Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Recommendations/Featured albums
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Minstrel in the Gallery
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedMinstrel in the Gallery

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Message
Teaflax View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1225
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 27 2005 at 09:23
Originally posted by Sean Trane Sean Trane wrote:

In retrospect, Minstrel is one of their better album but it is clearly a shot below everything done before it 

 
Clearly? I think that both Stand Up and This Was are far, far worse, partly because they're pretty much just boring white Blues, but also because Anderson sang with a lump in his throat on those early recordings (and why he did that, I will never know).
 
Come to think of it, I think Minstrel is a cut above both the albums that bookend it, and the begining of a streak of creativity that culminated in the masterful Bursting Out.
Back to Top
Velvetclown View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 8548
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 27 2005 at 09:30
One of their best albums !!!!!!!!!!! 
Back to Top
Bj-1 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 04 2005
Location: No(r)Way
Status: Offline
Points: 31661
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 27 2005 at 10:19
Great album!!
RIO/AVANT/ZEUHL - The best thing you can get with yer pants on!
Back to Top
grandoleopry View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: June 12 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 85
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 02 2005 at 07:11
Originally posted by Losendos Losendos wrote:

 


  It's fabulou s  get a hold ofa copy. One thing I am puzzling about is Jethro Tull were not considered prog in the 70s how did they become prog? By the same token How come ELO  are not considered prog



Good Question. In the 70's music was not compartmentalized like it is now. You could go to a concert and Wilson Picket would be on the same bill as ELP. Tull was just a rock n roll band as were the Stones, Zep, The Who, Neil Young etc. It wasn't until much later that the music industry started segregating genres of rock for social demographics I guess. Now, rock is so dis-asscociated from each other, people who listen to jazz and fusion are more associated with prog fans then those who listen to say, Techno or Hip Hop.
Rock back then and all music had far less social implications than now. Going to a rock n roll concert back then was a far less serious social undertaking because music did not have the heavy social connotations as now. If you liked Diana Ross and Jethro Tull so what? You were not ostricized from the "Tull Clique" for admitting to enjoying Diana Ross.Music was an enjoyment and a gentle hobby not the stern psychological/social statement it is now. Who you enjoyed was not a reflection of who you are as it is Today. After all, it's only rock n roll. As far as ELO, I consider them light prog same as Styx. But most people don't...
Back to Top
Miaugion View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 22 2004
Location: Christmas Island
Status: Offline
Points: 295
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 02 2005 at 08:03
Originally posted by mickstafa mickstafa wrote:

"love" for albums like Broadsword, Rock Island and Under Wraps comes from unconditional love for anything Tull.


Oh, come on. Please give "Rock Island" another chance. It may not be an influential classic because it's not from the 70s but the interaction between Anderson's flute und Barre's extraordinary guitar is excellent. Barre tends to play only fragments instead of cohesive melodies. Dynamic and stunning. Especially "Ears of Tin" and the title track are highly recommended.

You house proud town mouse
ha ha, charade you are
Back to Top
BEING View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: June 17 2005
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 9
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 02 2005 at 08:10
FANTASTIC.

Listen to Barriemore Barlow's drumming, Barres guitar riff's and solos and of course Anderson's individual voice!!!!

Back to Top
DolphinFan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 05 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 143
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 02 2005 at 10:26
Originally posted by nousommedusolei nousommedusolei wrote:

The Minstrel in the Gallery looked down upon the smiling (and disgusted, pissed off) faces. Most people I know either love this album or think it's garbage.

I enjoy it. What do you think?

Where's the hate?  Even members at this site can't find too much to criticize. Hard to pick on a great album.

Back to Top
Eetu Pellonpaa View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 17 2005
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 4828
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 05 2005 at 09:00

I have heard this few years ago, and I remember it was OK. Didn't it have somewhere flute played in a way, which resembled the mystic flutesequence in Rufus Zuphall's "Weiss der Teufel"?

Back to Top
Meng View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: June 29 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 14
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 05 2005 at 14:01
I'm in the "love it" group.

The title track is probably my favourite Tull song.
Back to Top
kingofbizzare View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 09 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 520
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 06 2005 at 00:09
I love it, but I really don't listen to it too much. I actually find it too boring to listen to it all the way through very often. Usually I just listen to the title track, Cold Wind to Valhalla, and Baker Street Muse. I think the acoustic stuff is great, but it just makes me want to fall asleep when I listen to all of it at once.
Back to Top
Trotsky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 25 2004
Location: Malaysia
Status: Offline
Points: 2771
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 06 2005 at 02:41

I like it, and think the title track's awesome, but actually prefer the first six JT albums!

Also, am I the only one who was disappointed by what Cold Wind To Valhalla became after that amazing first minute or so with just acoustic guitar and vocals?

"Death to Utopia! Death to faith! Death to love! Death to hope?" thunders the 20th century. "Surrender, you pathetic dreamer.”

"No" replies the unhumbled optimist "You are only the present."
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Forum Guest Group
Forum Guest Group
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 07 2005 at 23:21
not tull best but a good album for the tull collection!!!! better than 80's and 90's tull albums which i find them extremely boring i stop listening to tull scene their 80's stuff and move to bands like ozric tentacles, porcupine, thaeter,tool,cairo,flower king, but i nver stop listening to king crimson,rush,pink floyd.
Back to Top
moonlapse View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 15 2005
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 464
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 09 2005 at 23:43
Originally posted by Salmacis72 Salmacis72 wrote:

WHO thinks its garbage? It is an excellent Tull album, I love the whole thing.



Just bought Minstrel today, think it's great. Have to follow up with TAAB.

Well, if you wonder who thinks it garbage, check out some of the amazon.com reviews.  Here's an <interesting> quote from a 2-star review:

["Requiem"'s first phrase ("Well, I saw a bird today/Flying from a bush/Then the wind blew it away") is in the key of Bb, starting on the subdominant (Eb major) and ending on the dominant (F major). Its second phrase ("And the black-eyed mother sun/ Scorched the butterfly at play/Velvet-veined, I saw it burn") repeats precisely the same music a major second higher. Strictly speaking, the movement from the prominent Eb's in the first phrase (the C minor and Eb major triads and the Eb's in the vocal line, on "wind", for example) to the E-natural in the vocal line on "eyed" is not a false relation because the F major triad intervenes. It nevertheless has the effect of one. This harsh and superfluous key change (notice I don't call it a modulation) is nevertheless cacophonous and unmusical. I don't expect its author to have analyzed why (necessarily), but I do expect to him to LISTEN to the effect, recognize that it's there, and do something about it. Clearly, he was not listening, and this failure to listen pervades the entire album.]

Ah, so that's why Minstrel is garbage!


Back to Top
The Hemulen View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 31 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 5964
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2005 at 15:36
Originally posted by moonlapse moonlapse wrote:

Originally posted by Salmacis72 Salmacis72 wrote:

WHO thinks its garbage? It is an excellent Tull album, I love the whole thing.



Just bought Minstrel today, think it's great. Have to follow up with TAAB.

Well, if you wonder who thinks it garbage, check out some of the amazon.com reviews.  Here's an <interesting> quote from a 2-star review:

["Requiem"'s first phrase ("Well, I saw a bird today/Flying from a bush/Then the wind blew it away") is in the key of Bb, starting on the subdominant (Eb major) and ending on the dominant (F major). Its second phrase ("And the black-eyed mother sun/ Scorched the butterfly at play/Velvet-veined, I saw it burn") repeats precisely the same music a major second higher. Strictly speaking, the movement from the prominent Eb's in the first phrase (the C minor and Eb major triads and the Eb's in the vocal line, on "wind", for example) to the E-natural in the vocal line on "eyed" is not a false relation because the F major triad intervenes. It nevertheless has the effect of one. This harsh and superfluous key change (notice I don't call it a modulation) is nevertheless cacophonous and unmusical. I don't expect its author to have analyzed why (necessarily), but I do expect to him to LISTEN to the effect, recognize that it's there, and do something about it. Clearly, he was not listening, and this failure to listen pervades the entire album.]

Ah, so that's why Minstrel is garbage!




Christ. Now, I'm not a violent man, but the author of that review deserves to have his life terminated in an excruciating fashion over a period of several hours. That "review" is despicable!!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.466 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.