Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Rapture Countdown ... join the after-party!
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedRapture Countdown ... join the after-party!

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 13141516>
Author
Message
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 27 2011 at 17:24
Yeah, so where exactly is this post rapture party?
I am holding Mike responsible for it.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 27 2011 at 17:33
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

So England is not just a police state but a theocratic police state?
And it's all done without guns.
What?
Back to Top
timothy leary View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 29 2005
Location: Lilliwaup, Wa.
Status: Offline
Points: 5319
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 27 2011 at 17:35
by bobbies, lol
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 28 2011 at 01:37
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

There has to be a way to link this thread to libertarianism, just because it's what we do... Okay found it! 

Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

 

It would be more honest to simply keep those activities separated:

1. Help
2. Heal
3. Educate
4. Indoctrinate

1, 2 and 3 can - and should - be provided independently of 4.

No it doesn't have to. If the provider of a service (education in this case) decides to teach their own version of history and related, they are entitled to. If you don't like it, you are free to choose another provider. 

I knew it could be done! Big smile

I said "it would be more honest" and "should be provided independently". Private organisations (in the US) are free to teach whatever crap they want to, but it's different for public schools. Here in Germany even private schools are tightly regulated to prevent indoctrination. As far as libertarianism is concerned: IMO it's a really, really silly concept - a weird combination of social darwinism and liberalism. It's doomed to fail simply because it leads to anarchy and, essentially, bullying and stronger people/clans dominating weaker ones. This essentially diminishes the overall level of personal freedom, which, ironically, is what libertarians are supposed to be all about. Example: Abolish the police -> everybody fends for themselves -> streets aren't safe anymore -> stronger people/clans cannot be kept from bullying weaker people/clans -> for most people personal freedom is severely curtailed.
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 28 2011 at 01:40
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Yes T, at least Dawkins is planning to start one:

http://richarddawkins.net/articles/483402-updated-richard-dawkins-atheist-free-school-articles

They will teach "about the gods of ancient Greece and Norse legend, and would treat the Bible as a work of literature rather than a basis for morality."

In other words...No religion, and it's his right.

Iván

More precisely: They will teach comparative religion rather than indoctrinating the children that one of the religions is special.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 28 2011 at 05:15
Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Yes T, at least Dawkins is planning to start one:

http://richarddawkins.net/articles/483402-updated-richard-dawkins-atheist-free-school-articles

They will teach "about the gods of ancient Greece and Norse legend, and would treat the Bible as a work of literature rather than a basis for morality."

In other words...No religion, and it's his right.

Iván

More precisely: They will teach comparative religion rather than indoctrinating the children that one of the religions is special.
That's the distinction we Brits make between Religious Education and Religious Instruction; here "State Religious Education is non-proselytising and covers a variety of faiths, although the legislation still requires it to include more Christian content than on other faiths" so eventhough that is essentially teaching comparative religion it has a christian bias, so it is not in a form that would be acceptable to Dawkins. Also "Free Schools" have to provide a daily act of collective worship (again, I doubt Dawkins would find that acceptable):

Quote What obligations regarding religious education and collective worship will Free Schools be subject to?

Free Schools must teach religious education and provide for a daily act of collective worship. The type of religious education and the nature of collective worship that a Free School provides is determined by its funding agreement and depends on its religious designation. Requirements broadly reflect the provisions that apply to local authorities and schools in the maintained sector.
 
Free Schools with a religious designation must provide religious education and a daily act of collective worship in accordance with the tenets of their faith. Collective worship in a Free School without a religious designation should be of a broadly Christian nature.  
http://www.education.gov.uk/schools/leadership/typesofschools/freeschools/freeschoolsfaqs/a0075656/free-schools-faqs-curriculum/#faq3
What?
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 28 2011 at 06:08
Here in Germany public schools offer religious classes (instruction) based on the religions/denominations - public schools are secular except for these classes, and parents can decide whether their children should attend them. The remaining children - Atheists as well as children of believers in religions for which there aren't specific classes - attend ethics class instead, which is essentially philosophy and comparative religion. 
Back to Top
Peter View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: January 31 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 9669
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 28 2011 at 10:36
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy!
O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!'
He chortled in his joy.
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 28 2011 at 11:55
Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:


Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

There has to be a way to link this thread to libertarianism, just because it's what we do... Okay found it! 

Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

 
It would be more honest to simply keep those activities separated:
1. Help
2. Heal
3. Educate
4. Indoctrinate
1, 2 and 3 can - and should - be provided independently of 4.

No it doesn't have to. If the provider of a service (education in this case) decides to teach their own version of history and related, they are entitled to. If you don't like it, you are free to choose another provider. 
I knew it could be done! Big smile

I said "it would be more honest" and "should be provided independently". Private organisations (in the US) are free to teach whatever crap they want to, but it's different for public schools. Here in Germany even private schools are tightly regulated to prevent indoctrination. As far as libertarianism is concerned: IMO it's a really, really silly concept - a weird combination of social darwinism and liberalism. It's doomed to fail simply because it leads to anarchy and, essentially, bullying and stronger people/clans dominating weaker ones. This essentially diminishes the overall level of personal freedom, which, ironically, is what libertarians are supposed to be all about. Example: Abolish the police -> everybody fends for themselves -> streets aren't safe anymore -> stronger people/clans cannot be kept from bullying weaker people/clans -> for most people personal freedom is severely curtailed.
It's obvious you haven't ever read one iota about libertarianism and all what it means. But calm down Mike, I'll let you stick to the matters you know about. Politics have never been your thing, so probably you have never read Hayek, Rothbard, Paul, Mises, etc (any of the austrian economists and political proponents of libertarianism). What you're afraid of is what we call anarcho-capitalism but it's not as terrible as you mention. In fact, letting the market solve most problems without government regulation is the ideal scenario. Anyway, there's no point in debating it with you, used to the state to tell you what you can and can't say. So let's not go any further into this because there is an appropriate thread in PA for that. I was just making a joke. I'm sorry, though, that in a country as beautiful as Germany you have to be told by the
state what to teach. Anyway, the Us and Germany come from different places and their pasts have been very different.

By the way, how curious: "even private schools are tightly regulated to prevent indoctrination". Seems to me children ARE being indoctrinated, since they can't deviate from what the state wants them to think....

Edited by The T - May 28 2011 at 11:56
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 28 2011 at 12:11
That's easily the most arrogant post I've read in this forum for a long time. Just another reason not to touch the icky libertarian thread with a ten foot pole ... the only question is whether an even longer pole would have to be used for the Christian thread. 



BTW: What makes you think that I agree with the system we have here in Germany?
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 28 2011 at 13:15
^Well precisely the arrogant way you seemed to agree with how your system supposedly prevents indoctrination and how you said that US institutions are free to teach "whatever crap they want to". That's all. I thought you agreed with your country's system. Of course I might be wrong. Usually your posts against religion are very arrogant so I'm not sure what surprised you here...
Back to Top
Alitare View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 08 2008
Location: New York
Status: Offline
Points: 3595
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 28 2011 at 15:19
Aw that's all bullsh*t, baby - people just ain't no good.
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 28 2011 at 16:51
What liberal use of the implies sign by you Mike. 
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 28 2011 at 17:28
Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Yes T, at least Dawkins is planning to start one:

http://richarddawkins.net/articles/483402-updated-richard-dawkins-atheist-free-school-articles

They will teach "about the gods of ancient Greece and Norse legend, and would treat the Bible as a work of literature rather than a basis for morality."

In other words...No religion, and it's his right.

Iván

More precisely: They will teach comparative religion rather than indoctrinating the children that one of the religions is special.

No Mike, seems you have troubles reading (you read what you want to understand), he said he WOULD only teach the Bible as LTERATURE, and only would teach about ancient gods.

In no moment he said he would teach comparative religion, that would  imply to teach the moral values of the Bible, Qu'ran and other holy books, not to teach exclusively the literary merits or characteristics of the Bible.

Now, it's true that the British system of education forces to provide an hour of worship, so most likely he will pay no school.

Iván

            
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 28 2011 at 18:22
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Yes T, at least Dawkins is planning to start one:

http://richarddawkins.net/articles/483402-updated-richard-dawkins-atheist-free-school-articles

They will teach "about the gods of ancient Greece and Norse legend, and would treat the Bible as a work of literature rather than a basis for morality."

In other words...No religion, and it's his right.

Iván

More precisely: They will teach comparative religion rather than indoctrinating the children that one of the religions is special.

No Mike, seems you have troubles reading (you read what you want to understand), he said he WOULD only teach the Bible as LTERATURE, and only would teach about ancient gods.

In no moment he said he would teach comparative religion, that would  imply to teach the moral values of the Bible, Qu'ran and other holy books, not to teach exclusively the literary merits or characteristics of the Bible.

Now, it's true that the British system of education forces to provide an hour of worship, so most likely he will pay no school.

Iván

Sorry Iván, but in this instance it is you who did not read the whole article, for he clearly says:
Quote “I would also teach comparative religion, and teach it properly without any bias towards particular religions, and including historically important but dead religions, such as those of ancient Greece and the Norse gods, if only because these, like the Abrahamic scriptures, are important for understanding English literature and European history.”
You need to click the ... Continue reading link to see the full article Smile
 
What?
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 28 2011 at 19:34
I read the whole article Dean, and it says:

"if only because these, like the Abrahamic scriptures, are important for understanding English literature and European history"

Only because of the literary influence of the Abrahamic texts (He doesn't even mention the new Testament) in English literature and history.

So no religion, only the influence of some ancient texts in English literature and history.
            
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 28 2011 at 20:04
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

I read the whole article Dean, and it says:

"if only because these, like the Abrahamic scriptures, are important for understanding English literature and European history"

Only because of the literary influence of the Abrahamic texts (He doesn't even mention the new Testament) in English literature and history.

So no religion, only the influence of some ancient texts in English literature and history.
And?
 
Is it: "In no moment he said he would teach comparative religion" or does the article say: "I would also teach comparative religion, and teach it properly without any bias towards particular religions"?
 
Selective intepretation of text is a dangerous ground to tread. Of course he doesn't mention the NT, that is implicit in the words "Abrahamic scriptures" used when teaching christianity as a comparative religion - even I know that the Abrahamic scriptures are the holy books of the three major Abrahamic religions of judaism (Tanakh... OT), christianity (Bible... NT) and islam (Quoran... LT). He will teach those alongside the Poetic Edda, the Prose Edda and the Theogonía because he recognises their importance as literature and not as history books (something that I remember you agreeing with some time back - the OT is not a history book).
 
 
What?
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 29 2011 at 01:24
I agree the Bible is not a history book, but it's more than just an example of literature, it's the representation of the most sacred beliefs of a huge percentage of the world.

Iván
            
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 29 2011 at 01:26
Originally posted by Alitare Alitare wrote:

Aw that's all bullsh*t, baby - people just ain't no good.


Post of the month.
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 29 2011 at 01:31
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

^Well precisely the arrogant way you seemed to agree with how your system supposedly prevents indoctrination 


Did I? I simply wanted to mention how things are done in Germany. In order to prevent indoctrination you would obviously need to abolish instructive classes as well as prevent parents from indoctrinating their children - needless to say that isn't accomplished by the system as I described it.

Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

and how you said that US institutions are free to teach "whatever crap they want to". That's all. I thought you agreed with your country's system. Of course I might be wrong. Usually your posts against religion are very arrogant so I'm not sure what surprised you here...
I said "private organizations", not "US institutions. And no, I don't agree with it - IMO the state should intervene to protect the children - they have a right to be protected from indoctrination. But obviously, as I stated repeatedly in previous discussions, this conflicts with the right of the parents to raise their children without interference. It's a moral dilemma without an easy solution.

BTW: Are you sure you're not confusing arrogance with lack of respect (of religion)?
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 13141516>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.189 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.