Forum Home Forum Home > Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements > Help us improve the site
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Reviews discussion
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Reviews discussion
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 152153154155156 182>
Author
Message
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Snow Dog Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 25 2012 at 03:45
^I've actually given 4.
Back to Top
Dayvenkirq View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 25 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 10970 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dayvenkirq Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 25 2012 at 04:13
Originally posted by tamijo tamijo wrote:

Infact would be best if we had just 4 stars, and very political correct too.
All music (especialy if a tiny bit prog) is good, dont have to think at all  ,and with only the 4 star option, we dont have to fight over if the top album is overrated. anymore.

A bit utopian, but I like the idea of not fighting over anything. I hate possibilities of friction.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dean Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 25 2012 at 04:18
^ reviews without ratings is the better alternative. Ratings are one the main thing that makes me reluctant to review.
What?
Back to Top
tamijo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 06 2009
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 4287 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tamijo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 25 2012 at 04:37
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

^ reviews without ratings is the better alternative. Ratings are one the main thing that makes me reluctant to review.
Agree, its allways hard to find the right rating.
 
But as a user, its a guideline of where to start with a band you want to dig into, would be a lot of work having to read all the reviews. How i start with the album with the best rating, read 2-3 high rating reviews, and a few lower rating reviews.
Then I often get a good picture why people think this is one af the bands better albums. 


Edited by tamijo - July 25 2012 at 04:38
Prog is whatevey you want it to be. So dont diss other peoples prog, and they wont diss yours
Back to Top
tamijo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 06 2009
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 4287 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tamijo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 25 2012 at 04:48
Originally posted by Dayvenkirq Dayvenkirq wrote:

Originally posted by tamijo tamijo wrote:

Infact would be best if we had just 4 stars, and very political correct too.
All music (especialy if a tiny bit prog) is good, dont have to think at all  ,and with only the 4 star option, we dont have to fight over if the top album is overrated. anymore.

A bit utopian, but I like the idea of not fighting over anything. I hate possibilities of friction.
 
Was trolling - as I said before, I think rating should reflect the text in the guidelines. It dosent say dont give 1 star ratings, it says use 1 and 5 stars carefully.
 
 
Prog is whatevey you want it to be. So dont diss other peoples prog, and they wont diss yours
Back to Top
Warthur View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 06 2008
Location: London, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 617 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Warthur Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 25 2012 at 19:03
I tend to use 1 star ratings in three circumstances:

- Where I consider an album to be a scam of some kind (for example, the VdGG "The Masters" compilation which consists partly of tracks from Time Vaults, partly Jackson/Banton/Evans tracks which were never actually VdGG songs).

- Where the album production or performance is so inept as to render enjoyment impossible. (Rarest of them all, can't actually think of any cases off the top of my head.)

- Where the very idea behind the album is so poor as to spoil it, and the participants really should have known that. (See: VdGG's ALT.)

- Where my personal reaction to the album is so extremely negative that rating it any higher would feel like a dishonest representation of my feelings about the subject. (ELP's Brain Salad Surgery is an example of this for me - I find it so aesthetically objectionable that I just can't bring myself to give it a single extra star.)

Some of these are very subjective, of course, but I think pretending to be an objective reviewer is an exercise in fooling yourself: in my view your biases are always going to come out, so it's best to be honest and upfront about them and trust that the overall mass of reviews and ratings will in the long run correct any outliers.
Back to Top
Sheavy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 28 2010
Location: Alabama
Status: Offline
Points: 2866 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Sheavy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 25 2012 at 19:31
Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

^I've actually given 5.
 
Tongue silly.
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32530 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Epignosis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 25 2012 at 22:24
Originally posted by Warthur Warthur wrote:

I tend to use 1 star ratings in three circumstances:

- Where I consider an album to be a scam of some kind (for example, the VdGG "The Masters" compilation which consists partly of tracks from Time Vaults, partly Jackson/Banton/Evans tracks which were never actually VdGG songs).

- Where the album production or performance is so inept as to render enjoyment impossible. (Rarest of them all, can't actually think of any cases off the top of my head.)

- Where the very idea behind the album is so poor as to spoil it, and the participants really should have known that. (See: VdGG's ALT.)

- Where my personal reaction to the album is so extremely negative that rating it any higher would feel like a dishonest representation of my feelings about the subject. (ELP's Brain Salad Surgery is an example of this for me - I find it so aesthetically objectionable that I just can't bring myself to give it a single extra star.)


That's four!  Tongue

Originally posted by Warthur Warthur wrote:

Some of these are very subjective, of course, but I think pretending to be an objective reviewer is an exercise in fooling yourself: in my view your biases are always going to come out, so it's best to be honest and upfront about them and trust that the overall mass of reviews and ratings will in the long run correct any outliers.


I absolutely agree with you here.  Well said.  There is no such thing as an objective review.  Clap


Edited by Epignosis - July 25 2012 at 22:25
https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays
Back to Top
dreadpirateroberts View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2011
Location: AU
Status: Offline
Points: 952 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dreadpirateroberts Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 25 2012 at 22:52
^ I agree
We are men of action. Lies do not become us.
JazzMusicArchives.
Back to Top
Dayvenkirq View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 25 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 10970 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dayvenkirq Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 25 2012 at 23:50
^ Didn't you guys discuss this before? Yes, on the very same thread not too long ago. If you present facts in your review, than you are being objective. You bring in some piece of your mind about the album as well, than it's part-objective, part-subjective. 

I don't know a review that can be completely objective because the whole point of it is for the reviewer to share his/her feelings about the album.


Edited by Dayvenkirq - July 25 2012 at 23:52
Back to Top
Warthur View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 06 2008
Location: London, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 617 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Warthur Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2012 at 05:27
^ And in terms of ratings at least (which is where the discussion's focused currently), there's no objectivity possible. There's no star-detector we can wave over an album which will beep and tell us scientifically how awesome it is. The rating you ascribe to an album is a section of the review which is more or less entirely devoid of facts because it provides absolutely no objectively verifiable information about the material to hand.

I agree that you can't have a 100% objective review because that would be a recitation of facts about an album which drew no conclusions and made no comment on how effective it actually is, which is more of an encyclopaedia entry than a review. I'd actually go further though and say that it's the subjective part of a review which is actually interesting to readers. Someone who wants a review wants to see someone make a subjective judgement call on the merits of an album; if you just wanted the objective facts you wouldn't look up a review, you'd go to a reference page like discogs.com or Wikipedia or the non-review parts of our database entries.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dean Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2012 at 05:32
Is there a difference between "I don't like this album" and "This album is abysmally bad"?
What?
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Snow Dog Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2012 at 05:45
^ Probably. All I know is that anyone who admits to  giving Brain Salad Surgery 1 star is someone I will never read or  take notice of his reviews ever again. And his opinion will also mean zero to me personally.
Back to Top
Tony R View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: July 16 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 11979 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tony R Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2012 at 06:16
I've given it no stars whatsoever.
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Snow Dog Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2012 at 06:20
^yes but I have never had respect for your opinion.LOL
Back to Top
dreadpirateroberts View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2011
Location: AU
Status: Offline
Points: 952 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dreadpirateroberts Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2012 at 06:33
Originally posted by Dayvenkirq Dayvenkirq wrote:

^ Didn't you guys discuss this before? Yes, on the very same thread not too long ago. If you present facts in your review, than you are being objective. You bring in some piece of your mind about the album as well, than it's part-objective, part-subjective. 

I don't know a review that can be completely objective because the whole point of it is for the reviewer to share his/her feelings about the album.


YeahEmbarrassed
We are men of action. Lies do not become us.
JazzMusicArchives.
Back to Top
tamijo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 06 2009
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 4287 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tamijo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2012 at 07:58
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Is there a difference between "I don't like this album" and "This album is abysmally bad"?
Yes :
"I don't like this album" StarStar
"This album is abysmally bad" Star
 
 
Prog is whatevey you want it to be. So dont diss other peoples prog, and they wont diss yours
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32530 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Epignosis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2012 at 08:12
Originally posted by tamijo tamijo wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Is there a difference between "I don't like this album" and "This album is abysmally bad"?
Yes :
"I don't like this album" StarStar
"This album is abysmally bad" Star
 
 


LOL
https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays
Back to Top
Ambient Hurricanes View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 25 2011
Location: internet
Status: Offline
Points: 2549 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ambient Hurricanes Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2012 at 10:49
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Is there a difference between "I don't like this album" and "This album is abysmally bad"?


Yes, one is a subjective judgement, and the other is an objective judgement (or at least an attempt at one).
I love dogs, I've always loved dogs
Back to Top
Warthur View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 06 2008
Location: London, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 617 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Warthur Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2012 at 11:28
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Is there a difference between "I don't like this album" and "This album is abysmally bad"?
In the former case you can grudgingly admit that there's probably stuff about the album other people like; in the latter case you are expressing bewilderment as to how anyone could like it. It looks like an objective statement but nobody should mistake it for one and everyone would get along a lot smoother if people learned to take such hyperbole in the right spirit.


Edited by Warthur - July 26 2012 at 11:28
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 152153154155156 182>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.217 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.