Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
topofsm
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 17 2008
Location: Arizona, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1698
|
Posted: May 31 2009 at 18:01 |
^ I agree man. And although IMO there are a lot of good points in that kind of music, lots of musicians base their beleifs solely on the music they listen to. I think that's a bit sheep like, and they should at least try and learn about beleifs and whatnot.
For example, my beleifs don't really agree with my experience of the Mormon faith, but before I call out some judgments on them I know I should read the book of Mormon first. I have it in my bookshelf and it's one I'm planning on looking through, though to be honest I haven't read the bible all the way through.
|
|
|
Raff
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: July 29 2005
Location: None
Status: Offline
Points: 24429
|
Posted: May 31 2009 at 18:08 |
p0mt3 wrote:
topofsm wrote:
p0mt3 wrote:
Damnit, I missed this! That's what happens when you get too busyt to frequent the same sites all the time.
Anyway . . . I recently aquired an Apologetics Bible, which has really begun to open up my eyes to plenty of things I didn't even know existed before. I find it very inspiring and insightful. |
Nice to see you in this thread Micah. As another uber-hardcore Tool and metal fan I assumed you might be one of those guys that talks about Christians as mindless sheep or something.
I really don't have much to contribute to this thread though, but I am going to a Presbyterian week long camp in a couple week so I might share some insight after that. |
Haha, nah, man. I love Tool and Metal in general, but my faith is with God; more specifically, the Christian God.
And yes, many Christians ARE mindless sheep, but so are a lot of other people, and God has nothing to do with that; it's general stupidity and the inability to make your own choices that cause people to follow blindly, not a belief in a supreme being.
That's what I always try to tell people who are so quick to write off all Christians as ignorant or insane. I mean, isn't it just as blind and mindless to assume Christianity is ''bullsh*t'' based on others' opinions without doing the research yourself?
|
I applaud you, Micah . Though I've been an agnostic for decades, I respect everyone's right to have a spiritual life, and dislike those who call them 'mindless sheep'. You can be a mindless sheep even if you are an atheist - I don't think that Hitler's or Stalin's followers were exactly open-minded in this respect. Heck, there are people whose life is based on avidly reading the latest antics of some celebrity or the other (the so-called 'cult of personality').. Being unable to make your own choices is not a prerogative of religious people, and I vehemently disagree with those who maintain that eliminating religion would solve a lot of the world's problems. Such people are probably unfamiliar with human nature ...
|
|
JLocke
Prog Reviewer
Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
|
Posted: June 01 2009 at 00:31 |
Raff wrote:
p0mt3 wrote:
topofsm wrote:
p0mt3 wrote:
Damnit, I missed this! That's what happens when you get too busyt to frequent the same sites all the time.
Anyway . . . I recently aquired an Apologetics Bible, which has really begun to open up my eyes to plenty of things I didn't even know existed before. I find it very inspiring and insightful. |
Nice to see you in this thread Micah. As another uber-hardcore Tool and metal fan I assumed you might be one of those guys that talks about Christians as mindless sheep or something.
I really don't have much to contribute to this thread though, but I am going to a Presbyterian week long camp in a couple week so I might share some insight after that. | Haha, nah, man. I love Tool and Metal in general, but my faith is with God; more specifically, the Christian God. And yes, many Christians ARE mindless sheep, but so are a lot of other people, and God has nothing to do with that; it's general stupidity and the inability to make your own choices that cause people to follow blindly, not a belief in a supreme being. That's what I always try to tell people who are so quick to write off all Christians as ignorant or insane. I mean, isn't it just as blind and mindless to assume Christianity is ''bullsh*t'' based on others' opinions without doing the research yourself? | I applaud you, Micah. Though I've been an agnostic for decades, I respect everyone's right to have a spiritual life, and dislike those who call them 'mindless sheep'. You can be a mindless sheep even if you are an atheist - I don't think that Hitler's or Stalin's followers were exactly open-minded in this respect. Heck, there are people whose life is based on avidly reading the latest antics of some celebrity or the other (the so-called 'cult of personality').. Being unable to make your own choices is not a prerogative of religious people, and I vehemently disagree with those who maintain that eliminating religion would solve a lot of the world's problems. Such people are probably unfamiliar with human nature... | Thank you. I agree. In fact, I myself have taken a more Agnostic viewpoint on life just as much as I have a Christian one. I dunno, I just think it pays to keep an open mind on things, especially when the 'meaning of life' is concerned. There's a bit of truth in everything, if you ask me, and disregarding others' beliefs isn't getting us any closer to it. That goes for both sides. Okay, I'm off my soapbox now.
Edited by p0mt3 - June 01 2009 at 00:36
|
|
weetabix
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 20 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 170
|
Posted: June 01 2009 at 21:25 |
I am not much of a political person but one matter has always puzzled me. I have seen some news about an abortion doctor,Dr.Tiller, being murdered by a white christian American male. You seem to be the terrorists,................. so try to worm an excuse. I think I can draw your excuse 4 u " not all christians are like that". Go.................
|
|
Epignosis
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524
|
Posted: June 01 2009 at 21:44 |
weetabix wrote:
I am not much of a political person but one matter has always puzzled me. I have seen some news about an abortion doctor,Dr.Tiller, being murdered by a white christian American male. You seem to be the terrorists,................. so try to worm an excuse. I think I can draw your excuse 4 u " not all christians are like that". Go.................
| Um.
Not all Christians are like that.
Edited by Epignosis - June 01 2009 at 21:45
|
|
|
Jim Garten
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin & Razor Guru
Joined: February 02 2004
Location: South England
Status: Offline
Points: 14693
|
Posted: June 02 2009 at 06:04 |
Admin note -
One stupid question hidden & two responses.
Please respect the spirit of this thread.
Many thanks,
Jim Garten
|
Jon Lord 1941 - 2012
|
|
Norbert
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 20 2005
Location: Hungary
Status: Offline
Points: 2506
|
Posted: June 02 2009 at 12:50 |
People never should not take criminal justice in their own hands, that belongs to the authorities, but George Massmurderer Tiller actually quite deserved what he got. He is now probably there where he belongs. Probably if Tiller was convicted by a jury he would not be murdered... But he was found "not guilty". Washed clean in other words. The problem is that the pro-murder groups including the false prophet in the White House will use this murder as a tool to supress everyone who want to stop the abortion epidemic.
There are so nice "Christian" organizations, Catholics for a Choice, for instance... This shows a big erosion in the Christian tradition. But there are other ones, too, like the demagogic levelling down of the Catholic lithurgy from the late '60s.
|
|
Easy Money
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10618
|
Posted: June 02 2009 at 15:20 |
^ eye for an eye, ay.
|
|
StyLaZyn
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 22 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4079
|
Posted: June 02 2009 at 15:23 |
Easy Money wrote:
^ eye for an eye, ay. |
Over in the Rush forum, this was just addressed. Very interesting it came up here too.
|
|
|
Easy Money
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10618
|
Posted: June 02 2009 at 15:26 |
I think it is more than obvious that Christ was the exact opposite of eye for en eye type thinking, or actions.
|
|
StyLaZyn
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 22 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4079
|
Posted: June 02 2009 at 15:40 |
Easy Money wrote:
I think it is more than obvious that Christ was the exact opposite of eye for en eye type thinking, or actions. |
I agree. I have always felt he incorporated many ideals presented by Buddha.
|
|
|
Epignosis
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524
|
Posted: June 02 2009 at 15:58 |
I feel I should point out something about the Ancient Hebrew law (which I studied intently for quite some time) with regards to "Eye for an eye..."
In many Ancient Near Eastern societies, a small slight could cost you your life (this still happens today). The "eye for an eye" rule was not a means of satisfying the person wronged, but was a means of protection for the guilty party.
Couple that with what Christ said about "If thine own eye offend thee, pluck it out..."
Hmm...
|
|
|
StyLaZyn
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 22 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4079
|
Posted: June 02 2009 at 16:06 |
Epignosis wrote:
I feel I should point out something about the Ancient Hebrew law (which I studied intently for quite some time) with regards to "Eye for an eye..."
In many Ancient Near Eastern societies, a small slight could cost you your life (this still happens today). The "eye for an eye" rule was not a means of satisfying the person wronged, but was a means of protection for the guilty party.
Couple that with what Christ said about "If thine own eye offend thee, pluck it out..."
Hmm...
|
The eye has become a metaphor. That could result in a liberal translation for those who would choose the eye be something of their discontent.
|
|
|
Epignosis
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524
|
Posted: June 02 2009 at 16:20 |
StyLaZyn wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
I feel I should point out something about the Ancient Hebrew law (which I studied intently for quite some time) with regards to "Eye for an eye..."
In many Ancient Near Eastern societies, a small slight could cost you your life (this still happens today). The "eye for an eye" rule was not a means of satisfying the person wronged, but was a means of protection for the guilty party.
Couple that with what Christ said about "If thine own eye offend thee, pluck it out..."
Hmm...
|
The eye has become a metaphor. That could result in a liberal translation for those who would choose the eye be something of their discontent. | What Christ was saying (which meshes perfectly with his charge: "Be ye perfect as my father in Heaven is perfect") was effectively this: Whatever brings you into sin and evil, get rid of it. It isn't worth it.
|
|
|
StyLaZyn
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 22 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4079
|
Posted: June 02 2009 at 16:29 |
Epignosis wrote:
StyLaZyn wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
I feel I should point out something about the Ancient Hebrew law (which I studied intently for quite some time) with regards to "Eye for an eye..."
In many Ancient Near Eastern societies, a small slight could cost you your life (this still happens today). The "eye for an eye" rule was not a means of satisfying the person wronged, but was a means of protection for the guilty party.
Couple that with what Christ said about "If thine own eye offend thee, pluck it out..."
Hmm...
|
The eye has become a metaphor. That could result in a liberal translation for those who would choose the eye be something of their discontent. |
What Christ was saying (which meshes perfectly with his charge: "Be ye perfect as my father in Heaven is perfect") was effectively this: Whatever brings you into sin and evil, get rid of it. It isn't worth it.
|
Was his father married? Being like the father should imply everything.
|
|
|
Epignosis
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524
|
Posted: June 02 2009 at 16:34 |
StyLaZyn wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
StyLaZyn wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
I feel I should point out something about the Ancient Hebrew law (which I studied intently for quite some time) with regards to "Eye for an eye..."
In many Ancient Near Eastern societies, a small slight could cost you your life (this still happens today). The "eye for an eye" rule was not a means of satisfying the person wronged, but was a means of protection for the guilty party.
Couple that with what Christ said about "If thine own eye offend thee, pluck it out..."
Hmm...
|
The eye has become a metaphor. That could result in a liberal translation for those who would choose the eye be something of their discontent. |
What Christ was saying (which meshes perfectly with his charge: "Be ye perfect as my father in Heaven is perfect") was effectively this: Whatever brings you into sin and evil, get rid of it. It isn't worth it.
|
Was his father married? Being like the father should imply everything. | Perhaps you'd prefer a more apt translation: "Be holy as my father in Heaven is holy."
|
|
|
StyLaZyn
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 22 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4079
|
Posted: June 02 2009 at 16:39 |
Epignosis wrote:
StyLaZyn wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
StyLaZyn wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
I feel I should point out something about the Ancient Hebrew law (which I studied intently for quite some time) with regards to "Eye for an eye..."
In many Ancient Near Eastern societies, a small slight could cost you your life (this still happens today). The "eye for an eye" rule was not a means of satisfying the person wronged, but was a means of protection for the guilty party.
Couple that with what Christ said about "If thine own eye offend thee, pluck it out..."
Hmm...
|
The eye has become a metaphor. That could result in a liberal translation for those who would choose the eye be something of their discontent. |
What Christ was saying (which meshes perfectly with his charge: "Be ye perfect as my father in Heaven is perfect") was effectively this: Whatever brings you into sin and evil, get rid of it. It isn't worth it.
|
Was his father married? Being like the father should imply everything. |
Perhaps you'd prefer a more apt translation: "Be holy as my father in Heaven is holy."
|
Be married can imply not being holy.
Which leads me to lust. Your mind automatically creates lustful thoughts. Perhaps that should be plucked out.
|
|
|
Epignosis
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524
|
Posted: June 02 2009 at 16:49 |
StyLaZyn wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
StyLaZyn wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
StyLaZyn wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
I feel I should point out something about the Ancient Hebrew law (which I studied intently for quite some time) with regards to "Eye for an eye..."
In many Ancient Near Eastern societies, a small slight could cost you your life (this still happens today). The "eye for an eye" rule was not a means of satisfying the person wronged, but was a means of protection for the guilty party.
Couple that with what Christ said about "If thine own eye offend thee, pluck it out..."
Hmm...
|
The eye has become a metaphor. That could result in a liberal translation for those who would choose the eye be something of their discontent. |
What Christ was saying (which meshes perfectly with his charge: "Be ye perfect as my father in Heaven is perfect") was effectively this: Whatever brings you into sin and evil, get rid of it. It isn't worth it.
|
Was his father married? Being like the father should imply everything. |
Perhaps you'd prefer a more apt translation: "Be holy as my father in Heaven is holy."
|
Be married can imply not being holy.
Which leads me to lust. Your mind automatically creates lustful thoughts. Perhaps that should be plucked out. | How do you know what my mind conjures up?
I should explain that Christ gives Christians a command they can in no way live up to in and of themselves.
But probably my favorite verse in the Bible says this (it's the end of Jude):
24To him who is able to keep you from falling and to present you before his glorious presence without fault and with great joy— 25to
the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through
Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen. It means that a Christian's holiness is already declared by God (Jesus paid the price- sin no longer has any meaningful place in a believer's life), but that holiness will not be literally set in place until the end, and throughout that time, God brings His children closer to Himself through hardship and chastisement (I've been there so many times and will continue to go through that).
The Greek word for this figurative language is "prolepsis." It means speaking about something that will come as though it already is- because it is a certainty.
A gangster can use prolepsis when he says of somebody, "Oh, he's a dead man." It doesn't mean that person is literally dead already, just that that person is in for it.
|
|
|
StyLaZyn
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 22 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4079
|
Posted: June 02 2009 at 20:44 |
Let me correct that statement. "One's" mind. The normal mind would immediately turn to lust in the presence of the correct person. It's completely natural. Just saying.
|
|
|
The T
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
|
Posted: June 02 2009 at 21:26 |
Norbert wrote:
People never should not take criminal justice in their own hands, I agree. that belongs to the authorities, but George Massmurderer Tiller actually quite deserved what he got. This contradicts what you just said. He is now probably there where he belongs. Very "christian" of you to decide who deserves to live and who deserves to die. Probably those who don't agree with your views, like people who perform abortions. Probably if Tiller was convicted by a jury he would not be murdered... But he was found "not guilty". Washed clean in other words. By the legal system. the HUMAN legal system, the only one that works since NONE can really know what god (if he exists) wants... The problem is that the pro-murder you mean religious fanatics? groups including the false prophet in the White House will use this murder as a tool to supress everyone who want to stop the abortion epidemic.
There are so nice "Christian" organizations, Catholics for a Choice, for instance...There actually exists nice christian organizations. Those filled with people that are NOT like you. This shows a big erosion in the Christian tradition. The big murdering tradition of the past century? But there are other ones, too, like the demagogic levelling down of the Catholic lithurgy from the late '60s.
Amazing how none says anything about a post that blatantly condones murder.... even if you think Tiller was a murderer (which you have the right to think...)
So much for really following the words of Christ...
|
|
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.