Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - How important are lyrics to you?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

How important are lyrics to you?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123
Poll Question: What is your preference?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
20 [22.73%]
12 [13.64%]
8 [9.09%]
4 [4.55%]
17 [19.32%]
27 [30.68%]
You can not vote in this poll

Author
Message
Lieutenant_Lan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 20 2021
Location: North Carolina
Status: Offline
Points: 365
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Lieutenant_Lan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 15 2021 at 08:43
I prefer good lyrics in my native language with a good vocalist, But I can find enjoyment in the other options.
Back to Top
Hrychu View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 03 2013
Location: poland?
Status: Offline
Points: 5310
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Hrychu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Yesterday at 03:09
Originally posted by Grumpyprogfan Grumpyprogfan wrote:

The music comes first.
Unless the lyrics support an ideology you don't agree with. ;) Kind of hypocritical imho.

Originally posted by Grumpyprogfan Grumpyprogfan wrote:

And that's okay for some, but I find it tiresome with Neal's solo work specifically because of the lyrics. Once again he sings about his imaginary friend, and it is especially cringey on "Ever Interceding"

This is just an example of my hypothesis that cringeworthy lyrics are a kind of litmus test by which you can tell if those who boldly claim that they don't care about the lyrics, really mean it or it's just an empty slogan.

Anyway, I think this poll needs an option that says "any language that I can understand".

Edited by Hrychu - Yesterday at 03:18
“On the day of my creation, I fell in love with education. And overcoming all frustration, a teacher I became.”
— Ernest Vong
Back to Top
octopus-4 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
RIO/Avant/Zeuhl,Neo & Post/Math Teams

Joined: October 31 2006
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 13976
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote octopus-4 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Yesterday at 05:09
Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

My parents were ultra left leaning liberals who loved left wing folkies like Woody Guthrie and Pete Seeger. So I picked up an appreciation of the genre quite young, which was transferred to 60s folkies like Phil Ochs and Dylan. The lyrics of that era's protest music was especially important to me, so that carried over to some prog  groups like the Strawbs and Renaissance, which dealt with some social issues, as well as telling good stories. It also made listening to the babbling of Jon Anderson quite a challenge at times. While I enjoy many prog artists for just their musical abilities, the better lyrical artists have a special place in my level of appreciation.

Same for me. If both lyrics and music are good it's better, but with great lyrics I can even give up to great music. Leonard Cohen and Woody Guthrie are good examples.
I stand with Roger Waters, I stand with Joan Baez, I stand with Victor Jara, I stand with Woody Guthrie. Music is revolution
Back to Top
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17444
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote moshkito Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Yesterday at 05:15
Hi,

Coming from a literary house ... is extremely different, and difficult. I don't look at "lyrics" as any more important than the rest, and I have been a listener to a lot of opera for many years before this discussion.

The "meanings" are tough ... since the expressions are not universal, and the different languages all over the world have a tendency to interpret things their way, not in a way that we all would "get" and "understand" ... and this is something that the Internet has helped a lot when it comes to "progressive or progrock" music all over the world ... and all of a sudden our discussion is about how we relate to it all ... 

The conventional theory for many years, is that the music illustrated the words, and this could be seen in many operas for a long time, and when radio came along for everyone (after WW2 for sure! But was there in the 1930's), the idea that the music illustrated the words, kinda took a beating and changed. Music became just a song, and a few years later the new scene that helped create the 1960's and eventually gave in to "progressive" from "art rock", was all about NEW EXPRESSIONS with a new emphasis on new ways of showing and presenting the music, which had a lot more classical ideas in it, than what it was to eventually become, which was just another song and no connections to anything but itself.

The hard part, and we learned that in theater and film from the 1960's on, the words and the music were not in sync, the way we thought they should be, and a lot of different scenes, made a point of using that contrast to a very far and away idea or concept for our minds. But, today, the words and the music are NOT, NECESSARILY, in sync with each other and I am not sure why ... since it is possible that there is a disconnect with today's music ... when it comes to music history ... somehow, for me, just "songs" are not as meaningful, with any lyrics ... as a lot of stuff was for a long time.

"Lyrics" are not sacred; thus, they are not any more important than the rest of the piece they are a part of ... but we always studied a lot of poetry way back in school (gaddd ... do they have schools today???) .... and somehow, we were made to believe that Prufrock was more important than Bob Dylan, and Neal Morse ... and now we have a problem ... how do we interpret and look at the more modern poetry in terms of "lyrics" ... are lyrics a poem? Is a poem a bunch of "lyrics" ... 

And things get confusing!

The idea, these days, is to smash the thoughts and designs that have been there for years ... I'm quite OK with that, and sometimes, you get surprised, when what you hear goes everywhere ... and doesn't stop ... and you get up from the couch sweating and wondering ... what is that all about? 

