"Democracy is Teetering" |
Post Reply | Page <1 7891011 21> |
Author | |||
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21136 |
Posted: March 30 2024 at 16:54 | ||
A conspiracy theorist is someone who believes that certain events might be the result of ... conspiracies. How does that require to "know everything"?
|
|||
Hugh Manatee
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 07 2021 Location: The Barricades Status: Offline Points: 1587 |
Posted: March 30 2024 at 19:39 | ||
Well you see now we come up against conspiracy theories versus actual conspiracies.
Humans are pattern seekers and storytellers. Add imagination and anything becomes possible. |
|||
I should have been a pair of ragged claws
Scuttling across the floors of uncertain seas |
|||
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21136 |
Posted: March 31 2024 at 05:25 | ||
^ What’s the difference? What would be typical examples?
|
|||
omphaloskepsis
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 19 2011 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 6339 |
Posted: March 31 2024 at 05:39 | ||
The CIA infiltrating mainstream media was a conspiracy theory that was/is proven to be true. In 1975, Church Committee Congressional investigations revealed CIA connections with journalists and civic groups. Today the media does not even hide it. The mainstream media companies regularly hire "ex" CIA operatives. The accusation that the Apollo moon landings were faked continues to be a conspiracy theory that has not been proven. Hugh Manatee's argument is not an argument. Humans are indeed storytellers and they recognize patterns. But that's not an argument. Suppose we are discussing the chemical reaction of iron-oxidizing. I could state the fact that a molecule of iron has more atoms than a molecule of oxygen. I haven't added anything of value to the discussion of iron-oxidizing. Edited by omphaloskepsis - March 31 2024 at 06:06 |
|||
The Dark Elf
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: February 01 2011 Location: Michigan Status: Online Points: 13053 |
Posted: March 31 2024 at 08:33 | ||
Many imbeciles still think the world is flat, and yet they still have not fallen off the side. Which, of course, would be my preferred method for their demise. As far as the moon-landing conspiracy, it is appropriate that the term "lunacy" refers to a state of insanity.
|
|||
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology... |
|||
SteveG
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 11 2014 Location: Kyiv In Spirit Status: Offline Points: 20604 |
Posted: April 01 2024 at 12:18 | ||
The incredible thing about conspiracy theorists is that they will hold fast to one plausible argument for their theory while ignoring 99 plausible counter arguments, which are generally referred to as a the truth.
|
|||
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
|
|||
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21136 |
Posted: April 01 2024 at 15:12 | ||
^ So conspiracy theorists are always wrong?
|
|||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Online Points: 65246 |
Posted: April 01 2024 at 16:23 | ||
^ No, conspiracy theorists are attracted to the plausibility of a conspiracy. Nothing wrong with that any more than being attracted to the non-conspiracy narrative. What's important is knowing what things are conspiracy and what aren't. No easy task.
|
|||
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
|||
MortSahlFan
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 01 2018 Location: US Status: Offline Points: 2932 |
Posted: April 01 2024 at 18:16 | ||
I can't believe it's THAT many; it's probably just amplified. Many who say they do might not believe it in actuality. I also think some say it just to get attention. The problem are their followers. Unfortunately, more people should just re-state the atrocities their own governments admit to.
|
|||
https://www.youtube.com/c/LoyalOpposition
https://www.scribd.com/document/382737647/MortSahlFan-Song-List |
|||
Hugh Manatee
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 07 2021 Location: The Barricades Status: Offline Points: 1587 |
Posted: April 01 2024 at 19:29 | ||
"Conspiracy theories are ultimately not about conspiracies; they are about our fear of chaos. Their focus often overlaps with actual conspiracies; but their function is not about understanding the mechanisms of actual conspiracies, but instead working as explanatory narratives for the unpredictable nature of modern life.
... If we can convince ourselves that the problem is an external organization conspiring to frustrate democracy, we can convince ourselves that the system itself isn't broken." UNDER THE EYE OF POWER: How fear of secret societies shapes American democracy. Colin Dickey |
|||
I should have been a pair of ragged claws
Scuttling across the floors of uncertain seas |
|||
Hugh Manatee
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 07 2021 Location: The Barricades Status: Offline Points: 1587 |
Posted: April 01 2024 at 19:48 | ||
It could be posited that people in general believed that their government was working in their interests in a somewhat transparent fashion, however since the revelations of MKUltra, the Iran/ Contra affair and other covert government operations, trust has been diminished to the extent that all bets are off. Now people create their own narratives, supported and enabled by others through social media, creating an echo chamber that allows no opposing point of view to penetrate. This has a built-in defence mechanism whereby anyone who expresses an opposing view is perceived as part of the cover up. The real fight is not about good vs. evil, rather it is a fight between information and disinformation, and just as good and evil can blur into each other, so to can information and disinformation until it becomes very difficult to ascertain the difference. This for me is the smokescreen that has been created which allows all kinds of things to proliferate on the boundaries of truth. |
|||
I should have been a pair of ragged claws
Scuttling across the floors of uncertain seas |
|||
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21136 |
Posted: April 02 2024 at 02:41 | ||
So conspiracy theorists are sometimes right, and sometimes wrong? That was kind of my point, since it was suggested that they're never right.
|
|||
I prophesy disaster
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 31 2017 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 4776 |
Posted: April 02 2024 at 04:10 | ||
But anyone can create a conspiracy theory, and indeed a few years ago, Peter McIndoe created a satirical conspiracy theory "on a whim" called "Birds Aren't Real", which posits that birds are actually drones operated by the United States government to spy on American citizens. Thus, although a conspiracy theory is not necessarily false, the vast majority probably are and usually too ridiculous to seriously entertain. |
|||
No, I know how to behave in the restaurant now, I don't tear at the meat with my hands. If I've become a man of the world somehow, that's not necessarily to say I'm a worldly man.
|
|||
omphaloskepsis
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 19 2011 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 6339 |
Posted: April 02 2024 at 04:59 | ||
^ Exactly. Some conspiracy theories become conspiracy facts. Some conspiracy theories are wrong. The term "conspiracy theory" causes some folks' eyes to glaze over as they automatically disregard the theory. That's the power of the term itself.
|
|||
SteveG
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 11 2014 Location: Kyiv In Spirit Status: Offline Points: 20604 |
Posted: April 02 2024 at 05:58 | ||
Edited by SteveG - April 02 2024 at 06:01 |
|||
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
|
|||
moshkito
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 04 2007 Location: Grok City Status: Offline Points: 17497 |
Posted: April 02 2024 at 06:47 | ||
Hi, ... regardless of the fact that it could be wrong ... but for those folks it's right and the rest is wrong! It gets kinda ridiculous and American politics is turning into this kind of game, and it won't stop ... instead of worrying about the guy being right or wrong, he could be voted down .,... instead you get folks complaining about ... anything ... and on top of it, not voting! Recent poll here in the State of Wa, less than 40% of folks went to the polls ... thus the thought and idea of how the state and its folks really look like, is impossible to determine ... and the cynicism continues with more complaints! ... and folks intentionally finding arguments that ... are worse than them crying for the chocolate kiss they didn't get!
Edited by moshkito - April 02 2024 at 06:49 |
|||
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com |
|||
Archisorcerus
Forum Senior Member Joined: February 02 2022 Location: Izmir Status: Offline Points: 2666 |
Posted: April 02 2024 at 07:30 | ||
|
|||
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21136 |
Posted: April 02 2024 at 08:02 | ||
In your scenario I would also assume the conspiracy theory is wrong. But the actual "pertinent question" is what the pros and cons look like for each individual conspiracy theory.
|
|||
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21136 |
Posted: April 02 2024 at 08:08 | ||
Yes - if a particular conspiracy theory makes specific predictions that can be verified now or in the future, they can (then) be categorised as true or false. But often they are worded in a very generic way that makes them impossible to verify. There's also conspiracy theories about past events ... those are impossible to verify (or falsify) in a scientific sense. For example, the theory that the moon landings were fake is most likely false, but there is no experiment that we can perform now or in the future which will help us decide, there is only historic data.
|
|||
SteveG
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 11 2014 Location: Kyiv In Spirit Status: Offline Points: 20604 |
Posted: April 02 2024 at 10:08 | ||
Edited by SteveG - April 02 2024 at 10:17 |
|||
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
|
|||
Post Reply | Page <1 7891011 21> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |