How important are lyrics to you? |
Post Reply | Page 123> |
Author | ||
nick_h_nz
Collaborator Prog Metal / Heavy Prog Team Joined: March 01 2013 Location: Suffolk, UK Status: Offline Points: 6737 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: June 26 2021 at 02:53 |
|
inspired by a recent comment by Pedro elsewhere, I was thinking of how my attitude towards vocals and lyrics has changed over time.
When I was younger, while I have always enjoyed instrumental music, my preference was always for music with sung lyrics, and I only ever heard lyrics sung in English. Thus I was always able to understand the lyrics (well, almost always - some singers by virtue of their delivery and/or accent were rather unintelligible to me at times). I used to love to learn the lyrics to every song I listened to, so that I could sing along, if I wanted. I liked to think about what they meant, and if they weren’t obvious, to try and work out what they meant. Back in pre-Internet days, the meaning of lyrics was not easily discovered, so it was more of less working it out for oneself. I loved it when lyrics told a story, over a song, over a series of songs, or over a whole album. But for years now, I’ve not cared at all about lyrics - which I recognise is potentially quite offensive, because I know how much thought and effort some composers put into their words. The reason is simple, though. I now listen to music from all around the world, and more often than not, in a language not English. I have no way of knowing what the lyrics are, so the vocals for me are now just one more instrument in the mix. But I have also often found this doesn’t make a difference to being able to follow a concept, or even knowing what a song might be about. The way a vocalist sings can imply a lot of meaning, without knowing what the words are. It is the music, however, that I’ve found really tells the story on many an occasion. I have listened to several purely instrumental concept albums that tell the story better than many vocal concept albums. I think I’m at a point these days where I prefer either an instrumental album, or an album with foreign vocals, to one where the vocals are in English. This feeling is compounded by how often I struggle with a group because of the vocalist. I avoided Yes for years because I can’t stand Jon Anderson’s voice. The Yes albums with Jon I like, I like in spite of his vocals, and I would far rather Yes were an instrumental band. I love King Crimson’s Lizard, but Jon Anderson completely ruins the first part of the piece for me with his god-awful voice. Likewise, for many years I just couldn’t get into any form of extreme metal with harsh vocals. Someone might play something, and I’d think it was ok until the vocals kicked in. I wouldn’t go so far as to say I hated extreme metal, but I certainly avoided it. However, I knew there was some really good music in there, if I could just open my ears. It was Opeth who were eventually my way into extreme metal. I still don’t like harsh vocals, but I can tolerate them - and I now have a good deal of extreme metal in my collection. But, again, it’s in spite of the vocals. Pedro mentioned he thought he had about 20 different languages in his music collection, which inspired me to see what I have in mine. I’m sure to have missed some, because to come up with the list, I was simply flicking through my iPad. So not only would it have been easy to flick past an artist or band which has foreign language vocals, but if they’re not on my iPod, I won’t even have thought about them. There are also several bands that have their own made up language, but rather than list them separately, I’ve just combined them. That will probably upset some people, but hey - upsetting some people seems to be inevitable in any discussion on PA! (Also, it should be noted that languages such as French, Portuguese and Spanish can be very different depending on where in the world they are spoken, so bear that in mind when you come across them. Similarly, there are about 12 “main” Indonesian languages, and something like 700 Indonesian languages overall. And I’ll be honest, I have no idea which of the Senegalese languages is being sung in my collection either, so apologies too for not being more accurate, there. My inclusion of Indonesian and Senegalese is probably, therefore, as offensive as when Pedro said he counted Welsh, Irish and Scottish as English. I can only apologise for my ignorance here. Sorry.) Belarusian Catalan Croatian Czech Danish Faroese Finnish French Georgian German Hebrew Hungarian Icelandic Indonesian Invented languages Irish (aka as Irish Gaelic or Gaeilge) Italian Japanese Korean Mandarin Māori Norwegian Polish Portuguese Romanian Russian Samoan Sanskrit Sardinian Senegalese Spanish Swedish Ukrainian I initially thought I’d have a longer list, but as I was scrolling through my iPod I realised that although I have music from all around the world, often they are still singing in English (so while, for example, I have a few Bulgarian bands on my iPod, the lyrics are sung in English). I do wish more bands and artists would sing in their native language, as to my ears, it always sounds better than English. |
||
Man With Hat
Collaborator Jazz-Rock/Fusion/Canterbury Team Joined: March 12 2005 Location: Neurotica Status: Offline Points: 166178 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
|
Instrumental for me. If vocals, I prefer either vocal sounds or a foreign language.
|
||
Dig me...But don't...Bury me
I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect. |
||
Lewian
Prog Reviewer Joined: August 09 2015 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 14664 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Good question! About 1/3 of what I have is instrumental. Chances are this is far higher than what you find in most other collections. As a default I don't care about lyrics, although I'm not against having voices. In fact, the human voice is a great instrument and I love having a good vocalist. On the other hand, a vocalist I don't like can ruin music more to me than much else, so instrumentals always play it safer and have an easier job to make me like them, although a great vocalist may help music to reach my personal super top status (instrumentals are there, too, if not maybe at the relative frequency of 1/3). Consequently I voted for "depends on the vocalist". This also means that I don't care much in principle for the language, as I don't need to understand the lyrics to enjoy the singing. I like to hear some languages more than others though (sorry my Danish friends!). There are exceptions though. There are some lyrics that drag me in, and some I get interested in over time. So the content of the lyrics can occasionally have a positive impact and I even may end up finding them important in the odd case (Talk Talk's Colour of Spring is a great example, Animals is another one, and some of Peter Hammill's stuff). I also have far more stuff from my native Germany in my collection than from any other non-English speaking country, and in fact more German stuff appeals to me lyrically, probably because German lyrics connect more directly to my emotions and other languages need more brain impact (if they work at all - that's actually only English and to a limited extent Italian and French). Surely I cannot claim that German lyrics are better or even that German sounds any better than other languages! There is also far more German stuff that I hate because of cringeworthy lyrics I'd probably let a song in another language get away with more easily. So lyrics can matter to me, even though often they don't. Edited by Lewian - June 26 2021 at 04:37 |
||
suitkees
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 19 2020 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 9050 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Nice read, Nick! I will not follow up with a list - I'm too lazy for that - but looking at yours and thinking what is in my collection things add up quite quickly... So, yes, many different languages in my collection too and I like to hear foreign languages. I'm afraid, however, that I am unable to choose one of your poll options. It all depends... Music comes as it comes, with or without lyrics, and I don't have a preference for one or the other. I like hearing foreign languages (I'm constantly surrounded by one, since I don't live in my native country), but I don't mind when an artist/band is singing in another language than its/their native one, as long as the accent is not too disastrous. Most Dutch bands (my native language) sing in English, but I don't mind either hearing artists/bands singing in Dutch. As Dutch we are constantly confronted with foreign languages: English, especially, but also many others. It's a small country with a small linguistic reach and on TV most of the programs/films are subtitled (instead of dubbed), so we hear those foreign languages and are more used to it than people in some other countries with dominating languages such as English, Spanish, French... I live in France now since 20 years and it is quite surprising how little we are confronted here with other languages, compared to the Netherlands, and how few people can speak another language than French. Back to music, I like to hear singing in all kinds of languages and I don't mind not understanding the lyrics if they're sung in a language I don't know. I don't mind Frank Bornemann from Eloy sings in English (despite the accent) and I even think that it would sound less good in German, while I also love some German bands that sing in their mother tongue. The contents of the lyrics only become important when the lyrics are good. I mean, there are a good bunch of silly or just bad lyrics out there, but when the music is good, that's fine with me. The melody, the voice, the music are more important than the quality of the lyrics. But when music and singing are good and the lyrics too, than it is event better! The vocals are, as - indeed - just another instrument are also important for me. There are many bands/artists whose music I like very much but I don't like to listen to because of the vocals (e.g. Il Balletto di Bronzo), or even singers whose singing quality is outstanding but I can not listen to longer than a couple of tracks because their voice is fatiguing me (e.g. Björk on most of her albums). I'm generally put off by growling in music, but sometimes it fits well and I can stand it or even like it in a particular song... So, I could vote for all of your poll options... It all depends...
Edited by suitkees - June 26 2021 at 04:03 |
||
The razamataz is a pain in the bum |
||
nick_h_nz
Collaborator Prog Metal / Heavy Prog Team Joined: March 01 2013 Location: Suffolk, UK Status: Offline Points: 6737 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I should probably have mentioned. I made this a multiple vote poll, as it is entirely possible for more than one answer to to co-exist. I haven’t voted yet myself, but I could easily vote for:
Instrumental; Foreign Language (which effectively is no different to instrumental to me); Vocals, but not necessarily lyrics; AND Depends on the vocalist. Lewian’s answer seems to almost wholly reflect my own views. There are definitely exceptions where the lyrics really hit me, and/or draw me in, and/or are really effective and interesting, so that I’m not sure I’d enjoy the music so much without those English lyrics. But those are definitely exceptions. Bands like Magma prove that no one needs to know what is being sung, for lyrics to be meaningful and affective. And Francesco di Giacomo had one of the most expressive and impressive voice ever in prog. Like Magma vocals, di Giacomo’s were effectively for me, just one more instrument in the mix - but what a gorgeous and powerful instrument. I have found more and more, though, that instrumental music and/or music with foreign language vocals, allows me to envisage far more easily and effectively what a piece is about, than if it is sung in English. An aural equivalent, I guess, of the old saying - so that, if a picture tells a thousand words, a piece of music paints a thousand pictures. |
||
nick_h_nz
Collaborator Prog Metal / Heavy Prog Team Joined: March 01 2013 Location: Suffolk, UK Status: Offline Points: 6737 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Choose more than one, then? There’s not just one answer that’s right for me, either. That’s why I made it a multiple vote poll.
I have a lot of Dutch artists and bands in my collection, but all are either instrumental or sing in English. I wonder if this is related to a later point you make, that some music is probably better suited to English sung lyrics than the native language. Romance languages are very musical by nature but, no offence intended, Dutch and German are not so musical to the ear. The only German language albums in my collection are angular and avant, where the language suits the music, and indeed I think sounds far better than if it were to be sung in English. But, Eloy (who you mentioned) is not the sort of music where the German language would fit so well, perhaps? |
||
Progishness
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 10 2020 Location: Planet Rhubarb Status: Offline Points: 2565 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
For me a lot depends on the emotion and passion conveyed by the vocalist.
|
||
dwill123
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 19 2006 Status: Offline Points: 4460 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Instrumental (no lyrics). If lyrics are needed, I'll fill them in myself.
|
||
suitkees
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 19 2020 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 9050 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Yes, it is maybe the guttural nature of the German and Dutch languages, but there are some Dutch and German dialects that are smoother and softer. It is maybe a question of "fitting better" specific types of music, but somehow I'm not really convinced by this (is it more because of habit and what we are more used to?). Another example: Arab is another guttural language, but the singing can be very beautiful too... I love (too) hearing the Roman languages, French, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish, Catalan, Romanian... all of them.
|
||
The razamataz is a pain in the bum |
||
SteveG
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 11 2014 Location: Kyiv In Spirit Status: Offline Points: 20602 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
My parents were ultra left leaning liberals who loved left wing folkies like Woody Guthrie and Pete Seeger. So I picked up an appreciation of the genre quite young, which was transferred to 60s folkies like Phil Ochs and Dylan. The lyrics of that era's protest music was especially important to me, so that carried over to some prog groups like the Strawbs and Renaissance, which dealt with some social issues, as well as telling good stories. It also made listening to the babbling of Jon Anderson quite a challenge at times. While I enjoy many prog artists for just their musical abilities, the better lyrical artists have a special place in my level of appreciation.
|
||
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
|
||
Lewian
Prog Reviewer Joined: August 09 2015 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 14664 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
|
An important point that I'd like to add to what I had written before is that the positive impact of lyrics relies on fitting the music and being sung in a way that fits the message/emotion they convey. When I'm listening even their meaning should ideally become "one" with the music.
Edited by Lewian - June 26 2021 at 04:42 |
||
Tasartir
Forum Senior Member Joined: September 06 2005 Location: Spain Status: Offline Points: 606 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I voted for "It depends on the vocalist", though I do think this has nothing to do with how important the lyrics are to me as there are too many variations to consider if I do like the vocalist:
A great vocalist singing terrible lyrics. A great vocalist singing great lyrics written by someone else. A great vocalist singing great lyrics written by them. Not sure I made myself clear here, but in a nutshell I'd say "it depends on the vocalist" has nothing to do with how much I enjoy or don't enjoy lyrics. I couldn't care less for Bob Dylan's singing, but the man CAN WRITE A LYRIC.
|
||
...Histoires Sans Paroles...
|
||
Progishness
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 10 2020 Location: Planet Rhubarb Status: Offline Points: 2565 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
It doesn't necessarily matter what the lyrics are either - a prime example being Jon Anderson (e.g. the whole of the CTTE album) - most of the time I've got no idea what he's on about, but the passion he conveys is undeniable.
|
||
Hiram
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 30 2009 Location: Finland Status: Offline Points: 2084 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I voted depends and native language lyrics.
Which I understood as band/singer singing in their native language. I wish everyone did that instead of taking the easy way of English as the international language of rock music. This of course means non-native speakers of English only. If necessary, translations or summaries can be included with albums or on websites. I can't stand growled or screamed extreme metal vocals nowadays (I listened to that stuff earlier), but anything else is fine with me, depending on the style of music. As for the lyrical content, I'm fine with anything that's well written. Except most blatant preaching (whatever the subject) and most syrupy love songs. |
||
Manuel
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 09 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13261 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I consider the voice to be another intrument, so you need a good vocalist, and somebody who can write great lyrics.
Edited by Manuel - June 26 2021 at 09:01 |
||
Shadowyzard
Forum Senior Member Joined: February 24 2020 Location: Davutlar Status: Offline Points: 4506 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Rarely important. But if so, very important. (An answer to the title.)
The contents of the lyrics... Well, if written by a real poet, any language can do the job, I think. Language is just a vessel... The one(s) inside it are more important for me. The more important thing for me about languages in singing is... sonority. Here's my take regarding that: I like English, Serbian and Italian in singing. But I can even like French, German or Arabic, depending on the songs, although I pretty much hate those as spoken languages. Japanese is also very cool in some songs. Spanish can be fun in adventurous and energetic songs, or ballads. My language Turkish is, oh... Long story... It can be from horrendous to awesome. Instrumentals are always welcome, though... Even in friendships, sometimes you share more things in silence. All in all, it really depends... |
||
SteveG
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 11 2014 Location: Kyiv In Spirit Status: Offline Points: 20602 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
||
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
|
||
Shadowyzard
Forum Senior Member Joined: February 24 2020 Location: Davutlar Status: Offline Points: 4506 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
^ Oops, imagine there's pleasant background sounds.
|
||
Icarium
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: March 21 2008 Location: Tigerstaden Status: Offline Points: 34055 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Lyrics is a vital part of any journy which wants you to take part in, as a narration through the thoughts of the songwriter. Also in a prog format this is a strong presamce leaning on many literary traditions and sources. As the instrumentalists brings their skill and precision aøsp the lyriacist wants to be a part of this soup and delivers lyrics with story, concept and layers.
|
||
|
||
moshkito
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 04 2007 Location: Grok City Status: Offline Points: 17444 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
|
Hi, Thanks a bunch.
It was the variety of languages that got me interested in it all. However, I had already been seasoned at home by dad's very large classical music collection (over 2K LP's and at least 35 operas, probably more!), and the different languages. I had heard Boris Christoff in Russian, I had heard Renata Tebaldi do Italian, and I had heard Maria Callas do Spanish, so in the end, I was not surprised when I heard things from different countries in the late 60's and early 70's. As an example, when Manticore released the BANCO album in English, the first thing I did was go with my friend to Moby Disk (famed import store for many years in Van Nuys) and make sure that I got the Italian version, because I felt that it would be better. Same thing for PFM, with the combined couple of albums, and the Italian felt much better and more on tune for my ears. And in Brazil, pop radio in the middle 60's was very vital and strong with a lot of political overtones, and I often mention the song "Carcara" which to me was more valuable at the time, than what Coppola did later visually ... her song was political. Coppola's was a show off of how cinema could blow away your ideas and expectations but did not have the imagery and strength that Maria Betania's song did. Again, the language was not the problem. Lyrics: This is a very tough area for me, because I come from a house of over 35K books of Portuguese, Brazilian and Spanish Literature. I remember reading Castaneda around 1975 or 1976, and the only thing I disagreed with was ... not all paper was designed for the bathroom! And I knew that some lyrics were valuable and important, despite the usual popular idea that some songs are "better" than others because the word love is used! Or because they have a story. With all this in mind, the movies (my first and greatest love!) helped show that some lyrics were not important, and I remember watching my first Godard film, and all in all, his idea for lyrics is for them to be "anti-lyrics", which is something that most rock bands can not do, although some folks like FAUST did a bit of it, but then got serious when folks thought it was just fun and play in the sandbox! And then, here comes a bunch of French folks, and they had a distinct flavor for trashing the language and how to use it. Reading Genet was different. Then all of a sudden, I read "Naked Lunch", and realized that words were AN IMAGE that we end up believing, however, the EXACT SAME PHRASE in different languages brings out different meanings (Peter Brook's book "Tip of The Tongue") which I was already aware of because he had done a totally far out version of "Midsummer's Night Dream" and a year later did a play that was all words, but the visuals accented them so strongly that you left the building stunned. MARAT/SADE is about the words, and Ian Richardson, Patrick Magee and Glenda Jackson take this whole thing to a stratospheric idea of what it all means ... and the words in the play are powerful ... "I AM the Revolution" "No, you are just another idiot who thinks he can change the world!" ... and all of a sudden you see The Beatles start to write better songs about their lyrics. Poetry is weird, but within the rock context, it is even better, and rarely will you not "get it", whereas the lyrics in many a song, including "progressive" are merely bagatelles compared to the really powerful stuff out there in the literary world. Somehow rockers and pop'rs think that all literature is the craps, and really, you gotta really (eventually) realize that the pop'rs are just trying to get some attention, and even many of their words are not that important. Hearing Roy Harper is far out ... it's not about the music, it's about his words! Hearing Jim Morrison, is a lot more about his words and wording than anything, however the lyrical content is very challenging at times, when you are faced with whipping the horse's eye, and you will go around the world several times and still not have an idea! And that's not really to say that it has a meaning, but you and I know that Jim was not exactly an empty goon rock'n'roller. For a lot of these reasons, a lot of the better known "progressive" moments don't grab me, but this is the part that folks think I'm being a turkey for. I don't blame DE for saying what he does, but Ian's words are very hollow, and sometimes just mean! His best ended with PP and MIAG, in my book, although there always were some neat songs here and there, but it's all they were. Nice songs. ELP had great lyrics and many written by Pete Sinfield who gets laughed at many times, and yet his touch is all over the early KC and other bands. My thoughts are/were that we did not want another Donovan, and his new age styled mysticism under the cover of hipness. Thus, language for me is simply a way to say something, and it is not always the main point of the whole thing. In fact, one of my favorite bits in film is in a Godard film that you can only see in a film class. It starts with a couple sitting on 2 stools in a bar, and the camera is watching them from behind. All of a sudden the camera starts moving to the left and continues and we see everything else in the bar, and a bit of their conversation, and it goes on for a while, as he comes back and then continues his adventure of looking around! The point was, for me, that we don't really care anyway! AND, our minds do the same thing over and over and over again, not having the ability (I call it the Zen) to concentrate on something for a longer period of time than the prescribed Hollywood 2 or 3 minutes! Acting has helped some rockers and DB and MJ are two very good examples. You remember how and what they said, and this moment about DB is in Edgar Froese's book! DB wanted him on the album, however he could not find his "voice" within what he had, and the producer stopped the rehearsal, and took every one out, and left DB on the piano alone. He had not found "his voice" in his words! These are not the only ones. Robert Plant will not discuss acting, but in his early days, and most of the LZ material he is acting out the words literally, specially if you had the bootlegs of all the early LZ stuff! And then you get to Christian Decamps (ANGE) and he is a true and tried actor and lovely to listen to. He knows what he is saying and why! It makes a huge difference, as opposed to so much stuff that supposedly has meaning and is not scratching the surface of nothing except some ideal. And ideals and ideas DO NOT (always) TRANSLATE TO AN AUDIENCE, if you EVER have been in a stage production and found the Saturday Night audience, different from the Friday Night audience! But rock music keeps giving you this idea that supposedly it is important and valuable, and compared to a lot of other artistic things, it is not. This is a topic that can not be discussed in one or two words. There is too much to it, and I doubt seriously that we can come up with some sort of consensus about the whole thing. In different cultures these are relate to differently. And the next thing we are going to say is that Japanese and Chinese theater is crap because we don't get it! Lovely thoughts you mentioned and I have been writing for 2 years a book on improvisations, and the one thing that is toughest to discuss? Lyrics, since they are not exactly the "truth" as actors like to speak of on stage and film. The best know the difference. The rest is just pop music to my ears!
|
||
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com |
||
Post Reply | Page 123> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |