![]() |
In defense of Works |
Post Reply ![]() |
Author | ||
Nergdnur Ddot ![]() Forum Newbie ![]() ![]() Joined: February 25 2025 Location: The Many Status: Offline Points: 5 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 21 hours 55 minutes ago at 08:39 |
|
I genuinely think Piano Concerto No. 1 and Pirates are amazing songs. I don't get all the hate for this album. Is it because of the songs in-between?
|
||
![]() |
||
Rick1 ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: April 14 2020 Location: Loughborough UK Status: Offline Points: 2949 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
ELP tend to be knocked by the prog purists - I've got used to it over the decades. I was really excited when this album came out (I assume you are talking about Vol. 1) and agree with your selection. I found Lake's side the weakest but Palmer's The Enemy God and the reworking of Tank are outstanding and sounded great live. (So does 'Pirates'). My only moan is that they did not tour the UK when it came out and I had to wait many years until I saw them live.
|
||
![]() |
||
richardh ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: February 18 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 29545 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
For my money it's typical of most double albums of the decade. About 80% is great but that other 20% could be left off. Piano Concerto No 1 and Pirates are solid. Do I need a whole side of Lake/Sinfield songs (no!) and there are at least 2 tracks on Carl Palmer's side that are self indulgent nonsense. Fanfare For The Common Man could have been left off the album altogether (apparently Keith Emerson was of that opinion as it didn't really fit the orchestral remit but he was overruled by Atlantic records) although admittedly I love it. Works Vol's 1 and 2 could have been organised a little better maybe? I rate it about 3 stars out of 5 but even the best version is not as good as Trilogy or BSS imo.
|
||
![]() |
||
verslibre ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: July 01 2004 Location: CA Status: Offline Points: 18606 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Both volumes are worth having if you dig ELP.
|
||
![]() |
||
Hosydi ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: December 25 2024 Location: Rolling Hills Status: Offline Points: 803 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
It was evident that ELP had lost its inventiveness after Brain Salad Surgery and a tiring tour. They chose to have a double LP with each member contributing a side and the last side being a collaborative effort, instead of a one-disc album where they perform as a group. And the result of such a decision is probably the most terrible double-LP album in the history of the genre. Only Lake's material has some lovely moments as well as parts with him on the vocals on Pirates. Love Beach, despite its awful sleeve design, is a masterpiece album in comparison with Works.
|
||
![]() |
||
meAsoi ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: December 22 2024 Location: E.U, Status: Offline Points: 759 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I don't hate whoever made Emerson, Lake & Palmer make "Love Beach" due to contractual obligations, because if he hadn't, we would have had "Works Vol. 2" as the last ELP album. For me, "Love Beach" is a far better album than "Works Vol. 1" despite its ugly album cover because, in my opinion, "Love Beach" could be seen as a worthy late 70s compromise between beautiful progressive pop and first-class prog rock. On the other side, "Works Vol. 1" is a megalomaniacal double LP that failed in its basic idea of the solo escapades of the three. It only showcases a fact that Keith Emerson never reached the class of the finest classical composers.
|
||
![]() |
||
richardh ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: February 18 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 29545 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
There was a 3 year gap between BSS and Works so I don't think the World Tour of 1973/74 had much to do with it. They wanted to release 3 solo albums but the record company wouldn't allow it so they had to compromise. Carl Palmer had the most interesting material and along with his excellent Percussion concerto (composed by Joseph Horowitz) could have put out a strong legit solo album. Lake had a had a hit with his Xmas record and had some recognition as a solo artist but he wasn't prolific as far as writing songs go so a full album would have been tricky. Emerson was very much tied to the band but eventually put out some excellent solo albums in the 80's. One of the good things that came out of Works (more specifically the tour) was the link up with orchestral conductor Godfrey Salmon. Salmon helped with the arrangements of Inferno and Nighthawks. For Works Emerson had used John Mayer who was the leader of the London Philharmonic and who had also orchestrated the 1972 track Abaddons Bolero. He did a fine job imo. Works had a reason for existing and made some sense at least. Love Beach was poorly conceived and none of the excitement or inspiration that made the band what it was was there anymore. It's hard to take an album that includes A Taste Of My Love seriously. If it was meant ironically then we could have laughed but actually it was meant to be serious. Works is at least listenable and Fanfare For The Common Man was and still is a very unique sounding piece of music. That carried the last vestige of magic that once surrounded the band. Ultimately they were pretty much done by 1974 in terms of creative ideas and should have stopped then (yes I made this point on the other thread and it's still true).
Edited by richardh - 6 hours 60 minutes ago at 23:34 |
||
![]() |
||
richardh ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: February 18 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 29545 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Works Vol 2 would have been the natural end of the line. It contained remnants of the Works and BSS sessions so didn't hold together at all. Howerver it's a weird eclectric mix of music and is quite fun in a way and represented the goofy side of the band that people hate although I don't hate it. Re Love Beach, ''Compromise'' in music is rarely a good thing. Emerson was admittedly still writing symhonically and carried that through with his much better solo albums of the early 80's but it was still lacking the basic power of ELP. To this 16 year old at the time it just showed the band was nothing anymore and gave the music critics all the ammunition they needed to bury the band. I absolutely hate it for that. Their reputation and legacy took a massive hit. One of the most important bands in rock history reduced to half baked 'no balls' commercialism. ELP were never that.
|
||
![]() |
||
moshkito ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: January 04 2007 Location: Grok City Status: Offline Points: 18088 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Hi, All in all, I do not remember any "prog purists" in 1977 ... so I presume that those so named folks are folks that heard ELP some 10 to 20 years later, and by that time, they (likely) could not handle the differences and variety, as their tastes (fans) had already turned, and in the 1990's it was fashionable to start the trashing of a lot of the bands in the 1970's that ended up giving the name a spin, as "progressive". I would take a closer look at the folks that state such things, as I would imagine that they are mentioning some younger and current "fans", who prefer something else, that is not progressive, and leans towards formats and numbers, than it ever did as the music of a generation that actually MEANT SOMETHING to many folks. I agree that the whole orchestra thing was too much, but I'm not sure I would not want to try it and give it a go, something that even here we don't appreciate much ... even DT's album is not appreciated for the fantastic work they were able to put together with an orchestra, although I would like a bit less thrashing, and more orchestration, but that's another story. For me, and many "fans" at the time, folks like ELP were vital and important. They were rewriting the history of pop music, and showing themselves very capable composers of a lot of great music, with one important side of things here ... we look at it all as "songs" not music, and that means that anyone can trash things, and not respect it for the music that was created. We don't talk of Mozart and Beethoven as songs, and we will not do that in 50 more years with ELP, either! And maybe, just maybe, a lot of those "prog purists" will all be enchanted with something else ... that is an idea, not a reality. ELP were a "reality" ... not an idea like so many things these days, with pulp-like-fiction for ideas and concepts! |
||
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com |
||
![]() |
||
octopus-4 ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() RIO/Avant/Zeuhl,Neo & Post/Math Teams Joined: October 31 2006 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 14565 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I love Works. I agree about Piano Concerto and Pirates, but also the cover of Fanfare For The Common Man is great. 2 sides over 4 are 5 stars for me. Greg's side isn't that bad even if it doesn't stand up, but C'est la Vie is a great song. Palmer's side is the weakest, IMO. |
||
I stand with Roger Waters, I stand with Joan Baez, I stand with Victor Jara, I stand with Woody Guthrie. Music is revolution
|
||
![]() |
||
omphaloskepsis ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: October 19 2011 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 6810 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Works Vol I is my second most listened-to ELP album. I adore Lake's side. Hallowed Be Thy Name may be my favorite ELP song. C'est la Vie is divine.
I get why folks don't dig Works. I agree with Octopus-4. Palmer's side is the weakest.
|
||
![]() |
||
richardh ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: February 18 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 29545 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I enjoy Carl Palmer's side roping in Joe Walsh for LA Nights and a great Buddy Rich inspired work out for Food For Your Soul. I also like The Enemy God (Prokoviev is the best!) and the version of Tank with more Buddy Rich inspired madness. The 2 short tracks are pretty bad though and at least can easily be skipped. One interesting fact about the album is that it was played on all three BBC radio stations at the time (Radio 1 -pop/rock, Radio 2 - easy listening and Radio 3 - classical). That must be a very rare thing in itself.
|
||
![]() |
||
Psychedelic Paul ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: September 16 2019 Location: Nottingham, U.K Status: Online Points: 43533 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Works Vol. 1 has always been my favourite ELP album, although my opinion doesn't amount to much when I highly-rate the much-maligned Love Beach album too.
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
omphaloskepsis ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: October 19 2011 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 6810 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I enjoy Carl Palmer's side too. I agree with your mini-review. 
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
Rick1 ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: April 14 2020 Location: Loughborough UK Status: Offline Points: 2949 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Agreed - the post-modern irony of the cover of 'Love Beach' is also lost on most prog fans. Throbbing Gristle did something similar with '20 Jazz Funk Greats' atop Beachy Head.
|
||
![]() |
||
Octopus II ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: May 21 2023 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 12461 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I have always been a big fan of both Works albums.
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
Psychedelic Paul ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: September 16 2019 Location: Nottingham, U.K Status: Online Points: 43533 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I was hugely disappointed when I heard Throbbing Gristle's 20 Jazz Funk Greats for the first time recently, because I really was expecting to hear some Jazz Funk Greats, but instead, it turned out to be an unlistenable Avant Prog album.
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
richardh ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: February 18 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 29545 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
^
![]() |
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |