2.1 speaker system |
Post Reply | Page 123 6> |
Author | ||
limeyrob
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: January 15 2005 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 1402 |
Topic: 2.1 speaker system Posted: February 28 2006 at 15:59 |
|
Can I have your advice please.
I am thinking of changing my speakers in the lounge (coming under a lot of pressure from the missus to get some smaller ones). Anyway I have a pair of Rogers LS6a which I have to say are quite big, but produce a superb base. I know I'll have to compromise but I was looking at a 2.1 system. The speakers I had a quick listen to in the shop was a pair of Linn Classic Unik (which can be wall mounted). They were too bright for me and needed a bit of whoomph so I thought about a subwoofer. The B&W PV1 looks a meaty one and it can be powered by my Audiolab 8000A amp. Has anyone had any experience in using a 2.1 setup as their main system. I am listening to some Altec Lansing's through my PC. They are OK for PC use but I think I need something extra for the lounge. I don't think I'm in the market for a full 5.1 upgrade as I don't want to turn the lounge into a home cinema area yet Any suggestions gratefully received. Thanks |
||
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
Posted: March 10 2006 at 07:54 | |
Adding a good sub (minimum 38cm) on a good system produces a huge inprovment on image, dynamic, matter, low, high, everything.
Here's a cheap but highly musical one: Magnat Omega 380 PS: forget Rogers, it's crap. Edited by oliverstoned |
||
Bob Greece
Prog Reviewer Joined: July 04 2005 Location: Greece Status: Offline Points: 1823 |
Posted: March 10 2006 at 08:18 | |
I'm certainly no expert on this but I bought a Creative 2.1 system for 30 Euros and it sounds really great IMO. OliverStoned would probably have an apoplexy if he heard it but it's good for me.
|
||
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
Posted: March 10 2006 at 09:08 | |
At least it's not a 5.1!
Let's dream on serious gear (i currently want to buy extraordinary 1000€/piece "Transparent Super" power cables ): |
||
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
Posted: March 10 2006 at 09:24 | |
Just for the eyes' pleasure:
Top canadians tube amps, (i think there are now discontinued cause too expensive.) Anyway it's excellent and even better than Conrad Johnson |
||
Bob Greece
Prog Reviewer Joined: July 04 2005 Location: Greece Status: Offline Points: 1823 |
Posted: March 10 2006 at 09:34 | |
What's wrong with 5.1 systems? 1000 Euros for cables? You get paid too much in France. |
||
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
Posted: March 10 2006 at 09:45 | |
In a pure audio set up, 5.1 provides a far less good image (soundstage) than a good stereo or 2.1 system.
I didn't said that i can afford these cables. But i'm ready to sacrifice all to get some (on second hand, you can het one for about 500€.) The improvment is incredible and worth the price. If you must put only one, you put it on the preamp. It makes: boom!! A second on the source. A third on the amp, etc... And eventually you put it on every devices and it makes...BOOOOM!!! |
||
Guests
Forum Guest Group |
Posted: March 10 2006 at 10:43 | |
I tried 2.1 in the end I reverted back to 2 because if the two speakers are top quality the sub woofer (in my case) only created less clarity , so I stick with two very nice speakers
|
||
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
Posted: March 10 2006 at 11:02 | |
Bad sub (featuring a less than 38cm loudspeaker) and/or bad setted.
But with a good sub, it's always better (on good records of course) as it enhances dynamic, image, etc..even with very high end speakers cause it enables to explore extreme low freq. Another fantastic and surprising effect is that it enhances highs too. Edited by oliverstoned |
||
Empathy
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 30 2005 Status: Offline Points: 1864 |
Posted: March 10 2006 at 11:27 | |
Wow, oliverstoned, you give "audiophile" new meaning!
|
||
Pure Brilliance:
|
||
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
Posted: March 10 2006 at 11:33 | |
Should i take it as a compliment?
Audiophile was a pejorative word maybe? |
||
Empathy
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 30 2005 Status: Offline Points: 1864 |
Posted: March 10 2006 at 11:56 | |
No, not meant in the pejorative. Hey, we all have our fetishes! Mine would be my CD collection and ever-growing musical equipment collection. I'm not one to criticise! |
||
Pure Brilliance:
|
||
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21138 |
Posted: March 10 2006 at 11:58 | |
I can recommend the Logitech speaker sets ... but why not buy a 5.1 set? They're not much more expensive, and you can always use them without the rear speakers and add them later. Low budget PC speakers (around $80), but still MUCH better than any other PC speaker set that I know:
Medium Budget ($200): Big budget ($500): |
||
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
Posted: March 10 2006 at 12:12 | |
Thanks Mike for showing what's to avoid: false speakers and a false sub...
|
||
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21138 |
Posted: March 10 2006 at 12:28 | |
You forgot to add "in my opinion". Edit: By the way, what do you mean by "false" sub? You keep talking about speaker diameters like 38cm being mandatory for good bass reproduction ... that's utter nonsense. May I remind you of the famous 2x12/4x10 bass cabinets? Edited by MikeEnRegalia |
||
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21138 |
Posted: March 10 2006 at 12:44 | |
What's even more laughable is that these are POWER cables. What a joke ... sorry, but any engineer would literaly roll on the floor laughing his ass off when he heard about that. |
||
Tony R
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: July 16 2004 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 11979 |
Posted: March 10 2006 at 14:35 | |
I have a Creative Labs 6.1 Speaker package and I'm very happy with them. They are attached to my Audigy2 Platinum soundcard and more than serve their purpose with both music and movies. Anyone who pays €1000 for a power cable needs their head testing (IMO). This is just "Emperor's New Clothes" territory and an example of how the HiFi market preys on enthusiasts. The ultimate aim of high end HiFi claims be to reproduce as faithfully as possible what the Sound Engineer could hear,however if you do not use the same equipment as him then you are unlikely to get exactly the same sound image...whether you spend more or less is relatively irrelevant. |
||
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
Posted: March 10 2006 at 15:16 | |
These cables features filtering boxes which play the same role than power filter and it results in a huge improvment in term of soundstage, dynamic, remove a lot of harshness...
To sum up, a huge improvment on all criterias. Same for interconnect cables, all very high end cables features these kind of boxes. Those who don't hear the difference need their ears to be checked. (we made the test to my father last weekend -who was quite septikal at first- and he was amazed by the result. Now he'd like to get some for his own system, but gave up because of the price and will stay on cheaper cables). Do you really believe that i'm fool enough to spent 500€ on a cable just because it's expensive? And know that the equipment we use is sometimes even better than what they use in studio (I.E tube amps versus solid state one). A Conrad Johson amp is far more musical (it doesn't mean that it's less acuurate, it's far more in the highs) than any studio solid sate amp used for monitoring. The CD player i use is up to what they use for radio broacast (they use Studer integrated CD players most of the time, while we use separate drive/converter far better). PS: Sorry Mike to forget the "IMO", that was not kind of me. High end cables: This studio engineer uses Transparent cables Bob Ludwig, an absolute reference in rock mastering (this guy manages to make digital musical) uses Transparent cables for its own needs. Technical explanations (from Transparent cables website): "You may not realize how much low-level noise is robbing your system of its potential -- until you hear your components linked with Transparent. If the cables and power conditioning products in your music and film system are not Transparent, then every signal path is like an antenna to unwanted noise. All Transparent cables and power conditioning products reject noise. Noise at any point in the signal chain inhibits the ability of your music or film system to reveal all the subtle nuances of texture, tone, color, body, dimension, and contrast that are encoded in your favorite music and film program materials. These subtle nuances are the critical elements that help us to suspend our belief that we are only listening to or viewing electronic signals. They are the critical elements that bring our listening and viewing experiences to life. oused within those distinctive "black boxes" on our audio cable are special passive electrical networks that reject noise. The networks also tune that specific length and type of cable to provide exactly the right balance of electrical properties for the use of the cable within the music or film system. Transparent video and digital cables also reject noise, but they do so without networks. Because of the ultra-high frequency transmission required by digital and video cables, precision manufacturing and termination techniques can ensure that these types of cables have the correct balance of electrical properties without the use of networks. Transparent video and digital cables reject noise through proprietary materials, shielding, and termination techniques. Transparent power products reject noise through networks and shielding techniques. The more we study the effects of dirty power on music and pictures, the more we appreciate what clean power can do for every home system. ransparent designs start in a well equipped test laboratory, where an important 35% of each product's development takes place. The testing allows us to calibrate each cable and length to achieve theoretically ideal characteristics for its application. This calibration improves the performance of our products in a number of ways. The primary aim of our design process is to remove noise from the signal path. Our commitment to create uniform behavior in our cables means a lot of painstaking work, but the results make it worthwhile. For each model of Transparent Cable that requires a network, we design a specific filter for each length of cable that we offer in that model. If 6 lengths are offered in a given model, then we design 6 individual filters to keep response uniform. Each cable is calibrated to control high frequency roll-off behavior, group delay characteristics, resonance, and impedance behavior into a wide range of its intended audio load conditions. However, laboratory test equipment can not adequately predict how a cable and its network will really behave on the wide range of audio and video components that are available today. Therefore, the ultimate refinement of all Transparent cable and power conditioning designs takes place in our music and film studio where we can directly experience how our designs work with other components. This unique studio is our most important design tool. The engineering and architectural features of the room allow us to hear the merits of our products in conjunction with other components without the room contributing to the sonic presentation." Edited by oliverstoned - August 09 2006 at 08:16 |
||
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21138 |
Posted: March 10 2006 at 15:24 | |
Well, I'm tempted to (but will not) anwer that question. Sorry, I can't resist to post a link to this again: http://www.theaudiocritic.com/downloads/article_1.pdf It's foolish to believe that the cables that you showed above can do any better than simple balanced audio cables. Noise is cancelled out by a cheap €5 cable as well as by a €5000 cable.
Edited by MikeEnRegalia |
||
Empathy
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 30 2005 Status: Offline Points: 1864 |
Posted: March 10 2006 at 15:25 | |
Ooooh, this is getting good!
|
||
Pure Brilliance:
|
||
Post Reply | Page 123 6> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |