yup i'd go along with that - it follows the format of the Beatles Anthology and similar Stones book to a degree - though it's all from Nick's perspective.
As you'd expect the design is great and the pics lavish and lovely.
If I had one criticism it's that there's not enough detail. The personal recollections and anecdotes are great but I wanted more detail, more pinpoint memories etc. I think Nick also did his usual sterling job of fence-sitting with regard to the David/Roger rifts and the ousting of Rick during the Wall. I think he skirted a lot of issues, though he does constantly remind the reader that Floyd's modus operandi in addressing arguments/bones of contention was to simply pretend they did not exist - such a very 'English' way
You'll zip through it, and Mason has a nice dry, laconic style which makes it a very easy read. Good stuff. But still not the definitive tale of the Floyd. I think a many-interview process by a decent journalist might have dragged out a few more solid opinions and more anecdotes.
Another 300 pages each from Rick, Roger and David would have been welcome!