"Freedom" thread or something |
Post Reply | Page <1 112113114115116 294> |
Author | ||
The T
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 16 2006 Location: FL, USA Status: Offline Points: 17493 |
Posted: January 23 2013 at 22:37 | |
But Doc, do you want to stop employers in general from firing people? What if the employee is a lazy slacker? Should regulation keep him in place while a worker eager to perform remains unemployed? And why is it bad if a company refuses to sell you something? Then they lose a customer, hence gained by the competition.
|
||
|
||
The Doctor
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: June 23 2005 Location: The Tardis Status: Offline Points: 8543 |
Posted: January 23 2013 at 22:57 | |
I didn't say I wanted to stop employers from firing people, I was simply responding to Logan's assertion that corporations can do nothing to you. Of course they can. I'm just again pointing out that all power over other people does not necessarily come at the point of a gun as Logan likes to claim. Corporations have power over people by their power not to buy or to stop buying (in the case of firing) and to not sell. This would be ok if everyone had the same amount of bargaining and economic power, but obviously this is not the case, and that is why government is necessary to at least to some degree, even the playing field.
|
||
I can understand your anger at me, but what did the horse I rode in on ever do to you?
|
||
dtguitarfan
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 24 2011 Location: Chattanooga, TN Status: Offline Points: 1708 |
Posted: January 24 2013 at 05:34 | |
Here's the problem with that sentence - the government has a right to tax us. They HAVE to in order to be a government at all. So at what point does their right to tax us become "taking our stuff" and who gets to decide where that point is? "Give to Caesar what is Caesar's..." |
||
thellama73
Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: May 29 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 8368 |
Posted: January 24 2013 at 06:31 | |
Firing an employee or opting not to sell is not "doing something" to you. Anymore than you are "doing something" to a business if you quit or refuse to buy their services. It is simply declining to continue doing business together. It is not a positive action, it is inaction.
If you claim that not selling to you or not employing you is a means of exerting power, then you must also accept that YOU exert power every time you don't buy something. By not buying a loaf of bread at your local baker's you are exerting power over him. Employers and customers are the same thing. If you hire a barber to cut your hair, you are a customer. If you ire a barber to cut other people's hair, you are an employer. They are the same thing, and so every negative thing you say about employers must also apply to yourself as a customer. This is the point I want to get across. Also, no one is arguing that there should be no police or no laws, so your concern there is without warrant. Geoff, what gives the government the "right" to tax us? Where does that right come from? Edited by thellama73 - January 24 2013 at 06:47 |
||
|
||
dtguitarfan
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 24 2011 Location: Chattanooga, TN Status: Offline Points: 1708 |
Posted: January 24 2013 at 07:57 | |
From a practical standpoint, you just said it yourself. You want laws and police to enforce those laws? You're gonna have to pay for it. You give an entity the power to make and enforce laws, the first law they are going to make and enforce is taxes, because making and enforcing laws doesn't pay for itself. Don't want taxes? Then we're gonna have to go back to barbarism. |
||
The Doctor
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: June 23 2005 Location: The Tardis Status: Offline Points: 8543 |
Posted: January 24 2013 at 08:17 | |
My power Logan is minimal compared to the power a company exerts over its employees. For example, I will not buy Papa John's pizza, in part because I'm not a huge fan of their pizza anyway, and more importantly I think the owner is a huge (unprintable word). I haven't exactly brought Papa Johns to its knees, now have I? On the other hand, when a person is fired, it can really have a huge negative impact on that person's life. Heck, some people commit suicide when they lose their job. Think John Schattner is going to off himself because I refuse to buy his pizza?
|
||
I can understand your anger at me, but what did the horse I rode in on ever do to you?
|
||
Epignosis
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: December 30 2007 Location: Raeford, NC Status: Offline Points: 32550 |
Posted: January 24 2013 at 08:32 | |
Your government fires people all the time. Yet all of us are still forced to buy their "pizzas." |
||
The Doctor
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: June 23 2005 Location: The Tardis Status: Offline Points: 8543 |
Posted: January 24 2013 at 08:39 | |
|
||
I can understand your anger at me, but what did the horse I rode in on ever do to you?
|
||
manofmystery
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 26 2008 Location: PA, USA Status: Offline Points: 4335 |
Posted: January 24 2013 at 08:42 | |
On the last page he ignores economic reality and claims deregulation has led to the increasing pay gap and on this page he ramps up his foaming illogical and insane hatred, making it clear that he'd feel better if he could get those whose business model he doesn't like to consider suicide. Any chance we, as a group, can just ignore this sicko? |
||
Time always wins. |
||
Epignosis
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: December 30 2007 Location: Raeford, NC Status: Offline Points: 32550 |
Posted: January 24 2013 at 08:46 | |
Your argument:
1. You cannot ruin Papa John's by refusing to order their pizza. 2. Papa John's can ruin a person by firing them. (Then you make a twisted remark about being able to make someone kill himself, but I'll assume that isn't germane) Somehow, you find an injustice between 1 & 2, yet you support big government. I pointed out that government fires people all the time (thus, presumably ruining some of them), yet we are forced to buy their "products" or go to jail. That's inconsistent on your part. |
||
HarbouringTheSoul
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 21 2010 Status: Offline Points: 1199 |
Posted: January 24 2013 at 08:55 | |
As a non-participant in this discussion, let me just say that this is an outrageous lie. He was stating that the power a company can exert over an individual is large enough to drive some of them to suicide, whereas the opposite is not true. That doesn't mean in any shape or form that he wants to make anyone kill themselves. You can dislike The Doctor and think that everything he says is stupid, but that is slander. |
||
The Doctor
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: June 23 2005 Location: The Tardis Status: Offline Points: 8543 |
Posted: January 24 2013 at 09:08 | |
Thanks HTS. I would have responded myself, but then I figured what's the point. What I said was easily understandable, but MoM and to a lesser degree Rob decided to twist it into something it wasn't. Says more about them than it does about me.
|
||
I can understand your anger at me, but what did the horse I rode in on ever do to you?
|
||
The T
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 16 2006 Location: FL, USA Status: Offline Points: 17493 |
Posted: January 24 2013 at 09:27 | |
How would you "fix" that though Doc (if you consider the whole firing people has to be fixed). You can't stop companies of trying to be productive, and keeping lousy employees is not the best road to productivity. There are already rules in place for those cases of employees fired for no reason whatsoever or for wrong reasons (I would accept a law that prevents firing people because of illness or pregnancy for example). But you make it sound like the very firing of an employee, whatever the reason, is abusive power.
|
||
|
||
The Doctor
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: June 23 2005 Location: The Tardis Status: Offline Points: 8543 |
Posted: January 24 2013 at 09:39 | |
Firing can be an abuse of power, but I wasn't saying it is always an abuse of power. I was merely responding to Logan's assertion that I have power over corporations, by stating that corporations have a lot more power over individuals than individuals have over corporations. Not all of that power is necessarily bad, but the original assertion that corporations can do nothing to an individual is fallacious.
People love putting words in my mouth that I didn't actually say. But hey, at least you didn't accuse me of wanting to drive people to suicide.
|
||
I can understand your anger at me, but what did the horse I rode in on ever do to you?
|
||
manofmystery
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 26 2008 Location: PA, USA Status: Offline Points: 4335 |
Posted: January 24 2013 at 09:42 | |
BS, I've read enough of his garbage to know that this is clearly his thought process. He's expressed an illogical hatred towards business owners and it seems he has a especial hatred towards the Papa Johns guy, for some reason. Maybe he only wants that guy to consider taking his own life but that's enough. His overall philosophy involves picking and choosing winners through government force for arbitrary reasons , anyway, so whether or not he actually intentionally wants to destroy people's lives (and I do believe, based on what I've read from him, that he does) he argues for it as policy. The government, by the way, is seeing a stagering number of suicides in it's military branches without having to fire anyone.
|
||
Time always wins. |
||
The T
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 16 2006 Location: FL, USA Status: Offline Points: 17493 |
Posted: January 24 2013 at 09:46 | |
Also, companies only have that power because you have given it to them. It's better to generate more employment. Then there's more options for people to say "screw you" to employers and go somewhere eslse.
|
||
manofmystery
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 26 2008 Location: PA, USA Status: Offline Points: 4335 |
Posted: January 24 2013 at 09:55 | |
The best we can do is accept that people are only equal in their shared liberty. Any system that tries to balance out the individual results of this liberty is immoral as it requires using force to institutionalize inequality.
|
||
Time always wins. |
||
The T
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 16 2006 Location: FL, USA Status: Offline Points: 17493 |
Posted: January 24 2013 at 10:01 | |
No Doc I'm sure you don't want to drive nobody to suicide though you're getting closer with some libertarians here
MoM, do you think liberty is the one value that has to preserved at all costs in a society? (if we agree that a "society" exists). |
||
|
||
JJLehto
Prog Reviewer Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Tallahassee, FL Status: Offline Points: 34550 |
Posted: January 24 2013 at 10:01 | |
Yes, it has gotten bigger, and like you and many others....I also thought the lesser government movement of the last 30 years was to blame.
Now I will give you, deregulation especially in the FIRE economy (finance, insurance, real estate) as well as Fed policy has led to those areas taking off like rockets, thus leading to greater income inequlity.
Here's the thing...that's that group. If you look into it, (and you should...after all Im a crazed libertarian right?) the "1%" are largely doctors, lawyers, higher level managers and business owners (not necessarily wal mart or apple). Naturally there are wall street bankers, CEOs of major companies, etc but much of the "enemy" are hard working people, and government policy really doesn't impact it much. The line to be 1% varies but I've seen $345k to $500kish (though it is 1million in NYC). Sooo yeah I'd say that's a good sized business but not a mega conglomorate.
Back to the FIRE economy...their boom has been largely responsible for the growing gap but while you say de-regualtion there was also the government enouraging of irresponsible house loans in the 90s (even if it was well itnentioned) , the Bush tax cuts which were unfair in design, and Wubya increased spending with his 2 wars and etc...I believe in cutting taxes but also spending so ya know...it actually works.
Also I read that women have been becoming increasingly successful in moving up so that helps push the gap, as well as increase in high tech jobs.
IDK if you will but check this out, pretty fair and good I think: http://www.reuters.com/subjects/income-inequality/washington
|
||
JJLehto
Prog Reviewer Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Tallahassee, FL Status: Offline Points: 34550 |
Posted: January 24 2013 at 10:13 | |
Anyway, this is obvious to Doc but the REAL issue is: does income inequality really matter?
Again, it's always been there. Did people care as much during the 90s when things were booming? While there are a few that always feel it is wrong and unjust, did the masses really care until the recession? As long as everyone is doing better, even if a few are really blowing up with wealth, most people are less vengeful than Doc, and couldn't care...long as you are doing fine.
The only problem I see with too big a gap is concentration of political power in the hands of them, but that can be addressed by removing power from government in as many ways as possible.
You still havn't gotten back to me...what is your ideal system? I see the anger, the passion, the wants... but now I just wanna know the realistic goals. Step up and give me how exactly you want to solve the issues you speak of. How would Doc's America look like?
Edited by JJLehto - January 24 2013 at 10:21 |
||
Post Reply | Page <1 112113114115116 294> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |