Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Question about George W Bush
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedQuestion about George W Bush

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 8>
Poll Question: Do you like what Mr. George W. Bush is doing?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
4 [2.05%]
7 [3.59%]
15 [7.69%]
43 [22.05%]
116 [59.49%]
10 [5.13%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
synthguy View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 25 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 225
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 26 2005 at 19:31
Originally posted by spectral spectral wrote:

^ not you personally, just the
actions of your govt!  Shame really, as I lived in the
States for a number of years and I like it over
there!

I love this place. Born here. Lived here all my life.
Hate the policies of my government. Totally disagree
with them. In a recent AP poll 53% of Americans
polled thought the "Iraq War" was a mistake.

I love that I can voice my opinion about it (sort of).
I wish more people would become involved.

If you don't vote you can't complain.
"My vote doesn't matter."
Bullsh*t.
But then again.... in Florida....all those years ago..
Where is she now?
Wearing feelings on our faces when our faces took a rest...
Back to Top
marktheshark View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 24 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1695
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 26 2005 at 19:33
Originally posted by synthguy synthguy wrote:

Gleam wrote:
"Your sweeping statements are as vacous as your
illusion that the British had remotely anything to do
with the U.S. winning WW2. At best, England was a
good launching pad for the U.S. to take the war to the
Germans. Englands role in WW2 after the U.S. entry
was ancillary at best."



That's an interesting statement. I suppose the
"Russians" contributions to the effort were "ancillary
at best." I just don't get it, I guess.



Spectral Wrote:
"The poll is a good indication of world public opinion
toward the US.  Face facts, the majority of the world
hate you."



I hope you don't mean me, personally.



The majority doesn't hate us. They're just jealous. There's a big difference between hate and envey. Many people don't think it's fair that we're now the lone superpower. The scale is now tipped in our favor. And they don't think that's right. The playing field should always be level.

Back to Top
synthguy View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 25 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 225
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 26 2005 at 19:51
The majority don't hate us?
Thank you for your expert assesment of the balance
of power on the world scene.
Wearing feelings on our faces when our faces took a rest...
Back to Top
marktheshark View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 24 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1695
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 26 2005 at 20:14
Originally posted by synthguy synthguy wrote:

The majority don't hate us?
Thank you for your expert assesment of the balance
of power on the world scene.


Go ahead, keep going. I'm all ears.
Back to Top
ldlanberg View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 18 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 249
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 27 2005 at 01:40

The Poll's question reads, "Do you like what Mr. George W. Bush is doing?". ( Bold is mine, obviously). BUT the choices which are laid out do not allow us to answer that question. I do not like most of what President Bush does, or, in some cases, fails to do. I strongly disagree with any form of paternalism, which Republicans are notorious for. We don't need a daddy, we need a friend in Office.

But, this is not to say that I don't like him. I've never met him. Why the eagerness to "hate" a person?

 

Back to Top
marktheshark View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 24 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1695
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 27 2005 at 01:49
If we had a "friend" in office, that would mean someone who wants to please everybody. And that usually means someone who is spineless and wishy-washy. And when you say paternalism, don't you mean leadership?
Back to Top
ldlanberg View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 18 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 249
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 27 2005 at 01:58

Well, leadership to me is just being a good example for others. 24 hours a day. Giving sound advice about what's good and what's harmful, etc. is part of it too. This thing about someone going on a kick about protecting us from a proverbial Big Bad Wolf is totally uncalled for. We are adults and can take care of ourselves. Or at the very least we are capable of making our own decisions on the most basic of everyday issues.

 



Edited by ldlanberg
Back to Top
marktheshark View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 24 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1695
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 27 2005 at 02:51
You don't think Al Queda is something we should be protected from?

Don't get me wrong. I'm may be a Republician but even I am not to thrilled with Bush either. One thing he's showed considerable lack of leadership in is our borders. He won't do anything on it so he can cater to the Hispanic voters. It's just matter of time 'til some wacko terrorist comes across armed to the teeth.
Back to Top
spectral View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 04 2005
Location: Vatican City State
Status: Offline
Points: 1422
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 27 2005 at 07:23

ldlanberg: "But, this is not to say that I don't like him. I've never met him. Why the eagerness to "hate" a person?"

I hate what he is doing.  His policies are divisive and dangerous.  I never met Hitler but I hate him.  I'm not comparing Bush to Hitler, but I'm judging the guy on his actions, not his personality orwhether he a thoroughly nice chap!

marktheshark: "The majority doesn't hate us. They're just jealous"

It is far from being jealously, it is quite simply hatred.  You are exacerbating tensions in the world and inciting violence through your own violence in Iraq.

marktheshark: "You don't think Al Queda is something we should be protected from?"

Do you really fear the al qaida threat?  Hasn't it been blown out of all proportion?  There was a newspaper article recently which said that the threat from eco-terrorists is far stronger than that of al qaida.

"...misty halos made visible by the spectral illumination of moonshine."
Back to Top
lynton samuel View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 10 2005
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 183
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 27 2005 at 09:09
i think this thread deserves my 100th post:
HE SUCKS!!!
[IMG]http://www.denness.net/rpi/u/arners/bc/FFFFFF/bg/FFFFFF/bg1/FFFFFF/bg2/FFFFFF/ac/CC00CC/tc/ff9933/dc/CC00CC/nc/CC00CC/tic/CC00CC/rpi.png">
Back to Top
marktheshark View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 24 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1695
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 27 2005 at 09:46
Originally posted by spectral spectral wrote:

<SPAN =bold>ldlanberg: "</SPAN>But, this is not to say that I don't like him. I've never met him. Why the eagerness to "hate" a person?"


I hate what he is doing.  His policies are divisive and dangerous.  I never met Hitler but I hate him.  I'm not comparing Bush to Hitler, but I'm judging the guy on his actions, not his personality orwhether he a thoroughly nice chap!


<SPAN =bold>marktheshark: "The majority doesn't hate us. They're just jealous"</SPAN>


<SPAN =bold></SPAN>It is far from being jealously, it is quite simply hatred.  You are exacerbating tensions in the world and inciting violence through your own violence in Iraq.


<SPAN =bold>marktheshark: "Y</SPAN>ou don't think Al Queda is something we should be protected from?"


<SPAN =bold></SPAN>Do you really fear the al qaida threat?  Hasn't it been blown out of all proportion?  There was a newspaper article recently which said that the threat from eco-terrorists is far stronger than that of al qaida.



If we're so hated. Then why are people from all over the world dying to get here?

As for the violence. Ours is a world governed by the agressive use of force. Sad but true. It would be nice if we could all hold hands and sing "We Are The World" but that utopian dream is just what it is, a dream. Sorry. I'm not to keen on what's going on in Iraq either, especially when we had some unfinished business in Afganistan. But what's done is done. We just can't walk out with our tails between our legs. Some of you might hate me for saying this, but the only way to end what's going on in Iraq is give the people in the Sudanese triangle 72 hours notice to evacuate and bomb the hell out of it. Knock out every arsenal using infrareds. When done, then let the Iraq security forces take over. If we just simply walk out, we'll never hear the end of it.

When the first bombing of the WTC happened, Clinton did nothing. When the embassies in Africa were bombed, again nothing. When the USS Cole was hit (which a Navy buddy of mine was on, but wasn't killed) Clinton did nothing again. Then what happened?
Back to Top
spectral View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 04 2005
Location: Vatican City State
Status: Offline
Points: 1422
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 27 2005 at 15:02

So why attack Iraq?  What does that have to do with 9/11? 

No one is perfect, especially people in the public eye, but Bush is a terrible leader.

As for bombing the hell out of the region - yep, that will solve the problem!!! NOT!  I agree that you can't just leave Iraq, but you shouldn't have been there in the first place. 

It's a tough situation, I just hope Bush and the US Administration learn from Iraq.

"...misty halos made visible by the spectral illumination of moonshine."
Back to Top
synthguy View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 25 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 225
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 27 2005 at 15:11
Originally posted by marktheshark marktheshark wrote:

Originally posted by synthguy synthguy wrote:

The
majority don't hate us?
Thank you for your expert assesment of the balance
of power on the world scene.


Go ahead, keep going. I'm all ears.


What can I say, you got me. I'm no expert.
I was a little..err.."angry"... when I made that remark.
Peace.
Wearing feelings on our faces when our faces took a rest...
Back to Top
marktheshark View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 24 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1695
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 27 2005 at 16:23
Originally posted by spectral spectral wrote:

So why attack Iraq?  What does that have to do with 9/11? 


No one is perfect, especially people in the public eye, but Bush is a terrible leader.


As for bombing the hell out of the region - yep, that will solve the problem!!! NOT!  I agree that you can't just leave Iraq, but you shouldn't have been there in the first place. 


It's a tough situation, I just hope Bush and the US Administration learn from Iraq.



Let's not forget Spec, you're in the same boat as we. Tony went right along with us. And why? Simple, bad intelligence. Ours, yours and the Ruskies on those WMDs. Also there was subsantial evidence that Sadam was harboring Al Queda members. I still think Georgie did jump the gun on Iraq when we still needed to get Bin Laden.

All we can do is ride this out and hopefully get our boys back home so they can go back to listening prog music.

Back to Top
spectral View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 04 2005
Location: Vatican City State
Status: Offline
Points: 1422
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 27 2005 at 16:59

^ Blair is as bad as Bush, you're totally right.  I'm Irish though, I only live here, but I despise the politics.  I'm sure Blair thought it would help raise his profile if the UK joined up to the war.  It's good that it backfired, but the guy is still in Downing Street, just like Bush is still in the White House.  It's only due to weak and non-existent opposition to the respective govt's that they're both still there.

Get prog out to the middle east - that will help the peace process!!

"...misty halos made visible by the spectral illumination of moonshine."
Back to Top
Borealis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 06 2005
Location: Neutral Zone
Status: Offline
Points: 599
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 27 2005 at 17:04

Originally posted by marktheshark marktheshark wrote:


The majority doesn't hate us. They're just jealous. There's a big difference between hate and envey. Many people don't think it's fair that we're now the lone superpower. The scale is now tipped in our favor. And they don't think that's right. The playing field should always be level.

Vive le Québec libre!...
Back to Top
nacho View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 18 2004
Location: Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 521
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 27 2005 at 17:38

Originally posted by marktheshark marktheshark wrote:


Also there was subsantial evidence that Sadam was harboring Al Queda members.

That's a really interesting remark. Is it based on some positive data or on Fox news? Can you please elaborate on that information? I'd love to understand how a completely secular government could be harboring religious fundamentalist terrorists...

 

Eppur si muove
Back to Top
spectral View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 04 2005
Location: Vatican City State
Status: Offline
Points: 1422
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 27 2005 at 17:53
^good point nacho.  The propaganda machine was working in overdrive prior to the invasion.  In the UK Blair said in the house of commons that Iraq could attack the UK with nuclear weapons in under 40 minutes (something along those lines anyway).  As expected, the claims proved to be unfounded...even dismissed by intelligence forces prior to Blair giving the statement.
"...misty halos made visible by the spectral illumination of moonshine."
Back to Top
marktheshark View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 24 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1695
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 27 2005 at 18:12
Originally posted by nacho nacho wrote:

Originally posted by marktheshark marktheshark wrote:

Also there was subsantial evidence that Sadam was harboring Al Queda members.


That's a really interesting remark. Is it based on some positive data or on Fox news? Can you please elaborate on that information? I'd love to understand how a completely secular government could be harboring religious fundamentalist terrorists...


 



Well, look at the insurgents we're fighting now. If they're not fundamentalist extremists, what are they? Their leader (what's name, I can't remember) came across the Syrian border a few years back and was treated with a broken leg in Saddam's palace.

If you all are wondering about my background on these type of things, my dad was a 30 yr CIA official, I was in the Navy for 5 years and worked as a civilian at International Affairs Research Div at the Pentagon for 5 years. I got out the whole gov thing, not enough money and too much BS. Maybe I'm not a real expert but I would say I'm somewhat knowledgable on this. Oh, and yes I do watch the Fox News Channel.

Back to Top
nacho View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 18 2004
Location: Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 521
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 27 2005 at 18:33

Originally posted by marktheshark marktheshark wrote:


Well, look at the insurgents we're fighting now. If they're not fundamentalist extremists, what are they? Their leader (what's name, I can't remember) came across the Syrian border a few years back and was treated with a broken leg in Saddam's palace.

If you all are wondering about my background on these type of things, my dad was a 30 yr CIA official, I was in the Navy for 5 years and worked as a civilian at International Affairs Research Div at the Pentagon for 5 years. I got out the whole gov thing, not enough money and too much BS. Maybe I'm not a real expert but I would say I'm somewhat knowledgable on this. Oh, and yes I do watch the Fox News Channel.

I've had too many discussions on the Iraq thing, so I prefer to back off. I'd only like to recommend you (all, but especially Fox-watching people) to read carefully this inform:

http://www.americanassembler.com/issues/media/docs/Media_10_ 02_03_Report.pdf

 

Eppur si muove
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 8>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.164 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.