Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Bands, Artists and Genres Appreciation
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Why save Internet radio?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedWhy save Internet radio?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
virginiaprogras View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 22 2006
Location: Virginia USA
Status: Offline
Points: 103
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Why save Internet radio?
    Posted: June 22 2007 at 06:26
1. It is the source for the most diverse and simply the most progressive music heard on the radio worldwide.
 

2. My vote for the most chilling scene on fiction film? It’s not a slasher, nothing involving Hannibal Lecter, not even the final moments of “Soylent Green.” No, my nomination for the Lifetime Achievement in Creepiness goes to the remake of “Invasion of the Body Snatchers.” As I remember it, the pod people are taking over San Francisco; one sign of their progress is that radio music is replaced with the single-mindless drone of a newscaster. The hero (aka Donald Sutherland) scurries desperately down a street, a perfect picture of paranoia. But wait! We hear bagpipes playing “Amazing Grace.” For a moment, there is a flicker of hope for humanity. Then the pipes are silenced in a burst of static, and after a moment’s silence, we hear only the newscaster.

This scene wouldn’t be so spooky if it were purely fictional. It’s not. Our human versions of pod people have several times taken over the radio realm, only to be subverted by the forces of diversity. In the 1920s, the number and variety of radio stations boomed, but fell under tight government and corporate control in the 1930s. To escape these limits, operators built huge, unregulated transmitters across the border, giving voice to the likes of Reverend Ike and Wolfman Jack. When rock ’n’ roll was under the safe control of the AM networks, saturated with ads, yammering DJs, and narrow playlists, along came FM underground radio and its undermining album-oriented rock. Remember KMPX?

When corrupt Republicanism reached a crescendo in the early GWB years, media mogul Rupert Murdoch’s Clear Channel was body-snatching independent community-centered radio stations by the dozen, leaving pre-programmed drones in its wake. The North Bay was lucky to have a good number of stations that escaped this plague, most notably KRCB, KRSH and KPFA. But with costs and commercial pressures on the rise, how long would real radio last? With the alternative voices silenced, would the demise of democracy be far behind?

I discovered Internet radio (IR) when my daughter got her own show at KZMU, the Moab, Utah listener-supported station. Technology, in the form of broadband access and audio streaming, made it possible for me to hear Laurel’s two-hour show live. Or I could set a timer to record the show on my hard drive, then put it on my iPod (no relation) for later listening. From KZMU, it was a short step to realizing that there were dozens — no, hundreds — of stations streaming on the Internet. Wow, what if there were a Web site “dial” for all these stations, a virtual community, combined with a pocket-sized micro-power FM transmitter? You’d dial-in your favorite programming at www.freebandradio.com, and your computer would beam the signal on your selected open frequency to any standard FM radio within 100 feet. Your garden-variety boom box could literally bring a world of music into your own garden.

The power of IR did for music and news what eBay did for retail commerce: it lowered the barrier for entry. Musicians out on “the long tail” didn’t have meet Clear Channel or Wal-Mart popularity thresholds to get a world-wide audience (long tail is a term for what you see when you plot the volume of music sales by artist. U2 is on the peak at the upper left; Toast Machine is out at the lower right, on the “long tail”). Combine this global reach with the search and collaborative filtering power of “Web 2.0”, and the radio business is revolutionized. For evidence, see my “dial” idea at www.live365.com (they beat me to it.)

All of this beautiful music will go mute, however, if the regulations proposed by the Copyright Royalty Board are allowed to take effect as planned on July 18. Unless Congress passes the Internet Radio Equality Act, royalty fee increases of 300 percent to 1,200 percent will kill Internet radio as we know it. The fee increase will benefit only the big labels and established artists, as the long-tail artists depend on IR to build their audiences. Congressmember Woolsey is a co-sponsor of IREA, but Senator Feinstein, a critical vote, needs to be swayed. Call her Washington office today, at (202) 224-3841. IR is in the ER; we need to save it.

(Bruce Hagen is a program manager for a digital entertainment media company, vice president of the non-profit Petaluma Phoenix Center and a member of Petaluma Green Lane and Friends of Lafferty Park. His e-mail address is [email protected]. All of his columns are on his Web site, www.bruce-hagen.com)

"To err is human; to purr, feline." Robert Byrne



Newgrass, Prog & More! Web Radio

http://www.live365.com/stations/virginiaprograsser

2,200+ Progressive & Eclectic Fans Worldwide Since 2003
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 22 2007 at 08:25
  when you see people, if effect,  stealing music...   I'm sure it's cyclic  People steal and the artists ask from from other sources.  Could launch into some diatribe about this being an a effect of the Reagan years.. of me first and to hell with others.  People only care for what they can get.. and for how little ...  music has never been free... nor should it ever be... most of us had to save our lunch money to buy cassettes and Lp's... not do a quick google search and download any album we choose to hear.

 but I won't I guess. Don't want to go off topic.

Sad to see that happen to IR... but it is the nature of business and result of the loss of income from other areas.


Edited by micky - June 22 2007 at 08:29
Back to Top
Finnforest View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 16913
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 22 2007 at 11:16
I agree Mickey.  It so sad to see people rationalize illegal downloading as somehow different than walking into a store and stuffing CDs into their coat, something they would probably abhor. 
 
Its' the same thing.  Stealing is stealing no matter how they go to the ends of the earth to justify it.  Sorry, same thing. 
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21206
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 22 2007 at 11:52
Originally posted by Finnforest Finnforest wrote:

I agree Mickey.  It so sad to see people rationalize illegal downloading as somehow different than walking into a store and stuffing CDs into their coat, something they would probably abhor. 
 
Its' the same thing.  Stealing is stealing no matter how they go to the ends of the earth to justify it.  Sorry, same thing. 


Agreed.
Back to Top
Peter View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: January 31 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 9669
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 22 2007 at 12:03

Ermm Why save it?

 
Stern%20Smile Because Archive uber prog sage Dick Heath would want us to! Angry
 
Wink
 
 
 
Embarrassed I confess, I don't listen to it, though. Can someone (again) post a link to a good channel or two, for troglodyte (proglodytes?) luddites like moi to try? Smile


Edited by Peter - June 22 2007 at 12:06
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy!
O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!'
He chortled in his joy.
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21206
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 22 2007 at 12:04
Back to Top
Melisma View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: October 18 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 25
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 22 2007 at 12:43

Internet radio plays what commercial radio doesn't.  Internet radio plays QUALITY MUSIC and permits us to discover bands that would not make it without a label. Yes there is download out there, but as a band member myself, all I wish for is for my music to be listened to. To pass my message through music. Internet is there for me and to spread the word. I think the labels need to know that buying radio transmission time is OUT. We need to hear what's out there and be able to overpass the laws that surround the transmission gimmicks. Here it's called CRTC and the best radio stations have been closed because of their conventions and laws... Internet in not yet touched by this. Get the point?

Melisma
Life is a trip! Death is an odyssey...
Back to Top
Ghandi 2 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 17 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1494
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 22 2007 at 13:22
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

 Could launch into some diatribe about this being an a effect of the Reagan years.. of me first and to hell with others. 
Haha, so Reagan invented selfishness? And, presumably, people under Carter were not? I understand that you are still bitter about the whole Iran-Contra thing, but the liberal hatred of Reagan sometimes seems to border on complete irrationality.
 
PS Blaming this on Bush is classy. Especially when it's the RIAA that's pushing this (looking it up, recently they were calling for increased royalties and claimed the right to collect royalties for artists not affiliated with them.
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 22 2007 at 13:29
Originally posted by Ghandi 2 Ghandi 2 wrote:

Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

 Could launch into some diatribe about this being an a effect of the Reagan years.. of me first and to hell with others. 
Haha, so Reagan invented selfishness? And, presumably, people under Carter were not? I understand that you are still bitter about the whole Iran-Contra thing, but the liberal hatred of Reagan sometimes seems to border on complete irrationality.
 
PS Blaming this on Bush is classy. Especially when it's the RIAA that's pushing this (looking it up, recently they were calling for increased royalties and claimed the right to collect royalties for artists not affiliated with them.


hahahha.. piss off .... it's a joke... you take things far too seriously...
Back to Top
Dick Heath View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Jazz-Rock Specialist

Joined: April 19 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 12813
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 22 2007 at 13:31
Originally posted by Peter Peter wrote:

Ermm Why save it?

 
Stern%20Smile Because Archive uber prog sage Dick Heath would want us to! Angry
 
Wink
 
 
 
Embarrassed I confess, I don't listen to it, though. Can someone (again) post a link to a good channel or two, for troglodyte (proglodytes?) luddites like moi to try? Smile

'Are you going to Scarborough Fair, parsley SAGE rosemary and thyme'. La de da.'

(Traditional arrangement Martin Carthy - ripped of by you know who for the purpose of royalty gathering).


Peter old chap, you startled me out a trace induced by marking my 120th examination question today. Wot do yer mean bringing me into this.........

Oh well enough of this banter. Back to see if another undergraduate thinks glass fibre is magnetic?????????
The best eclectic music on the Web,8-11pm BST/GMT THURS.
CLICK ON: http://www.lborosu.org.uk/media/lcr/live.php
Host by PA's Dick Heath.

Back to Top
Ghandi 2 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 17 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1494
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 22 2007 at 13:34
If you'll note, I was laughing too, and since the rest of your post was serious it was kind of hard to tell. And I know someone who hates Reagan that much, so it wasn't entirely ridiculous.
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 22 2007 at 13:42
Originally posted by Ghandi 2 Ghandi 2 wrote:

If you'll note, I was laughing too, and since the rest of your post was serious it was kind of hard to tell. And I know someone who hates Reagan that much, so it wasn't entirely ridiculous.


cool Wink...  I happen to like old Ronnie, not hate him..maybe it's nostalgia though... he was a dottering old fool ....but he was honest one and well meaning one.

like Nixon.... an ace for the foreign policy... and a disaster domestically.  It took his policies to make Democrats look fiscally responsible. 
Back to Top
Ghandi 2 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 17 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1494
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 22 2007 at 13:57

I thought you were more liberal. I guess the Off-topic political discussions all blend together after a while. ;-)

Yeah, we could use Nixon right now. He may have been a paranoid b*****d, but he was a damn good diplomat. And I'm sure he couldn't be any worse than W at domestic policy (I used to like him, but he has made a lot of mistakes and probably has wrecked any chance for the Republicans to gain control anytime soon).
 
But we should probably get back on topic. ;-)
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 22 2007 at 15:33
Originally posted by Ghandi 2 Ghandi 2 wrote:

I thought you were more liberal. I guess the Off-topic political discussions all blend together after a while. ;-)

Yeah, we could use Nixon right now. He may have been a paranoid b*****d, but he was a damn good diplomat. And I'm sure he couldn't be any worse than W at domestic policy (I used to like him, but he has made a lot of mistakes and probably has wrecked any chance for the Republicans to gain control anytime soon).
 
But we should probably get back on topic. ;-)


we should... Wink though I think this topic  is dead ... I think the nail's head has been struck with this topic.  Blame the frickin kiddies and their need for free music for those increases.....

fwiw....I am a flaming left wing liberal, you've seen me there in off-topic discussions...however I'm just an honest objective one. 
Back to Top
Garion81 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 22 2004
Location: So Cal, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4338
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 22 2007 at 15:57
^ I disagree Micky.  It is not dead but very much alive.  Here is a good place to start:
 
 
Lost of great article links for those who don't know all of what is going on.  Big ground swell grass roots movement has gotten the attention of members in both houses of congress.
 
 
 


"What are you going to do when that damn thing rusts?"
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 22 2007 at 16:01
Originally posted by Garion81 Garion81 wrote:

^ I disagree Micky.  It is not dead but very much alive.  Here is a good place to start:
 
 
Lost of great article links for those who don't know all of what is going on.  Big ground swell grass roots movement has gotten the attention of members in both houses of congress.
 
 
 


hey Brian... long time no talksie....  never mind being proved wrong LOLWink

glad to hear it...Clap

Back to Top
Garion81 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 22 2004
Location: So Cal, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4338
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 22 2007 at 18:49
Well, to be honest this topic came up on a few other boards I post on over the last few weeks so I already had done the research.  Embarrassed
 
Good to see you posting again Michael. Going to Nearfest? 
 
 


"What are you going to do when that damn thing rusts?"
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 22 2007 at 18:52
Originally posted by Garion81 Garion81 wrote:

Well, to be honest this topic came up on a few other boards I post on over the last few weeks so I already had done the research.  Embarrassed
 
Good to see you posting again Michael. Going to Nearfest? 
 
 


thanks Brian!

tried that link.... was down ...at least earlier when I tried it.

in Italy now ... don't think I'll make it hahhaha.
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 22 2007 at 19:08
got it that time Brian... it's pretty late here... and since the brain is on auto-pilot. I'll dive into that tomorrow. Thanks again for the link.
Back to Top
virginiaprogras View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 22 2006
Location: Virginia USA
Status: Offline
Points: 103
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 22 2007 at 21:53
The American Assoc. of Independent Music is NO friend of indie and small label musicians!
 
The following link is the letter source:

http://p2pnet.net/story/12538)

It was sent by well-known Nashville entertainment lawyer Fred Wilhelms to A2IM (American Association of Independent Music) boss Rich Bengloff.

It remains unanswered to date.

I have nothing to add as it pretty much says it all.
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Dear Mr. Bengloff,

I have noted that your organization has spoken vigorously in favor of
the Internet radio royalty rates set by the CRB and due to go into
effect on July 15, 2007.

A few things puzzle me about A2IM's position, and I am hoping that you can clarify them for me.

Music from independent artists and labels make up 30% of what we getto hear on Internet radio. This is substantially more than we hear on terrestrial radio, where the great majority of music comes from the major labels of the RIAA. Live365.com claims that 70% of the music heard on their client stations comes from independent labels and artists. That's thousands of stations, and tens of thousands of hours of webcasting independent music.

Live365 has stated that without permanent relief from the CRB
decision, they will go off the air on July 15 because the only option
is bankruptcy. There are thousands of other stations that face the
same choices, many of whom feature music from labels that are members of your organization.

Yet A2IM steadfastly supports the rate structure that will drive these
stations off the air.

My first questions are simple:

Who is going to pay your members their performance royalties if these stations that play their music now are are gone?

How are you going to make up for those stations going silent?

How are your artists going to replace the promotional value of getting heard on Internet radio?

If anyone should understand the value of a vigorous, varied and
thriving Internet broadcast environment, it ought to be A2IM. The morewebcasters there are, each paying a reasonable royalty, the better the chance the independent artist is going to get paid, because there will be stations that play those artists, and promote their live appearances, and sell their CDs. Yet publicly, you're supporting a rate schedule that is going to eliminate the very stations that play your artists. promote their gigs and sell their CDs.

And, to be completely frank, the settlement "offers" that Sound Exchange
 has made in recent press releases are nothing but window dressing. All they do is postpone the problem while imposing limits on both revenue and listeners that will spell immediate death for any webcaster popular enough to grow beyond those limits. God help the webcaster who plays one of your artists who begins to actually attract a following. God's got to help him because SoundExchange and A2IM aren't going to, either under the CRB rate or the current SoundExchange "settlement" offer.

So that leads to my next simple question:

Do you think your label members would agree to a rule that if they
sold "X" number of CDs in a year they would be forced to pay
retroactive membership fees to the RIAA?

The webcaster who goes one dollar over the revenue cap, or one
listener over the usage cap that SoundExchange has included in the
press release "offer" is facing an equivalent dilemma. I would have
thought that A2IM, made up largely of new and ambitious labels, would be acutely sensitive to arbitrary limits to growth that punish success.
I have read with interest your wholehearted embrace of the RIAA's
campaign to get terrestrial radio to pay performance royalties. I
would like to see a performance royalty in place as well. However,
I've read on your own website that you realize that A2IM is going to
have to provide the "poster children" for this campaign because no one can truly be sympathetic to a major label artist asking for moremoney. Yet, independent artists and labels will share in less than 10% of those royalties given the current terrestrial playlist bias in favor of the major labels.

And that brings us to my final question:

Why is your organization lending its name and numbers to a campaign gives your constituency so little and gives the RIAA so much?
In regard to these three issues, I really fail to see how your
organization deserves to put "independent" in its name, as you are
following the RIAA lead without much "independent" thought entering
into it. To an interested outsider, it certainly looks like you aren't
very independent when it comes to supporting things the RIAA wants.
When I heard of the establishment of your organization (and I even
attended several discussions at SXSW about your plans on behalf of some small label clients), I had hopes that you would truly bring a new viewpoint to the conversations about the future of the music business.

I think the time is perfect for you to raise that truly independent voice.

I look forward to your response.

Fred Wilhelms"
"To err is human; to purr, feline." Robert Byrne



Newgrass, Prog & More! Web Radio

http://www.live365.com/stations/virginiaprograsser

2,200+ Progressive & Eclectic Fans Worldwide Since 2003
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.184 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.