AND, sometimes, you think that the lyrics are the answer ... don't get fooled again! It's just another instrument in the grouping of things.
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
David_D View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 15019
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote David_D Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Yesterday at 09:45

I like a lot of instrumental music, the vocal style is very important to me, lyrics can be very giving.
                      quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Back to Top
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17444
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote moshkito Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 hours 50 minutes ago at 08:04
Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

My parents0 were ultra left leaning liberals who loved left wing folkies like Woody Guthrie and Pete Seeger. So, I picked up an appreciation of the genre quite young, which was transferred to 60s folkies like Phil Ochs and Dylan. The lyrics of that era's protest music was especially important to me, so that carried over to some prog groups like the Strawbs and Renaissance, which dealt with some social issues, as well as telling good stories. It also made listening to the babbling of Jon Anderson quite a challenge at times. While I enjoy many prog artists for just their musical abilities, the better lyrical artists have a special place in my level of appreciation.

Hi,

I like this ... though I can't exactly say that this is my motto ... I can handle Jon as well as I can T. S. Eliot and what seems like a run-on sentence/comment, takes on a different meaning later, or adds to a completely different suggestion and thought.

At one time, NOT EVERYTHING was known and posted, and the likes of academia was able to define what might be good, or bad, and in general we all accepted that since we didn't know any better. Fly on 50 years later, and the Internet brings you everything, and now lyrics are making poetry look bad ... and we don't know, or care to find a difference, or how we really feel about it all, except one thing ... most folks go for their only knowing ... I suppose ... which is their favorite. Now, it is when I sit back and wonder how Ian Anderson stands next to some well-known poets ... I like Ian's lyrics, but I am not sure I ever thought of them as poetry at all. And all of a sudden, Ian is a step down on my mind based on what I have read and learned ... in my years at University, I was still doing a lot of literature, even as a Director in the Theater Department ... I made sure I took all 6 of the classes of theater literature ... even if only for basic knowledge, and for me ... appreciation, because I can see the history of theater in a lot of those books ...

But I think, wonder, if rock's history has gone too fast, and it has not had the time to make a solid statement beyond the obvious sales that define this band or that band as the best or the one with the most ... which is a bad idea that tends to dismantle any thought of discussion of its content.

Lyrics, I suppose, are just as important as the rest of the work ... since we know, sadly enough, that there are some outstanding words that have been ignored and left behind, because we did not care for the band.

I can only hope that this whole thing grows past the fame part of it, so the material can be studied correctly and evaluated, not to suggest that one is better than the other, but to give us a better idea of what the band is really about. In this sense, I do not find Jon Anderson, bad, but I think that he has gotten way too full of himself in order to be more honest and caring about his words, but his comments about fans telling him what things meant, are sad, and sometimes done in really poor taste, even if he is tired of folks doing that to him.

In the end, the "lyrics" are supposed to be a part of the whole thing ... so specifying that they are important or not, is almost the same as suggesting that the rest is not as good, or better ... and at that point this discussion will suffer, and not get anywhere.

Lastly, the different languages often bring about some translations that are just horrendous, and IO can point this to a lot of my own dad's translations of various works, including poetry, when some of these are just insane and out of it in my book , but because they were done by someone with 100 degrees of education, they are supposed to be "valid" translations and then accepted as the "it" ... and I have to tell you that I have even had a stomach ache, for my older sister's translations ... she translated a small play I directed by dad (The Death of the Pope) and I had to change half the stuff so it could be used and said on stage ... it was on the literal side of things, but it was impossible to understand and get anywhere with it! 

I find the same thing similarly in translations from Italian and French and Spanish, and it is one of the main reasons why I do not purchase the translated albums. Some things come out OK, but they are not great ... Peter Hammill did the translation of Felona and Serona if I remember correctly, however, in my ears it did not sing smoothly as the Italian did ... that's not a surprise at all ... and likely one of the reasons why sometimes we don't end up enjoying something or other.
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
Grumpyprogfan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 09 2019
Location: Kansas City
Status: Offline
Points: 11491
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Grumpyprogfan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 9 hours 28 minutes ago at 10:26
Originally posted by Hrychu Hrychu wrote:

Originally posted by Grumpyprogfan Grumpyprogfan wrote:

The music comes first.
Unless the lyrics support an ideology you don't agree with. ;) Kind of hypocritical imho.

Originally posted by Grumpyprogfan Grumpyprogfan wrote:

And that's okay for some, but I find it tiresome with Neal's solo work specifically because of the lyrics. Once again he sings about his imaginary friend, and it is especially cringey on "Ever Interceding"

This is just an example of my hypothesis that cringeworthy lyrics are a kind of litmus test by which you can tell if those who boldly claim that they don't care about the lyrics, really mean it or it's just an empty slogan.

Anyway, I think this poll needs an option that says "any language that I can understand".
I don't care about what anyone sings about, but when they sing about the same thing endlessly it is tiresome. What if all lyrics to every Pink Floyd song was about a Bike? Would you still enjoy the music?

If you continue to write similar songs with similar words it might be an exception to this question. Most lyrics are written after the music. So the music is more important.

Edited by Grumpyprogfan - 9 hours 24 minutes ago at 10:30
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.125 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.