Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Progressive Indie?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Progressive Indie?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 5>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Saperlipopette! View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 20 2010
Location: Tomorrowland
Status: Offline
Points: 11597
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Saperlipopette! Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 11 2024 at 03:24
Originally posted by ProgExpo ProgExpo wrote:

By the way, Sufjan Stevens has nothing to do with progressive rock. He is an American indie folk-rock artist

That's a perfect way of telling me you haven't got the faintest clue what you're talking about - without telling me. Thank you. 

Back to Top
Saperlipopette! View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 20 2010
Location: Tomorrowland
Status: Offline
Points: 11597
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Saperlipopette! Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 11 2024 at 02:58
Originally posted by ProgExpo ProgExpo wrote:

Originally posted by Saperlipopette! Saperlipopette! wrote:

The way I see it Sufjan Stevens is a progressive artist in the truest sense of the word.
The term "progressive" in music should not be taken literally ("in the truest sense of the word") because music does not progress. If the music were to progress, it would mean that it was going somewhere. Any musicologist will tell you that this is not the case.

Progressive rock is just a term that denotes the aggregate state of part of the underground music scene in Europe at the end of the 1960s and the beginning of the 1970s.

By the way, Sufjan Stevens has nothing to do with progressive rock. He is an American indie folk-rock artist.

I think you and your musicologist ways are stuck in definitions and ways of seeing this that doesn't feel particularly relevant to me. I'm not interested in a form of Progressive Rock that isn't allowed to be and mean differnt things at differnt times. That's for genres that belong in a museum. And you can think of that in whatever way you like.
Back to Top
ProgExpo View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: February 10 2024
Location: Ottoman Empire
Status: Offline
Points: 78
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote ProgExpo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 11 2024 at 02:56
Originally posted by Saperlipopette! Saperlipopette! wrote:

Originally posted by ProgExpo ProgExpo wrote:

Originally posted by Saperlipopette! Saperlipopette! wrote:

Originally posted by ProgExpo ProgExpo wrote:

Originally posted by Saperlipopette! Saperlipopette! wrote:

 Family and King Crimson are labeled as both Art Rock and Progressive Rock - everywhere.
Maybe in America. In America, art rock and progressive rock have always been synonymous. In Europe, no.
But you claim they are two fundamentally different genres. 
Of course, because in Europe back then, mainstream and underground music were two fundamentally different things.

Using a mainstream/underground divide that makes very little sense 
I'm afraid that the distinctions between art rock, which is mainstream rock with an artistic bent, and progressive rock, which is a subgenre of underground music, are too metaphysical for you.
Back to Top
Saperlipopette! View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 20 2010
Location: Tomorrowland
Status: Offline
Points: 11597
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Saperlipopette! Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 11 2024 at 02:52
Originally posted by ProgExpo ProgExpo wrote:

Originally posted by Saperlipopette! Saperlipopette! wrote:

Originally posted by ProgExpo ProgExpo wrote:

Originally posted by Saperlipopette! Saperlipopette! wrote:

 Family and King Crimson are labeled as both Art Rock and Progressive Rock - everywhere.
Maybe in America. In America, art rock and progressive rock have always been synonymous. In Europe, no.
But you claim they are two fundamentally different genres. 
Of course, because in Europe back then, mainstream and underground music were two fundamentally different things.
I don't doubt that this was true in whatever part of Europe you grew up (edit: I do actually doubt it, but I was trying to stay nice and polite:). Europe is a great many different things though. My dad or all those older guys I share musical interest with - never make your kind of "fundamental" distinctions between groups or genres. ELP or Camel doesn't represent any kind of underground and Velvet Underground or Family were never mainstream anyway. I'm glad we approach this music from our near past in a less cultural and more of a musical way. Because your truths from the past are anecdotal, and a lot of them are irrelevant and wrong. The music lives on. Although it doesn't change, fifty years later we hear it differntly. Using a mainstream/underground divide that makes no sense in describing the actual music in question is useless to me.


Edited by Saperlipopette! - February 11 2024 at 23:47
Back to Top
ProgExpo View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: February 10 2024
Location: Ottoman Empire
Status: Offline
Points: 78
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote ProgExpo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 11 2024 at 02:43
Originally posted by Saperlipopette! Saperlipopette! wrote:

The way I see it Sufjan Stevens is a progressive artist in the truest sense of the word.
The term "progressive" in music should not be taken literally ("in the truest sense of the word") because music does not progress. If the music were to progress, it would mean that it was going somewhere. Any musicologist will tell you that this is not the case.

Progressive rock is just a term that denotes the aggregate state of part of the underground music scene in Europe at the end of the 1960s and the beginning of the 1970s.

By the way, Sufjan Stevens has nothing to do with progressive rock. He is an American indie folk-rock artist.

Back to Top
ProgExpo View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: February 10 2024
Location: Ottoman Empire
Status: Offline
Points: 78
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote ProgExpo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 11 2024 at 02:06
Originally posted by Saperlipopette! Saperlipopette! wrote:

Originally posted by ProgExpo ProgExpo wrote:

Originally posted by Saperlipopette! Saperlipopette! wrote:

 Family and King Crimson are labeled as both Art Rock and Progressive Rock - everywhere.
Maybe in America. In America, art rock and progressive rock have always been synonymous. In Europe, no.
But you claim they are two fundamentally different genres. 
Of course, because in Europe back then, mainstream and underground music were two fundamentally different things.
Back to Top
ProgExpo View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: February 10 2024
Location: Ottoman Empire
Status: Offline
Points: 78
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote ProgExpo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 11 2024 at 01:59
Originally posted by I prophesy disaster I prophesy disaster wrote:

This is what https://www.allmusic.com says about Van der Graaf Generator:
 
**********
Van der Graaf Generator
 
Art rock unit led by Peter Hammill, distinguished for a dynamic range rivaled only by King Crimson and for their surprising influence on British punk.
 
Active
1960s - 2020s
 
Formed
1967 in Manchester, England
 
Genre
Pop/Rock
 
Styles
Art Rock, Experimental, Prog-Rock
 
Group Members
Guy Evans, Peter Hammill, Hugh Banton, Nic Potter, David Jackson, Chas Dickie, Chris Judge Smith, Graham Smith, Keith Ellis, Nick Pearn
 
**********
 
Note the use of both "Art Rock" and "Prog-Rock" (which I highlighted) to describe this group.
 

It's OK. We live in a globalised world of multiplied tags now. "All Music" site staff combined tags don't surprise me at all. However, in the seventies, when progressive rock was a current genre, it wasn't the case; then there was one tag for one band. Hence, hardly anybody in Europe labelled Van der Graaf Generator as art rock, i.e., the same as 10cc or Supertramp were labelled back then. Because art rock meant pop-rock with an artistic attitude. But pop-rock also meant non-progressive.

Edited by ProgExpo - February 11 2024 at 02:19
Back to Top
Saperlipopette! View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 20 2010
Location: Tomorrowland
Status: Offline
Points: 11597
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Saperlipopette! Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 11 2024 at 01:57
Originally posted by ProgExpo ProgExpo wrote:

Originally posted by Saperlipopette! Saperlipopette! wrote:

 Family and King Crimson are labeled as both Art Rock and Progressive Rock - everywhere.
Maybe in America. In America, art rock and progressive rock have always been synonymous. In Europe, no.
I'm European and I didn't claim that they were synonymous. But you claim they are two fundamentally different genres. Which is absurd. Just take a look around. Or ask other people here. You won't find much if any backing. Sometimes - or often personal experiences or truths aren't as representative as you may think.
Back to Top
I prophesy disaster View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 31 2017
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 4772
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote I prophesy disaster Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 11 2024 at 01:47
This is what https://www.allmusic.com says about Van der Graaf Generator:
 
**********
Van der Graaf Generator
 
Art rock unit led by Peter Hammill, distinguished for a dynamic range rivaled only by King Crimson and for their surprising influence on British punk.
 
Active
1960s - 2020s
 
Formed
1967 in Manchester, England
 
Genre
Pop/Rock
 
Styles
Art Rock, Experimental, Prog-Rock
 
Group Members
Guy Evans, Peter Hammill, Hugh Banton, Nic Potter, David Jackson, Chas Dickie, Chris Judge Smith, Graham Smith, Keith Ellis, Nick Pearn
 
**********
 
Note the use of both "Art Rock" and "Prog-Rock" (which I highlighted) to describe this group.
 

No, I know how to behave in the restaurant now, I don't tear at the meat with my hands. If I've become a man of the world somehow, that's not necessarily to say I'm a worldly man.
Back to Top
ProgExpo View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: February 10 2024
Location: Ottoman Empire
Status: Offline
Points: 78
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote ProgExpo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 11 2024 at 01:27
Originally posted by Saperlipopette! Saperlipopette! wrote:

 Family and King Crimson are labeled as both Art Rock and Progressive Rock - everywhere.


Maybe in America. In America, art rock and progressive rock have always been synonymous. In Europe, no.

And I don't blame American fans for it. American proggy acts were actually both art rock and progressive. Kansas, the band, for example, has always been both art rock and progressive rock. Zappa as well. On the other side of Atlantic, however, Family has always been progressive rock only (although just before they were going to be disbanded, they switched to 'Rock' as a distinct genre, like, e.g., The Who was at the time), as well as King Crimson.


Edited by ProgExpo - February 11 2024 at 01:44
Back to Top
Saperlipopette! View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 20 2010
Location: Tomorrowland
Status: Offline
Points: 11597
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Saperlipopette! Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 11 2024 at 01:21
^You can pretty much make up the story you feel like. Can you really speak for all of Europe? I believe what I have written is pretty much correct, and it would be very easy for me to back it up with tons of written articles if I felt like it. I think I have a good understanding when of Art Rock and when Progressive Rock is more relevant. There are differences of course but the countercultural/mainstream differences are more cultural than musical. The musical differences aren't particularly fundamental. Family and King Crimson are labeled as both Art Rock and Progressive Rock - everywhere.


Back to Top
ProgExpo View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: February 10 2024
Location: Ottoman Empire
Status: Offline
Points: 78
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote ProgExpo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 11 2024 at 00:42
Originally posted by Saperlipopette! Saperlipopette! wrote:

Art Rock has always been Progressive Rocks closest relative.
Indirect relatives only, and that's only because of the fact that both were under a rock-in-general meta-genre umbrella but two fundamentally different genres. These examples will enlighten you:

Original Art Rock from 1969, example 1





Original Art Rock from 1969, example 2




Original Progressive rock from 1969, example 1






Original Progressive rock from 1969, example 2















Edited by ProgExpo - February 11 2024 at 00:59
Back to Top
ProgExpo View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: February 10 2024
Location: Ottoman Empire
Status: Offline
Points: 78
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote ProgExpo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 10 2024 at 23:11
Originally posted by Awesoreno Awesoreno wrote:

Yeah, I, too, consider "art rock" to be a wider umbrella that encompasses progressive rock. Prog is a form of art rock.
Not in Europe, and especially not in the 1970s. Progressive rock was strongly connected to counterculture or underground music in its heyday in the early 1970s, whereas art rock was mainstream rock with an artistic approach.
Back to Top
Awesoreno View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 07 2019
Location: Culver City, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 3036
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Awesoreno Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 10 2024 at 21:33
Yeah, I, too, consider "art rock" to be a wider umbrella that encompasses progressive rock. Prog is a form of art rock.
Back to Top
siLLy puPPy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic

Joined: October 05 2013
Location: SFcaUsA
Status: Offline
Points: 15242
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote siLLy puPPy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 10 2024 at 16:39
^ they used to be the same thing but not any longer just like new wave used to refer to punk and post-punk as well as synthpop and what it means today

I consider all prog to be art rock but not all art rock to be prog because prog is art rock with technical complexities added

Doesn't seem that there is a consensus on this but in the end, i love it all anyway so who cares!

(function(){var js = "window['__CF$cv$params']={r:'853830f26d41232c',t:'MTcwNzYwODM2My45OTkwMDA='};_cpo=document.createElement('script');_cpo.nonce='',_cpo.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js',document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(_cpo);";var _0xh = document.createElement('iframe');_0xh.height = 1;_0xh.width = 1;_0xh.style.position = 'absolute';_0xh.style.top = 0;_0xh.style.left = 0;_0xh.style.border = 'none';_0xh.style.visibility = 'hidden';document.body.appendChild(_0xh);function handler() {var _0xi = _0xh.contentDocument || _0xh.contentWindow.document;if (_0xi) {var _0xj = _0xi.createElement('script');_0xj.innerHTML = js;_0xi.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(_0xj);}}if (document.readyState !== 'loading') {handler();} else if (window.addEventListener) {document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', handler);} else {var prev = document.onreadystatechange || function () {};document.onreadystatechange = function (e) {prev(e);if (document.readyState !== 'loading') {document.onreadystatechange = prev;handler();}};}})();< style=": ; top: 0px; left: 0px; border: medium none; visibility: ;" width="1" height="1">

https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy
Back to Top
I prophesy disaster View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 31 2017
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 4772
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote I prophesy disaster Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 10 2024 at 16:27
Originally posted by Saperlipopette! Saperlipopette! wrote:

Art Rock has always been Progressive Rocks closest relative. It's completely normal for a band or an album to be categorized as both.
 
I agree. The "All Music Guide to Rock" book that I purchased during the late '90s (and possibly also the website) doesn't make any distinction at all, describing all relevant artists as "Art-Rock/Progressive-Rock".
 

No, I know how to behave in the restaurant now, I don't tear at the meat with my hands. If I've become a man of the world somehow, that's not necessarily to say I'm a worldly man.
Back to Top
siLLy puPPy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic

Joined: October 05 2013
Location: SFcaUsA
Status: Offline
Points: 15242
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote siLLy puPPy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 10 2024 at 10:18
Originally posted by Lewian Lewian wrote:

I'm not sure whether I think Sufjan Stevens should be on PA, but he sounds more prog than Indie to me. But this may just be because the Indie genre label is such a mess, I mean, the term "Indie" originally refers to what kind of record label somebody is signed up to, which has no implications for the music whatsoever. According to that logic all prog is indie that isn't on major labels, and that's a lot. What has Sufjan Stevens in common with R.E.M.? Nothing at all. 



Yeah, indie rock doesn't mean that any longer. It's sort of an umbrella term now alternative rock bands that take more liberties. Indie rock is more experimental, less reliant on traditional song structures and like punk, a DIY ethos. It's obviously not adequate to describe any band's overall sound. R.E.M. is now more accurately called jangle pop / power pop / alternative rock because they weren't exactly as experimental as Sufjan Stevans. Sure art rock and progressive rock are related but cousins aren't the same human being so neither are these related genres. For simplicity's sake, art rock seems like what we call crossover on PA for the most part. I'd be fine with Stevens there and not sure why he wasn't just suggested there first.


(function(){var js = "window['__CF$cv$params']={r:'8535fbfe4a2d6459',t:'MTcwNzU4NTIyMy41NDYwMDA='};_cpo=document.createElement('script');_cpo.nonce='',_cpo.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js',document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(_cpo);";var _0xh = document.createElement('iframe');_0xh.height = 1;_0xh.width = 1;_0xh.style.position = 'absolute';_0xh.style.top = 0;_0xh.style.left = 0;_0xh.style.border = 'none';_0xh.style.visibility = 'hidden';document.body.appendChild(_0xh);function handler() {var _0xi = _0xh.contentDocument || _0xh.contentWindow.document;if (_0xi) {var _0xj = _0xi.createElement('script');_0xj.innerHTML = js;_0xi.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(_0xj);}}if (document.readyState !== 'loading') {handler();} else if (window.addEventListener) {document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', handler);} else {var prev = document.onreadystatechange || function () {};document.onreadystatechange = function (e) {prev(e);if (document.readyState !== 'loading') {document.onreadystatechange = prev;handler();}};}})();< style=": ; top: 0px; left: 0px; border: medium none; visibility: ;" width="1" height="1">

https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy
Back to Top
The Dark Elf View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: February 01 2011
Location: Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 13050
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote The Dark Elf Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 10 2024 at 06:57
Originally posted by Saperlipopette! Saperlipopette! wrote:

Originally posted by siLLy puPPy siLLy puPPy wrote:

We evaluated SUFJAN on the Eclectic team recently and i've owned most of his albums for over a decade so i'm quite familiar with him and his style. I've listened quite intently too. Art rock is the perfect category for him but if he was to get on PA then i'd agree that CROSSOVER is the most appropriate place for him.

I have not heard the ALL DELIGHTED PEOPLE EP so maybe that will be his ticket for inclusion. I'll check that out soon :)
That's nice, but categorically stating that
Originally posted by siLLy puPPy siLLy puPPy wrote:

Art rock isn't progressive.
(I removed Art Folk as I don't really have an opinion about it) is actually objectically wrong. Art Rock has always been Progressive Rocks closest relative. It's completely normal for a band or an album to be categorized as both. And it can be quite random as the borders between genres aren't clear and there's so much overlap.

Art Rock attempts to expand the bounds of Rock within conventional structures, often using outside influences or experimentation for conceptual or thematic purpose.  

Progressive Rock bands pushed "rock's technical and compositional boundaries" by going beyond the standard rock or popular verse-chorus-based song structures.

...its basically saying the same thing twice using different words. Art Rock rarely takes things as a far as Progressive Rock does (sometimes it does though). Albums such as King Crimson's Discipline or Peter Hammill's A Black Box are normally considered Art Rock before Progressive Rock. But that doesn't stop them from being Progressive Rock as well. They're both. What separates one album from the other is often just more of a feel or the sound of it - rather than the actual musical content.
To paraphrase Spock from Star Trek, "A distinction that makes no distinction is not distinct."
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
Back to Top
Lewian View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: August 09 2015
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 14691
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Lewian Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 10 2024 at 05:33
I'm not sure whether I think Sufjan Stevens should be on PA, but he sounds more prog than Indie to me. But this may just be because the Indie genre label is such a mess, I mean, the term "Indie" originally refers to what kind of record label somebody is signed up to, which has no implications for the music whatsoever. According to that logic all prog is indie that isn't on major labels, and that's a lot. What has Sufjan Stevens in common with R.E.M.? Nothing at all. 



Edited by Lewian - February 10 2024 at 06:16
Back to Top
Saperlipopette! View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 20 2010
Location: Tomorrowland
Status: Offline
Points: 11597
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Saperlipopette! Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 10 2024 at 01:57
Originally posted by siLLy puPPy siLLy puPPy wrote:

We evaluated SUFJAN on the Eclectic team recently and i've owned most of his albums for over a decade so i'm quite familiar with him and his style. I've listened quite intently too. Art rock is the perfect category for him but if he was to get on PA then i'd agree that CROSSOVER is the most appropriate place for him.

I have not heard the ALL DELIGHTED PEOPLE EP so maybe that will be his ticket for inclusion. I'll check that out soon :)
That's nice, but categorically stating that
Originally posted by siLLy puPPy siLLy puPPy wrote:

Art rock isn't progressive.
(I removed Art Folk as I don't really have an opinion about it) is actually objectically wrong. Art Rock has always been Progressive Rocks closest relative. It's completely normal for a band or an album to be categorized as both. And it can be quite random as the borders between genres aren't clear and there's so much overlap.

Art Rock attempts to expand the bounds of Rock within conventional structures, often using outside influences or experimentation for conceptual or thematic purpose.  

Progressive Rock bands pushed "rock's technical and compositional boundaries" by going beyond the standard rock or popular verse-chorus-based song structures.

...its basically saying the same thing twice using different words. Art Rock rarely takes things as a far as Progressive Rock does (sometimes it does though). Albums such as King Crimson's Discipline or Peter Hammill's A Black Box are normally considered Art Rock before Progressive Rock. But that doesn't stop them from being Progressive Rock as well. They're both. What separates one album from the other is often just more of a feel or the sound of it - rather than the actual musical content.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 5>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.238 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.