Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Bands, Artists and Genres Appreciation
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Why are Porcupine Tree listed as "heavy prog?"
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedWhy are Porcupine Tree listed as "heavy prog?"

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Author
Message
Prog_Traveller View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 29 2005
Location: Bucks county PA
Status: Offline
Points: 1474
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Why are Porcupine Tree listed as "heavy prog?"
    Posted: September 19 2010 at 22:33
Sorry folks but I don't get it. On this website Porcupine Tree are listed as "heavy prog." They started out as a psychedelic/ space rock kind of band so I think if anything they should be under that category. Do we list Yes or Genesis as crossover bands or prog related? No they are listed as symphonic prog. OK you might argue and say that PT are most well known as a heavy prog band. Maybe maybe not. I think most of the hardcore fans of the band knew them when they were more in the Pink Floyd direction and that is when they really became accepted in the prog community. Their later heavier albums are less prog and shouldn't be considered the essence of what the band was or even is. Sure, they have heavy moments but they always have. Feel free to debate me. I don't expect the category to be changed but I just wanted to make my point. I think it's one of the reasons why the categories don't work so well on here. Many bands can easily fit under more than one category so maybe that's something to look into. 
Back to Top
Queen By-Tor View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 13 2006
Location: Xanadu
Status: Offline
Points: 16111
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 19 2010 at 22:37
Because... theyz heavy... and theyz prog...


What would YOU call them? Metal? You'd be a crazy person. Symphonic? Then you deserve the wraiths of hell. Neo-prog? I've seen men eat their own livers over making such a terrible mistake.
Back to Top
Henry Plainview View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 19 2010 at 22:41
They were originally in Psych, but whoever is in charge decided that Heavy was more accurate for their current direction. The late period of Yes and Genesis don't count because those albums aren't prog, while modern PT is (I guess), so I agree. Max has been promising genre tagging by album for quite some time now, but I'm pretty sure it's never going to happen. :(
if you own a sodastream i hate you
Back to Top
Queen By-Tor View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 13 2006
Location: Xanadu
Status: Offline
Points: 16111
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 19 2010 at 22:44
well, I'd say that 3 of PTs albums are psych (Sunday, Downstair and Sky) while the rest are HP (Signify, Lightbulb, Stupid, Absentia, Deadwing, Blank, Incident) - although Lightbulb and Stupid do often border on Xover.
Back to Top
The Quiet One View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 16 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 15745
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 19 2010 at 22:49
I agree with the OP, they're either Xover or Psych, depending which period you're taking in account.
 
Since they're not playing psych prog anymore, I would list them under Xover.
Back to Top
Queen By-Tor View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 13 2006
Location: Xanadu
Status: Offline
Points: 16111
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 19 2010 at 22:52
Come on Pablo. That's a gross miscategorization. Based on everything from Absentia until now they're 100% heavy prog. Put them in Xover and the whole website might as well be there. Call it Xoverarchives.
Back to Top
The Quiet One View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 16 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 15745
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 19 2010 at 23:00
Originally posted by King By-Tor King By-Tor wrote:

Come on Pablo. That's a gross miscategorization. Based on everything from Absentia until now they're 100% heavy prog. Put them in Xover and the whole website might as well be there. Call it Xoverarchives.
 
Maybe I'm making Heavy Prog as a rather limited sub-genre, since I mainly think it's rather for heavy rock bands that delve through Prog Rock some way or another. And not for Alt. Rock bands or Prog Rock bands that delve through heavy territory, I really can't think of many cases of the latter.
 
Anyway, we clearly have different conceptions of the genres and of the band. For me Porcupine Tree's 99-10 music is alt. rock inspired music with prog, psych and metal influences. Not saying they're not Prog, but they definitely have a strong inclination towards alt. rock or pop or however you want to call it.
 
BTW: I wouldn't even consider The Mars Volta Heavy Prog, for me they belong to Eclectic. I'm telling you this so you can know how my mind works.


Edited by The Quiet One - September 19 2010 at 23:02
Back to Top
Queen By-Tor View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 13 2006
Location: Xanadu
Status: Offline
Points: 16111
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 19 2010 at 23:02
And that makes them HP, is what I'm saying. My definition of HP is whatever the current generation considers Heavy rock + prog, which is exactly what their last 4 albums is, Xover would make them to be a more Radiohead kind of output.


Whatever, this website doesn't know its own definitions from a piece of rock. Which is half the reason I quit
Back to Top
The Quiet One View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 16 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 15745
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 19 2010 at 23:06
Originally posted by King By-Tor King By-Tor wrote:

And that makes them HP, is what I'm saying. My definition of HP is whatever the current generation considers Heavy rock + prog, which is exactly what their last 4 albums is, Xover would make them to be a more Radiohead kind of output.


Whatever, this website doesn't know its own definitions from a piece of rock. Which is half the reason I quit
 
That's not Porcupine Tree for me. For me their 1999-2009 period is: Alt Rock + Prog + Metal (not in the heaviest way) = Crossover. But I'm no expert on the Xover genre neither that expertise on the Heavy Prog genre.
Back to Top
Queen By-Tor View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 13 2006
Location: Xanadu
Status: Offline
Points: 16111
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 19 2010 at 23:10
but that so clearly = heavy prog! They are the clear leaders of the genre as it exists in the modern age! Xover is for more poppy bands.


Whatever. My definition of prog is not what others is. Otherwise they wouldn't have added Tori Amos and Nine Inch Nails. Big f**king mistakes, IMO. But hey, the category will never change, so this argument is all for naught. And even if it did, all I would do is complain - it wouldn't actually effect my day-to-day life. So whatevs. This website is in the sh*tter enough as it is. Let's add Gaga under related while we're at it for her progressive effect on pop music.
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 19 2010 at 23:12
Because we've clearly given up.
Back to Top
The Quiet One View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 16 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 15745
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 19 2010 at 23:27
lol.
Back to Top
Catcher10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17848
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 19 2010 at 23:55
Originally posted by King By-Tor King By-Tor wrote:

This website is in the sh*tter enough as it is. Let's add Gaga under related while we're at it for her progressive effect on pop music.
 
Dude really?? I mean come on,  clearly Lady goo-goo Gaga would be Eclectic Prog...or maybe Zeuhl (just cause I dunno what that is...) Confused
 
IMO Porcupine Tree are disco since all the songs have a catchy beat and are easy to dance to.
Rawks
Back to Top
Prog_Traveller View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 29 2005
Location: Bucks county PA
Status: Offline
Points: 1474
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 19 2010 at 23:59
Lot's of stuff is heavy. Relayer and Drama by Yes are heavy. The knife from the Trespass album is heavy. You can even say some PF and JT stuff is heavy especially JT. Oh well. I give up. 


Oh and aren't Rush listed as heavy prog too? Maybe half of their stuff is heavy. The other half is either prog, synth rock, new wave or modern rock. I'll let them slide though since they seem to be back into a heavier direction again. Boy do those guys flip flop. ;)


Edited by Prog_Traveller - September 20 2010 at 00:02
Back to Top
Triceratopsoil View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 03 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 18016
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2010 at 00:07
Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

Because we've clearly given up.
Back to Top
lazland View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 28 2008
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 13635
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2010 at 05:09
And this debate exemplifies the eternal madness of endlessly categorising bands into strict sub genresLOL
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org

Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!
Back to Top
Any Colour You Like View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: May 15 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 12294
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2010 at 05:28
The first four PT albums in Psych/Space, SD and LS in Xover and the rest in HP.

But... that won't happen yet... maybe ever.
Back to Top
Textbook View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 08 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 3281
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2010 at 05:30
I've always thought tagging should be done by album, not by band, and that multi-tagging should be possible.
 
However, nobody wants to go through the entire database retagging.
 
Except maybe Marty.
Back to Top
progkidjoel View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2009
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 19643
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2010 at 05:58
Originally posted by Any Colour You Like Any Colour You Like wrote:

The first four PT albums in Psych/Space, SD and LS in Xover and the rest in HP.

But... that won't happen yet... maybe ever.

My thoughts exactly.
Back to Top
timothy leary View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 29 2005
Location: Lilliwaup, Wa.
Status: Offline
Points: 5319
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 20 2010 at 13:11
all you need is 5 genre
king crimson derived
yes derived
genesis derived
pink floyd derived
crossover
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.230 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.