What is art rock? |
Post Reply | Page 123> |
Author | |||||
mathman0806
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 06 2014 Location: United States Status: Online Points: 6442 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: July 09 2023 at 15:43 |
||||
I had posted my opinion about art rock that was partially influenced by ChatGPT answer. This is what I posted there.
So, while I am still considering whether I accept the following, I would say that I did think of the term of art rock to be more expansive than prog rock. The following is an answer generated by ChatGPT to the question of the difference between progressive rock and art rock.
And thinking more about it, prior to visiting Prog Archives, I had thought of Prog Rock as that more specific genre of music that came from the late 60's and 70's that is most closely associated with Symphonic Rock and expanded to include the types of music similar from what comes from the usually accepted "Big Five". To me, I had not prior to visiting PA considered Jazz Rock Fusion, RIO, Post Rock, or Math Rock as subgenre's of Prog Rock. But Art Rock would. Even something like Post Punk, would be a part of Art Rock. |
|||||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65268 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
That's one of the reasons Art Rock here at PA had become a sort of back-burner swamp of bands that were not symphonic or metal or folk or avant-garde or jazzrock. For the purposes of archiving, 'Art Rock' no longer tangibly existed as a genre and was separated into Heavy, Eclectic, and Crossover.
|
|||||
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
|||||
Lewian
Prog Reviewer Joined: August 09 2015 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 14754 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
ChatGPT has no authority whatsoever of course. Whatever sense it makes is taken from some text on which the system is trained, and it would be interesting to find the original author from which master plagiator ChatGPT has stolen this. Of course this doesn't make it wrong; just to the extent to which it makes sense, it is stolen without attribution. That said, both Art Rock and Prog Rock are not very constraining terms and could fit pretty much everything interesting that has at least a bit of rock in it. Which one of these is more general (if any) will be the result of chaotic social processes, journalists, and marketing people who know how to use such distinctions to their favour. I for one haven't seen Tangerine Dream referred to as Art Rock; on the other hand XTC aren't on PA but hardly anyone would question their art rock credentials, but what do I know? Sticking to PA when it comes to the Prog Rock definition and using Art Rock occasionally for some stuff that isn't on PA but could be is just fine by me.
|
|||||
siLLy puPPy
Special Collaborator PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic Joined: October 05 2013 Location: SFcaUsA Status: Offline Points: 15254 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
||||
This... |
|||||
https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy |
|||||
mathman0806
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 06 2014 Location: United States Status: Online Points: 6442 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Good answer. No way ChatGTP can top that.
I understand is basically a glorified search engine. I also think that one can probably refine one's questions to lead it to provide answers you want to hear. My initial question was what is art rock. The answer to that was basically the same as what you would find on Wikipedia---that art rock is another term for progressive rock. So, the follow up on what is the difference lead it to search for answers that lead it to what I copied. If I ask again with maybe a question of examples of a progressive rock bands that are not art rock and vice versa, it could lead to some interesting (or not) results. It is interesting to me to hear about how the art rock subcategory got split into crossover and eclectic. But that would explain why some less apparent bands would be on PA to begin with, such as Oingo Boingo, Talking Heads, and David Bowie. On a group like Tangerine Dream, as best as I can recall, I first heard their music in the early 80's and I think they were called electronic and I had not associated them to what I knew as progressive rock back then. |
|||||
jamesbaldwin
Prog Reviewer Joined: September 25 2015 Location: Milano Status: Offline Points: 5989 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
In my opinion, Xtc music is more art pop than art rock. In Pa art rock is settled in Crossover prog, or eclectic prog or prog related category. But sometimes even in prog folk and so on. Many groups I love play more art rock than prog rock, for example Family, Roxy Music, Traffic, Strawbs etc. Edited by jamesbaldwin - July 09 2023 at 19:58 |
|||||
Amos Goldberg (professor of Genocide Studies at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem): Yes, it's genocide. It's so difficult and painful to admit it, but we can no longer avoid this conclusion.
|
|||||
siLLy puPPy
Special Collaborator PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic Joined: October 05 2013 Location: SFcaUsA Status: Offline Points: 15254 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
From RYM: The term art rock has been employed to describe several works of Rock music developed right after the 1960s Psychedelic Rock
explosion. Following on the heels of this phenomenon, art rock has been
the result of musicians developing an interest towards a handful of
forms of music out of the boundaries of rock and, in general terms,
making an attempt to break away as much as possible from the constrains
imposed by Rock & Roll (or from the roots of rock itself, which, in turn, inspired genres like Blues Rock, Country Rock or U.S. Folk Rock).
A non-musical factor that could explain this development is the
conscious transition that certain rock (and non-rock) artists made from
singles-based music towards a bigger development of the album as a
cohesive lyrical and thematic whole (an important step towards the
popularization of the so-called concept album) as shown by the 1966–1967
set of examples like Pet Sounds, Freak Out!, The Who Sell Out or Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band (which can be counted as forerunners of later art rock).
The Velvet Underground & Nico, which interpolated raw Garage Rock and psychedelia with lengthy Modern Classical-inspired drone and noise passages, unorthodox guitar tunings with heavy use of feedback, and subject matter generally centered around stark lyrical topics (all tied in with elaborate pop art-inspired imagery and live performances) is considered by critics and fans as the starting point of art rock. This template of limit-breaching rock music, concept-oriented LPs and complex live performances would be the basis for many artists during the 70s that added various influences to this archetype, including Jazz, Western Classical Music, Funk, avant-garde and early Electronic and Ambient music (and even instrumentation typical of some of these styles). Examples of art rock musicians during this stage include Roxy Music (along with the solo careers of Brian Eno and Phil Manzanera, as well as the Roxy-related 801), Pink Floyd, Station to Station/Berlin trilogy-era David Bowie, Peter Gabriel, Barclay James Harvest, Steve Harley/Cockney Rebel and ex-Velvet Underground members Lou Reed and John Cale. Ever since its beginnings, art rock has shared connections, musical ties and even presents apparent overlaps with Experimental Rock and Progressive Rock (eventually also bearing a relationship with styles like Art Pop, Glam Rock, Krautrock and Jazz-Rock). While art rock strives to find a level of complexity similar to the one present in these two affiliated genres, it generally features a mix of rock music that tends to follow certain Pop-based structures or patterns along with the aforementioned set of eclectic influences and certain degree of complexity and conceptuality, in contrast to the more classical/jazz-mimicking or inspired patterns of prog suites, or the more radical and angular experimental rock. After the Punk Rock explosion of the second half of the 1970s, art rock dissolved, during the following decades, into other forms of rock music, including (but not limited to): Post-Punk, New Wave, Art Punk, and Post-Hardcore. The 1990s and 2000s would then see a series of newer bands taking inspiration from the musical and conceptual leanings of 60s/70s art rock acts (along with other influences) and as such, groups like late-90s/early-00s Radiohead, The Mars Volta, TV on the Radio, dEUS, АукцЫон [Auktyon], and The Mollusk-era Ween have been commonly credited with reviving popular interest in the genre into the new millennium. |
|||||
https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy |
|||||
mathman0806
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 06 2014 Location: United States Status: Online Points: 6442 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
I can follow along with RYM. From the description there, art rock, progressive rock, and experimental rock are three terms/genres used to describe music that could occupy the same space. But there are traits within each that may not exist in the others.
|
|||||
AFlowerKingCrimson
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 02 2016 Location: Philly burbs Status: Offline Points: 18301 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Art rock is more or less what is called crossover prog on here. Many of those bands could be labelled art rock. Some examples would be Styx, Ambrosia, 10CC, Bebop Deluxe, Roxy Music, Crack The Sky, Supertramp, etc. Sometimes they do full on prog but usually they are not quite full blown prog. They still have prog elements in their music though. That is my take on it anyway.
Edited by AFlowerKingCrimson - July 09 2023 at 20:56 |
|||||
siLLy puPPy
Special Collaborator PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic Joined: October 05 2013 Location: SFcaUsA Status: Offline Points: 15254 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
||||
^ All prog is art rock but not all art rock is prog as evidenced by the top ART ROCK albums on RYM's chart
4.26
91,202
1,688
16 June 1997
melancholic
anxious
alienation
male vocals
futuristic
existential
lonely
atmospheric
|
|||||
https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy |
|||||
Octopus II
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 21 2023 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 10511 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
|
|||||
richardh
Prog Reviewer Joined: February 18 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 28085 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Art Rock is just a 'get out jail free' card for all those bands that don't don't like being labelled 'Prog'. Its the 'ELP factor', they were unashamedly bombastic and theatrical in approach. No one wants that connection and would rather be seen as more reserved and considered , perhaps 'tasteful'. There is a school of thought that bands like ELP hi-jacked the progressive rock movement while it was the likes of Roxy Music that more represented the purist ideology. Ultimately Art rock is just anything that isn't generic so actually there is a lot of prog rock that isn't art rock in my view.
|
|||||
Sean Trane
Special Collaborator Prog Folk Joined: April 29 2004 Location: Heart of Europe Status: Offline Points: 20251 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Aaaaah, good old revisionism. In my book & youth (I'm from 63), the music I loved throughout the 70's (started buying records in 74 in Toronto & Montreal) was generally called "Art Rock" and everyone I spoke to in High school seemed to know exactly what it was... and it didn't include Roxy, Bowie and other Glam (or Glitter) Rock artistes. And that remained unquestioned throughout most of the 80's - even when Marillion & IQ poppeed their heads on the airwave (the former mainly). I never heard the expression Neo-prog until much later. However, I learned during the mid-90's in Continental Europe that most everyone called that Prog(ressive) Rock, and when I spoke of Art Rock, everyone thought I was crazy to call Yes & Genesis as Hard Rock (I agree, until I corrected the misunderstanding). But it's in the 90's that I first heard that some Glam ruck bands started become identified as Art Rock .
Edited by Sean Trane - July 10 2023 at 08:10 |
|||||
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter keep our sand-castle virtues content to be a doer as well as a thinker, prefer lifting our pen rather than un-sheath our sword |
|||||
David_D
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 26 2010 Location: Copenhagen Status: Offline Points: 15135 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Only some albums are labelled by RYM as both Progressive Rock and Art Rock. For instance no Yes, Genesis, ELP, Jethro Tull, or other Symphonic Prog or Progressive Folk albums I guess. |
|||||
quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
|
|||||
siLLy puPPy
Special Collaborator PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic Joined: October 05 2013 Location: SFcaUsA Status: Offline Points: 15254 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
^ the labeling system is a bit weird on RYM. If you look at the top albums for avant-prog it will include zeuhl because they consider zeuhl a subset of avant-prog. The labeling can be done by anyone so you can't take the labeling of albums as an absolute but by definition all prog would be considered art rock
|
|||||
https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy |
|||||
moshkito
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 04 2007 Location: Grok City Status: Offline Points: 17529 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Hi, With all due respect and abilities to both "styles", it is statements like this that confuse folks and make these definitions more difficult ... I would go so far as to suggest that the person who wrote this, did not listen to music at all, and was not able to determine differences, which ... is a bit more difficult than we think. But generalizing it with a statement that it does not happen in "progressive" or "rock" music, is down right silly and empty.
This is bizarre ... specially as classically minded material (... check The Nice and early ELP and many other European bands that also did classical music) ... is far more complex and intricate than the simplistic rock music idea and design. 4 or 5 tracks of music, will never come closer to 25/30 tracks that a symphony or opera would have ... thus saying that something like "progressive rock" is characterized by something that exists in a lot of music, is not a good description of the music whatsoever ... you learned absolutely nothing from that statement, except maybe acknowledging that you do not know classical music or have heard a lot of stuff that is far more advanced than Chuck Berry!
It might be better said that "art rock" had its development in classical music, specially when you could hear some folks doing classical pieces with their own material, as The Nice did and ELP went on to do Mussorgsky. There is NOTHING experimental or unconventional about this at all ... since it had been at least 100 years since Modest Mussorgsky's piece of music, and it had already been dissected by academia to no end ... there would be absolutely nothing that could be considered "broader range", than what YES did on TFTO and CTTE or JT on PP and TAAB.
Also a poor generalization, since most "art rock" or at least material that is so described, is not exactly "avant-garde" in the proper definition of the term. I think that it became known as "art rock" when it connected with classical music, that we consider "art", while we do not accept that rock music as art at all ... many folks here will stand by the songs, never the art itself. And that might be the real issue ... but that would not quite fit in this discussion. I would be VERY CAREFUL with "these definitions" since many of them can be easily broken down to nothing, and show that the intent and idea behind the comment was not even musical whatsoever. it was more "geek" oriented, trying to show you they know "music" that everyone else, and academia could not possibly know it at all. The terms are badly used ... and a perfect example is the thread about "chamber rock" ... which should be re-defined as "chamber song" since a lot of the material does not even fit into the discussion as to what would be considered "chamber music", which ... would be something more like "unplugged" ... than otherwise. There are some peculiarities here, as Terje Rypdal and other ECM folks have done a lot of "chamber music" electrically, and came off really special ... were it not for folks not wanting to hear "chamber music" ... just "songs". Again, here was a vast difference in the definition of the term, and how it was used, and not specifically cleaned up and explained.
I tend to differ from a couple of PA folks in that, for me, music has been progressive for more than 500 years, with various details from then to what it is now, and I think that we are ignoring the music history and how much it has changed and come forth. Rock music, and most top ten, would not even be considered music 100 years ago, by the classical standards that we learn about in school. Too simple, and not while neat and melodious and interesting, for all intents and purposes its simplicity and brevity, would not meet the standards for what academia has considered "classical music" for the last 500 years.
|
|||||
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com |
|||||
AFlowerKingCrimson
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 02 2016 Location: Philly burbs Status: Offline Points: 18301 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Yep. That definition works too. In a broad sense prog is art rock just like both could still be considered rock.
|
|||||
David_D
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 26 2010 Location: Copenhagen Status: Offline Points: 15135 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
The labelling of albums shows how the definitions are interpreted and used. |
|||||
quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
|
|||||
David_D
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 26 2010 Location: Copenhagen Status: Offline Points: 15135 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
^ As far as I can see, Progressive Rock and Art Rock are considered by RYM as two distinct genres with some overlap. The same concerning Art Rock and Experimental Rock, but maybe with less overlap. Edited by David_D - July 10 2023 at 17:15 |
|||||
quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
|
|||||
jamesbaldwin
Prog Reviewer Joined: September 25 2015 Location: Milano Status: Offline Points: 5989 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Oh, yes, I totally agree, but.... Tell me, why does Progarchives consider Radiohead crossover prog?
|
|||||
Amos Goldberg (professor of Genocide Studies at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem): Yes, it's genocide. It's so difficult and painful to admit it, but we can no longer avoid this conclusion.
|
|||||
Post Reply | Page 123> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |