going on. The recognition that is not merely enough to beat Trump, or even push reset to fall 2016 and clean up his messes.. the problem is.. there are some major problems that in fact did give rise to Trump that need to be addressed and the only way to do them. Is not hitting reset back to 2008 .. or beating one's head against the wall trying to compromise with obstuctionist Repubiicans.. it is using the full power of the Presidency.. both in its traditional vein. and now those ushered in by Trump himself and bypassing Congress.. to herald fundemental change econonically in this country. Really only Warren and Sanders understand that.. but I think many see that Sanders is simply not the right person and think he didn't come across all that well last night. Not in substance.. but style.. and especially the giant gorilla in the room. Electibility.. forget the polls 18 months out.. he is probably the only front running Democrat that Trump can beat. best quote - Mayor Pete f**kING A!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! worst quote - again Mayor Pete 'I couldn't get it done' major bonus points for honesty... but not a good quote for a man running for President if he can't manage a mid sized city.. good luck with this nation. Very impressive man btw. I agree with some commentary I read. If you didn't know him previously, one could be excused for not thinking he was a front runner, or some Senator or Governor. Again, he is young and someone to watch. Handling himself and presented himself extremely .. extremely well |
|||
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|||
![]() |
|||
micky ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 02 2005 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 46838 |
![]() |
||
easy there.. watch Biden.. hesitating raised his hand late (seeing he was the only one not to??.. in fact it was noticed and was called out for it to the point a question was addressed to him.. and he completely side stepped it. one of his many snaffu's last night. The worse perhaps being the NRA.. ouch.. trust me .. we haven't heard the last of that gafff... as to your point.. after the outrages of the last few years.. I don't think the optics look that bad. I do think there is a very real sense we have gone completely off the rocker on our national moral compass and if Medicade for all for undocumented is a price we pay for trying to make amends.. even if to our sense of national shame. I think most will have no problem with it. especially for the basic fact that they are paying for it as well... they ARE paying in as those taxes are coming out of their paychecks. An easy to understand and explain counter rebuttal to the claim 'our' taxes are paying for their healthcare
|
|||
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|||
![]() |
|||
King of Loss ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: April 21 2005 Location: Boston, MA Status: Offline Points: 16882 |
![]() |
||
I actually think that Sanders has a better chance against Trump than Warren. Warren is far too intellectual for the common man to feel a connection with. Think Adlai Stevenson. I like her and I even met her while interning at HLS, but I think she'll lose to Trump.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
micky ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 02 2005 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 46838 |
![]() |
||
^ on a personal note before I touch your post. Nice to see back around. Don't remember seeing you around before I took this last break. You and I never really interacted much with but you were a favorite poster of my better half... who still.. all these years later goes on and laughs about 'hot and sexy Gildonlow'
now back to Sanders - Warren. I really can't agree with that at all man. Here is why... same reason I disagreed so vehemely that Sanders could have beaten Trump in 2016 whereas Clinton didn't. Clinton may have lost a lot of progressive voters.. Bernie Supporters... but what was likely true then is probably still true today. While the party is rapidly moving left... it still has a large... very large moderate centrist wing and I think it is plainly obvious they do not want Sanders. Socialism has if you have not noticed.. taken the place of the old school 'liberal' boogyman in the context of poltics. I think he can.. and wouldlose a significant portion of moderate and centirst votes if he did get teh nomination. Enough so? Hard to say but it is possible so it is as I said.. he is the one major candidate that can lose to Trump in 2020. I think we have changed enough in the last 4 to say he can win... but .. and a big but.. after 2016 there is little to no appetite to take the chance of losing to Trump in 2020. The differences with Warren.. subtle but substantial. She is not a socialist but a free market Capitalist and we have already seen signs she has a strong appeal to the centrists and moderates where Sanders likely has little to none. And I was actually going to have this as my #1 quote until Mayor Pete blew all before it away. And interesting note to be made about Warren.. something that got little play in the press and poli junkies.. but trust me.. for those interested.. it WAS noticed. Her stance on guns... she won over my best friend who is a militant gun owner and fears the Democratic Party and for good reason for most candidates promise unrleasitic and .. let's be honest.. unconstituional measures against.. law abiding citizens. she alone really has the appeal for both progressive voter.. and non bigot Trump voter. As I posted way back in my 2020 preview.. Warren alone has the power to flip a state with Ohio. A powerful progressive economic message.. but delivered with conservative midwestern roots.
Edited by micky - June 28 2019 at 08:09 |
|||
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|||
![]() |
|||
rogerthat ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() Joined: September 03 2006 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 9869 |
![]() |
||
I hope so micky. But we went through the same arguments that Modi had to be repudiated at any cost and the people simply refused to buy it. What narrative is offered by the opposition also matters. Price to pay as a rationale may not wash. Therefore, also, there is space yet for another centrist candidate or somebody posing as a centrist to take over Biden's votes. Methinks Tulsi is trying very hard to be that candidate. I have a bad feeling about it (I distrust pseudoscience deeply) but let's see. Especially her strong reiteration of her military service as well as being against intervention (making it a point to take on Ryan over it) suggests she knows national security remains a priority for the masses. Especially as people get older, they get frightened more easily (hence why they also start learning conservative with age). |
|||
![]() |
|||
King of Loss ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: April 21 2005 Location: Boston, MA Status: Offline Points: 16882 |
![]() |
||
Thanks for the compliment. Those were the more fun years of my life! ![]() ![]() I disagree with your comment on Sanders losing to Trump just like Clinton. His economic message actually quite resonates with people in the Midwest. The Midwest, with the same demographics, once had a very powerful labor movement. Many more people would actually have went to the polls if Sanders was the nominee and I think that would have made the difference in 2016. Either way, I think Trump will most likely win in 2020, because his base goes out and votes in large numbers, while the Democratic base will most likely not. Warren will generate considerable excitement from the base, but perhaps not as much as Sanders. Socialism withstanding, I think Bernie's appeal is I think wider than you think. Especially with his anti-establishment message that resonated so well with a lot of voters.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
micky ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 02 2005 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 46838 |
![]() |
||
sh*t man.. you ain't kidding me. It was like a f**king soap opera here. You tuned in every day to see who was sleeping with who (hint it was usually me.. both in male incarnation while Raff and I played out publicly in the forum.. or my lesser known female incarnation.. who still has an active account here.. who was such a dick tease and famously left one of the collabs here so hot and bothered he broke down when 'she' decided .. umm.. it was time to disappear ![]() yeah.. they were such fun times. I joke about it but there was a large measure of truth to it in those early days. It wasn't just a soap opera.. it was indeed the wild wild west. Anything went.. and those quickest on the draw ruled it.... as far as your thoughts on Sanders.. perhaps.. as I said. It isn't the message that is the problem.. it is the messenger. His message is the right one, and a powerful one. But remember man... ideas and issues do not win elections. While those that love Bernie do with a passion... many others even those that agree with the message don't think him a good winning messenger. And the main point is, he is not the only messenger. Those weren't my thoughts.. but the thoughts that appear to be settling in among the undecided. Why Sanders.. when we have Warren who appears to be a far more formidable candidate and campaigner.. as well as debater and public speaker. oh.. and a woman as well
|
|||
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|||
![]() |
|||
micky ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 02 2005 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 46838 |
![]() |
||
on that note... a far more consise explanation of what I am trying to say
It’s Bernie’s party now. The takeaway from the two debates is simple: It is Bernie Sanders’ party. It was Kamala Harris’ star turn. It was Joe Biden’s nightmare. And it’s Elizabeth Warren's nomination to lose. Sanders’ complete and total conquest of the Democratic Party policy center was astounding to watch. Nearly every viable candidate espoused beliefs in line with or to the left of Bernie 2016. But as much as Sanders’ policies have taken over the political conversation, his middling debate performance—juxtaposed with extremely strong performances by Warren and Harris—leave him on the outside looking in. And poor, anachronistic Biden. He seemed lost in his responses. He was eaten alive by Harris’ “that little girl was me” line, and he spent a good chunk of his time defending his antagonism to busing. It will be a slow (or fast) glide-path out of first place for him. The contours of the race are becoming clear, and they likely don’t involve Joe Biden. |
|||
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|||
![]() |
|||
micky ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 02 2005 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 46838 |
![]() |
||
which brings me to my thoughts as I watched these 4 the last couple of nights.. was going to put this on the debate cold take but wanted to think this over some more before running with it.
Before the debates we had 3 candidates sitting at the top of the polling. Biden by a good bit and Sanders and Warren.. with Warren having moved sharply up the polls in the month previous overtaking Sanders in most polls. (note many outlets still use averages which had Sanders well in front of Warren) the make take from the debates is Biden .. even if he doesn't completely crash and burn.. is likely coming back down to the rest of the pack. I mean .. front runner.. no.. he likely never was for he was obviously very out of touch with where the party was. Much as Bush III early on in 2015.. huge name recognition.. big money...establishment support.... yet completely out of touch with where the party .. ummm .. let's be more precise.... its VOTERS were for they took over the party and said f**k you to the establishment.. and its candidates. A big lession to be learned and not forgotten in 2020. I didn't.. which is why I never really thought Biden was going to survive politically what was coming. It just came sooner than I expected.. and not from who I expected it to come from. Luck of the debate draw I suppose. so with Biden dropping one can easily assume Kamala Harris makes the jump from 2nd tier to first tier and inserted herself into the front runners. So today we are looking at 4 candidates holding the most support.. so what of those 4... time for a beer and smoke and I'll start laying out what I think of them.. and their chances. In order of impossiblity of winning...
Edited by micky - June 28 2019 at 11:46 |
|||
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|||
![]() |
|||
King of Loss ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: April 21 2005 Location: Boston, MA Status: Offline Points: 16882 |
![]() |
||
I still miss the Ulking threads and the crazy wild west threads. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Ok! Even if the Democrats lose with their more progressive candidate in 2020, it'll be the left's version of Barry Goldwater. If the Democrats don't win in 2020, in the future, I believe there will be a Reagan of the left that will change and transform the American country like what Reagan did. In my humble opinion, a better America will emerge than it has been since those Reagan years. ![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
micky ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 02 2005 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 46838 |
![]() |
||
hahah that's right you were in the 'kiddie crew' as I like to affectionately call them.. yeah.. I had a few dust ups with some of the more... Ayn Randish types we used to have. When I was bored f**king with the DT fanboys. Philosophy for pre-pubescents... ahhh good times. Good memories
the site was not merely a good time for me though. it was a bit of life safer. I was working one of the first generation pre PA's prog websites when a certain Peruvian blue fonted wizard stumbled in and we hit off immediately... ie we immediately started arguing and disagreeing about everything other than the color of the blue sky. I guess I impressed him.. he invited me to join up over here and I lurked for good while, joined (in my female personna) then finally decided to take teh plunge and start working here full time. Met a lot of great friends and .. interesting people... I needed it for I was complete mess personally as my marriage was falling apart .. sh*t.. that makes it sound nice. We hated each others f**king guts and had 3 beautiful children right in the middle of it. I make many jokes about her.. but it is a pain I still carry today and likely will the rest of my life and is perhaps a large part of the flippancy of the length of said life. It destroyed me in many ways.. only the Angel that is Raff and meeting her here saved me. Even then.. . I have not been easy for her. Many scars... and that isn't even counting some far deeper scars I got earlier in my life. anyhow.. good to see you back. I'm sure you've noticed the site in general is boring as f**k. What it gained in civility and multitudes of f**king Genesis threads.. it lost in energy passion and pure simple fun.
Edited by micky - June 28 2019 at 12:59 |
|||
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|||
![]() |
|||
micky ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 02 2005 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 46838 |
![]() |
||
so back on topic... I see 4 plausible candidates for the democratic nomination. A lot of time still to go.. things can happen. Just look at last night.. but as they do.. we will adjust the 'front runner' category.
so of the 4.. who really has the best chance to emerge and face Trump in the general. I'll start them least likely to most likely. 4. Surprising NOT Joe Biden. .for reasons I'll get to. I do have to go with Bernie Sanders as the least likely to get the nomination. For a lot of reasons I mentioned earlier. He has one important piece of Donald Trump within him which will keep him the frontrunner category as long as he stays in the race (and he will) they will keep him from having much of any chance to win the nomination. plain and simple... he has a very low ceiling and a concrete f**king floor. Among those that support him, they do and will continue to do so. His problem.. next to no appeal to those that already do not fully support him. For reasons I'll get to in a bit some signifcant differences between the Democratic Party of 2020 and the Republican of 2016 will keep him from doing what Trump did. Take that fracton of the party and ride it all the way to the general election. Pure and simple.. I really can't think of a realistic way Bernie expands his appeal to undecided.. progressive and especially moderate. For unlike 2016 it is not a binary choice between him and a largely hated establishment candidate. 16% he has been stuck there for some time.. suspect he'll be stuck there in large part for the rest of the campagin and that will not win him the nomination. His ideas? yes.. him? No
Edited by micky - June 28 2019 at 13:28 |
|||
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|||
![]() |
|||
micky ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 02 2005 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 46838 |
![]() |
||
next up and reflective of what happened last night. Not eonugh to knock him out.. but down? you bet your ass it did.
3. Joe Biden - was in many ways.. to many observers a paper tiger of a front runner. However he did just have one bad night and he will pay for it. Rather than being able to skim through teh primaries 'above the fray' and not punching down (soon to be infamous its strategy) and acting as the presumtive nominee a year before the general election and 6 months before even the first primary).... he will have to fight and fight hard to win this nomination. Can he do it.. sure .. he is a beloved and well respected by most all democrats. Most though think his time has come and gone.. and is very much out of step with teh party. However to win first he'll have to slay Kamala Harris who obviously will be fighting him hard for the black vote. Then if he dos.. he'll have what was to likely have been the really hard fight.. winning over the progressive vote and defeating ... note.. very troubling stories coming out of the Biden camp today.. word is internally that special focus voter groups in key early primary states.. word is they did not react well to Biden at all last night. He is not out.. but he is in big trouble. He could be out by the next month if he has another debate debacle like that one last night. Which means the oppo sees that possiblity too.. next months debates should be HIGHLY entertaining
Edited by micky - June 28 2019 at 13:48 |
|||
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|||
![]() |
|||
micky ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 02 2005 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 46838 |
![]() |
||
and next up.. toying with idea of placing her as most likely but .. it is too early for that for a couple of different reasons.
2. Kamala Harris. Great liftoff.. then stalled out for months and fell into teh 2nd tier.. but awakened from her coma in time to stagger Biden with a helluva haymaker. You take down the 'front runner' like that.. you get bumped way up. She has more potentail upside than anyone in this field IMO.. perhaps one that can passionately unite center and left.... but one of the reasons she is not #1 being the otherwise complete package of a very smart, politically savvy and a woman of color.. is her potential downside. Not exactly lost in the praise of knocking Biden silly was .. some potential weaknesses on the policy side. Not many specifics and a few waffles. Already a bit of a flap on her position on health care... 'herself only?' sorry babe.. I want you.. and quite badly but you are NO ditzy blond.. you knew exactly what the moderator was asking. She has some work to do on the policy end if she wants to win the nomination... identity politics may helf her knock out Biden.. it might win her the general election. It may not alone win her the nomination.
|
|||
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|||
![]() |
|||
micky ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 02 2005 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 46838 |
![]() |
||
and to the most probable.. not surprising as that dude earlier stole my thunder
1. Elizabeth Warren - quietly.. and yet competently dominated her debate and yet was smart enough to stay above the fray and allow what could be one single weakness as a candidate could be... sexism and coming across as shrill and unlikeable being Hillary'd. She is exactly right. Sexism is still a very real concern. One reason why Harris did take such a chance going after Biden as she did. Good example Look at what happened to Gillabrand last night.. obviously desperation drove her to it and she did not come off well. Last night finished her. Joining Beto in the completely f**ked in the first debate club. Don't pass go.. collect 200 or bother showing for the next debates. Anyhow.. other than not having a dick.. pretty much no weakness. She owns policy.. she didn't bend to it.. she is large part helped crate the very policy the party is gravitating to. Unike Bernie has an appeal to moderates and centrists and could be a bridge candidate between the two wings of the party. Note again her position on guns. May not play well with the hard left.. but a killer position to have in a general election for fighting for 'trump voters' She is relative newcomer politically.. no skeletons in her closet. How do you attack her and not set yourself off course from where much of the party has moved. her only potential weakness.. inexperience.. we saw it with the whole DNA thing. That was minor.. and no one other than FAUX junkies cared but it was a warning sign that her political inexperience could be an issue and perhaps with something not silly or trivial.
Edited by micky - June 28 2019 at 14:33 |
|||
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Snicolette ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: November 02 2018 Location: OR Status: Offline Points: 6048 |
![]() |
||
I have to say I am pretty much with you on these takes, Micky. The only worry I have about Warren is the female thing (not from me, but can a woman become president yet in this country?). She is not afraid to take on the big boys and has some great policy ideas without seeming too far to the left to keep centrists out and also is from the midwest, which should help win her the disgruntled previous Trump voters...and no one is afraid she's coming for their guns. I think Kamala did great with the personal anecdote that she sideswiped Biden with, but I just don't trust her for some reason, or know enough yet about what she is all about.
|
|||
"Into every rain, a little life must fall." ~Tom Rapp
|
|||
![]() |
|||
micky ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 02 2005 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 46838 |
![]() |
||
and with you as well... almost all the way. I can't say I got that particular feeling about Kamala. My thinking is she really isn't about policy... for her it is identity politics that drives her. My impression.. an initial one so it might be way off.
If you do put a finger on the distrust do let me know.. I'd like to know so I can look for it myself.
as i said.. ID politics wielded by her would beat Trump.... her problem is they won't beat Warren/Sanders. Too much recongiation that beating Trump is not enough... there are real problems ... DEEP rooted systematic problems that need fundamental change .. not feel good poltics.. not cooperation with obstructing Republicans to fix. I haven't dove too deep into the changes nominating process yet.. but you bet I will by the time the primaries start. if Biden doesn't get knocked out.. and to be hoenst.. I don't think he will. Not early at least. He made a huge tactical error but will be ready next month. His basic problem though is likely still a fatal one.. he is too old and too out of touch. But the changes in the delegate allocation (superdelegates on 2nd ballot only?) could make this a very.. VERY interesting primary season. Edited by micky - June 28 2019 at 15:42 |
|||
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Snicolette ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: November 02 2018 Location: OR Status: Offline Points: 6048 |
![]() |
||
She does have that truancy law thing against her, imo....https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-kamala-harris-truancy-20190417-story.html
and maybe it's the identity politics thing that I'm sensing...and not liking. I don't care what colour your skin is, whether your male or female, or your age, I want someone who can get the job done well and also get people inspired to go out and vote for them and for whoever that ends up being that they don't divide the party. It's more important to get so many of the things that have been destroyed by greed back onto a track that won't annihilate the future. We all could use some civility and decency from our leadership once more and a little less boot-licking of dictators. It will indeed be interesting to see how it all unfolds...
|
|||
"Into every rain, a little life must fall." ~Tom Rapp
|
|||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 158159160161162 434> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |