Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Tech Talk
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Time Signatures
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedTime Signatures

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>
Author
Message
Ben2112 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: March 15 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 870
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 28 2005 at 21:54
Regarding the 7/8 vs. 7/4 issue, I had always counted "Money" by Pink Floyd in the 7/4 time. However, if you watch the making of Dark Side... DVD, Dave says it's in 7/8. Wow, that would be a SLOOOOW 7/8. I guess it does just come down to where you consider the bars/measures to fall.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Forum Guest Group
Forum Guest Group
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 29 2005 at 11:32

Originally posted by Ben2112 Ben2112 wrote:

Regarding the 7/8 vs. 7/4 issue, I had always counted "Money" by Pink Floyd in the 7/4 time. However, if you watch the making of Dark Side... DVD, Dave says it's in 7/8. Wow, that would be a SLOOOOW 7/8. I guess it does just come down to where you consider the bars/measures to fall.

I have a music book with all the sheet music for DSOTM and the publisher wrote Money as being a measure of 3/4 followed by a measure of 4/4. This combination is repeated. I really don't think Pink Floyd would have been obtuse enough to write it this way. I think the transcriber probably was just an airhead who did it this way.

Back to Top
alan_pfeifer View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: December 05 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 823
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 29 2005 at 17:35

Well as a drummer, being able to count time sigs is a nessecary ability, and listeng to prog has definitly in that department.  But I find that you can ususaly figure out the time signature if you listen to where the drummer places a crash cymbal. also, many of the higher time sigs like 6/8 or 7/4 are ,much easier to count when broken up.

Back to Top
Hierophant View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: March 11 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 651
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 30 2005 at 04:26
Planet X - 2116    heh... Try counting that one.
Back to Top
JrKASperov View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 07 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 904
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 30 2005 at 05:47
Originally posted by alan_pfeifer alan_pfeifer wrote:

Well as a drummer, being able to count time sigs is a nessecary ability, and listeng to prog has definitly in that department.  But I find that you can ususaly figure out the time signature if you listen to where the drummer places a crash cymbal. also, many of the higher time sigs like 6/8 or 7/4 are ,much easier to count when broken up.



When counting, I usually find that with that 7/4 I count to 3.5. 1...2...3.1..2..3 When I come up with a half, I simply multiply it with two to come up with the desired number .
Epic.
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 30 2005 at 07:17

Originally posted by Ben2112 Ben2112 wrote:

Regarding the 7/8 vs. 7/4 issue, I had always counted "Money" by Pink Floyd in the 7/4 time. However, if you watch the making of Dark Side... DVD, Dave says it's in 7/8. Wow, that would be a SLOOOOW 7/8. I guess it does just come down to where you consider the bars/measures to fall.

It's not 7/8, it's 7/4. Dave's wrong

That's because you can count 7 easily and regularly - there is no compound time, it is purely simple. If it was 7/8, then there would not be 7 beats, but 2 and 1/3 beats per bar, and the whole "feel" would be quicker, as you note.

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Forum Guest Group
Forum Guest Group
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 12 2005 at 13:34
I am posting on this thread again to see if anyone adds anything new or interesting.
Back to Top
sigod View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 17 2004
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 2779
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 13 2005 at 07:52
Genesis' 'Turn It On Again' is in 13/8 which I think is a great rhythmic device as you hardly know the odd time is there.

Pushing it further however, it gets EVEN more complicayed when you get into polyrhythms, which are two time sigantures that play over one another i.e. 7/8 over 4/4 or even incorporating triplet figures over straight fours....

And don't get me started on rudimentary sticking...


Edited by sigod
I must remind the right honourable gentleman that a monologue is not a decision.
- Clement Atlee, on Winston Churchill
Back to Top
alan_pfeifer View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: December 05 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 823
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 26 2005 at 22:20
Originally posted by JrKASperov JrKASperov wrote:

Originally posted by alan_pfeifer alan_pfeifer wrote:

Well as a drummer, being able to count time sigs is a nessecary ability, and listeng to prog has definitly in that department.  But I find that you can ususaly figure out the time signature if you listen to where the drummer places a crash cymbal. also, many of the higher time sigs like 6/8 or 7/4 are ,much easier to count when broken up.



When counting, I usually find that with that 7/4 I count to 3.5. 1...2...3.1..2..3 When I come up with a half, I simply multiply it with two to come up with the desired number .

Hmm, seems a bit complicated, but whatever works for you.

Back to Top
Progbear View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 14 2005
Location: CA
Status: Offline
Points: 139
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2005 at 04:14
First of all, a bit of confusion over the whole 3/4 vs. 6/8 thing. Yes, both have the same number of eighth notes per measure, but they’re NOT the same. 3/4 is triple time (three beats per measure) whereas 6/8 is duple (compound 2/4, essentially). It’s music theory as opposed to mathematics. But it can add up; oftentimes you hear composers alternating bars of 3/4 and 6/8 continuously throughout a piece (I’ve even seen this notated as having BOTH time signatures at the beginning of the manuscript!)

As for “complex” time signatures (i.e.: those not divisible by 2 or 3), it’s up to the whim of the composer, really. I generally subscribe to the KISS principle, though that can be taken to extremes, too (like my former jazz instructor, who insisted that everything be notated in 2’s, 3’s and 4’s). On the other hand, I’ve seen John McLaughlin’s scores where he’s notated tunes as 10/8 (“The Dance of Maya”), 14/8 (“Lila’s Dance”) and 18/8 (“Birds of Fire”). Why he chose that method rather than, say, 5/4, 7/4 and 9/4 isn’t something I can explain, though I’m certain he had his reasons. As opposed to, say, the fractional notation (e.g.: 3½/4) that appeared on some Bartók pieces, which just seems like showing off.

-------------
MIKE (a.k.a. "Progbear")

 "That's my purse! I don't know you!" --Bobby Hill

N.P.:nothing
Back to Top
goose View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 20 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 4097
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2005 at 07:05
5/4's different to 10/8 just like 3/4 is different to 6/8 though
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21206
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2005 at 08:14
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

The more elaborate ones are fairly hard to get if you're not used to it - but practice does make perfect.

2/4 is very rarely used, and, as was pointed out above, 6/8 sounds like 2/4 but with triplets - that's because the 6 quavers pulse in 2 groups of three - the beat is actually a dotted crotchet (three quavers) - it's the same for any piece in compound time (anything /8 is in compound time).

Most pieces I've heard in more complex time signatures tend to cheat - in 7/4, for example, you'll hear musicians play a "bar" of 4 then a bar of 3, because it makes counting easier. Very few, like "Money" are truly in 7 time. 7/8 is very rare indeed, and should sound like 2 and a third, but typically sounds more like 3 and a half beats - which is 7/4, of course.

I'm really not sure about anything in /16 time - I rather think it's showing off. Some of the great composers used similar time signatures - like Stravinsky - but typically only for a few bars in a piece (e.g. the Rite of Spring). Usually clusters of bars in what appear to be freaky time signatures appear, when the composer could simply have stuck a few extra accents in there - for example, Stravinsky sticks a few bars of 3/4 in between some bars of 6/8, then in another passage [110] we see 2 bars of 5/8, then one each of 7/8, 5/8, 3/8, 3/4, 3/8, 4/4, 3/8.

Unless you were looking at the score, you'd never count that lot - but you'd be forgiven for thinking the whole thing was in 9/8.

I think that Money is also what you describe as a "fake" 7/4. When you listen to the bass/snare you'll get:

1 2 3 4 1 2 3
b s b s b s b

it's really just 4/4 3/4 ... and nothing's wrong with that. Steve Vai - Die To Live is a good example for a "true" 7/4 song:

1 a 2 a 3 a 4 a 5 a 6 a 7 a
b . . s . . . . b . b . s b

Edit: the editor replaces many consecutive blank characters with garbled code, so I used dots ... just ignore them.

 

 

 



Edited by MikeEnRegalia
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2005 at 08:40
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

I think that Money is also what you describe as a "fake" 7/4. When you listen to the bass/snare you'll get:

1 2 3 4 1 2 3
b s b s b s b

it's really just 4/4 3/4 ... and nothing's wrong with that. Steve Vai - Die To Live is a good example for a "true" 7/4 song:

1 a 2 a 3 a 4 a 5 a 6 a 7 a
b . . s . . . . b . b . s b

Edit: the editor replaces many consecutive blank characters with garbled code, so I used dots ... just ignore them.

I'm not so sure - I can hear a definite 7 beats in the guitar lines. Maybe that was just Nick's way of coping with it - he's hardly the ultimate drummer of all time - although he's definitely the very best drummer in Pink Floyd...

I don't own a copy of "Alien Love Secrets" - but I know that Vai pulls off complex time signatures with ease - as he does with practically everything else he does. The man is so insanely gifted

 

Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21206
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2005 at 08:49
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

I think that Money is also what you describe as a "fake" 7/4. When you listen to the bass/snare you'll get:

1 2 3 4 1 2 3
b s b s b s b

it's really just 4/4 3/4 ... and nothing's wrong with that. Steve Vai - Die To Live is a good example for a "true" 7/4 song:

1 a 2 a 3 a 4 a 5 a 6 a 7 a
b . . s . . . . b . b . s b

Edit: the editor replaces many consecutive blank characters with garbled code, so I used dots ... just ignore them.

I'm not so sure - I can hear a definite 7 beats in the guitar lines. Maybe that was just Nick's way of coping with it - he's hardly the ultimate drummer of all time - although he's definitely the very best drummer in Pink Floyd...

I don't own a copy of "Alien Love Secrets" - but I know that Vai pulls off complex time signatures with ease - as he does with practically everything else he does. The man is so insanely gifted

The guitar riff in Money is a 7 beat riff, that's true.

If you don't have Alien Love Secrets ... I highly recommend the DVD. Kill The Guy With The Ball is just insane ... Polyrhythms in perfection.

Back to Top
goose View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 20 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 4097
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2005 at 09:31
The guitar riff in Money accents the first and fourth beat, which is what makes it sound like a slow 7/8.
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21206
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2005 at 09:56

Originally posted by goose goose wrote:

The guitar riff in Money accents the first and fourth beat, which is what makes it sound like a slow 7/8.

Do you know if there's a definite rule to determine if something is 7/4 or 7/8?

Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2005 at 09:59

Originally posted by goose goose wrote:

The guitar riff in Money accents the first and fourth beat, which is what makes it sound like a slow 7/8.

I hear the hard accent on beat 1, but the accent on beat 4 is much softer, which stops the riff from "swinging" on that beat - it seems to swing around all the beats fairly evenly. Also, some of the rhythms are dotted across two main beats (e.g. notes 2 and 3 in bar 1), which is an unusual practice in 7/8.

Most tabs I've seen are in 7/4, and Roger himself describes it this way

"Paranoid Android" could well be in 7/8 though - I haven't made up my mind yet as I always stop analysing and start enjoying this one  

Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21206
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2005 at 10:30

I'm currently listening to The Andromeda Strain (Shadow Gallery: Room V), and after the solo there's a cool section: 5/4 on top of 4/4. There are 5 bars of 4/4, and part of the band plays 4 bars of 5/4 on top of it ... amazing. It creates the illusion of the drummer swapping bass and snare every bar.

Polyrhythms RULE.



Edited by MikeEnRegalia
Back to Top
LDGuy View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: May 31 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 68
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2005 at 12:09
With regards to time signatures in that PF song, you've got to remember they are only a label, and a lot of it comes from how the listener hears the music, or the player thinks about it while he/she is playing it. In other words, there's no such thing as a "fake" 7/4. With Money, if PF thought of it as seven 1/4 notes in a bar, then it is 7 notes in a bar, regardless of what the drums do. The same is true if PF thought of it as one bar of 4 and one of 3. However, it's an obvious 7 to me - there is only one downbeat in that riff IMO, and thats on the "one" of the 7.

...

I think the most important thing when working out time signatures is being able to asses where beat one is. You can't worry about subdivisions, polyrhythms, voicings or anything complex until you're able see where beat one is. Being able to do this is more or less difficult depending on the genre you're looking at. In rock, the strongest beat is mostly 1, so that makes it easier. However, in other genres, such as Jazz, the strongest beats may be on different beats. Jazz has strong beats on 2 and 4, and in Samba, beat 1 of a set of two bars is so weak often no instrument will ever hit it full on, the note most phrases start/end on being the "and" or 4 of the previous bar. This makes it very difficult when thinking about pulses in many of these types of music. But once you've mastered assesing where beat one is, you can then count on from there and work out the possible time signature.

Time signatures ultimately relate to whatever is being played, and if in doubt, always try and make it as close to 4/4 purely for clarity. I try and relate everything to 4/4 and then look for differences - stuff added, stuff taken away, etc. But sometimes labels play an important role to the phrasings of the music - 21/8 is definitely not the same as three bars of 7/8. Most definately, there will be varied phrasings within the bar which will not make it sound like three bars of 7/8. Bartok tried to get his point across like this when writing his pieces (especially the later pieces in his Mikrokosmos books). He might write a time signature of 3+3+2/8, which is not the same as 4/4, because the sections of the bar are clearly defined - the accents will land as so...
1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 ¦ 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 etc

This article deals with the more complex nature of time signatures - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_signature

As an example, here is a section from Ron Jarzombek's new album, Machinations of Dementia

http://www.spasticink.com/rjrem.wmv

If you've followed me this far, you'll be able to see the tim signatures go past as he plays them...

note: x [a number] indicates the number of bars this sime signature is played for.

4/4 count in
4/4 x 1
5/8 x 1
4/4 x 1
5/8 x 1
4/4 x 1
4/8 x 1 (this could also be 2/4)
5/4 x 5
4/4 x 1
3/8 x 1
4/4 x 1
3/8 x 1
5/8 x 1
4/4 x 1
5/8 x 1
4/4 x 1
5/8 x 1
4/4 x 1
5/8 x 1 and out...

Hope this helps you/answers your questions...


Edited by LDGuy
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21206
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2005 at 12:17

LDGuy:

I agree with all you're saying. Polyrhythms are just taking all of that one step further. And if someone thinks he knows all about rhythm as soon as he can count along and find the "one", he'll be amazed that this is just the beginning ...

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.219 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.